Skip to main content
Log in

Visual Translations: Medicine, Art, China and the West

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the history of medicine, relatively little attention has been paid to the way medical illustration circulated globally—or to the issues raised by the cultural “translation” of such images. My goal here is to flesh out some of the history of this circulation and translation by exploring the aesthetic and medical connections between two specific anatomical collections, both housed at the Gordon Pathology Museum at Guy’s Hospital, London. The Joseph Towne collection of anatomical waxes and the Lam Qua paintings of the patients of medical missionary Peter Parker were both produced in the nineteenth century. Significantly, the two collections were part of related but culturally specific shifts in the way bodies (and diseased bodies) were viewed, represented, understood and treated. I explore some of the convergences and divergences between Western and Chinese medical and artistic priorities and will address some of the issues raised by them. These two collections are important, I argue, because they demonstrate how aesthetic considerations shape medical knowledge and wider attitudes about the human body.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Of these Lam Qua-Parker portraits, there are 80 oil paintings held at Yale University Medical Historical Library, 23 hang at the Gordon Museum, four at Cornell University and one at the Peabody Essex Museum in Salem, Mass. There are also 15 gouache images in the Welcome Collection, London.

  2. Traditionally, it has been thought that Smugglerius was either one of the smugglers Benjamin Harley or Thomas Henman, hanged at Tyburn in May 1776 for murdering a customs-house officer who had intercepted them trafficking tea. However, this has been challenged by Artist Joan Smith and anthropologist Dr Jeanne Cannizzo, from the University of Edinburgh, who argue that the identity of Smugglerius was James Langar who was convicted at the Old Bailey as a “footpad”—a highwayman without a horse—and hanged in 1776. Yet, it was unlikely since Langar, as only a thief and not a murderer, would not have been sent for dissection after death, whereas Harley and Henman were subject to the Murder Act, and accordingly sentenced “to be afterwards dissected and anatomized; which sentence was executed upon them.”

  3. As told to Renilde Hammacher in an interview published in the Rotterdam catalogue, 13–23.

  4. At least in Britain, in the first decades of the nineteenth century, they seemed to disappear as public anatomical exhibitions took a hiatus.

  5. Maerker translates and quotes from the 1775 La Specola museum guide.

  6. This sketch comes from a file of Burke & Hare ephemera at Edinburgh Central Library. It bears the inscription “Jessie Patterson—model for the Life Academy—murdered by Burke and Hare—drawn by J Oliphant.”There is a second sketch in the National Library of Scotland, which is similar but looks as though the woman were face down, as if on a dissection table. It bears the inscription, “The unfortunate girl Paterson as she lay exposed on the table of Dr Knox for dissection the day after her murder”(Rosner 2010, 114–115).

  7. CR = Christian Repository Magazine.

  8. Years after Parker’s retirement, other medical missionaries were using very similar language in new medical projects. In an 1885 address on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the Canton hospital, T. W. Pearce observed that “the Chinese write and speak pictures”; therefore, “the hospital is a picture” that “supplies ocular evidence” of foreign faith in both surgery and God (In Cadbury and Jones 1935, 132).

  9. Also recorded in Gilman (1986, 62).

  10. Lawrence Weschler suggests that the reviewer was Oliver Wendell Holmes (Mr Wilson’s Cabinet of Wonder (1995, 140).

  11. I have seen this reference in other sources in the mid-1800s, supposedly written by “Mr. Lewes,” who I presume is George Henry Lewes, critic, philosopher and writer.

References

  • Alberti, Samuel J.M.M. 2011. Morbid curiosities: Medical museums in the nineteenth-century. Oxford: Oxford UP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Albinus, B.S. 1747. Tabulae sceleti et musculorum coporis humani. Basel: J. and H. Verbeek.

  • Alley, Ronald. 1981. Catalogue of the Tate Gallery’s collection of modern art, other than works by British artists. London: Tate Gallery and Sotheby Parke-Bernet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrell, John. 1989. “The Dangerous Goddess”: Masculinity, prestige, and the aesthetic in early eighteenth-century Britain. Cultural Critique 12: 101–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, John. 1794. Engravings, explaining the anatomy of the bones, muscles, and joints. Edinburgh: John Paterson.

  • Bennett, Tony. 1988. The exhibitionary complex. New Formations 4: 73–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bichat, Xavier. (1799) 1815. Physiological researches on life and death (trans: Gold, F.). London: Longman, Hunt, Rees, Orme and Browne.

  • Bidloo, Govard. 1685. Anatomia humani corporis. Amsterdam: Someren, Dyk, Hendrick & Boom.

  • Bridgman, Elijah Coleman and Samuel Wells Williams, eds. 1834. Chinese repository. vol. 2. Canton: For the proprietors.

  • Bridgman, Elijah Coleman and Samuel Wells Williams, eds. 1837. Chinese repository, vol. 5.

  • Bridgman, Elijah Coleman and Samuel Wells Williams, eds. 1839. Chinese repository, vol. 7.

  • Cadbury, William Warder, and Mary Hoxie Jones. 1935. At the point of a lancet: One hundred years of the Canton hospital, 1835–1935. Shanghai: Kelly & Walsh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesleden, William. 1733. Osteographia, or the anatomy of the bones. London: Chesleden.

  • Cunningham, Andrew. 2010. The anatomist anatomis’d: An experimental discipline in enlightenment Europe. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. 1992. The image of objectivity. Representations 40: 81–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fau, Julien. 1849. The anatomy of the external forms of man (trans: Robert Knox). London: Hippolyte Bailliere.

  • Fisher, Colonel C.B. 1863. Narrative of three years’ service in China. London: Bentley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. (1970/2002). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage.

  • Foucault, Michel. (1973/2003). The birth of the clinic. New York: Routledge.

  • Gilman, Sander. 1986. Lam Qua and the development of a westernized medical iconography in China. Medical History 30: 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayot, Eric. 2009. The hypothetical Mandarin: Sympathy, modernity, and Chinese pain. Oxford: Oxford UP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, Ari Larissa. 2008. The Afterlife of images: Translating the pathological body between China and the West. Durham: Duke.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkinson, Francis. (1789) 1793. An Oration, which might have been delivered to the Students in Anatomy. In American Poems, selected and original. Litchfield: Collier and Buel.

  • Hunter, William. 1774. Anatomia uteri humani gravidi (The anatomy of the human gravid uterus). Birmingham: J. Baskerville.

  • Hunter, William. 1784. Two introductory lectures. London: Joseph Johnson.

  • Hodgkin, Thomas. 1829. A catalogue of the preparations in the anatomical museum of Guy’s Hospital. London: Watts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Walter Keating. 1869. A collection of the proverbs of all nations. Andover: Warren F. Draper.

  • Kemp, Martin. 1993. “The Mark of Truth”: looking and learning in some anatomical illustrations from the Renaissance and eighteenth century. Eds. William Bynum and Porter Roy. Medicine and the five senses. Cambridge: CUP, 85–121.

  • Kemp, Martin. 2010. Style and non-style in anatomical illustration: From Renaissance humanism to Henry Gray. Journal of Anatomy 216(2): 192–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuriyama, Shigehisa. 2002. The expressiveness of the body and the divergence of Greek and Chinese Medicine. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Weschler. 1995. Mr wilson’s cabinet of wonder. New York: Random House.

  • Lonsdale, Henry. 1870. A sketch of the life and writings of Robert Knox, the anatomist. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leighton, Alexander. 1861. The court of cacus; or the story of Burke and Hare. London: Houlston & Wright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, Maclise. 1851. Surgical anatomy. London: John Churchill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maerker, Anna. 2006. The anatomical models of La Specola: Production, uses, and reception. Nuncius: Journal of the History of Science 21(2):295–321.

  • Massey, Lyle. 2008. On waxes and wombs: Eighteenth-century representations of the gravid uterus. Ed. Roberta Panzanelli. Ephemeral bodies: Wax sculpture and the human figure. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute.

  • Millard, Ann. 1825. An account of the circumstances attending the imprisonment and death of the late William Millard, formerly Superintendent of the Theatre of Anatomy of St. Thomas’s Hospital, Southwark. London: Ann Millard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickstone, John. 2001. Ways of knowing: A new history of science, technology, and medicine. Chicago: Chicago UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Roy. 1999. The greatest benefit to mankind: a medical history of humanity. New York: W. W. Norton & co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberta, Ballestriero. 2010. Anatomical models and wax Venuses: art masterpieces or scientific craft works? Journal of Anatomy 216: 223–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachman, Stephen. 2004. Memento morbi: Lam Qua’s paintings, Peter Parker’s patients. Literature and Medicine 1: 134–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rackstrow, Museum. 1790. A brief description of those curious and excellent figures of the human anatomy in wax... the works of the late celebrated mons. Denone. London: Rackstrow.

  • Rosner, Lisa. 2010. The anatomy murders. Philadelphia: U of Penn Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roughead, William (ed.). 1921. Burke and Hare. London: William Hodge and Company Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawday, Jonathan. 1997. The body emblazoned: Dissection and the human body in Renaissance culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, John Thomas. 1828. Nollekens and his times, vol. 2. London: H. Colburn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, Barbara Maria. 1991. Body criticism: Imaging the unseen in enlightenment art and medicine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The descriptive catalogue of the anatomical museum of the Boston Society for Medical Improvement. Boston: William D. Ticknor & Co., 1847.

  • Tiffany, Osmond. 1849. The Canton Chinese, or the American sojourn in the Celestial Empire. Boston: James Monroe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Corinna (ed.). 2014. Gothic evolutions: Poetry, tales, context, theory. Peterborough, ON: Broadview.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am very grateful to Bill Edwards, curator of the Gordon Pathology Museum, and Eleanor Crook, artist in residence there, and creator of wax anatomical models. My conversations with both, and my lesson in wax modeling with Eleanor have been immeasurably helpful in thinking about Joseph Towne’s work. I presented a short version of this paper at the British Association of Victorian Studies, September 2014. I am indebted to my copanelists Regenia Gagnier and Paul Young, and the audience for their insightful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corinna Wagner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wagner, C. Visual Translations: Medicine, Art, China and the West. Fudan J. Hum. Soc. Sci. 8, 193–234 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-015-0072-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-015-0072-0

Keywords

Navigation