Skip to main content
Log in

Peer-Assisted Learning (PAL): Perceptions and Wellness of First-Year Medical Students

  • ORIGINAL RESEARCH
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Medical education is oftentimes stressful and has been documented to compromise student well-being, hinder performance, and contribute to burnout. Many medical schools aim to foster students’ sense of well-being. This can be accomplished by peer-assisted learning (PAL), which has the potential to improve student wellness and performance in medical school.

Methods

The PAL program at Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine provides first-year medical students with educational sessions related to their curriculum, led by second-year medical students. The goal of this study was to determine the efficacy of PAL in promoting wellness and enhancing knowledge. Pre- and post-program surveys were distributed to students prior to and after the completion of PAL. Data analysis included frequencies of responses, qualitative analysis, and chi-square analysis.

Results

Thirty-eight out of 51 first-year medical students responded to the pre-program survey (response rate 75%) and 23 out of 51 responded to the post-program survey (response rate 45%). A majority of respondents from the pre-survey believed that PAL would provide them with tools necessary to be successful. These findings were similar in the post-program survey with a majority of attendees sharing that PAL enhanced their knowledge, reduced test-taking anxiety, and provided useful skills.

Discussion

Results from the pre- and post-program surveys suggest that PAL can enhance student well-being while improving knowledge of the material taught in medical school.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets generated and analyzed for this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Ishak W, Nikravesh R, Lederer S, Perry R, Ogunyemi D, Bernstein C. Burnout in medical students: a systematic review. Clin Teach. 2013;10:242–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. West CP, Dyrbye LN, Shanafelt TD. Physician burnout: contributors, consequences and solutions. J Intern Med. 2018;283:516–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haffizulla FS, Newman C, Kaushal S, Williams CA, Haffizulla A, Hardigan P, et al. Assessment of burnout: a pilot study of international women physicians. Perm J. 2020;24:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Reith TP. Burnout in United States healthcare professionals: a narrative review. Cureus. 2018;10:e3681.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shanafelt TD, Boone S, Tan L, Dyrbye LN, Sotile W, Satele D, et al. Burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance among US physicians relative to the general US population. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:1377–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arora M, Asha S, Chinnappa J, Diwan AD. Review article: burnout in emergency medicine physicians. Emerg Med Australas. 2013;25:491–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bullock G, Kraft L, Amsden K, Gore W, Prengle B, Wimsatt J, et al. The prevalence and effect of burnout on graduate healthcare students. Can Med Educ J. 2017;8:e90-108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Slavin SJ, Schindler DL, Chibnall JT. Medical student mental health 3.0: improving student wellness through curricular changes. Acad Med. 2014;89:573–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Neufeld A, Mossière A, Malin G. Basic psychological needs, more than mindfulness and resilience, relate to medical student stress: a case for shifting the focus of wellness curricula. Med Teach. 2020;42:1401–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Frajerman A, Morvan Y, Krebs M-O, Gorwood P, Chaumette B. Burnout in medical students before residency: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Psychiatry. 2019;55:36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moir F, Yielder J, Sanson J, Chen Y. Depression in medical students: current insights. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018;9:323–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dyrbye L, Shanafelt T. A narrative review on burnout experienced by medical students and residents. Med Educ. 2016;50:132–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shreffler J, Huecker M, Martin L, Sawning S, Thé S, Shaw MA, et al. Strategies to combat burnout during intense studying: utilization of medical student feedback to alleviate burnout in preparation for a high stakes examination. Health Prof Educ. 2020;6:334–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Khalid H, Shahid S, Punjabi N, Sahdev N. An integrated 2-year clinical skills peer tutoring scheme in a UK-based medical school: perceptions of tutees and peer tutors. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018;9:423–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sobowale K, Zhou N, Fan J, Liu N, Sherer R. Depression and suicidal ideation in medical students in China: a call for wellness curricula. J Int Assoc Med Sci Educ. 2014;5:31–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Burgess A, Dornan T, Clarke AJ, Menezes A, Mellis C. Peer tutoring in a medical school: perceptions of tutors and tutees. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Farkas AH, Allenbaugh J, Bonifacino E, Turner R, Corbelli JA. Mentorship of US medical students: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34:2602–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Santee J, Garavalia L. Peer tutoring programs in health professions schools. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70:70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guraya SY, Abdalla ME. Determining the effectiveness of peer-assisted learning in medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020;15:177–84.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Menezes A, Burgess A, Clarke AJ, Mellis C. Peer-assisted learning in medical school: tutees’ perspective. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2016;7:31–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jauregui J, Bright S, Strote J, Shandro J. A novel approach to medical student peer-assisted learning through case-based simulations. West J Emerg Med. 2018;19:193–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Williams B, Olaussen A, Peterson EL. Peer-assisted teaching: an interventional study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2015;15:293–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Akinla O, Hagan P, Atiomo W. A systematic review of the literature describing the outcomes of near-peer mentoring programs for first year medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18:98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Strobel J, van Barneveld A. When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdiscip J Prob-Based Learn. 2009;3:4.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tsou KI, Cho SL, Lin CS, Sy LB, Yang LK, Chou TY, Chiang HS. Short-term outcomes of a near-full PBL curriculum in a new Taiwan Medical School. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2009;25:282–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Kyle Bauckman, PhD, the Director of Research and the Fundamentals Course Director at Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, for his guidance throughout this project, including suggestions regarding research design and analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception, study design, and material collection. Literature review was performed by Caitlin Williams, Therese Vidal, Piero Carletti, and Ahraz Rizvi. Data analysis was performed by Caitlin Williams. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Caitlin Williams and Therese Vidal; revisions of the manuscript were performed by all authors. The figures and tables were created by Caitlin Williams. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caryl Ann Tolchinsky.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Human subject research approval was granted by the Nova Southeastern University Institutional Review Board on June 16, 2020, approval number 2020–291. The study was conducted in accordance with ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent to Participate

Waiver of documentation of informed consent was obtained due to the fact that participation was voluntary and no identifiable data was provided with participant responses. An explanation of the consent process was provided to participants at the time of recruitment.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Williams, C.A., Vidal, T., Carletti, P. et al. Peer-Assisted Learning (PAL): Perceptions and Wellness of First-Year Medical Students. Med.Sci.Educ. 31, 1911–1918 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01381-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01381-0

Keywords

Navigation