Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to describe a standardized model through which simulation can be used to evaluate competency trends for clinical education objectives in the acute care setting. The proposed model will be employed to examine the ability of medical students to identify and initiate treatment of a critical patient.
Activity
A standardized severe sepsis case was used to assess clinical skills and competency in a variety of roles with an adaptive algorithm and critical objectives.
Results
The study enrolled 210 third-year medical students divided into 42 groups. Groups were divided into various roles and evaluated based on critical objectives. Performance was significantly better in the roles of history, physical exam, and team leader than scribe and procedures.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates the model as a framework for standardized evaluation of clinical competency using medical simulation.
References
Nguyen HB, Daniel-Underwood L, Van Ginkel C, Wong M, Lee D, Lucas AS, et al. An educational course including medical simulation for early goal-directed therapy and the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle: an evaluation for medical student training. Resuscitation. 2009;80:674–9.
Lee MO, Brown LL, Bender J, Machan JT, Overly FL. A medical simulation-based educational intervention for emergency medicine residents in neonatal resuscitation. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19:577–85.
Ten Eyck RP, Tews M, Ballester JM. Improved medical student satisfaction and test performance with a simulation-based emergency medicine curriculum: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54:684–91.
Miloslavsky EM, Hayden EM, Currier PF, Mathai SK, Contreras-Valdes F, Gordon JA. Pilot program using medical simulation in clinical decision-making training for internal medicine interns. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4:490–5.
Okuda Y, Bryson EO, DeMaria Jr S, Jacobson L, Quinones J, Shen B, et al. The utility of simulation in medical education: what is the evidence? Mt Sinai J Med. 2009;76:330–43.
Wayne DB, Didwania A, Feinglass J, Fudala MJ, Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC. Simulation-based education improves quality of care during cardiac arrest team responses at an academic teaching hospital: a case–control study. Chest J. 2008;133(1):56–61.
Issenberg S, McGaghie W, Petrusa E, Lee Gordon D, Scalese R. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27:10–28.
Littlewood KE, Shilling AM, Stemlad CJ, Wright EB, Kirk MA. High-fidelity simulation is superior to case-based discussion in teaching the management of shock. Med Teach. 2013;35:e1003–10.
Godfred-Cato S, Metts M, Kolbinger G, Finnerty EP, Carney K. An e-Learning intervention to enhance medical student’s competence in oxygen delivery methods. Med Sci Educ. 2013;23:278–83.
Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H, Gerlach H, Calandra T, Cohen J, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:536–55.
Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Bion J, Parker MM, Jaeschke R, et al. For the International Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:296–327.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the students of the Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine class of 2015 at Des Moines University for their participation in this study. The authors also wish to thank Thomas Green, DO; Gavin Gardner, MAEd.; Gregory Kolbinger, MPAS, PA-C; Matthew Charnetski; William Enfinger; Angela Grundmeyer, MPAS, PA-C; Jayne Strathe; JD Polk, DO; Kara Thompson, DO; David Plundo, DO; Andrew Terry, DO; Alan Hilgerson, DO; and Donald Shumate, DO, for participating in case trials and Holly DeJong for providing technical support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stearns, L.P., Eales, T.W., Metts, J.M. et al. A Standardized Model for Team-Based Simulation Training and Assessment of Third-Year Medical Students in the Acute Care Setting. Med.Sci.Educ. 26, 25–29 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-015-0195-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-015-0195-6