Skip to main content
Log in

Establishing Fair and Ethical Medical Student Promotions Committees

  • Monograph
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Medical student promotions committees, also known as “academic progress” or “student performance” committees, act as essential gate-keepers to the medical profession, and make decisions that have enormous impact on students’ lives and careers. However, little is currently known about how to establish fair and ethical committees that both support student development and uphold academic and professional standards. Recommendations are provided to address issues of committee structure and composition, and to provide guidance regarding information sharing, decision-making, and committee member training. The recommendations are supported by specific examples and rationale from five US medical schools in an attempt to help develop a set of best practices across institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Standards for Accreditation of Medical Education Programs Leading to the MD Degree, 2016; Standards 3.5, 9.9, 10.3. [Internet]. Liaison Committee on Medical Education [cited 2017 May 9]. Available from: http://lcme.org/publications/

  2. Arawi T, Rosoff PM. Competing duties. J Bioeth Inq 2012;1;9(2):135–47.

  3. Green EP, Gruppuso PA. Justice and care: decision making by medical school student promotions committees. BMC Med Educ. 2017;51:621–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Standards and guidance for undergraduate medical education; Requirements R2.12, R2.16, R2.18, R3.15. [Internet]. General Medical Council [cited 2017 May 18]. Available from: http://www.gmc-uk.org/education/standards.asp

  5. Wear D, Keck-McNulty C, Jones B, Penn M, Moss P. Medical students’ experience of academic review and promotions committees. Teach Learn Med. 2004;16(3):226–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Maher BM, Hynes H, Sweeney C, Khashan AS, O’Rourke M, Doran K, et al. Medical school attrition—beyond the statistics. A ten year retrospective study. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13(1)

  7. O’Neill LD, Wallstedt B, Eika B, Hartvigsen J. Factors associated with dropout in medical education: a literature review. BMC Med Educ. 2011;45(5):440–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stetto JE, Gackstetter GD, Cruess DF, Hooper TI. Variables associated with attrition from Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences Medical School. Mil Med. 2004;169(2):102–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yates J. When did they leave, and why? A retrospective case study of attrition on the Nottingham undergraduate medical course. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. French W, Weis A. An ethics of care or an ethics of justice. J Bus Ethics. 2000;27(1–2):125–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gump LS, Baker RC, Roll S. The moral justification scale: reliability and validity of a new measure of care and justice orientations. Adolescence. 2000;35(137):67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Robert GH. Robert’s rules of order revised. 1921.

  13. Cobb NH, Jordan C. Students with questionable values or threatening behavior: precedent and policy from discipline to dismissal. J Soc Work Educ. 1989;25(2):87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Irby DM, Milam S. The legal context for evaluating and dismissing medical students and residents. Acad Med. 1989;64(11):639–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McAdams CR, Foster VA, Ward TJ. Remediation and dismissal policies in counselor education: lessons learned from a challenge in federal court. Couns Educ Supervis. 2007;46(3):212–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nash DA, Moore RN, Andes JO. Academic dismissal for clinical reasons: implications of the Horowitz case. J Dent Educ. 1981;45(3):150–5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Luhanga F, Yonge O, Myrick F. Failure to assign failing grades: issues with grading the unsafe student. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2008;5(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cruess RL, Cruess SR. Expectations and obligations: professionalism and medicine’s social contract with society. Perspect Biol Med. 2008;51(4):579–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cruess SR, Johnston S, Cruess RL. “Profession”: a working definition for medical educators. Teach Learn Med. 2004;16(1):74–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Morphew CC, Hartley M. Mission statements: a thematic analysis of rhetoric across institutional type. J Higher Educ. 2006;77(3):456–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tierney WG. Organizational culture in higher education: defining the essentials. J Higher Educ. 1988;59(1):2.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mission, Vision, and Goals [Internet]. University of Central Florida College of Medicine [cited 2017 May 9]. Available from: https://med.ucf.edu/about/strategic-plan/mission-vision-and-goals/

  23. Mission, Vision, and Values, Division of Biology and Medicine [Internet]. Brown University [cited 2017 May 9]. Available from: http://biomed.brown.edu/dean/mission.

  24. Mission Statement, Student Affairs [Internet]. Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University [cited 2017 May 9]. Available from: https://www.brown.edu/academics/medical/student-affairs.

  25. Coulehan J, Williams PC. Vanquishing virtue: the impact of medical education. Acad Med. 2001;76(6):598–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hafferty FW. Beyond curriculum reform: confronting medicine’s hidden curriculum. Acad Med. 1998;73(4):403–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hafferty FW, Franks R. The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching, and the structure of medical education. Acad Med. 1994;69(11):861–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Notes on Contributors

Emily P. Green, PhD, MA is Assistant Professor of Medical Science and the Director of Student and Faculty Development at the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and an ex-officio member of the Medical Committee on Academic Standing and Professionalism.

Gary Beck Dallaghan, PhD is Assistant Dean for Medical Education at the University of Nebraska College of Medicine, and an ex-officio member of the Student Evaluation Committee.

Daniel O’Hearn, MD is an Associate Professor of Medicine at the Oregon Health & Science University, and Chair of the Medical Student Progress Board.

Marcia L. Verduin, MD is Associate Dean for Students at the University of Central Florida College of Medicine, and an ex-officio member of the Student Evaluation and Promotion Committees.

Christa H. Zehle, MD is Associate Dean for Students at the Robert Larner, MD College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, and an ex-officio member of the Committee on Advancement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily P. Green.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Green, E.P., Beck Dallaghan, G.L., O’Hearn, D.J. et al. Establishing Fair and Ethical Medical Student Promotions Committees. Med.Sci.Educ. 28, 561–567 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-018-0582-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-018-0582-x

Keywords

Navigation