Abstract
Urbanization, industrialization and human population explosion not only increased the global power demand, but also led to global warming, pollution and climate change. This encouraged production of power from renewable sources, and thus, hydropower development has been focused. Today, there is more than 1300 GW of installed hydropower across the world, and most of the hydroelectric projects (HEPs) are multi-purpose which includes irrigation, flood and drought mitigation and tourism. Although credited as cheap, clean and green, recent studies demonstrate that the reservoirs of HEPs produce enormous quantities of greenhouse gases (GHGs), including carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O). A large number of estimates on the amount of GHGs from HEPs are available from across the globe. India is next only to USA and China in terms of number of large dams, and thousands of new dams are being planned or constructed, especially in the northeastern part. However, none of these projects have been analyzed in terms of production of GHGs, which is an essential prerequisite for developing such projects and to determine whether carbon emission reduction credits can be accorded or not. The present study was conducted to determine greenness of some of the HEPs of Northeast India in terms of emission of GHGs, and eligibility of the projects for carbon emission reduction credits. Further, the emission of different GHGs through various processes from the Tipaimukh HEP (Manipur) was estimated. In view of the findings, we have provided recommendations, which may be helpful in decision-making process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arora V, Kipgen N (2012) ‘We can live without power, but we can’t live without our land’: indigenous Hmar oppose the Tipaimukh dam in Manipur. Sociol Bull 61(1):109–128
Barros N, Cole JJ, Tranvik LJ, Prairie YT, Bastviken D, Huszar VLM, de Giorgio P, Roland F (2011) Carbon emissions from hydroelectric reservoirs linked to reservoir age and latitude. Nat Geosci 4:593–596
Bastviken D, Cole JJ, Pace M, Tranvik L (2004) Methane emissions from lakes: dependence of lake characteristics, two regional assessments, and a global estimate. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002238
Bastviken D, Cole JJ, Pace ML, Van de Bogert MC (2008) Fates of methane from different lake habitats: connecting whole-lake budgets and CH4 emissions. J Geophys Res Biogeosci. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000608
Bastviken D, Tranvik LJ, Downing JA, Crill PM, Enrich-Prast A (2011) Freshwater methane emissions offset the continental carbon sink. Science 331:50
Beaulieu JJ, McManus MG, Nietch CT (2016) Estimates of reservoir methane emissions based on a spatially balanced probabilistic-survey. Limnol Oceanogr 61:S27–S40
Bouwman AF, van der Hoek KW, Oliver JGJ (1995) Uncertainties in the global source distribution of nitrous oxide. J Geophys Res 100:2785–2800
BP Statistical Review of World Energy (2019) 68th edition. BP p.l.c. 1 St James’s Square London SW1Y 4PD UK sr@bp.com. https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2019-full-report.pdf. Accessed 22 Sept 2019
Brown PH, Tullos D, Tilt B, Magee D, Wolf AT (2009) Modeling the cost and benefits of dam construction from multidisciplinary perspective. J Environ Manag 90:S303–S311
Choudhury A (2013) The mammals of North East India, 1st edn. Gibbon Books, Guwahati
Choudhury NB, Dey Choudhury SR (2020) Implications for planning of hydroelectric projects in Northeast India: an analysis of the impacts of the Tipaimukh project. GeoJournal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10158-8
Chow MF, Bakhrojin MAB, Haris H, Dinesh AA (2018) Assessment of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission from hydropower reservoirs in Malaysia. Proceedings 1380:1–5. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2221380
Deemer BR, Harrison JA, Li S, Beaulieu JJ, Delsontro T, Barros N, Bezerra-Neto JF, Powers SM, Dos Santos MA, Vonk JA (2016) Greenhouse gas emissions from reservoir water surfaces: a new global synthesis. Bioscience 66(11):949–964
DelSontro T, Kunz MJ, Kempter T, Wüest A, Wehrli B, Senn DB (2011) Spatial heterogeneity of methane ebullition in a large tropical reservoir. Environ Sci Technol 45:9866–9873. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2005545
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), USA (2012) Global anthropogenic emissions of non-CO2 greenhouse gases: 1990–2030 report. www.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/EPAactivities/EPA_Global_NonCO2_Projections_Dec2012.pdf
Fearnside PM (2015) Emissions from tropical hydropower and the IPCC. Environ Sci Policy 50:225–239
Fearnside PM (2016) Green house gas emissions from hydroelectric dams in tropic forests. In: Lehr J, Keeley J (eds) Alternative energy and Shale gas encyclopedia. Wiley, New York, p 912
Gagnon L, Belanger C, Uchiyama Y (2002) Life-cycle assessment of electricity generation options: the status of research in year 2001. Energy Policy 30:1267–1278
Galy-Lacaux C, Delmas R, Kouadio G, Richar S, Goss P (1999) Long-term green house gas emissions from hydroelectric reservoirs in tropical forest regions. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 13(2):503–517
Giles J (2006) Methane quashes green credentials of hydropower. Nature Publishing Group, Berlin
Goldenfum JA (2010) GHG measurement guidelines for freshwater reservoirs. The International Hydropower Association, London. ISBN 978-0-9566228-0-8
Gómez-Gener L, Gubau M, von Schiller D, Marcé R, Obrador B (2018) Effect of small water retention structures on diffusive CO2 and CH4 emissions along a highly impounded river. Inland Waters. https://doi.org/10.1080/20442041.2018.1457846
Government of India (GoI) (2018) Dam safety bill, 2018: a step towards standardizing and strengthening dam safety practices and institutions. Press Information Bureau, Ministry of Water Resources, Govt. of India. www.pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=180056. Accessed 22 Sept 2019
Guérin F, Abril G, Tremblay A, Delmas R (2008) Nitrous oxide emissions from tropical hydroelectric reservoirs. Geophys Res Lett 35(L06404):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL033057
Huda MS (2017) Envisioning the future of cooperation on common rivers in South Asia: a cooperative security approach by Bangladesh and India to the Tipaimukh Dam. Water Int 42(1):54–72
IEA (International Energy Agency) (2008) Electricity/heat in world in 2008. http://go.nature.com/6mAAWK. Accessed 22 Sept 2019
IHA (International Hydropower Association) (2020) Hydropower status report: sector trends and insights, p 46. http://hydropower.org. Accessed 12 July 2020
IPCC. Climate Change (2013) The physical science basis contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 659–740. ISBN 978-1-107-66182-0
Kemenes A, Forsberg BR, Melack JM (2007) Methane release below a tropical hydroelectric dam. Geophys Res Lett 34:L12809. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl029479
Kemenes A, Forsberg BR, Melack JM (2011) CO2 emissions from a tropical hydroelectric reservoir (Balbina, Brazil). J Geophys Res 116(G03004):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JG001465
Kibler K, Tullos D, Tilt B, Wolf A, Magee D, Foster-Moore E, Gassert F (2012) Integrative dam assessment model (IDAM) documentation: users guide to the IDAM methodology and a case study from southwestern China. Oregon State University, Corvallis
Meinshausen M (2016) Paris agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2°C. Nature 534:631–639
Menon M, Vagholikar N, Kohli K, Fernandes A (2003) Large dams in the Northeast: a bright future? Ecol Asia 11(1):3–8
National Register of Large Dams (NRLD) (2019) Central water commission, Govt. of India. http://cwc.gov.in/national-register-large-dams. Accessed 21 Sept 2019
Olivier JGJ, Schure KM, Peters JAHW (2017) Trends in global CO2 and total greenhouse gas emissions: report. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Hague, pp 8–12
Osmani AR (2017) Tipaimukh multipurpose hydroelectric project: a policy perspective—Indo-Bangla priorities, indigenous peoples’ rights, and environmental concerns. In: Rao P, Patil Y (eds) Reconsidering the impact of climate change on global water supply, use, and management. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 227–251 (chapter 13)
Paucar MA, Amancha PI, San Antonio TD, Acurio LP, Valencia AF, Galarza C (2018) Methane emissions from Ecuadorian hydropower dams. Earth Environ Sci 151:012002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/151/1/012002
Prairie YT, Alm J, Beaulieu J, Barros N, Battin T, Cole J, del Giorgio P, DelSontro T, Guérin F, Harby A, Harrison J, Mercier-Blais S, Serça D, Sobek S, Vachon D (2018) Greenhouse gas emissions from freshwater reservoirs: what does the atmosphere see? Ecosystems 21(5):1058–1071
Rodhe H (1990) A comparison of the contribution of various gases to the greenhouse effect. Science 248(4960):1217–1219
Rogelj J, den Elzen M, Höhne N, Fransen T, Fekete H, Winkler H, Schaeffer R, Sha F, Riahi K, Meinshausen M (2016) Paris agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2°C. Nature 534:631–639
Singh RKR (2003) Tipaimukh. Ecol Asia 11(1):76–79
St Louis VL, Kelly CA, Duchemin É, Rudd JW, Rosenberg DM (2000) Reservoir surfaces as sources of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere: a global estimate. Bioscience 50:766–775
Steinhurst W, Knight P, Schultz M (2012) Hydropower greenhouse gas emissions: state of the research. Synapse Energy Economics, Inc., Cambridge, 24 p
Team CW, Pachauri R, Meyer L (2014) IPCC 2014: climate change 2014—synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, p 151
UNESCO/IHA (2008) Assessment of the GHG status of freshwater reservoirs: scoping paper. Working group on Greenhouse Gas Status of Freshwater Reservoirs. International Hydrological Programme. 28p. IHP/GHG-WG/3
Varis O, Kummu M, Härkönen S, Huttunen JT (2012) Greenhouse gas emissions from reservoirs. In: Tortajada C, Altinbilek D, Biswas AK (eds) Impacts of large dams: a global assessment. Ch. 4. Springer, Berlin, pp 69–94. ISBN 978-3-642-23570-2
Varun Prakash R, Bhat IK (2012) Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions estimation for small hydropower schemes in India. Energy 44:498–508
West WE, Creamer KP, Jones SE (2015) Productivity and depth regulate lake contributions to atmospheric methane: lake productivity fuels methane emissions. Limnol Oceanogr 54:2298–2314
World Commission on Dams (WCD) (2000) Dams and development: a new framework for decision making. Earthscan, London
Yumnam J (2012) An assessment of dams in India’s north east seeking carbon credits from clean development mechanism of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Citizens’ Concern for Dams and Development, Paona Bazar, Imphal Manipur 795001, India, p 64
Funding
The present study has not been funded by any organization.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical statement
The present article does not include studies involving animal models or human subjects.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choudhury, N.B., Dey Choudhury, S.R. Evaluating the greenness of hydroelectric projects of Northeast India: a study with special reference to the Tipaimukh project. Decision 47, 293–302 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-020-00251-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-020-00251-9