Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of “No” and “Random Guess” Judgment Selections By Primary Care Faculty Using a Modified Angoff Method

  • Innovation
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Downing S, Tekian A, Yudkowsky R. Procedures for establishing defensible absolute passing scores on performance examinations in health professions education. Teach Learn Med. 2006;18:50–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Angoff WH. Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In: Thorndike RL, editor. Educational measurement. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Council on Education; 1971. p. 508–600.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yudkowsky R, Downing SM, Popescu M. Setting standards for performance tests; a pilot study of a three-level angoff method. Acad Med. 2008;83(10):S13–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen D. Schneid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schneid, S.D., Armour, C., Bazzo, D. et al. Comparison of “No” and “Random Guess” Judgment Selections By Primary Care Faculty Using a Modified Angoff Method. Med.Sci.Educ. 26, 7–8 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-015-0212-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-015-0212-9

Keywords

Navigation