Skip to main content
Log in

Authoring of Patient Education Materials by Medical Students: an Activity Designed to Demonstrate Communication to the Lay Public

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As part of their training, physicians develop excellent patient communication skills. However, with a constellation of responsibilities that impinge on a physician’s time, it is not always possible to convey appropriate amounts of information such that patients can use this to enhance their health. Physicians also may not select the educational resources that best fit each patient’s needs, based on educational level of the patient. At The Commonwealth Medical College, one strategy we have utilized to demonstrate to students how to deliver an understandable diagnosis, instructions for treatment, or other medical information, was having our first year medical students write pamphlets on a disease covered in one of our small group cases for problem-based learning (PBL). The goal of the pamphlet was to explain a particular disease in layman’s terms, and to present information that patients would need in order to deal with a particular disease. Students were asked to write pamphlets during the first basic science course they encountered, the Cellular and Molecular Basis of Life. The problem-based learning case was on Bloom’s Syndrome, a genetic disease discussed in this course. Different groups approached the project in different ways, but all had a great deal of creativity in their final product. We include examples of these brochures to demonstrate the effectiveness of this exercise. These brochures were part of the narrative evaluation of our students, as the course was pass/fail. Students were given verbal feedback by their PBL facilitator as well. We present three examples of these pamphlets, and include an evaluation of these pamphlets by the faculty not shared with the students in which we used the Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM) tool to assess how well the students had met the goal of developing a useful tool for patient education and an on-line readability tool that assesses the readability of the patient education materials by several readability assays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Graph 1
Graph 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davis TC, Wolf MS. Health literacy: implications for family medicine. Fam Med. 2004;36:595–8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Doak, C.C., Doak, L., Root, J.H.: Teaching patients with low literacy skills 2nd ed. Philadelphia, J.B. Lippincott Co. (The SAM tool, based on this paper, was obtained from the following URL: http://www.p-h.com/pages.php?pageid=8.)1996.

  3. Farnsworth M. Differences in perceived difficulty in print and online patient education materials. Perm J. 2014;18(4):45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kelly PA, Haidet P. Physician overestimation of patient literacy: a potential source of health care disparities. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;66:119–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kincaid, J.P., Fishburne, R.P. Jr., Rogers, R.L., Chissom, B.S.: Research branch report 8-75: derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy enlisted personnel. URL: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltest/u2/a006655.pdf.1975.

  6. Kloza EM, Haddow PK, Halliday JV, O’Brien BM, Lambert-Messerlian GM, Palomaki GE. Evaluation of patient education materials: the example of circulating cell free DNA testing for aneuploidy. J Genet Couns. 2015;24(2):259–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rhee RL, von Feldt JM, Schumacher HR, Merkel PA. Readability and suitability assessment of patient education materials in rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Care Res. 2013;65(10):1702–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ryan L, Logsdon MC, Stikes R, Senior B, Helinger B, Small B, et al. Evaluation of printed health education materials for use by low-income families. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2014;46:218–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stossel LM, Segar N, Gliatto P, Fallar R, Karani R. Readability of patient education materials available at the point of care. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1165–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wallace AS, Seligman HK, Davis TC, Schillinger D, Arnold CL, Bryant-Shilliday B, et al. Literacy-appropriate educational materials and brief counseling improve diabetes self-management. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;75:328–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Weintraub D, Maliski SL, Fink A, Choe S, Litwin MS. Suitability of prostate cancer education materials: applying a standardized assessment tool to currently available materials. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;55:275–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen J. Doane.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Doane, K.J., Boyd, P. Authoring of Patient Education Materials by Medical Students: an Activity Designed to Demonstrate Communication to the Lay Public. Med.Sci.Educ. 26, 47–52 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-015-0182-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-015-0182-y

Keywords

Navigation