Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Case-Based Studies and Clinical Reasoning Development: Teaching Opportunities and Pitfalls for First Year Veterinary Students

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cased-based studies (CBS) is defined as a student-centered approach that prepares students for clinical practice using real clinical cases in the pre-clinical curriculum. CBS supports development of students’ clinical reasoning skills, which requires knowledge, understanding and integration of basic sciences and clinical information using a problem-solving approach. Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine (RUSVM) offers CBS I-IV in semesters 2 through 5, respectively. This study compared CBS in developing clinical reasoning skills through assessment and time spent between two cohorts of first year veterinary students. Thirty-one students enrolled in CBS, and 46 students served as the control. All students processed a clinical case and individually submitted three clinical reasoning assignments. A seven-item rubric was used to grade each assignment and these were scored overall using a scale from 0 to 4 with a maximum result of 28. Descriptive statistics for clinical reasoning assignment scores based on the rubric for enrolled students in CBS versus the control cohort were [m = 13.3; SD = 3.8], [m = 14.6; SD = 4.5], respectively. The control cohort had a significantly higher score on the explanation of the diagnosis (p = 0.02). Additionally, time spent for both cohorts resulted in higher scores of specific rubric items of prioritizing patient’s problems (r = 0.27, p = 0.02), identifying differential diagnoses (r = 0.23, p = 0.04) and ranking differential diagnoses (r = 0.23, p = 0.04). Lastly, the total rubric score of both cohorts was significantly associated with the time spent completing assignment 2 (r = 0.22, p = 0.05). Overall, the outcomes for the intervention cohort did not reflect the predicted effectiveness of CBS. Study outcomes reinforced the importance of student engagement that is pivotal in adult learning theory and self-directed learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Refesrences

  1. Lane EA. Problem-based learning in veterinary education. J Vet Med Educ. 2008;35(4):631–6. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.35.4.631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Harden R, Crosby J. Education guide no. 20—the good teacher is more than a lecturer: the twelve roles of the teacher. Association for Medical Education in Europe: Dundee; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Setia S, et al. Case based learning versus problem based learning: a direct comparison from first year medical students perspective. 2011. https://doi.org/10.9754/journal.wmc.2011.001976.

  4. Crowther E, Baillie S. A method of developing and introducing case-based learning to a preclinical veterinary curriculum. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(1):80–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Thistlethwaite JE, Davies D, Ekeocha S, Kidd JM, MacDougall C, Matthews P, et al. The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 23. Med Teacher. 2012;34(6):e421–44. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.680939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eshach H, Bitterman H. From case-based reasoning to problem-based learning. Acad Med. 2003;78(5):491–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200305000-00011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Patterson JS. Increased student self-confidence in clinical reasoning skills associated with case-based learning (CBL). J Vet Med Educ. 2006;33(3):426–31. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.33.3.426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hmelo-Silver CE. Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? Educ Psychol Rev. 2004;16(3):235–66. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Srinivasan M, Wilkes M, Stevenson F, Nguyen T, Slavin S. Comparing problem-based learning with case-based learning: effects of a major curricular shift at two institutions. Acad Med. 2007;82(1):74–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ACM.0000249963.93776.aa.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bowe CM, Voss J, Thomas Aretz H. Case method teaching: an effective approach to integrate the basic and clinical sciences in the preclinical medical curriculum. Med Teacher. 2009;31(9):834–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590902922904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dolmans DH, Snellen-Balendong H, van der Vleuten CP. Seven principles of effective case design for a problem-based curriculum. Med Teacher. 1997;19(3):185–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421599709019379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Malher X, Bareille N, Noordhuizen JPTM, Seegers H. A case-based learning approach for teaching undergraduate veterinary students about dairy herd health consultancy issues. J Vet Med Educ. 2009;36(1):22–9. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.36.1.22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kassirer JP. Teaching clinical reasoning: case-based and coached. Acad Med. 2010;85(7):1118–24. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d5dd0d.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hawkins DR, Paul R, Elder L, The thinker's guide to clinical reasoning. Dillon. California: Foundation for Critical Thinking; 2010. p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Farnsworth CC. Measuring the effects of problem-based learning on the development of veterinary students' clinical expertise. Acad Med. 1997;72(6):552–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199706000-00024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmidt H, et al. The development of diagnostic competence: a comparison between a problem-based, an integrated, and a conventional medical curriculum. Acad Med. 1996;71(6):658–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199606000-00021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lasater K. Clinical judgment development: using simulation to create an assessment rubric. J Nurs Educ. 2007;46(11):496–503.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Adamson KA, Gubrud P, Sideras S, Lasater K. Assessing the reliability, validity, and use of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: three approaches. J Nurs Educ. 2012;51(2):66–73. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20111130-03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Team RDC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kim S, Phillips WR, Pinsky L, Brock D, Phillips K, Keary J. A conceptual framework for developing teaching cases: a review and synthesis of the literature across disciplines. Med Educ. 2006;40(9):867–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02544.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Struthers CW, Perry RP, Menec VH. An examination of the relationship among academic stress, coping, motivation, and performance in college. Res High Educ. 2000;41(5):581–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007094931292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nonis SA, Hudson GI. Academic performance of college students: influence of time spent studying and working. J Educ Bus. 2006;81(3):151–9. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.81.3.151-159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Saretsky G. The OEO PC experiment and the John Henry effect. The Phi Delta Kappan. 1972;53(9):579–81.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Harden RM, Laidlaw JM. Essential skills for a medical teacher: an introduction to teaching and learning in medicine. London: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, P.O. Box 334, Basseterre, Saint Kitts and Nevis

    Mary Mauldin Pereira, Elpida Artemiou, Anne Conan & Luis Cruz-Martinez

  2. University of Glasgow School of Veterinary Medicine, 464 Bearsden Road G61 1QH, Glasgow, UK

    Liza Köster

Authors
  1. Mary Mauldin Pereira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elpida Artemiou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anne Conan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Liza Köster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Luis Cruz-Martinez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Mauldin Pereira.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electtronic Supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 35.8 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mauldin Pereira, M., Artemiou, E., Conan, A. et al. Case-Based Studies and Clinical Reasoning Development: Teaching Opportunities and Pitfalls for First Year Veterinary Students. Med.Sci.Educ. 28, 175–179 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-017-0533-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-017-0533-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation