Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Learning Anatomical Structures: a Reinforcement-Based Learning Approach

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given the reduced formal instruction time for many of the basic sciences within medical curricula, educators are searching for instructional methods that ensure students have the necessary foundational knowledge. The objective of this study was to design an anatomical structure identification reinforcement learning task for participants with minimal prior neuroanatomical knowledge. We predicted that the provision of immediate feedback would activate reinforcement learning mechanisms within the brain thus enhancing knowledge acquisition in novice learners such that performance accuracy (correct identification of neuroanatomical structures) improves from approximately 50 % (guessing) to 90 % by task completion. Ten participants learned to identify 10 neuroanatomical structures shown using two-dimensional (2D) coronal brain images over the course of 320 trials (20 trials per experiment block with 16 blocks total). An analysis of behavioural learning curves demonstrated the progression of learning, and each participant achieved a 90–100 % accuracy by block 13 (260 trials) for each of the 10 structures. The total task duration was approximately 30–35 min with all participants reaching proficiency by 25–30 min. Importantly, there was a significant increase in performance on a post-task knowledge identification test. Our results highlight the key role of reinforcement learning approaches to establishing foundational knowledge in the pre-clinical sciences, specifically anatomy, in a time-efficient manner. Further, progression of learning can be assessed through examination of learning curves. Designing effective pre-class exercises that make use of reinforcement learning theory as a means to promote learning may be an effective method to build base knowledge prior to classroom interactions in anatomy education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Drake RL, McBride JM, Lachman N, Pawlina W. Medical education in the anatomical sciences: the winds of change continue to blow. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2(6):253–9. doi:10.1002/ase.117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Garg AX, Norman G, Sperotable L. How medical students learn spatial anatomy. Lancet. 2001;357(9253):363–4. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03649-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3(2):83–93. doi:10.1002/ase.139.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bergman EM, Prince KJ, Drukker J, van der Vleuten CP, Scherpbier AJ. How much anatomy is enough? Anat Sci Educ. 2008;1(4):184–8. doi:10.1002/ase.35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee D, Seo H, Jung MW. Neural basis of reinforcement learning and decision making. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2012;35:287–308. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Butler AC, Roediger HL. Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing. Mem Cogn. 2008;36(3):604–16. doi:10.3758/mc.36.3.604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Krigolson OE, Pierce LJ, Holroyd CB, Tanaka JW. Learning to become an expert: reinforcement learning and the acquisition of perceptual expertise. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009;21(9):1833–40. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brainard DH. The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis. 1997;10:433–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pelli DG. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rorden C, Brett M. Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav Neurol. 2000;12(4):191–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Diamond A. Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135–68. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Friedlander MJ, Andrews L, Armstrong EG, Aschenbrenner C, Kass JS, Ogden P, et al. What can medical education learn from the neurobiology of learning? Acad Med. 2011;86(4):415–20. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820dc197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a competitive University of Calgary grant awarded to the authors: University Research Grants Committee (URGC) Seed Grant. SJA would like to acknowledge the stipend funding provided by the Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Doctoral Scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah J. Anderson.

Ethics declarations

This study was approved by the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Calgary (Ethics ID: REB14-088).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Additional information

This research was conducted at the University of Calgary, Canada

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anderson, S.J., Krigolson, O.E., Jamniczky, H.A. et al. Learning Anatomical Structures: a Reinforcement-Based Learning Approach. Med.Sci.Educ. 26, 123–128 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-015-0219-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-015-0219-2

Keywords

Navigation