Skip to main content
Log in

Export Competition in China: Evidence from Data at Provincial Level

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Through an analysis of the effects of Guangdong on exports from other provinces, this paper examines China’s interregional relationships regarding exports. We utilize provincial level data from 1998 to 2008 and apply the system GMM to estimate an empirical model derived from the gravity equation. The results indicate that Guangdong significantly crowds out exports from other provinces. Coastal provinces are less affected than their non-coastal counterparts. In coastal areas, the displacement effect on the Yangtze River Delta is less than that on the Pan Bohai Rim. Further research reveals that the improvements in service industries, labor productivity, capital-labor ratio, and agglomeration of manufacturing industries have significantly reduced export competition. Additionally, a province with a larger market potential or a lower degree of market disintegration is less affected by Guangdong’s export competition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These nine countries are big economies and leading importers in the world. More importantly, these countries are China’s major trading partners. In addition, during the whole sample period, China’s position in the imports of these nine countries has been enhanced all the way.

  2. The nearest port to Hebei is Tianjin rather than Qinhuangdao, and the nearest port to Jiangsu is Shanghai rather than Lianyungang. Using Qinhuangdao and Lianyungang as the respective ports of Hebei and Jiangsu makes no difference.

  3. Besides Guangdong, coastal regions include the Pan Bohai Rim (Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Liaoning, and Shandong), the Yangtze River Delta (Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Shanghai) and Fujian, Guangxi, and Hainan.

  4. Although Hebei is in the Pan Bohai Rim, its export-GDP ratio is only 8 % during 1998–2008.

  5. The author is grateful to Haojie Shan at Shenyin & Wanguo Securities for data of provincial capital stock (Shan 2008, pp. 17–32). Labor in capital-labor ratio refers to the employed population at the end of the year.

  6. Take average wage for example, Shanghai, Beijing, Zhejiang, Tianjin, and Jiangsu rank the top five, with scores of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 respectively.

  7. The distance within a province is 2/3 of its geographic radius: D jj =\( 2/3 \cdot \sqrt {Area_{j} /\pi } \), and the area is the land area of a province (Reading and Venables 2004, pp. 53–82).

References

  • Arellano, M., and S. Bond. 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 58(2): 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, M., and O. Bover. 1995. Another look at the instrumental variables estimation of Error-Components models. Journal of econometrics 68(1): 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, C., Y. Du, Z. Tao, and Y. Quan. 2004. Local protectionism and industrial concentration in China: overall trend and important factors. Economic Research Journal 4: 29–40. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrand, J.H. 1985. The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics 67(3): 474–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R., and S. Bond. 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of econometrics 87(1): 115–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., and Y. Xu. 2008. Changes in the spatial structure of China manufacturing industries and its influence on regional specialization. Economic Research Journal 10: 104–116. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, R.C., J.R. Markusen, and A.K. Rose. 2001. Using the gravity equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade. Canadian journal of economics 34(2): 430–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C.D. 1954. The market as a factor in the localization of industry in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 44(4): 315–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, H., Y. Qian, and B. Weingast. 2005. Regional decentralization and fiscal incentives: federalism, Chinese style. Journal of public economics 89(9-10): 1719–1742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, M., and Z. Chen. 2009. Fragmented growth: why economic opening may worsen domestic market segmentation. Economic Research Journal 3: 42–52. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, W., and Z. Li. 2007. Feedback and spillover effects between coastal and non-coastal regions in China. Economic Research Journal 5: 68–77. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poncet, S. 2003. Measuring China’s domestic and international integration. China economic review 14(1): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Y., G. Roland, and C. Xu. 1999. Why China is different from Eastern Europe? Perspectives from organization theory. European Economic Review 43(4–6): 1085–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redding, S., and A.J. Venables. 2004. Economic geography and international inequality. Journal of International Economics 62(1): 53–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, D. 2009. How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in stata. The stata journal 9(1): 86–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan, H. 2008. Reestimating the capital stock in China: 1952–2006. Journal of quantitative and technical economics 10: 17–32. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X. 2002. Have the Chinese provinces become integrated under reform? China economic review 13(2–3): 116–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. 2000. The razor’s edge: distortions and incremental reform of the People’s Republic of China. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(4): 1091–1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. 2006. Fiscal decentralization and political centralization in China: Implications for regional inequality. Journal of comparative economics 34(4): 713–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., T. Zhang, and T. Huang. 2010. Does domestic market segmentation push firms’ exporting. Economic Research Journal 8: 29–41. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, X., X. Jin, and D. Luo. 2005. Market segmentation and the expansion of China’s export. Economic Research Journal 12: 68–76. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to two anonymous referees for their suggestions. The authors are also grateful to Zhao Chen, Dazhong Cheng, Min Hua, Jiuli Huang, Ming Lu, Haojie Shan, Suhua Tian, Xiangshuo Yin, Tangjun Yuan, Jun Zhang, and Yuan Zhang for their comments. Changyuan Luo acknowledges financial support from National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals, National Social Sciences Foundation (11CJL039), Shanghai Pujiang Program (12PJC085), MOE Project of Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences at Universities (13JJD790004) and Project for Young Scholars of Fudan University. All remaining errors in this paper are solely their own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changyuan Luo.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhi, Y., Luo, C. Export Competition in China: Evidence from Data at Provincial Level. Fudan J. Hum. Soc. Sci. 7, 621–638 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-014-0047-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-014-0047-6

Keywords

Navigation