Skip to main content
Log in

Novel Spaced Repetition Flashcard System for the In-training Examination for Obstetrics and Gynecology

  • Original research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 22 June 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Introduction

Electronic flashcards allow repeated information exposure over time along with active recall. It is increasingly used for self-study by medical students but remains poorly implemented for graduate medical education. The primary goal of this study was to determine whether a flashcard system enhances preparation for the in-training examination in obstetrics and gynecology (ob-gyn) conducted by the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology (CREOG).

Methods

Ob-gyn residents at Duke University were included in this study. A total of 883 electronic flashcards were created and distributed. CREOG scores and flashcard usage statistics, generated internally by interacting with the electronic flashcard system, were collected after the 2019 exam. The primary outcome was study aid usage and satisfaction. The secondary outcome was the impact of flashcard usage on CREOG exam scores.

Results

Of the 32 residents, 31 (97%) participated in this study. Eighteen (58%) residents used the study’s flashcards with a median of 276 flashcards studied over a median of 3.7 h. All of the flashcard users found the study aid helpful, and all would recommend them to another ob-gyn resident. Using the flashcards to study for the 2019 CREOG exam appeared to correlate with improvement in scores from 2018 to 2019, but did not achieve statistical significance after adjusting for post-graduate year (beta coefficient = 10.5; 95% confidence interval =  − 0.60,21.7; p = 0.06).

Discussion

This flashcard resource was well received by ob-gyn residents for in-training examination preparation, though it was not significantly correlated with improvement in CREOG scores after adjusting for post-graduate year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Change history

References

  1. Schmidmaier R, Ebersbach R, Schiller M, Hege I, Holzer M, Fischer MR. Using electronic flashcards to promote learning in medical students: retesting versus restudying. Med Educ. 2011;45(11):1101–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kornell N, Bjork RA. The promise and perils of self-regulated study. Psychon Bull Rev. 2007;14(2):219–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kornell N, Son LK. Learners’ choices and beliefs about self-testing. Memory. 2009;17(5):493–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sleight DA, Mavis BE. Study skills and academic performance among second-year medical students in problem-based learning. Med Educ Online. 2006;11(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Allen EB, Walls RT, Reilly FD. Effects of interactive instructional techniques in a web-based peripheral nervous system component for human anatomy. Med Teach. 2008;30(1):40–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bottiroli S, Dunlosky J, Guerini K, Cavallini E, Hertzog C. Does task affordance moderate age-related deficits in strategy production? Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2010;17(5):591–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kang SHK. Spaced repetition promotes efficient and effective learning: policy implications for instruction. Policy Insights from Behav Brain Sci. 2016;3(1):12–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carpenter SK, Cepeda NJ, Rohrer D, Kang SHK, Pashler H. Using spacing to enhance diverse forms of learning: review of recent research and implications for instruction. Educ Psychol Rev. 2012;24(3):369–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ebbinghaus H. Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Mem A Contrib to Exp Psychol. 2013;20(4):155–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ronner L, Linkowski L. Online forums and the “Step 1 climate”: perspectives From a medical student reddit user. Acad Med. 2020;95(9):1329–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Deng F, Gluckstein JA, Larsen DP. Student-directed retrieval practice is a predictor of medical licensing examination performance. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4(6):308–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Anki. https://apps.ankiweb.net. Accessed March 1 2020.

  13. Larsen DP, Butler AC, Roediger HL. Repeated testing improves long-term retention relative to repeated study: a randomised controlled trial. Med Educ. 2009;43(12):1174–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Morin CE, Hostetter JM, Jeudy J, Kim WG, McCabe JA, Merrow AC, et al. Spaced radiology: encouraging durable memory using spaced testing in pediatric radiology. Pediatr Radiol. 2019;49(8):990–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Matos J, Petri CR, Mukamal KJ, Vanka A. Spaced education in medical residents: an electronic intervention to improve competency and retention of medical knowledge. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(7):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lingenfelter BM, Jiang X, Schnatz PF, O’Sullivan DM, Minassian SS, Forstein DA. CREOG in-training examination results: contemporary use to predict ABOG written examination outcomes. J Grad Med Educ. 2016;8(3):353–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The Duke BERD Method Core’s support of this project was made possible (in part) by Grant Number UL1TR002553 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Shelun Tsai: PGY-4 Resident. Co-conceived the idea behind the project; planned, designed, and executed the project; co-wrote the manuscript.

Michael Sun: PGY-4 Fellow. Co-conceived the idea behind the project; planned and designed the project; co-wrote the manuscript.

Melinda Asbury: Assistant professor of psychiatry. Assisted with project design; edited the manuscript.

Jeremy Weber: Biostatistician. Analyzed data; edited the manuscript.

Tracy Truong: Biostatistician. Analyzed data; edited the manuscript.

Elizabeth Deans: Assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology. Assisted with project design; facilitated coordination of the project with resident education curriculum; edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shelun Tsai.

Ethics declarations

Disclaimer

The contents of this project are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NCATS or NIH.

Ethics Approval

This project was granted exempt status by the Institutional Review Board of Duke University.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for Publication

No identifying details were included in this manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original article has been updated to correct the affiliations for 3 of the authors (Shelun Tsai, Michael Sun, and Melinda Asbury)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsai, S., Sun, M., Asbury, M.L. et al. Novel Spaced Repetition Flashcard System for the In-training Examination for Obstetrics and Gynecology. Med.Sci.Educ. 31, 1393–1399 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01320-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01320-z

Keywords

Navigation