Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A “Virtual Pharmacy Shelf” to Enhance the Rigor and Efficiency of Standardized-Patient OSCEs for Over-the-Counter Medication Advice

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Realistic simulation in health professional education can be costly or cumbersome.

Activity

A low-cost, tablet-based simulated “virtual shelf” of over-the-counter (OTC) medications, hyperlinked to Drug Facts labels, eliminated use of physical product boxes or printed drug lists in objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) for Doctor of Pharmacy students learning to provide OTC advice.

Results and Discussion

The application reduced instructor preparation and OSCE administration time by allowing students to tap product options instead of thumbing through medication lists. The shelf is realistic, easily updated, and transferable to other OSCEs when visual recognition is important or treatment options change frequently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Availability of Data and Material

Data availability is not applicable. Images used in developing the virtual pharmacy shelf are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Dinkins MM. Patient counseling: a pharmacist in every OTC aisle. US Pharm. 2010;35(4)(OTC Trends suppl):9–12. https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/patient-counseling-a-pharmacist-in-every-otc-aisle. Accessed 4 Jun 2021.

  2. Sinopoulou V, Rutter PM. Approaches to over-the-counter medications teaching in pharmacy education: a global perspective. Pharmacy Education. 2019;19(1):34–39. https://pharmacyeducation.fip.org/pharmacyeducation/article/view/654. Accessed 4 Jun 2021.

  3. Sansgiry SS, Bhansali AH, Bapat SS, Xu Q. Abuse of over-the-counter medicines: a pharmacist’s perspective. Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2017;6:1–6.

  4. Rein AM. How trends in over-the-counter (OTC) products are shaping the market. Life Science Health. 2020. https://www.lubrizol.com/Health/Blog/2020/04/How-Trends-in-Over-The-Counter-Products-are-Shaping-the-Market. Accessed 4 Jun 2021.

  5. Sengupta G, Rein AM. Rx-to-OTC switches: growth, drivers, and the role of patients. Life Science Health. 2020. https://www.lubrizol.com/Health/Blog/2020/11/Rx-to-OTC-Switches. Accessed 4 Jun 2021.

  6. Berger K. Back to pharmacy school, part 1: what’s being taught now? Pharmacy Times. 2018. https://www.pharmacytimes.com/view/back-to-school-part-1. Accessed 4 Jun 2021.

  7. Bowers R, Tunney R, Kelly K, Mills B, Trotta K, Wheeless CN, Drew R. Impact of standardized simulated patients on first-year pharmacy students’ knowledge retention of insulin injection technique and counseling skills. Am J Pharm Educ. 2017;81(6):113.

  8. Gortney JS. Development and implementation of a capstone course with OSCEs prior to Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences in a Pharm.D. program. Presentation to IUPUI Assessment Institute. 2019. https://assessmentinstitute.iupui.edu/overview/institute-files/2019-institute/monday-2019/gortney3G.pdf. Accessed 4 Jun 2021.

  9. Clauser J, Richardson BB, Odom-Maryon T, Mann D, Willson MN, Hahn PL, Purath J, Tuell E, Schwartz CR, DePriest D. Standardized patient simulation using SBIRT (Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral for Treatment) as a tool for interprofessional learning. MedEdPORTAL. 2020;16:10955. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10955

  10. DiVall MV, Hayney MS, Marsh W, Neville MW, O’Barr S, Sheets ED, Calhoun LD. Perceptions of pharmacy students, faculty members, and administrators on the use of technology in the classroom. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(4):75. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe77475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sciafani J, Tirrell TF, Franko OI. Mobile tablet use among academic physicians and trainees. J Med Syst. 2013;37(1):9903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-012-9903-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rodríguez-Ríos A, Espinoza-Téllez G, Martínez-Ezquerro D, Rendón-Macías M. Information and communication technology, mobile devices, and medical education. J Med Syst. 2020;44(4):90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-01559-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gadbury-Amyot CC, Purk JH, Williams BJ, Van Ness CJ. Using tablet technology and instructional videos to enhance preclinical dental laboratory learning. J Dent Educ. 2014;78(2):250–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2014.78.2.tb05675.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ambroziak K, Ibrahim N, Marshall VD, Kelling SE. Virtual simulation to personalize student learning in a required pharmacy course. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018;10(6):750–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fong KK, Gilder S, Jenkins R, Graham PL, Brown BT. The influence of online video learning aids on preparing postgraduate chiropractic students for an objective structured clinical examination. J Chiropr Educ. 2020;34(2):125–31. https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-18-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Takenouchi A, Otani E, Sunaga M, Toyama T, Uehara H, Akiyama K, Kawashima T, Ito K, Izuno H, Kinoshita A. Development and evaluation of e-learning materials for dental hygiene students in six schools: using smartphones to learn dental treatment procedures. Int J Dent Hyg. 2020;18:413–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Seybert AL, Smithburger PL, Benedict NJ, Kobulinsky LR, Kane-Gill SL, Coons JC. Evidence for simulation in pharmacy education. J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2019;2(6):686–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie Counts.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

N/A, because the manuscript describes an organizational process change and not research involving human subjects. Institutional Review Board approval was not sought.

Informed Consent

N/A, because the manuscript describes an organizational process change, not research involving human subjects; informed consent was not sought.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Counts, S., Fairman, K.A. A “Virtual Pharmacy Shelf” to Enhance the Rigor and Efficiency of Standardized-Patient OSCEs for Over-the-Counter Medication Advice. Med.Sci.Educ. 32, 63–67 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01494-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01494-6

Keywords

Navigation