Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Value of Progress Testing in Undergraduate Medical Education: a Systematic Review of the Literature

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increased implementation of progress testing as an assessment tool in medical education suggests a systematic review of the literature is necessary to increase understanding of the value of progress testing and its outcomes on student learning, as well as institutional and curriculum evaluation. Following the PRISMA guidelines, in 2014, the authors conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, and three education databases from EBSCO-ERIC, Education Research Complete, and Education Full Text. Sixteen papers were declared eligible for review based on eligibility criteria. Review of these papers revealed five themes addressing the value of progress testing in undergraduate medical education: Feedback, Evaluation, Perceived Value by Students, Student Progress and Academic Performance, and Licensure Exam Performance. The review suggests that advantages of progress testing include the ability to evaluate and track medical knowledge at the individual, cohort, and institutional level, as well as monitor curricular changes. Students find progress testing valuable for identifying strengths and weaknesses in their knowledge, as progress testing performance correlates with licensure exam performance. The greatest challenges to implementation of progress testing are the substantial time and personal resources required and the difficulty mapping test items to curricular content and objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blake JM, Norman GR, Keane DR, Mueller CB, Cunnington J, Didyk N. Introducing progress testing in McMaster University’s problem-based medical curriculum: psychometric properties and effect on learning. Acad Med. 1996;71:1002–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McHarg J, Bradley P, Chamberlain S, Ricketts C, Searle J, McLachlan JC. Assessment of progress tests. Med Educ. 2005;39:221–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Vleuten C, Verwijnen G, Wijnen W. Fifteen years of experience with progress testing in a problem-based learning curriculum. Med Teach. 1996;18:103–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Norman G, Neville A, Blake JM, Mueller B. Assessment steers learning down the right road: impact of progress testing on licensing examination performance. Med Teach. 2010;32:496–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wrigley W, van der Vleuten CP, Freeman A, Muijtjens A. A systemic framework for the progress test: strengths, constraints and issues: AMEE guide no. 71. Med Teach. 2012;34:683–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nouns Z, Schauber S, Witt C, Kingreen H, Schuttpelz-Brauns K. Development of knowledge in basic sciences: a comparison of two medical curricula. Med Educ. 2012;46:1206–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wade L, Harrison C, Hollands J, Mattick K, Ricketts C, Wass V. Student perceptions of the progress test in two settings and the implications for test deployment. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012;17:573–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cook DA, West CP. Conducting systematic reviews in medical education: a stepwise approach. Med Educ. 2012;46:943–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Muijtjens AM, Schuwirth LW, Cohen-Schotanus J, van der Vleuten CP. Differences in knowledge development exposed by multi-curricular progress test data. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008;13:593–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Albano MG, Cavallo F, Hoogenboom R, et al. An international comparison of knowledge levels of medical students: the Maastricht progress test. Med Educ. 1996;30:239–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Finucane P, Flannery D, Keane D, Norman G. Cross-institutional progress testing: feasibility and value to a new medical school. Med Educ. 2010;44:184–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Heijne-Penninga M, Kuks JB, Hofman WH, Muijtjens AM, Cohen-Schotanus J. Influence of PBL with open-book tests on knowledge retention measured with progress tests. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013;18:485–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aarts R, Steidel K, Manuel BA, Driessen EW. Progress testing in resource-poor countries: a case from Mozambique. Med Teach. 2010;32:461–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tomic ER, Martins MA, Lotufo PA, Bensenor IM. Progress testing: evaluation of four years of application in the school of medicine, university of Sao Paulo. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2005;60:389–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Willoughby TL, Others A. Correlation of quarterly profile examination and national board of medical examiner scores. Educ Psychol Meas. 1977;37:445–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Willoughby TL, Arnold LM, Calkins EV, Neaderhiser M. The concurrent and predictive validity of the quarterly profile examination. Educ Psychol Meas. 1988;48:537–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Willoughby TL, Bixby AR. Cross-validation of the quarterly profile examination. Educ Psychol Meas. 1991;51:691–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kerfoot BP, Shaffer K, McMahon GT, et al. Online "spaced education progress-testing" of students to confront two upcoming challenges to medical schools. Acad Med. 2011;86:300–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. De Champlain AF, Cuddy MM, Scoles PV, et al. Progress testing in clinical science education: results of a pilot project between the national board of medical examiners and a US medical school. Med Teach. 2010;32:503–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Coombes L, Ricketts C, Freeman A, Stratford J. Beyond assessment: feedback for individuals and institutions based on the progress test. Med Teach. 2010;32:486–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabrina M. Neeley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neeley, S.M., Ulman, C.A., Sydelko, B.S. et al. The Value of Progress Testing in Undergraduate Medical Education: a Systematic Review of the Literature. Med.Sci.Educ. 26, 617–622 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-016-0313-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-016-0313-0

Keywords

Navigation