Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Medical Student Learning Styles and Exam Performance in an Integrated Curriculum

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There has been an emphasis on the implementation of self-directed learning in medical education. Kolb’s experiential learning theory could be a useful framework in curriculum development.

Activity

During the 2016–2017 academic year, participants completed the learning styles inventory. Percent time dedicated to lecture, laboratory, small groups, modules, simulations, and exams was collected along with participant academic performance.

Results

Findings showed that the curriculum delivery accommodated Assimilators and Convergers, with Convergers primarily outscoring the other categories.

Discussion

Although efforts emphasized self-directed learning, the curriculum is still delivered by lectures. Based on Kolb’s theory, lecturing benefits Converger and Assimilator learning styles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Armstrong E, Parsa-Parsi R. How can physicians’ learning styles drive educational planning? Acad Med. 2005;80(7):680–4.

  2. Lynch TG, Woelfl NN, Hanssen CS. Learning style influences student examination performance. Am J Surg. 1998;176:62–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Curry L. Cognitive and learning styles in medical evaluation. Acad Med. 1999;74:409–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sternberg RJ, Zhang L. Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles. 1st ed. Florence: Taylor and Francis; 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Guild PB, Garger S. Marching to different drummers, Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development. 2nd ed. Alexandria; 1998.

  6. Veres JG, Sims RR, Locklear TS. Improving the reliability of Kolb’s revised LSI. Educ Psychol Meas. 1991;51:143–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bitran M, Zuniga D, Pedrals N, Padilla O, Mena B. Medical students’ change in learning styles during the course of the undergraduate program: from ‘thinking and watching’ to ‘thinking and doing’. Can Med Ed J. 2012;3(2):86–97.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gurpinar E, Musal B, Aksakoglu G, Ucku R. Comparison of knowledge scores of medical students in problem-based learning and traditional curriculum on public health topics. BMC Med Educ. 2005;5:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-5-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fox RD. Learning styles and instructional preferences in continuing education for health professionals: a validity study of the LSI. Adult Educ Q. 1984;35:72–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nicoll-Senft JM, Seider SN. Assessing the impact of the 4MAT teaching model across multiple disciplines in higher education. Coll Teach. 2010;58(1):19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kolb AY. The Kolb learning style inventory—version 3.1 2005 technical specifications. Boston: Hay Resource Direct; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kolb DA. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development: Prentice Hall; 1984.

  13. Zimmerman BJ. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: an overview. Educ Psychol. 1990;25(1):3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Augustin M. How to learn effectively in medical school: test yourself, learn actively, and repeat in intervals. Yale J Biol Med. 2014;87(2):207–12.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Conrad SS, Addams AM, Young GH. Holistic review in medical school admissions and selection: a strategic, mission-driven response to shifting societal needs. Acad Med. 2016;91(11):1472–14745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary L. Beck Dallaghan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was obtained to conduct this study and was deemed exempt.

Informed Consent

Agreeing to complete the survey was considered consent to use the data.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reynolds, Q.J., Beck Dallaghan, G.L., Smith, K. et al. Comparison of Medical Student Learning Styles and Exam Performance in an Integrated Curriculum. Med.Sci.Educ. 29, 619–623 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-019-00766-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-019-00766-6

Keywords

Navigation