Abstract
A plenary session at the annual meeting of the International Association of Medical Science Educators introduced the challenges and successes experienced with two models of interprofessional education (IPE). Representatives from the Vanderbilt Program in Interprofessional Learning (VPIL) and a five-university IPE consortium, the Southeastern Conference (SEC) for IPE, answered moderated questions from the audience including methods for integrating basic science learning with interprofessional students, in the clinical and digital environment. Online modules for delivering IPE with both asynchronous and synchronous connectivity were introduced. Additional areas of discussion included integration and relevance of IPE integration with basic science, the impact of IPE models on student behavior and career choice, concerns associated with documenting IPE activities for promotion and tenure, and managing difficulties associated with integrating IPE across multiple curricula.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Retrieved August 24, 2014, from http://www.ihi.org/Pages/default.aspx
Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Report of an expert panel. Washington, D.C.: Interprofessional Education Collaborative; 2011.
Acknowledgments
VPIL has been funded in part by the Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, New York, NY, and the Baptist Healing Trust, Nashville, TN. The SEC-IPE has been partially funded by the Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, New York, NY.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schorn, M.N., Wu, A., Davidson, H.A. et al. Interprofessional Education (IPE): Synchronous, Asynchronous, Clinical Practice, Simulation Across Disciplines, Across Universities. Med.Sci.Educ. 24 (Suppl 1), 9–11 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-014-0086-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-014-0086-2