Skip to main content
Log in

Beyond Dunning–Kruger Effect: Undermining the Biases Which Would Lead to Flawed Self-assessment Among Students

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Husmann PR, Chong AJ. Plans in perspective: a pilot study of medical student study strategies in physiology. Med Sci Educ. 2019;29:683–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-019-00769-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Krueger J, Mueller RA. Unskilled, unaware, or both? The better-than-average heuristic and statistical regression predict errors in estimates of own performance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;82:180–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dunlosky J, Lipko A. Metacomprehension: a brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2007;16(4):228–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eva KW, Regehr G. “I’ll never play professional football” and other fallacies of self-assessment. J Contin Educ Heal Prof. 2008;28(1):14–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eva KW, Regehr G. Exploring the divergence between self-assessment and self-monitoring. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011;16(3):311–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang JY, Bargh JA. The selfish goal: autonomously operating motivational structures as the proximate cause of human judgment and behaviour. Behav Brain Sci. 2014;37:121–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Epley N, Dunning D. Feeling “holier than thou”: are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self or social prediction? J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000;79:861–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Dinesh Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval and Informed Consent

This submission is a letter to editor and therefore, ethical approval and informed consent were not required.

Conflict of Interest

The corresponding author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, V.D. Beyond Dunning–Kruger Effect: Undermining the Biases Which Would Lead to Flawed Self-assessment Among Students. Med.Sci.Educ. 29, 1155–1156 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-019-00806-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-019-00806-1

Navigation