Abstract
Background
There has been an emphasis on the implementation of self-directed learning in medical education. Kolb’s experiential learning theory could be a useful framework in curriculum development.
Activity
During the 2016–2017 academic year, participants completed the learning styles inventory. Percent time dedicated to lecture, laboratory, small groups, modules, simulations, and exams was collected along with participant academic performance.
Results
Findings showed that the curriculum delivery accommodated Assimilators and Convergers, with Convergers primarily outscoring the other categories.
Discussion
Although efforts emphasized self-directed learning, the curriculum is still delivered by lectures. Based on Kolb’s theory, lecturing benefits Converger and Assimilator learning styles.
References
Armstrong E, Parsa-Parsi R. How can physicians’ learning styles drive educational planning? Acad Med. 2005;80(7):680–4.
Lynch TG, Woelfl NN, Hanssen CS. Learning style influences student examination performance. Am J Surg. 1998;176:62–6.
Curry L. Cognitive and learning styles in medical evaluation. Acad Med. 1999;74:409–13.
Sternberg RJ, Zhang L. Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles. 1st ed. Florence: Taylor and Francis; 2014.
Guild PB, Garger S. Marching to different drummers, Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development. 2nd ed. Alexandria; 1998.
Veres JG, Sims RR, Locklear TS. Improving the reliability of Kolb’s revised LSI. Educ Psychol Meas. 1991;51:143–50.
Bitran M, Zuniga D, Pedrals N, Padilla O, Mena B. Medical students’ change in learning styles during the course of the undergraduate program: from ‘thinking and watching’ to ‘thinking and doing’. Can Med Ed J. 2012;3(2):86–97.
Gurpinar E, Musal B, Aksakoglu G, Ucku R. Comparison of knowledge scores of medical students in problem-based learning and traditional curriculum on public health topics. BMC Med Educ. 2005;5:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-5-7.
Fox RD. Learning styles and instructional preferences in continuing education for health professionals: a validity study of the LSI. Adult Educ Q. 1984;35:72–85.
Nicoll-Senft JM, Seider SN. Assessing the impact of the 4MAT teaching model across multiple disciplines in higher education. Coll Teach. 2010;58(1):19–27.
Kolb AY. The Kolb learning style inventory—version 3.1 2005 technical specifications. Boston: Hay Resource Direct; 2005.
Kolb DA. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development: Prentice Hall; 1984.
Zimmerman BJ. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: an overview. Educ Psychol. 1990;25(1):3–17.
Augustin M. How to learn effectively in medical school: test yourself, learn actively, and repeat in intervals. Yale J Biol Med. 2014;87(2):207–12.
Conrad SS, Addams AM, Young GH. Holistic review in medical school admissions and selection: a strategic, mission-driven response to shifting societal needs. Acad Med. 2016;91(11):1472–14745.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval was obtained to conduct this study and was deemed exempt.
Informed Consent
Agreeing to complete the survey was considered consent to use the data.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reynolds, Q.J., Beck Dallaghan, G.L., Smith, K. et al. Comparison of Medical Student Learning Styles and Exam Performance in an Integrated Curriculum. Med.Sci.Educ. 29, 619–623 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-019-00766-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-019-00766-6