Abstract
In recent years, while developed countries are decommissioning hydroelectric projects (HEPs)/dams at a higher rate than constructing new ones, developing economies are doing the opposite. Although HEPs are regarded green, renewable and cheap, recent studies reveal that they do more harm than good. The impacts of HEPs are multiple, including socio-economic, environmental and geopolitical. India’s Northeastern (NE) region is a part of the Ganges–Brahmaputra–Meghna river basin, and has immense hydropower potential. A large number of HEPs are planned or under construction in the region, mainly in the hilly states of Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Sikkim and Mizoram. One such mega project is the Tipaimukh multipurpose HEP, to be constructed on the Barak river in the state of Manipur. The project is highly controversial, and is being protested against by the locals, academicians, researchers, social activists, NGOs, as well as Bangladesh. Further, a serious cost–benefit analysis, judicious environmental impact assessment and democratic public hearings have been questioned. The area submergence of the project is disproportionately high compared to other such projects of NE India, and the project site and the adjoining areas form a part of Indo-Burma global biodiversity hotspot. The present study details the impacts of the project from multidisciplinary perspectives, categorized into bio-physical, socio-economic and geopolitical impacts, including impacts on the downstream riparian nation—Bangladesh. Based on the study, we have provided recommendations, if ever the construction of project is actualized. Since there is lack of any such analysis, the present study is of immense significance on the decision making of the project, and paves a guideline for impact analysis of the upcoming large number of projects of the region.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbasi, A. H. (2009). Tipaimukh Dam, a potential seismic bomb for South Asia. South Asian Citizens Web. Retrieved October 5, 2019 from https://www.sacw.net/article1161.html.
Ahmed, I., Debnath, J., & Das, N. (2015). Impact of river on human life: a case study on the Gumti river, Tripura. Journal of Radix International Educational and Research Consortium, 4(9), 1–13.
Ali, S. H. (2007). Water security in South Asia: Technocratic cooperation and lasting security on the Indus basin and beyond. Journal of International Affairs, 61(2), 167–172.
Anderson, J. (1878). Anatomical and zoological researches: Comprising an account of zoological results of the two expeditions to western Yunnan in 1868 and 1875; and a monograph of the two cetacean genera, Platanista and Orcella (Vol. I & II). London: Bernard Quaritch.
Arora, V., & Kipgen, N. (2012). ‘We can live without power, but we can’t live without our land’: Indigenous Hmar oppose the Tipaimukh dam in Manipur. Sociological Bulletin, 61(1), 109–128.
Asaduzzaman, M., & Rahman, M. M. (2015). Impacts of Tipaimukh dam on the down-stream region in Bangladesh: A study on probable EIA. Journal of Science Foundation, 13(1), 3–10.
Barbhuiya, A. H. (2012). Mahseer fishes of river Barak, Jatinga, Dholeswari and Ganol in North East India. Research Journal of Recent Sciences, 1(ISC-2011), 7–16.
Bayley, P. B. (1991). The flood pulse advantages and the restoration of river-floodplain systems. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 6(2), 49. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrr.3450060203.
Bhatt, C. P., Juyal, N., & Kunwar, M. (1985). Vishnuprayag project: A risky venture in higher Himalaya. In J. S. Singh (Ed.), Environmental regeneration in Himalaya, concept and strategies (pp. 410–418). Nainital: Gyanodaya Prakashan.
Bhattacharjee, U. (2013). Dam planning under the spotlight, A guide to Dam sanctioning in India (pp. 1–33). California: International Rivers. Retrieved February 11, 2020, from https://www.internationalrivers.org/sites/default/fles/attached-fles/international_rivers_report_2013_low_res_0.pdf.
Bhaumik, S. (2003). Tripura’s Gumti Dam must go. The Ecologist Asia, 11(1), 84–86.
Borgohain, P. L. (2019). Downstream impacts of the Ranganadi hydel project in Brahmaputra Basin, India: Implications for design of future projects. Environmental Development, 30, 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrr.3450060203.
Brown, P. H., Tullos, D., Tilt, B., Magee, D., & Wolf, A. T. (2009). Modeling the cost and benefits of dam construction from multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, (Suppl. 3), S303-S311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.025.
Census of India. (2011). Planning Commission, Government of India. Retrieved February 11, 2020, from http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-Common/CensusData2011.html.
Central Electricity Authority (CEA). (2019). Executive summary of power sector, May 2019. Ministry of Power, Govt. of India. File No.CEA-CH-14-11/4/2018-Coordination Division (p. 55). Retrieved February 11, 2020, from http://www.cea.nic.in/reports/monthly/executivesummary/2019/exe_summary-05.pdf.
Cernea, M. M. (1999). The economics of involuntary resettlement: Questions and challenges. Washinton, DC: World Bank. Retrieved February 11, 2020, from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/790851468773055283/pdf/multi-page.pdf.
Chakraborty, S. K. (2003). A struggle for homeland and identity. The Ecologist Asia, 11(1), 44–45.
Chandi, T., Keenan, R. J., Petheram, R. J., & Shepherd, P. (2012). Impacts of hydropower development on rural livelihood sustainability in Sikkim, India: Community perceptions. Mountain Research and Development, 32(2), 117–125.
Chazireni, E., & Chigonda, T. (2018). The socio-economic impacts of dam construction: Case of Tokwe Mukosi in Masvingo province, Zimbabwe. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 3(2), 209–217.
Chian, A. K., Kawlra, A., & Rajan, S. C. (2012). Developing a participatory model for the assessment of the proposed Tipaimukh Hydro Multipurpose dam in Manipur: An ethnographic approach to environmental valuation. Retrieved February 11, 2020, from https://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/7116/976.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Choudhury, A. (n.d.). Comments on the EIA of Dibang Multipurpose project. Retrieved October 5, 2019, from https://ercindia.org/files/eiadocuments/eiareports/Comments%20on%20Dibang%20EIA%20-%20Anwaruddin%20Choudhury.pdf.
Choudhury, A. (1997). Records of the Gharial Gavialis gangeticus (Gmelin) from the Barak river system of north-eastern India. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society, 94(1), 162–164.
Choudhury, A. (1999). Mustelids, viverrids and herpesteds of Northeast India. ENVIS Bulletin: Wildlife and Protected Areas, 2(2), 43–47.
Choudhury, A. (2000). The birds of Assam (1st ed.). Gibbon Books & World Wide Fund for Nature-India, Guwahati, India. p. 240.
Choudhury, A. (2002). Distribution and conservation of the Gaur Bos gaurus in the Indian Subcontinent. Mammal Review, 32(3), 199–226.
Choudhury, A. (2009). Significant recent ornithological records from Manipur, north-east India, with an annotated checklist. Forktail, 25, 71–89. Retrieved February 11, 2020, from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c1a9e03f407b482a158da87/t/5c21017970a6ad50aaa8224b/1545666938430/Choudhury-Manipur.pdf.
Choudhury, A. (2013a). The mammals of North East India (1st ed.). Guwahati: Gibbon Books..
Choudhury, A. (2013b). Records of Asiatic black bear in North-East India. Final report to International Association for Bear Research & Management (IBA) (p. 96). Retrieved February 11, 2020, from https://www.bearbiology.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/choudhury_As_Black_Bear_in_NE_India_FINA_REPoRT1-1.pdf.
Choudhury, A. (2016). The mammals of India: A systematic and cartographic review (1st ed., pp. 140–141). Guwahati: Gibbon Books and The Rhino Foundation for Nature in NE India, with support from Forest Bureau, COA.
Choudhury, A. (2018). Natural history of North East India series: Mammals (Vol. 1). Guwahati: Rashmi Prakashan.
Choudhury, A., & Menon, M. (2003). Kameng underestimated! The Ecologist Asia, 11(1), 71–75.
Choudhury, N. B., Mazumder, M. K., Chakravarty, H., Choudhury, A. S., Boro, F., & Choudhury, I. B. (2019). The endangered Ganges river dolphin heads towards local extinction in the Barak river system of Assam, India: Plea for conservation. Mammalian Biology, 95, 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2019.03.007.
Cooper, W. E. D. (1951a). Forty years of sports on little known Assam rivers. Part 7. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 50(1), 91–100.
Cooper, W. E. D. (1951b). Forty years of sports on little known Assam rivers. Part II. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 50(2), 313–322.
Corbet, G. B., & Hill, J. E. (1992). The mammals of the Indo-Malayan region: A systematic review. Oxford University Press.
Darlong, V. T. (1998). Environmental impact assessment in Northeast India: A case study of river valley projects. In R. C. Sundariyal, U. Shankar, & T. C. Upreti (Eds.), Perspectives for planning and development in Northeast India (Vol. 11, pp. 277–289). Almora: G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development, Himavikas Occasional Publication.
Datt, G., & Mahajan, A. (2008). Datta & Sundaram’s Indian Economy (p. 1088). New Delhi: S. Chand Publication.
Dena, L. (2008). In search of identity: Hmars of northeast India. New Delhi: Akansha Publishing House.
Dikshit, K. R., & Dikshit, J. K. (2014). North-East India: Land, people and economy. Advances in Asian Human-environmental research. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7055-3.
Dudgeon, D. (2000). Large-scale hydrological changes in Topical Asia: Prospects for riverine biodiversity. BioScience, 50(9), 793–806.
Ekierman, C., Mejia, J., & Rodrigues, C. M. (2015). The construction of the Baihetan dam: A cost-Benefit analysis. A project report submitted to the University of Chicago USA. Retrieved June 28, 2019, from https://franke.uchicago.edu/bigproblems/BPRO29000-2015/Team15-CostBenefitAnalysisoftheBaihetanDamProject.pdf.
Gangumei, K. (1991). History of Manipur: Pre-colonial period (Vol. 1). New Delhi: National Publishing House.
Giordano, M., Giordano, M., & Wolf, A. (2005). International resource conflict and mitigation. Journal of Peace Research, 42(1), 47–65.
Goldsmith, E., Hildyard, N., Bunyard, P., & McCully, P. (2003). Rivers. The Ecologist Asia, 11(1), 15–18.
Goswami, D. C., & Das, P. J. (2003). The Brahmaputra river, India. The Ecologist Asia, 11(1), 9–14.
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C., & Inskipp, T. (1999). Birds of the Indian Subcontinent (pp. 1–888). London: Oxford Press & Christopher Helm.
Han, K. T. (2018). Possible socio-economic consequences of hydropower dams on downstream communities: Case study, Hatgyi dam. Sociology and Anthropology, 6(2), 237–251.
He, H. L., & Tsukuda, E. (2003). Recent progresses of active fault research in China. Journal of Geography, 12(4), 489–520.
Huda, M.S., & Ali, S.H. (2018). Environmental peacebuilding in South Asia: Establishing consensus on hydroelectric projects in the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna (GBM) Basin. Geoforum, 96, 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.08.015.
Huda, M. S., & McDonald, M. (2016). Regional cooperation on energy in South Asia: Unraveling the political challenges in implementing transnational pipelines and electricity grids. Energy Policy, 98, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.046.
Huda, M. S. (2013). Can robust bilateral cooperation on common rivers between Bangladesh and India enhance multilateral cooperation on water security in South Asia? Strategic Analysis, 37(3), 305–309.
Huda, M. S. (2017). Envisioning the future of cooperation on common rivers in South Asia: A cooperative security approach by Bangladesh and India to the Tipaimukh Dam. Water International, 42(1), 54–72.
Ibotombi, S. (2005). Tipaimukh dam is a geotectonic blunder of International dimensions? Part 1. Retrieved June 19, 2019, from https://www.e-pao.net/epSubPageExtractor.asp?src=news_section.opinions.Opinion_on_Building_of_Tipaimukh_Dam.TIPAIMUKH_DAM_a_geotectonic_blunder_I.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Working group 2: Impacts, adaptations, and vulnerability. Retrieved February 11, 2020, from https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ar4-wg2-intro.pdf.
International Hydropower Association (IHA). (2017). Hydropower status report 2017. London.
Khan, A. S., Masud, M. S., & Palash, W. (2005). Hydrological impact study of Tipaimukh Dam project of India on Bangladesh. Institute of Water Modelling (IWM), Dhaka, Bangladesh. Retrieved January 26, 2020, form https://www.iwmbd.org..
Khan, T. A. (2007). Trans-boundary water issues in South Asia (p. 224). Dhaka: Bangladesh Environmental Lawyers Association.
Kharbuli, B., Kayang, H., Nengnong, D. D., & Buam, D. R. M. (2003). Meghalaya—Biodiversity conservation and dams. The Ecologist Asia, 11(1), 87–90.
Kibler, K., Tullos, D., Tilt, B., Wolf, A., Magee, D., Foster-Moore, E., et al. (2012). Integrative Dam Assessment Model (IDAM) documentation: Users guide to the IDAM methodology and a case study from southwestern China. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University.
Kibria, Z. (2005). “Gaining Public Acceptance” for large dams on International Rivers: The case of Tipaimukh dam in India and concerns in Lower Riparian Bangladesh. Paper presented at the workshop organized by Dams and Development project (DDP), United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), Nairobi, Kenya. Retrieved on February 11, 2020, from https://www.internationalrivers.org/resources/gaining-public-acceptance-tipaimukh-dam-in-india-concerns-of-bangladesh-2528.
Kundu, B., & Gahalaut, V. K. (2012). Earthquake occurrence processes in the Indo-Burmese wedge and Sagaing fault region. Tectonophysics, 524–525, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2011.12.031.
Mali, J. D., & Chutia, P. (2017). Impact of Ranganadi dam on Socio-economic condition of fisher community in the downstream of Ranganadi river dam, NE India. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, 6(10), 19–23.
Marchese, C. (2015). Biodiversity hotspots: A shortcut for a more complicated concept. Global Ecology and Conservation, 3, 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2014.12.008.
Mazumder, M. K., Boro, F., Barbhuiya, B., & Singha, U. (2014). A study of the winter congregation sites of the Gangetic River Dolphin in southern Assam, India, with reference to conservation. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2, 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2014.09.004.
Mazumder, M. K. (2014). Annual Migration of the Gangetic Dolphin and the fish Tenualosa (Hilsa) ilisha: Correlation or coincidence? A report from the Barak river of Assam, India. Tigerpaper, 41(4), 30–32.
Mazumder, M. K. (2018a). Crestless Himalayan Porcupine, Chinese Porcupine, Malayan Porcupine. In: A. U. Choudhury (Ed.), Natural history of North East India series: Mammals (Vol. 1, pp. 323–325). Guwahati: Rashmi Prakashan.
Mazumder, M. K. (2018b). Small Indian civet. In: A. U. Choudhury (Ed.), Natural history of North East India series: Mammals (Vol. 1, pp. 137–139). Guwahati: Rashmi Prakashan.
Mazumder, M. K. (2018c). Large Indian civet. In: A. U. Choudhury (Ed.), Natural history of North East India series: Mammals (Vol. 1, pp. 133–136). Guwahati: Rashmi Prakashan.
Mazumder, M. K. (2018d). Ganges River Dolphin. In A. U. Choudhury (Ed.), Natural history of North East India series: Mammals (Vol. 1, pp. 174–177). Guwahati: Rashmi Prakashan.
McCully, P. (1996). Silenced rivers: The ecology and politics of large dams (p. 47). Zed Books, London.
McCully, P. (2001). Silenced rivers: The ecology and politics of large dams (Enlarged and updated ed.). Zed Books, New York.
Menon, M., Vagholikar, N., Kohli, K., & Fernandes, A. (2003). Large dams in the Northeast: A bright future? The Ecologist Asia, 11(1), 3–8.
Menon, M. (2003). Saved! The story of Rathongchu. The Ecologist Asia, 11(1), 33.
Mittermeier, R. A., Turner, W. R., Larsen, F. W., Brooks, T. M., & Gascon, C. (2011). Global biodiversity conservation: The critical role of hotspots. In F. E. Zachos & J. C. Habel (Eds.), Biodiversity hotspots (pp. 3–22). London: Springer.
MoEFCC. (2012). Agenda No. 2: Diversion of 25822.14 hectares Forest land for construction of Tipaimukh HEP in Manipur (File No. 8-63/2005-FC). Proceeding of the Forest Advisory Committee Meeting. Retrieved February 11, 2020, from https://ercindia.org/archive.ercindia.org/files/fac/Meeting%2012-01-12.pdf.
MoEFCC. (2013a). Agenda No. 3: Diversion of 22777.50 hectares Forest land for construction of Tipaimukh Hydroelectric Project in Manipur (File No. 8-63/2005-FC). Proceeding of the Forest Advisory Committee Meeting. Retrieved February 11, 2020, from https://www.internationalrivers.org/sites/default/files/attached-files/forestadvisorycommittee_july_2013_minutes.pdf.
MoEFCC. (2013b). Fact sheet: Diversion of 25822.14 hectares Forest land for construction of Tipaimukh Hydroelectric Project in Manipur (File No. 8-63/2005-FC). Retrieved February 11, 2020, from http://forestsclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/AdditionalInformation/AddInfoReceived/7115124112111Agenda632005Chaudhary.pdf.
MoEFCC. (2013c). Fact sheet: Diversion of forest land for 1551.60 ha of forest land under the forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 for construction of Tipaimukh Hydro Electric Project in Mizoram (File No. 8-02/2012-FC). Retrieved on February 11, 2020, from http://www.forestsclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/AdditionalInformation/AddInfoReceived/8112122012171Tipaimukh.pdf.
Monga, P., & Lakhanpal, T. N. (1988). Rural energy alternatives in the hilly areas. New Delhi: Today and Tomorrows, Printers and Publishers.
Mukherji, A., Molden, D., Nepal, S., Rasul, G., & Wagnon, P. (2015). Himalayan waters at the crossroads: Issues and challenges. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 31(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2015.1040871.
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R., Mittermeier, C., da Fonseca, G., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403(6772), 853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501.
Nath, S. R. (2000). Indian Environment Protection and Forest Conservation Acts and accelerated construction of hydro electric projects. A critical review and case studies. In R. S. Goel (Ed.), Environment, management in Hydropower and River Valley Project. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., Pvt. Ltd.
National Hydroelectric Power Corporation (NHPC). (2016). Performance highlights archives. Retrieved January 31, 2020, from https://www.nhpcindia.com/performance-highlights.htm.
Obour, P. B., Owusu, K., Agyeman, E. A., Ahenkan, A., & Madrid, A. N. (2016). The impacts of dams on local livelihoods: A study of the Bui Hydroelectric project in Ghana. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 32(2), 286–300.
O'Connor, J. E., Duda, J. J., & Grant, G. E. (2015). 1000 Down and counting. Science, 348(6234), 496–497.
Osmani, A. R. (2017). Tipaimukh multipurpose hydroelectric project: a policy perspective—Indo-Bangla priorities, indigenous peoples’ rights, and environmental concerns. In P. Rao & Y. Patil (Eds.), Reconsidering the impact of climate change on global water supply, use, and management (Chap. 13, pp. 227–251). Hershey: IGI Global.
Pamei, A. (2001). Havoc of Tipaimukh high dam project. Economic and Political Weekly, 36(13), 1045–1148.
Pamei, A. (2009). Say no to Tipaimukh dam. Paper presented at the Seminar on Tipaimukh Mega Dam Project: Looking into the International River Laws, Environmental and Human Security prospective, Organized by the Centre for Human Rights, Development and Human Security, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Retrieved January 31, 2020, from https://dailyalochona.blogspot.com/2009/08/alochona-say-no-to-tipaimukh-dam.html.
Perera, R. (2016). Cost-benefit analysis of proposed Mini Hydropower dam in Gatambe, Sri Lanka. A thesis submitted to the Asian University for women.
Poff, N. L., Allan, J. D., Bain, M. B., Karr, J. R., Prestegaard, K. L., Richter, B. D., et al. (1997). The natural flow regime: A paradigm for conservation and restoration of river ecosystems. BioScience, 47(11), 769–784.
Poff, N. L., & Hart, D. D. (2002). How dams vary and why it matters for the emerging science of dam removal. BioScience, 52(8), 59–68.
Pulipaka, S., Gorthi, H., & Sircar, S. (2016). North-East India—An overview of political frameworks, economy and connectivity. Indian Journal of Public Administration, LXII(3), 383–398.
Purtill, C. (2012). Don’t repeat our mistakes on dam building, US urges Asia. Retrieved January 31, 2020, from https://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/5505-Don-t-repeat-our-mistakes-on-dam-building-US-urges-Asia.
Pyatt, G. (2011). Hydro diplomacy of regional cooperation over Himalayan watersheds. South Asia Journal,1, 24–27. Retrieved February 11, 2020, from http://southasiajournal.net/geoffrey-pyatt-hydro-diplomacy-for-regional-cooperation-over-himalayan-watersheds/.
Raatan, T. (2004). Economic development of Manipur. Encyclopedia of North-east India (Vol. 3). Delhi: Kalpaz Publications.
Roluahpuia. (2018). Hydro-nation, discourse and discontent in Northeast India: The case of Tipaimukh Dam, Manipur. Society and Culture in South Asia, 4(2), 1–23.
Sahani, K. (1988). The environment challenges in Himachal Pradesh. In S. K. Chanda (Ed.), Himalayas ecology and environment. New Delhi: Mittal Publication.
Shah, T., & Amarasinghe, U. A. (2016). River linking project: A solution or problem to India’s Water Woes? In V. Narain & A. Narayanamoorthy (Eds.), Indian water policy at the crossroads: Resources, technology and reforms. Global issues in water policy (Vol. 16, Chap. 7, pp. 109–130). Switzerland: Springer.
Singh, K. J. (2017a). Area submergence of Tipaimukh dam, India. International Journal of Engineering Technology Science and Research, 4(3), 266–274.
Singh, L. S., Singh, K. M., & Dhar, I. (2018). Problems and prospects of dams in Manipur. IOSR Journal of Applied Geology and Geophysics, 6(3), 30–35.
Singh, O. B. (2007–2008). Economic survey of Manipur. Imphal. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Government of Manipur.
Singh, R. K. R. (2003a). Tipaimukh. The Ecologist Asia, 11(1), 76–79.
Singh, S. (2003b). Social and environmental impacts of large dams in India. The Ecologist Asia, 11(1), 61–70.
Singh, V. K. (2017b). Ranganadi floods, yet again. The Telegraph (Regional daily newspaper). Retrieved October 15, 2019, from https://www.telegraphindia.com/states/north-east/ranganadi-floods-yet-again/cid/1436149.
Singha, T. P., Dutta, B. K., & Biswas, S. P. (2013). The status of the Ganges River Dolphin Platanista gangetica gangetica in the river Barak, Assam, India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 110(2), 129–134.
Singha, T. P. (2009). Habitat ecology and conservation strategy of the Fresh Water Dolphin, Platanista gangetica Roxburgh, in the River Barak in Southern Assam. A thesis submitted to Assam University, Silchar, India (p. 297).
Srivasstava, R. N., & Goel, R. S. (2000). Measure for effective environmental management in hydropower and river valley projects. In R. S. Goel (Ed.), Environmental impact assessment of water resources project. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., Pvt. Ltd.
Sun, Q. (2013). Partial social cost-benefit analysis of Three Gorges dam: Impact assessment update and a green house gas externality component study. A thesis submitted to Dalhousie University, Halifax, Novascotia.
Timilsina, G. R., & Toman, M. (2016). Potential gains from expanding regional electricity trade in South Asia. Energy Economics, 60, 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.08.023.
Timilsina, G. R., & Toman, M. (2018). Carbon pricing and cross-border electricity trading for climate change mitigation in South Asia. Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy, 7(2), 1–14.
Timilsina, G. R. (2018). How would cross-border electricity trade stimulate hydropower development in South Asia? Policy Research Working Paper 8513. World Bank Group. Retrieved December 26, 2019, from https://www.worldbank.org/research.
Tiwari, P.C., & Joshi, B. (2012). Environmental changes and sustainable development of water resources in the Himalayan headwaters of India. Water Resources Management, 26(4), 883–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9825-y.
United Nations Committee on Economic Development (UNCED). (1993). Agenda 21. New York: United Nations Publications.
Vagholikar, N., & Das, P. J. (2010). Damming Northeast India. Kalpavriksh, Aaranyak and ActionAid India. Retrieved on February 11, 2020, from https://chimalaya.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/damming-northeast-india-final.pdf.
Vaholikar, N., & Ahmed, F. (2003). Tracking a hydel project: the story of Lower Subansiri. The Ecologist Asia, 11(3), 25–32.
Wangkheirakpam, R. (2003). Lessons from Loktak. The Ecologist Asia, 11(3), 19–24.
WB. (2018). The potential of intra-regional trade for South Asia. World Bank Infographic. Retrieved January 31, 2020, from https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/infographic/2016/05/24/the-potential-of-intra-regional-trade-for-south-asia.
Webber, M., & McDonald, B. (2004). Involuntary resettlement, production, and income: evidence from Xiaolangdi, PRC. World Development, 32(4), 673–690.
Whitelaw, E., & MacMullan, E. (2002). A framework for estimating the costs and benefits of dam removal. BioScience, 52(8), 724–730.
Wijayatunga, P., Chattopadhyay, D., & Fernando, P. N. (2015). Cross-border power trading in South Asia: A techno economic rationale. ADB South Asia Working paper series. No. 38. Asian Development Bank. Retrieved December 27, 2019, from https://www.adb.org.
Williams, K. J., Ford, A., Rosauer, D. F., De Silva, N., Mittermeier, R., Bruce, C., et al. (2011). Forests of east Australia: The 35th biodiversity hotspot. In F. E. Zachos & J. C. Habel (Eds.), Biodiversity hotspots (pp. 295–310). London: Springer.
World Commission on Dams (WCD). (2000). Dams and development: A new framework for decision making. London: Earthscan.
Funding
The study has not been funded by any organisation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights
The study involves no human participant or animals.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choudhury, N.B., Dey Choudhury, S.R. Implications for planning of hydroelectric projects in Northeast India: an analysis of the impacts of the Tipaimukh project. GeoJournal 86, 1999–2019 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10158-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10158-8