Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Simple Interactive Lecturing Strategies for Fostering Students’ Engagement and Active Participation

  • Monograph
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Of all the strategies used in our teaching practice, lecture is perhaps one of the most common. Although we have acknowledged the pedagogical value of lecture, the traditional didactic format is usually a passive learning experience for students and it fails to engage them. As the lecture will remain a necessary method of teaching in education, we should enhance it, not drop it. One of the most effective methods to transform students from passive to active learners is to integrate lectures with various interactive strategies. This article aims to describe four interactive lecture strategies: connecting students’ prior knowledge to the objective of a lecture, organizing a lecture in a proper sequence, using different audiovisual devices, and providing opportunities to students to practice what they have learned. Since these strategies are simple, junior educators with little or no pedagogical training can use them with no loss of content or time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harden RM, Laidlaw JM. The lecture and teaching with large groups. In: Harden RM, Laidlaw JM, editors. Essential skills for a medical teacher: an introduction to teaching and learning in medicine. Amserdam: Elsevier; 2016. p. 167–74.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Huggett K, Jeffries WB. Overview of active learning research and rationale for active learning. In: Fornari A, Poznanski A, editors. How-to guide for active learning. Huntington: International Association of Medical Science Educators; 2015. p. 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Laidlaw JM. Twelve tips for lecturers. Med Teach. 1988;10(1):13–7. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421598809019320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Butler JA. Use of teaching methods within the lecture format. Med Teach. 1992;14(1):11–25. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421599209044010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Matheson C. The educational value and effectiveness of lectures. Clin Teach. 2008;5(4):218–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-498X.2008.00238.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown G, Manogue M. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 22: refreshing lecturing: a guide for lecturers. Med Teach. 2001;23(3):231–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590120043000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cantillon P. Teaching large groups. In: Cantillon P, Wood D, editors. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine. Hoboken: Wiley; 2011. p. 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  8. White G. Interactive lecturing. Clin Teach. 2011;8(4):230–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-498X.2011.00457.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bligh DA. Evidence of what lectures achieve. In: What’s the use of lectures? Jossey-Bass; 2000. p. 3–20s.

  10. Amin Z, Eng KH. Overview of teaching and learning methods. In: Amin Z, Eng KH, editors. Basics in Medical Education. 2009. p. 87–91.

  11. Papp KK, Miller FB. The answer to stimulating lectures is the question. Med Teach. 1996;18(2):147–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421599609034150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Long A, Lock B. Lectures and large groups. In: Swanwick T, editor. Understanding medical education: evidence, theory and practice. Hoboken: Wiley; 2011. p. 139–50.

    Google Scholar 

  13. King A. From sage on the stage to guide on the side. Coll Teach. 1993;41(1):30–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1993.9926781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McLaughlin K, Mandin H. A schematic approach to diagnosing and resolving lecturalgia. Med Educ. 2001;35(12):1135–42. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.01090.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Richardson D. Don’t dump the didactic lecture; fix it. Adv Physiol Educ. 2008;32(1):23–4. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00048.2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jeffries WB. Teaching large groups. In: Huggett K, Jeffries WB, editors. An introduction to medical teaching. Netherlands: Springer; 2014. p. 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stuart J, Rutherford RJ. Medical student concentration during lectures. Lancet. 1978;2(8088):514–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown G, Edmunds S. Lectures. In: Dent J, Harden RM, editors. A practical guide for medical teachers. 4th ed. UK: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013. p. 61–8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Steinert Y, Snell LS. Interactive lecturing: strategies for increasing participation in large group presentations. Med Teach. 1999;21(1):37–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421599980011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Graffam B. Active learning in medical education: strategies for beginning implementation. Med Teach. 2007;29(1):38–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590601176398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Huxham M. Learning in lectures: do ‘interactive windows’ help? Act Learn High Educ. 2005;6(1):17–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787405049943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Silver HF, Perini MJ. Introducing the interactive lecture. In: The interactive lecture: how to engage students, build memory, and deepen comprehension. Alexandria: ASCD; 2010. p. 5–31.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bligh DA. Factors influencing memory. In: What’s the use of lectures? Jossey-Bass; 2000. p. 23–43.

  24. Stein M, Neill P, Houston S. Case discussion in clinical pharmacology: application of small group teaching methods to a large group. Med Teach. 1990;12(2):193–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Latif R. Impact of case-based lectures on students’ performance in vascular physiology module. Adv Physiol Educ. 2014;38(3):268–72. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00103.2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schwartz PL. Active, small group learning with a large group in a lecture theatre: a practical example. Med Teach. 1989;11(1):81–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421598909146279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Prober CG, Heath C. Lecture halls without lectures—a proposal for medical education. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(18):1657–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1202451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaukfman D. Applying educational theory in practice. In: Cantillon P, Wood D, editors. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine. Hoboken: Wiley; 2011. p. 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Martini FH, Bartholomew EF. The nervous system. In: Martini FH, Bartholomew EF, editors. Essentials of anatomy & physiology: Pearson New International Edition. London: Pearson Education Limited; 2014. p. 219–74.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kalogiannis S, Pagkalos I, Koufoudakis P, Dashi I, Pontikeri K, Christodoulou C. Integrated interactive chart as a tool for teaching metabolic pathways. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2014;42(6):501–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dong C, Goh PS. Twelve tips for the effective use of videos in medical education. Med Teach. 2015;37(2):140–5. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2014.943709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ventura S, Onsman A. The use of popular movies during lectures to aid the teaching and learning of undergraduate pharmacology. Med Teach. 2009;31(7):662–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802641489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bligh DA. Factors affecting student’s attention. In: What’s the use of lectures? Jossey-Bass; 2000. p. 45–56.

  34. Bachhel R, Thaman RG. Effective use of pause procedure to enhance student engagement and learning. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(8):Xm01–xm03. https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2014/8260.4691.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Amin Z, Eng KH. Effective lecture. In: Basics in Medical Education; 2009 p. 93–100.

  36. Richards LW, Wang AT, Mahapatra S, Jenkins SM, Collins NM, Beckman TJ, et al. Use of the pause procedure in continuing medical education: a randomized controlled intervention study. Med Teach. 2017;39(1):74–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2016.1230664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rowe MB. Pausing principles and their effects on reasoning in science. New Direct Commun Coll. 1980;1980(31):27–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.36819803106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Linsenmeyer M. Brief activities: questioning, brainstorming, think-pair-share, jigsaw, and clinical case discussions. In: Fornari A, Poznanski A, editors. How-to guide for active learning. Huntington: International Association of Medical Science Educators; 2015. p. 37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bligh DA. Overcoming common difficulties. In: What’s the use of lectures? Jossey-Bass; 2000 p. 214–231.

  40. Elkowitz DE. Socratic questioning to engage learners. In: Fornari A, Poznanski A, editors. How-to guide for active learning. Huntington: International Association of Medical Science Educators; 2015. p. 89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cho YH, Lee SY, Jeong DW, Im SJ, Choi EJ, Lee SH, et al. Analysis of questioning technique during classes in medical education. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12(1):39. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wilen W, Clegg A. Effective questions and questioning: a research review. Theor Res Soc Educ 1986;14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1986.10505518.

  43. Millis BJ. Active Learning Strategies in Face-to-Face Courses. IDEA Papers, vol 53. Manhattan: IDEA Centre; 2012. http://www.ideaedu.org/Portals/0/Uploads/Documents/IDEA%20Papers/IDEA%20Papers/PaperIDEA_53.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Health Sciences, Nanyang Polytechnic, Singapore, Singapore

    Eugenie Phyu Aye Thwin

  2. Department of Emergency Medicine, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

    Zaw Lwin

Authors
  1. Eugenie Phyu Aye Thwin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zaw Lwin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugenie Phyu Aye Thwin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thwin, E.P.A., Lwin, Z. Simple Interactive Lecturing Strategies for Fostering Students’ Engagement and Active Participation. Med.Sci.Educ. 28, 203–209 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-017-0492-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-017-0492-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation