Abstract
Twelve years after his famous Essay on Some Problems Concerning the Normal and the Pathological (1943), the philosopher Georges Canguilhem (1904–1995) published a book-length study on the history of a single biological concept. Within France, his Formation of the Reflex Concept in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (1955) contributed significantly to defining the “French style” of writing on the history of science. Outside of France, the book passed largely unnoticed. This paper re-reads Canguilhem’s study of the reflex concept with respect to its historiographical and epistemological implications. Canguilhem defines concepts as complex and dynamic entities combining terms, definitions, and phenomena. As a consequence, the historiography of science becomes a rather complex task. It has to take into account textual and contextual aspects that develop independently of individual authors. In addition, Canguilhem stresses the connection between conceptual activities and other functions of organic individuals in their respective environments. As a result, biological concepts become tied to a biology of conceptual thinking, analogical reasoning, and technological practice. The paper argues that this seemingly circular structure is a major feature in Canguilhem’s philosophical approach to the history of the biological sciences.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Unless otherwise stated all translations from the French and the German are my own.
For a nuanced confirmation of this argument, see Braunstein (1998).
As already noted, similar conceptions of life can be found in Max Verworn, Jabob von Uexküll, Frederik Buytendijk, and Kurt Goldstein, to quote only a few general biologists. As a point of reference in this connection, see, for example, Verworn (1895).
A similar conception of concepts can be found in the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. On this issue see Schmidgen (in press).
This notion of vitalism is spelled out in more detail in Canguilhem (2008c).
On the early history of this institute, see Bonah (2000).
I would like to warmly thank the Strasbourg physiologist Bernard Canguilhem for having shown this library to me.
It should be noted that Kayser (1947), at the end of his second lecture, credits Canguilhem for his help in conducting the historical research that was required for preparing his presentation.
For reasons of genealogical completeness one may add that von Weizsäcker’s chef d’oeuvre, Der Gestaltkreis (1940), was published in a French translation established by Michel Foucault and Daniel Rocher in 1958.
For the experimental background of this mode of thought, see (Johns and Schmidgen 2002, pp. 640–645).
It seems to be this thought that Foucault has rephrased with regard to Canguilhem’s contributions to the history of concepts: “Through the elucidation of the knowledge of life and from the concepts which articulate this knowledge, Canguilhem gets to the question of the concept in life” (Foucault 1980, p. 60). I follow here a different, at times more pertinent translation of Foucault’s “Introduction” to The Normal and the Pathological than the one which was published with Canguilhem (1989).
References
Bergson, H. (1959). Introduction (Deuxième Partie). De la position des problèmes. Œuvres. Édition du centénaire (pp. 1271–1330). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Bitbol, M., & Gayon, J. (Eds.). (2006). L’épistémologie française. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Bonah, C. (2000). Instruire, guérir, server. Formation, recherche et pratique médicales en France et en Allemagne pendant la deuxième moitié du XIXe siècle. Strasbourg: Presses Universitaires de Strasbourg.
Braunstein, J.-F. (1998). Canguilhem, Comte et le positivisme. In F. Bing, J.-F. Braunstein, & E. Roudinesco (Eds.), Actualité de Georges Canguilhem (pp. 95–120). Synthélabo: Le Plessis-Robinson.
Brenner, A., & Gayon, J. (Eds.). (2009). French studies in the philosophy of science. Contemporary research in France. Heidelberg/Dordrecht/New York: Springer.
Canguilhem, G. (1937). Descartes et la technique. In Travaux du IXe Congrès international de philosophie (Congrès Descartes) (Vol. 2, pp. 77–85). Paris: Hermann.
Canguilhem, G. (1955). La formation du concept de réflexe aux XVIIe et XVIII siècles. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Canguilhem, G. (1977). La formation du concept de réflexe aux XVIIe et XVIII siècles (2nd ed.). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Canguilhem, G. (1989) Essay on some problems concerning the normal and the pathological. In The normal and the pathological (C. R. Fawcett, Trans., pp. 29–229). New York: Zone.
Canguilhem, G. (1994) The death or man, or exhaustion of the cogito?. In G. Gutting (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Foucault (C. Porter, Trans., pp. 71–91). Cambridge/New York/Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Canguilhem, G. (2002a). Le concept de réflexe au XIXe siècle. In Etudes d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences (7th ed., pp. 295–304), 2nd printing. Paris: Vrin.
Canguilhem, G. (2002b). Le concept et la vie. In Etudes d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences (7th ed., pp. 335–364), 2nd printing. Paris: Vrin, 335–364.
Canguilhem, G. (2002c). La constitution de la physiologie comme science. In Etudes d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences (7th ed., pp. 226–273), 2nd printing. Paris: Vrin.
Canguilhem, G. (2008a). Thought and the living. In P. Marrati & T. Meyers T (Eds.), Knowledge of life (S. Geroulanos & D. Ginsburg, Trans., pp. xvii–xx). New York: Fordham University Press.
Canguilhem, G. (2008b). Machine and organism. In P. Marrati & T. Meyers (Eds.), Knowledge of life (S. Geroulanos & D. Ginsburg, Trans., pp. 75–77). New York: Fordham University Press.
Canguilhem, G. (2008c). Aspects of vitalism. In P. Marrati & T. Meyers (Eds.), Knowledge of life (S. Geroulanos & D. Ginsburg, Trans., pp. 59–74). New York: Fordham University Press.
Canguilhem, G., & Planet, C. (1939). Traité de Logique et de Morale. Marseille: Robert et fils.
Cavaillès, J. (1938). Méthode axiomatique et formalism. Essai sur le problème du fondement des mathématiques. Paris: Hermann.
Cavaillès, J. (1960). Sur la logique et la théorie de la science. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Chimisso, C. (2008). Writing the history of the mind. philosophy and science in France, 1900 to 1960s. Adlershot: Ashgate.
Chimisso, C. (2013). Gaston Bachelard. Critic of science and the imagination. London: Routledge.
Debru, C. (2004). Georges Canguilhem. Science et non-science. Paris: Editions Rue d’Ulm.
Delaporte, F. (Ed.) (2000) A vital rationalist. Selected writings from Georges Canguilhem (A. Goldhammer, Trans.). New York: Zone Books.
Deleuze, G. (2004). Faces and surfaces. In D. Lapoujade (Ed.), Desert islands and other texts, 1953–1974 (M. Taormina, Trans., pp. 281–283). Los Angeles/New York: Semiotext(e).
During, E. (2004). ‘A history of problems’. Bergson and the French epistemological tradition. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 35(1), 4–23.
Eckhard, C. (1881). Geschichte der Entwickelung der Lehre von den Reflexerscheinungen. Beiträge zur Anatomie und Physiologie, 9, 29–192.
Fichant, M. (1973). L’épistemologie en France. In F. Châtelet (Ed.), Histoire de la philosophie, Le XXe siècle (Vol. VIII, pp. 135–178). Paris: Hachette.
Foucault, M. (1954). Maladie mentale et personnalité. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Foucault, M. (1980) Georges Canguilhem. Philosopher of error. Technologies of the Human Sciences, 7, 51–62 (G. Burchell, Trans.).
Foucault, M. (1985). La vie. l’expérience et la science. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 90(1), 3–14.
Foucault, M (1989). Introduction. In G. Canguilhem. The normal and the pathological (C. R. Fawcett, Trans., pp. 7–24). New York: Zone.
Gayon, J. (1998). The concept of individuality in Canguilhem’s philosophy of biology. Journal of the History of Biology, 31(3), 305–325.
Goldstein, K. (1934). Der Aufbau des Organismus. Einführung in die Biologie unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Erfahrungen am kranken Menschen. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Goldstein, K. (1951). La structure de l’organisme. Introduction à la biologie à partir de la pathologie humaine. Paris: Gallimard.
Goldstein, K. (1995). The Organism. A holistic approach to biology derived from pathological data in man. New York: Zone Books.
Gutting, G. (1989). Michel Foucault’s archaeology of scientific reason (pp. 9–54). Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press.
Hacking, I. (1998). Canguilhem amid the cyborgs. Economy and Society, 27(2–3), 202–216.
Harrington, A. (1996). Reenchanted science. Holism in german culture from Wilhelm II to Hitler. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hayward, R. (2001). The tortoise and the love-machine. Grey Walter and the politics of electroencephalography. Science in Context, 14(4), 615–641.
Hoff, H. E., & Kellaway, P. (1952). The early history of the reflex. Journal of the History of Medecine and Allied Sciences, 7(3), 211–249.
Hyder, D. (2003). Foucault, Cavaillès, and Husserl on the historical epistemology of the sciences. Perspectives on Science, 11(1), 107–129.
James, W. (1996). Some problems of philosophy. A beginning of an introduction to philosophy. Lincoln/London: University of Nebraska Press.
Johns, Schloegel J., & Schmidgen, H. (2002). General physiology, experimental psychology, and evolutionism. unicellular organisms as objects of psychophysiological research, 1877–1918. Isis, 93(4), 614–645.
Kayser, C. (1947). Réflexes et comportement. Bulletin de la Faculté des Lettres de Strasbourg, 25 (4–5)(89–108), 133–148.
Lacan, J (1991) The Seminar, Book II. The Ego in Freud’s Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis, 1954–1955 (S. Tomaselli, Trans. ). New York/London: Norton.
Laubichler, M. E. (2006). Allgemeine Biologie als selbständige Grundwissenschaft und die allgemeinen Grundlagen des Lebens. In M. Hagner & M. E. Laubichler (Eds.), Der Hochsitz des Wissens. Das Allgemeine als wissenschaftlicher Wert (pp. 185–207). Diaphanes: Zürich/Berlin.
Le Blanc, G. (2002). La vie humaine. Anthropologie et biologie chez Georges Canguilhem. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Lebesgue, H. (1905). Sur les fonctions représentables analytiquement. Journal des mathématiques pures et appliquées, 6(1), 139–216.
Lecourt, D. (1972). L’histoire épistémologique de Georges Canguilhem. In Pour une critique de l’épistémologie (pp. 64–97). Paris: Maspéro.
Macherey, P. (1964). La philosophie de la science de Georges Canguilhem. Épistémologie et histoire des sciences. La pensée, 113, 50–74.
Merleau-Ponty, M (1963). The structure of behavior (A. L. Fisher, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
Métraux, A. (2005). Georges Canguilhem als Architekt einer Philosophie des Lebenden. In C. Borck, V. Hess, & H. Schmidgen (Eds.), Maß und Eigensinn. Studien im Anschluß an Georges Canguilhem (pp. 317–346). Fink: München.
Milne-Edwards, H (1878–1879) Leçons sur la physiologie comparée de l’homme et des animaux (Vol. XIII), Paris: Masson.
Minkowski, M. (1927). L’état actuel de l’étude des réflexes (Henri Ey, Trans.). Paris: Masson.
Müller, J. (1833–1844). Handbuch der Physiologie des Menschen, I/II. Koblenz: Hölscher.
Pickering, A. (2009). The cybernetic brain. Sketches of another future. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Prochaska, G. (1797). Lehrsätze aus der Physiologie des Menschen. Wien: Wappler.
Renard, G. (1996). L’épistémologie chez Georges Canguilhem. Paris: Nathan.
Roth, X. (2013). Georges Canguilhem et l’unité de l’expérience. Juger et agir, 1926–1939. Paris: Vrin.
Schmidgen, H. (2004). Pictures, preparations, and living processes. The production of immediate visual perception (Anschauung) in late-nineteenth-century physiology. Journal of the History of Biology, 37, 477–513.
Schmidgen, H. Cerebral drawings between art and Science. On Gilles Deleuze’s philosophy of concepts. Theory, Culture and Society (in press).
Verworn, M. (1895). Allgemeine Physiologie. Ein Grundriß der Lehre vom Leben. Jena: Fischer.
von Weizsäcker, V. (1938). Geleitwort. In E. Marx (Ed.), Die Entwicklung der Reflexlehre seit Albrecht von Haller bis in die zweite Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts, Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Math.-naturwiss. Klasse (Vol. 10, pp. 3–9).
von Weizsäcker, V. (1958) Le cycle de la structure. (Der Gestaltkreis)(M. Foucault & D. Rocher, Trans.). Bruges: Desclée de Brouwer.
Whytt, R. (1751). An essay on the vital and other involuntary motions of animals. Edinburgh: Balfour and Neill.
Willis, T. (1681). The second medical and physical discourse on musculary motion. In Five treatises (pp. 34–49). London: Dring, Harper, Leigh and Martin.
Acknowledgments
The present paper is a condensed, revised and updated version of my introduction to the German translation of Canguilhem’s book on the formation of the reflex concept in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries (see Schmidgen H., 2008, “Fehlformen des Wissens”. In Georges Canguilhem, Die Herausbildung des Reflexbegriffs im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert, München: Fink, VII–LVIII). An early version of this paper was discussed in the colloquium of Department III (Hans-Jörg Rheinberger) at the Max Planck-Institute for the History of Science, Berlin. I am thankful for the criticism and comments that I received in this forum. I would also like to thank Karl Hall (Central European University, Budapest) and Travis Gaug (Regensburg University) for their corrections of my English.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmidgen, H. The life of concepts:. HPLS 36, 232–253 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-014-0030-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-014-0030-1