Skip to main content
Log in

Improving Passage Rate on USMLE Step 2 Clinical Skills: Results from a Pilot Program

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the United States (US), successful passage of United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 2 Clinical Skills (Step 2 CS) is required to enter into residency training. In 2017, the USMLE announced an increase in performance standards for Step 2 CS. As a consequence, it is anticipated that the passage rate for the examination will decrease significantly for both US and international students. While many US institutions offer a cumulative clinical skills examination, their effect on Step 2 CS passage rates has not been studied. The authors developed a six-case, standardized patient (SP)-based examination to mirror Step 2 CS and measured impact on subsequent Step 2 CS passage rates. Students were provided structured quantitative and qualitative feedback and were given a final designation of “pass” or “fail” for the practice examination. A total of 173 out of 184 (94.5%) students participated in the examination. Twenty SPs and $26,000 in direct costs were required. The local failure rate for Step 2 CS declined from 4.5% in the year proceeding the intervention to 2.1% following the intervention. In the same timeframe, the US failure rate for Step 2 CS increased from 3.8 to 5.1%, though the difference between local and national groups was not significantly different (P = .07). Based on the initial success of the intervention, educational leaders may consider developing a similar innovation to optimize passage rates at their institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Unites States Medical Licensing Examination. Step 2 Clinical Skills: content description and general information. 2017. http://www.usmle.org/pdfs/step-2-cs/cs-info-manual.pdf. Accessed 17 Dec 2017.

  2. De Champlain A, Swygert K, Swanson DB, Boulet JR. Assessing the underlying structure of the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 test of clinical skills using confirmatory factor analysis. Acad Med. 2006;81(10 Suppl):S17–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Harik P, Clauser BE, Grabovsky I, Margolis MJ, Dillon GF, Boulet JR. Relationships among subcomponents of the USMLE Step 2 Clinical Skills Examination, the Step 1, and the Step 2 Clinical Knowledge Examinations. Acad Med. 2006;81(10 Suppl):S21–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor ML, Blue AV, Mainous AG, Geesey ME, Basco WT. The relationship between the National Board of Medical Examiners’ prototype of the Step 2 clinical skills exam and interns’ performance. Acad Med. 2005;80(5):496–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cuddy MM, Winward ML, Johnston MM, Lipner RS, Clauser BE. Evaluating validity evidence for USMLE Step 2 Clinical Skills Data Gathering and Data Interpretation Scores: does performance predict history-taking and physical examination ratings for first-year internal medicine residents? Acad Med. 2016;91(1):133–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. National Board of Medical Examiners. Performance Data. 2019. https://www.usmle.org/performance-data/. Accessed 4 Jan 2019.

  7. United States Medical Licensing Examination. Change in performance standards for Step 2 CS. 2017. http://www.usmle.org/announcements/default.aspx?ContentId=210. Accessed 13 Dec 2017.

  8. Hauer KE, Hodgson CS, Kerr KM, Teherani A, Irby DM. A national study of medical student clinical skills assessment. Acad Med. 2005;80(10 Suppl):S25–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gilliland WR, La Rochelle J, Hawkins R, et al. Changes in clinical skills education resulting from the introduction of the USMLE step 2 clinical skills (CS) examination. Med Teach. 2008;30(3):325–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hauer KE, Teherani A, Kerr KM, O’Sullivan PS, Irby DM. Impact of the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 Clinical Skills exam onmedical school clinical skills assessment. Acad Med. 2006;81(10 Suppl):S13–6.

  11. Berg K, Winward M, Clauser BE, Veloski JA, Berg D, Dillon GF, et al. The relationship between performance on a medical school’s clinical skills assessment and USMLE Step 2 CS. Acad Med. 2008;83(10 Suppl):S37–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dong T, Swygert KA, Durning SJ, Saguil A, Gilliland WR, Cruess D, et al. Validity evidence for medical school OSCEs: associations with USMLE® step assessments. Teach Learn Med. 2014;26(4):379–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Levine RB, Levy AP, Lubin R, Halevi S, Rios R, Cayea D. Evaluation of a course to prepare international students for the United States Medical Licensing Examination step 2 clinical skills exam. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2017;14:25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kolb D. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Le T, Bhushan V, Sheikh-Ali M, Lee K. First aid for the USMLE Step 2 CS (clinical skills). 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Akins R. Victor Billar, acute abdominal pain. MedEdPORTAL. 2012;8:9118. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9118.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Makoul G. The SEGUE framework for teaching and assessing communication skills. Patient Educ Couns. 2001;45(1):23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Downing SM. Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ. 2003;37(9):830–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the clerkship directors and simulation center staff at VCU who assisted in the construction of cases, administration of the simulation, and grading of encounter notes described in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael S. Ryan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was deemed exempt by the Virginia Commonwealth University IRB. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

A statement regarding “informed consent” is not applicable.

Additional information

This work was presented as an oral abstract at the 2018 Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead meeting.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ryan, M.S., Bradner, M., Rigby, F. et al. Improving Passage Rate on USMLE Step 2 Clinical Skills: Results from a Pilot Program. Med.Sci.Educ. 29, 709–714 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-019-00768-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-019-00768-4

Keywords

Navigation