Abstract
Introduction
Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy are leading causes of renal allograft failure. Shear wave elastography could be a promising noninvasive method for providing information on the state of the kidney, with specific regard to fibrosis but currently available data in the literature are controversial. Our study aimed to analyze the correlation between shear wave elastography and various kidney dysfunction measures.
Methods
This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021283152). We systematically searched three major databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL) for articles concerning renal transplant recipients, shear wave elastography, fibrosis, and kidney dysfunction. Meta-analytical calculations for pooled Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients (r) were interpreted with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was tested with Cochran’s Q test. I2 statistic and 95% CI were reported as a measurement of between-study heterogeneity. Study quality was assessed with the QUADAS2 tool.
Results
In total, 16 studies were included in our meta-analysis. Results showed a moderate correlation between kidney stiffness and interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, graded according to BANFF classification, on biopsy findings for pooled Pearson (r = 0.48; CI: 0.20, 0.69; I2 = 84%) and Spearman correlations (r = 0.57; CI: 0.35, 0.72; I2 = 74%). When compared to kidney dysfunction parameters, we found a moderate correlation between shear wave elastography and resistive index (r = 0.34 CI: 0.13, 0.51; I2 = 67%) and between shear wave elastography and estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) (r = -0.65; CI: − 0.81, − 0.40; I2 = 73%). All our outcomes had marked heterogeneity.
Conclusion
Our results showed a moderate correlation between kidney stiffness measured by shear wave elastography and biopsy results. While noninvasive assessment of kidney fibrosis after transplantation is an important clinical goal, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of elastography over the performance of a kidney biopsy.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
It is known that pathways of renal graft dysfunction ultimately lead to a common endpoint: fibrosis. Therefore, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy are considered the most common causes of allograft loss [1]. Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy start early after transplantation and are rooted in multiple causes, including acute or persistent subclinical rejection and ischemia–reperfusion injury [2]. These conditions result in increased serum creatinine, decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), proteinuria, and hypertension [1, 3].
It is crucial to monitor allograft function after transplantation. Currently, information provided by kidney biopsy can clarify the diagnosis of graft dysfunction and serve as a guide to clinical management [4]. Although biopsies are considered safe, they hold risks, and major complications include arteriovenous fistula, hemorrhage and rarely even graft loss [5,6,7,8]. Additionally, biopsies cannot be performed in the presence of severe thrombocytopenia, anticoagulant usage, severe hypertension, bacteremia, or uncorrectable coagulopathy [9, 10].
In the past decade, options to minimize the need for invasive procedures have been explored. Ultrasound-based elastography seems to be a promising modality for assessing the state of the kidney, as changes in tissue elasticity are linked to pathological processes [11].
Shear wave elastography is a form of dynamic elastography that provides information on the elastic properties of tissues by measuring shear-wave speed [12]. It has already proven to be useful in the detection of liver fibrosis; broadening of its application to other organs, including the breast, prostate, lymph nodes, thyroid, and kidneys is being tested [12]. However, apart from their highly anisotropic nature, urinary pressure, vascular perfusion, hydronephrosis, and body mass index can affect shear wave elastography results [1]. Many studies have reported the link between kidney elasticity and fibrosis; still, there are conflicting data on this relationship. Some studies observed no correlation between kidney stiffness measured by shear wave elastography and biopsy results [13, 14], while others report that stiffness is positively correlated to fibrosis [10, 15]. Given the controversy, we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the correlation between shear wave elastography findings, biopsy results, and renal dysfunction parameters in kidney transplant recipients.
Methods
Our systematic review and meta-analysis is reported following the recommendations of the PRISMA 2020 guidelines [16] (see Supplementary Table S1) while referring to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [17]. The protocol of the study was registered on PROSPERO under registration number CRD42021283152.
Literature search, data sources, and study selection
Our systematic search was conducted on October 17, 2021, in three major medical databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL). On February 15, 2023, we reran our systematic search to identify additional relevant articles. Language or date restrictions were not applied. The search key used in all databases is detailed in the supplementary material (Table S2.). All types of observational studies investigating kidney transplant recipients and reporting the correlation coefficient for shear wave elastography values and kidney dysfunction parameters were found eligible. Kidney dysfunction parameters were defined as fibrosis, resistive index, serum creatinine, and eGFR. Animal studies, reviews, letters, case reports, and studies using transient- or magnetic resonance elastography were excluded.
Two independent review authors (TF and ASz) performed the selection of potentially eligible studies. We used EndNote X9 (Clarivate Analytics) reference manager software in the article selection process. After duplicate removal, selection by title and abstract was followed by the selection of full texts. We measured inter-rater consistency with Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ), calculated after each step. If there were disagreements regarding a study, its eligibility was decided by a third reviewer (BT).
Backward and forward citation searching of all eligible articles was also conducted to identify further articles.
Two authors (TF and AF) collected data from the eligible articles independently. A third reviewer (BT) helped to resolve disagreements. We collected data in pre-defined Excel sheets (Microsoft Corporation). The extracted contents included: study characteristics: first author, publication year, Digital Object Identifier, study design, study location, and the number of patients; and baseline patient data: age, gender, time elapsed since transplantation, alive or deceased donation, and Banff fibrosis scores (if applicable). We also collected technical features of the ultrasound devices, the shear wave elastography technique, and raw data about shear wave elastography and available details on operators. Regarding the outcomes of our study, the correlation coefficients (Pearson's or Spearman's) and corresponding p values between shear wave elastography and kidney dysfunction parameters were calculated. Study authors were contacted if important data were not reported in the articles.
Study quality evaluation
The risk of bias assessment was carried out independently by two authors (FT, AF) using the QUADAS-2 tool [18], which consists of two parts: concerns about bias and practical applicability. The former was assessed in terms of the following four domains: patient selection, index test, reference standard, and flow and timing; the latter enclosed three elements: patient selection, index test, and reference standard. In case of disagreements about the quality of a study, a third investigator (BT) helped in the decision.
Strategy for data synthesis
A minimum of three studies per outcome were required to be included in our meta-analysis. Outcomes that did not reach this number were only included in Forest plots for visualization. The statistical analysis of data was carried out using the R programming language (R Core Team, 2019, version 4.1). To calculate random effects estimates for meta-analysis with correlation data we used the metacor function of the meta v5.5 R package [19].
Using the extracted correlation coefficient (r) from each study, we calculated pooled correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the random-effects model with the inverse variance weighting method and Restricted Maximum Likelihood method estimator for between-study variance [20]. Before analysis, correlation coefficients had to be transformed into Fisher’s z (z = 0.5 log e (1 + r/1-r)) unless the included studies had very large sample sizes [21]. This transformation was automatically performed by metacor function, with the sm argument set to "ZCOR". The different types of correlations were not pooled together, since Pearson's product-moment correlation is used when a linear relationship is assumed between two continuous, random variables, and Spearman's rank correlation is used when the relationship of two variables appears to be monotonic, but nonlinear. The correlation strength was ranked as follows: 0.00–0.10 was considered negligible, 0.10–0.39 weak, 0.40–0.69 moderate, 0.70–0.89 strong, and 0.90–1.00 very strong [22]. Results were considered statistically significant if p < 0.05. Forest plots were used to graphically summarize the results.
Heterogeneity was tested with Cochran’s Q tests and significant heterogeneity was indicated by p < 0.1. We report I2 statistics and their 95% CI, which represent the percentage of total variation across studies due to between-study heterogeneity [23]. According to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [17], a rough guide for the interpretation of I2 at 0% to 40% might not be important, 30% to 60% may represent moderate heterogeneity, 50% to 90% may represent substantial heterogeneity, and 75% to 100% significant heterogeneity. Furthermore, where applicable, we reported the prediction intervals (i.e., the expected range of effects of future studies) of pooled estimates as well [24].
The estimation of publication bias was not possible because the number of articles did not reach the minimum of 10 for this assessment.
Results
Systematic search and study selection
Through our systematic search, we identified a total of 6956 studies. Interrater reliability assessment resulted in a Cohen's kappa of 0.82 and 1.0 for the title and abstract selection and full-text selection, respectively. At the end of the study selection process, 16 studies [10, 15, 25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38] were included in the meta-analysis, one of which [25] was added during reference searching. A more detailed outline of our selection process is depicted in Fig. 1.
Basic characteristics of included studies
Baseline characteristics of the populations and technical features of the included studies are detailed in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. The articles were published from 2010 to 2022, and the total number of patients assessed in this meta-analysis was 931. One article [28] reported on a pediatric population; all others examined adults. The publications included participants from 9 countries in total. Two articles [31, 38] were not written in English; for their translation we requested the help of a translator.
Study populations were quite heterogeneous regarding age (range: 4 m-79y), gender (15–49.2% females), and kidney function. Study inclusion criteria also varied, but shared the same basis of including renal transplants for renal ultrasound examination. Some articles included patients with suspected pathology, while others included stable patients or a mix of both.
Risk of bias assessment and concerns about applicability
Of the four [26,27,28, 33] articles calculating the correlation between shear wave elastography and histopathology using Spearman's correlation, only two [27, 33] did not state whether the index test and reference standard were interpreted blindly. Regarding resistive index, concerns about bias were high in the domains of index test and reference standard, as shear wave elastography and Doppler ultrasound were performed in one sitting by the same radiologist; therefore, blinded interpretation was not possible. However, one article [29] stated that ultrasound examinations were performed blinded to clinical data. The overall risk of bias for this outcome is therefore high, but we considered concerns of applicability to be low.
The outcomes concerning laboratory parameters were harder to assess because laboratory test results were not detailed in the articles. However, most articles [15, 26, 29, 31, 32] stated that shear wave elastography was performed blinded to clinical data.
To sum up, the overall risk of bias varied from low to high concerning different outcomes, and we considered concerns about applicability to be low. Tables and diagrams detailing the results of the assessment of the risk of bias and applicability are to be found in the supplementary material (Table S3–S10, Figure S1–S8).
Quantitative and qualitative synthesis
Correlation between elastography and biopsy results
Nine [10, 15, 26,27,28, 30, 33, 36, 37] studies, with a total of 494 patients, included calculated correlation coefficients between stiffness measured by shear wave elastography and fibrosis according to histopathology (Fig. 2). The pooled results showed a moderate positive correlation for Pearson (r = 0.48; CI: 0.20, 0.69) and Spearman correlation coefficients (r = 0.57; CI: 0.35, 0.72). Heterogeneity test results showed marked heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 84%; p = 0.002 and I2 = 74%; p = 0.002).
Determining fibrosis according to histopathology was based on the BANFF classification, defined as interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy lesion score (“ci” + ”ct”) and graded from 0-III. Desvignes et al. [28] calculated correlations with the BANFF “ci” lesion score only.
Correlation between elastography and arterial Resistive Index
Eight [10, 25, 26, 29, 33, 35, 37, 38] studies assessing 371 patients were evaluated with respect to the relationship between shear wave elastography and renal arterial resistive index (Fig. 3). Pooled Pearson's correlation between shear wave elastography and resistive index was weak (r = 0.34; CI: 0.13, 0.51). Heterogeneity assessment showed substantial heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 73%; p < 0.011). Pooled Spearman’s correlation for the same outcome showed no correlation (r = − 0.02; CI:− 0.24, 0.20) and low heterogeneity (I2 = 17%; p = 0.302).
Correlation between elastography and creatinine
The relationship between shear wave elastography and serum creatinine levels was explored in nine studies [10, 15, 25, 26, 29, 32, 34, 37, 38], including 478 patients (Fig. 4). Our results show a moderate positive Pearson's correlation between these two parameters (r = 0.48; CI: 0.22, 0.68). Considerable heterogeneity was found between the articles (I2 = 73%; p < 0.001). Pooled results for Spearman’s correlation showed negligible correlation (r = 0.10; CI:− 0.04, 0.23). No heterogeneity was found between these studies (I2 = 0%; p = 0.953).
Correlation between elastography and eGFR
In the case of eGFR, six studies [25, 26, 29, 31, 32, 37] reported calculated correlation coefficients (Fig. 5). The total number of patients was 380. The rate of correlation calculated with pooled Pearson’s correlation coefficient was moderate (r = − 0.65; CI: -0.81, 0.40). In this case, heterogeneity was substantial (I2 = 73%, p = 0.023). The results with pooled Spearman's correlation coefficient did not show a statistically significant correlation (r = − 0.24; CI: − 0.66, 0.30). The heterogeneity between the studies was significant (I2 = 95%; p < 0.001).
The calculation method of eGFR varied throughout the articles. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study equation was used in three studies [25, 31, 37], two studies [26, 32] used the Chronic Kidney Disease EPIdemiology formula, and Ghonge et al. [29] applied the Nankivell formula.
Discussion
In the past decade, the relationship between kidney stiffness measured by elastography and fibrosis has been increasingly investigated. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the correlation between renal allograft shear wave elastography findings and kidney dysfunction parameters in a kidney transplanted population. Our study showed a positive correlation between kidney allograft elasticity measured by shear wave elastography and kidney biopsy results. Additionally, we found a positive correlation between kidney stiffness and resistive index, a positive correlation between shear wave elastography and creatinine level, and a negative correlation between shear wave elastography and eGFR.
Shear wave elastography has previously been shown to be effective in detecting and measuring the severity of liver fibrosis [39,40,41,42,43]. As transplanted kidneys are more superficially located in the pelvis, shear wave elastography can be used more accurately than in case of native kidneys [44]. He et al. examined 50 patients with stable allograft function and 52 with impaired allograft function and found that the sensitivity and specificity of shear wave elastography to determine allograft dysfunction was 78% and 86.5%, respectively [31]. For the same outcome, Agrawal et al. calculated a sensitivity and specificity of 70.4% and 100%, respectively [25]. Another study by Chhajer et al. examined shear wave elastography to differentiate between low-grade (Banff 0–1) fibrosis and high-grade (Banff 2–3) fibrosis; sensitivity and specificity was 78.9% and 91%, respectively. The ability of shear wave elastography to differentiate grade 2 fibrosis from grade 3 was also tested, with a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 92% [15].
Ultrasound guidance is an important factor in utilizing shear wave elastography; we focused on this method because of its ease of use and wide availability. However, another possibility for assessing renal fibrosis noninvasively would be magnetic resonance elastography. Magnetic resonance elastography of renal allografts has also been investigated recently [45, 46], but is more expensive and time consuming. On the contrary, ultrasound-guided elastography can be carried out more quickly, without long examination times [47].
Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy are major causes of allograft injury [48]. In the presence of chronic tubulointerstitial damage, the outcome of allograft survival is generally poor [49]. Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy start in the early post-transplant period [2, 50]. In the first year after transplantation, tubulointerstitial damage may develop rapidly and is associated with immunologic factors. This results in irreversible glomerulosclerosis and thus severe impairment of nephrons [2, 50]. Presently, the degree of fibrosis in allografts can only be determined by biopsy, which is an invasive procedure, sampling only < 1% of the kidney [48]. As a semi-quantitative hierarchical classification of chronic lesions, Banff classification often results in interobserver discrepancies [1, 51, 52].
In our study, most of the included articles did not find a strong correlation between fibrosis and kidney stiffness. Based on our results, the lowest correlation rate was found in the study by Desvignes et al.[28] in which only pediatric patients with low fibrosis rates (0–1) were included. A weak correlation was found by Chiocchini et al., who examined patients requiring allograft biopsy for clinical reasons. Additionally, Grenier included patients presenting for protocol biopsies [26, 30]. Furthermore, eight of Stock's patients had histologically-proven rejection the year before the examination [33]. Quin et al. included patients with chronic allograft dysfunction and found one of the highest correlation rates [37]. Data on the number of patients for each Banff grade was available in only two studies. A total of 22.7% of the population in the study by Chhajer et al. had high fibrosis grades (2–3); in Stock et al. this prevalence was 16.7% [15, 33]. Although data are scarce, it is probable that in those studies where the number of patients with fibrosis was higher, the correlation was stronger.
An important tool in the management of allografts is Doppler ultrasound; it determines renal arterial resistive index, which is a semi-quantitative index derived from the evaluation of the renal vasculature [53]. Due to the high vascularization of the kidney, kidney perfusion contributes to mechanical stiffness. The clinical meaning of kidney stiffness measured by shear wave elastography should be interpreted accordingly [54]. There are two theories on how resistive index is significant in determining renal dysfunction. First, the vessels themselves are being injured; alternatively, vessels are influenced by surrounding interstitial fibrosis thus resulting in increased resistive index [55]. Regardless of the cause, ultrasound elastography seems to show renal impairment earlier than Doppler ultrasound [56]. Loock et al. [57] hypothesized that longitudinal resisitive index changes could be more informative than a single measurement of resistive index. Their study showed that in the first year after transplantation, graft loss was significantly more frequent in patients with increasing intrarenal resistive index. Our results showed a moderate positive correlation, but the high heterogeneity in the published data suggests that this association may be incidental. Among our included articles, the population of Ghonge et al. was the most diverse, as they had equal amounts of stable and unstable patients; they also reported the highest rate of correlation [29]. Regarding technical details, the study by Wang et al. was outstanding, as they used a linear transducer and included only transplants within 12 months since transplantation [35]. Although in the study by Soudmand et al. the population consisted of patients with suspected pathology and a high average resistive index, they found no relevant correlation between elastography and Doppler ultrasound [10]. It is also important to point out that resistive index is highly variable as it is influenced by several factors including the patient’s age, hydration status, heart rate, medications, presence and degree of hypertension, hydronephrosis, and other comorbidities [58,59,60].
Regarding laboratory kidney dysfunction parameters, the highest correlation rate between creatinine and shear wave elastography was found in the two papers by Agrawal et al. and Ghonge et al.; the population in both studies consisted of mainly male patients [25, 29]. Our study found a positive correlation between kidney stiffness and creatinine levels. However, as serum creatinine levels rise in the later phases of allograft failure, they can only be used to predict severe dysfunction [61].
Due to progressive glomerulosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy lead to decline of eGFR [61]. This inverse relationship between eGFR and parenchymal stiffness was apparent in our results. A strong correlation rate was found by Ghonge et al., in which allografts with stable and impaired kidney function were studied [29]. One of the inclusion criteria in Chiocchini's study was based on eGFR, but the Authors could not find a significant correlation with parenchymal stiffness [26]. Interestingly, Järv et al. found a significant inverse correlation between shear wave elastography and eGFR. Their population included 100 stable patients, which could explain the discrepancy [32].
To the best of our knowledge, the systematic review and meta-analysis presented herein is the first to assess the correlation between shear wave elastography and kidney dysfunction parameters. With the help of rigorous methodology, we were able to carry out a detailed renal function assessment in a transplanted population.
However, only a few studies could be integrated into our meta-analysis. The populations of the included articles were quite heterogeneous. Exploration of heterogeneity could not be sufficiently carried out because information for subgroup analysis was scarce in the original studies.
Because of their location in the iliac fossa [62], transplanted kidneys lie more superficially than native kidneys, and thus higher-quality images can be acquired by shear wave elastography [31, 44]. Further research is needed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of shear wave elastography to detect fibrosis in the transplanted kidney. The relationship between kidney elasticity and kidney dysfunction parameters such as resistive index, creatinine, and eGFR should be further explored to confirm the reliability of shear wave elastography as an additional tool in renal function assessment. Detailed population data should be reported in future studies.
It is very important for scientific results to be translated into everyday practice [63] therefore, based on our results, we suggest the development of standardized, hardware-specific protocols for the evaluation of allografts with shear wave elastography. Further research is also needed to determine cut-off values for different grades of fibrosis and degrees of allograft dysfunction. Comparative studies comparing shear wave elastography, magnetic resonance elastrography and transplant kidney biopsy could improve our understanding of the association between kidney stiffness and fibrosis.
Conclusion
In summary, our study found a moderate positive correlation between kidney stiffness measured by shear wave elastography and biopsy results. Noninvasive assessment of kidney fibrosis after transplantation is crucial. However, there is currently insufficient evidence to support elastography over biopsy in the longitudinal management of kidney transplant patients.
Data availability
As a systematic review and meta-analysis, data serving as basis for our analysis was extracted from readily available articles in the literature. Type of data extracted is detailed in the methods section of our article. Datasets generated for analysis are available upon request. Original datasets are to be requested from individual studies’ authors.
References
Early H, Aguilera J, Cheang E, McGahan J (2017) Challenges and considerations when using shear wave elastography to evaluate the transplanted kidney with pictorial review. J Ultrasound Med 36(9):1771–1782
Nankivell BJ, Borrows RJ, Fung CL, O’Connell PJ, Allen RD, Chapman JR (2003) The natural history of chronic allograft nephropathy. N Engl J Med 349(24):2326–2333
Solez K, Colvin RB, Racusen LC, Sis B, Halloran PF, Birk PE et al (2007) Banff ’05 Meeting Report: differential diagnosis of chronic allograft injury and elimination of chronic allograft nephropathy ('CAN’). Am J Transplant 7(3):518–526
Williams WW, Taheri D, Tolkoff-Rubin N, Colvin RB (2012) Clinical role of the renal transplant biopsy. Nat Rev Nephrol 8(2):110–121
Furness PN, Philpott CM, Chorbadjian MT, Nicholson ML, Bosmans JL, Corthouts BL et al (2003) Protocol biopsy of the stable renal transplant: a multicenter study of methods and complication rates. Transplantation 76(6):969–973
Preda A, Van Dijk LC, Van Oostaijen JA, Pattynama PM (2003) Complication rate and diagnostic yield of 515 consecutive ultrasound-guided biopsies of renal allografts and native kidneys using a 14-gauge Biopty gun. Eur Radiol 13(3):527–530
Schwarz A, Gwinner W, Hiss M, Radermacher J, Mengel M, Haller H (2005) Safety and adequacy of renal transplant protocol biopsies. Am J Transplant 5(8):1992–1996
Wilkinson A (2006) Protocol transplant biopsies: are they really needed? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 1(1):130–137
Ahmad I (2004) Biopsy of the transplanted kidney. Semin Intervent Radiol 21(4):275–281
Soudmand A, Ulu Ozturk F, Uslu N, Haberal N, Boyvat F, Moray G et al (2018) Efficacy of the sonoelastography method for diagnosis of fibrosis in renal transplant patients. Exp Clin Transplant 20(5):472–479
Ophir J, Céspedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X (1991) Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging 13(2):111–134
Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE, Chammas MC, Willmann JK (2017) Ultrasound elastography: review of techniques and clinical applications. Theranostics 7(5):1303–1329
Syversveen T, Brabrand K, Midtvedt K, Strom EH, Hartmann A, Jakobsen JA et al (2011) Assessment of renal allograft fibrosis by acoustic radiation force impulse quantification–a pilot study. Transpl Int 24(1):100–105
Lee J, Oh YT, Joo DJ, Ma BG, Lee AL, Lee JG et al (2015) Acoustic radiation force impulse measurement in renal transplantation: a prospective, longitudinal study with protocol biopsies. Medicine (Baltimore) 94(39):e1590
Chhajer G, Arunachalam VK, Ramasamy R, Mehta P, Cherian M (2021) Elastography: a surrogate marker of renal allograft fibrosis-quantification by shear-wave technique. Pol J Radiol 86(1):e151–e156
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 134:178–189
Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Chandler J, Welch VA, Higgins JP et al (2019) Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:000142
Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB et al (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155(8):529–536
Guido Schwarzer JRC (2015) Gerta Rücker. Springer, Meta-Analysis with R
DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188
Fisher RE (1971) Statistical methods for research workers, 14. Aufl., Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, London 1970. XIII, 362 S., 12 Abb., 74 Tab., 40 s. Biom Z 13(6):429–430
Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA (2018) Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg 126(5):1763–1768
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327(7414):557
van Aert RCM, Schmid CH, Svensson D, Jackson D (2021) Study specific prediction intervals for random-effects meta-analysis: a tutorial: prediction intervals in meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 12(4):429–447
Agrawal D, Murthy N, Sanjeeva Shetty M, Hiremath D (2021) Shear wave elastography in transplant kidney and its correlation with renal doppler parameters and eGFR. Int J Radiol Diagn Imaging 4:86–91
Chiocchini ALC, Sportoletti C, Comai G, Brocchi S, Capelli I, Baraldi O et al (2017) Correlation between renal cortical stiffness and histological determinants by point shear-wave elastography in patients with kidney transplantation. Prog Transpl (Aliso Viejo, Calif) 27(4):346–353
Dai X, Liu M, Guo Y, Zhao B, Tan Y, Xiang F (2014) Noninvasive evaluation of renal allograft fibrosis by virtual touch tissues quantification Zhong nan da xue xue bao Yi xue ban. J Central South Univ Med Sci 39(2):173–177
Desvignes C, Dabadie A, Aschero A, Ruocco A, Garaix F, Daniel L et al (2021) Technical feasibility and correlations between shear-wave elastography and histology in kidney fibrosis in children. Pediatr Radiol 51(10):1879–1888
Ghonge NP, Mohan M, Kashyap V, Jasuja S (2018) Renal allograft dysfunction: Evaluation with shear-wave sonoelastography. Radiology 288(1):146–152
Grenier N, Poulain S, Lepreux S, Gennisson JL, Dallaudière B, Lebras Y et al (2012) Quantitative elastography of renal transplants using supersonic shear imaging: a pilot study. Eur Radiol 22(10):2138–2146
He WY, Jin YJ, Wang WP, Li CL, Ji ZB, Yang C (2014) Tissue elasticity quantification by acoustic radiation force impulse for the assessment of renal allograft function. Ultrasound Med Biol 40(2):322–329
Järv L, Kull I, Riispere Z, Kuudeberg A, Lember M, Ots-Rosenberg M (2019) Ultrasound elastography correlations between anthropometrical parameters in kidney transplant recipients. J Investig Med 67(8):1137–1141
Stock KF, Klein BS, Vo Cong MT, Sarkar O, Römisch M, Regenbogen C et al (2010) ARFI-based tissue elasticity quantification in comparison to histology for the diagnosis of renal transplant fibrosis. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 46(2–3):139–148
Tukhbatullin MG, Galeev SR, Garifullina LI, Galeev RH (2017) Shear wave ultrasound elastography to evaluate the state of renal transplant. Sovrem Tehnol Med 9(4):131–135
Wang HK, Lai YC, Lin YH, Chiou HJ, Chou YH (2017) Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of the transplant kidney: correlation between cortical stiffness and arterial resistance in early post-transplant period. Transpl Proc 49(5):1001–1004
Barsoum NR, Elsisy AE, Mohamed MF, Hassan AA (2022) Role of shear wave elastography in assessment of chronic allograft nephropathy. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-022-00778-0
Qin C, Jin H, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Guan Z, Gao Y (2021) Noninvasive assessment of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy in renal transplant by combining point-shear wave elastography and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Diagnostics (Basel). 12(1):18
Yang S, Liu Y, Zuo H, Feng L, Xu C, Gu L et al (2022) Effects of body parameters on renal cortical stiffness measured by shear-wave elastography in patients with kidney transplantation. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 47(10):1385–1391
Cassinotto C, Boursier J, de Ledinghen V, Lebigot J, Lapuyade B, Cales P et al (2016) Liver stiffness in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a comparison of supersonic shear imaging, FibroScan, and ARFI with liver biopsy. Hepatology 63(6):1817–1827
Sporea I, Sirli R, Bota S, Fierbinteanu-Braticevici C, Petrisor A, Badea R et al (2011) Is ARFI elastography reliable for predicting fibrosis severity in chronic HCV hepatitis? World J Radiol 3(7):188–193
Friedrich-Rust M, Lupsor M, de Knegt R, Dries V, Buggisch P, Gebel M et al (2015) Point Shear Wave elastography by acoustic radiation force impulse quantification in comparison to transient elastography for the noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: A Prospective International Multicenter Study. Ultraschall Med 36(3):239–247
Ye XP, Ran HT, Cheng J, Zhu YF, Zhang DZ, Zhang P et al (2012) Liver and spleen stiffness measured by acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis and esophageal varices in patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Ultrasound Med 31(8):1245–1253
Zhuang Y, Ding H, Zhang Y, Sun H, Xu C, Wang W (2017) Two-dimensional shear-wave elastography performance in the noninvasive evaluation of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B: comparison with serum fibrosis indexes. Radiology 283(3):873–882
Grenier N, Gennisson JL, Cornelis F, Le Bras Y, Couzi L (2013) Renal ultrasound elastography. Diagn Interv Imaging 94(5):545–550
Lee CU, Glockner JF, Glaser KJ, Yin M, Chen J, Kawashima A et al (2012) MR elastography in renal transplant patients and correlation with renal allograft biopsy: a feasibility study. Acad Radiol 19(7):834–841
Marticorena Garcia SR, Fischer T, Dürr M, Gültekin E, Braun J, Sack I et al (2016) Multifrequency Magnetic Resonance Elastography for the Assessment of Renal Allograft Function. Invest Radiol 51(9):591–595
Low G, Kruse SA, Lomas DJ (2016) General review of magnetic resonance elastography. World J Radiol 8(1):59–72
Kirpalani A, Hashim E, Leung G, Kim JK, Krizova A, Jothy S et al (2017) Magnetic resonance elastography to assess fibrosis in kidney allografts. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 12(10):1671–1679
Naesens M, Kuypers DR, De Vusser K, Evenepoel P, Claes K, Bammens B et al (2014) The histology of kidney transplant failure: a long-term follow-up study. Transplantation 98(4):427–435
Seron D, Arns W, Chapman JR (2008) Chronic allograft nephropathy–clinical guidance for early detection and early intervention strategies. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23(8):2467–2473
Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB, Bonsib SM, Castro MC, Cavallo T et al (1999) The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int 55(2):713–723
Roufosse C, Simmonds N, Clahsen-van Groningen M, Haas M, Henriksen KJ, Horsfield C et al (2018) A 2018 reference guide to the banff classification of renal allograft pathology. Transplantation 102(11):1795–1814
Spatola L, Andrulli S (2016) Doppler ultrasound in kidney diseases: a key parameter in clinical long-term follow-up. J Ultrasound 19(4):243–250
Urban MW, Rule AD, Atwell TD, Chen S (2021) Novel uses of ultrasound to assess kidney mechanical properties. Kidney 2(9):1531–1539
Ikee R, Kobayashi S, Hemmi N, Imakiire T, Kikuchi Y, Moriya H et al (2005) Correlation between the resistive index by Doppler ultrasound and kidney function and histology. Am J Kidney Dis 46(4):603–609
Goncalves LM, Forte GC, Holz TG, Libermann LL, de Figueiredo CEP, Hochhegger B (2022) Shear wave elastography and Doppler ultrasound in kidney transplant recipients. Radiol Bras 55(1):19–23
Loock MT, Bamoulid J, Courivaud C, Manzoni P, Simula-Faivre D, Chalopin JM et al (2010) Significant increase in 1-year posttransplant renal arterial index predicts graft loss. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5(10):1867–1872
Akgul A, Ibis A, Sezer S, Basaran C, Usluogullari A, Ozdemir FN et al (2009) Early assessment of renal resistance index and long-term renal function in renal transplant recipients. Ren Fail 31(1):18–24
Kolonko A, Chudek J, Zejda JE, Wiecek A (2012) Impact of early kidney resistance index on kidney graft and patient survival during a 5-year follow-up. Nephrol Dial Transplant 27(3):1225–1231
Radermacher J, Mengel M, Ellis S, Stuht S, Hiss M, Schwarz A et al (2003) The renal arterial resistance index and renal allograft survival. N Engl J Med 349(2):115–124
Chapman JR, O’Connell PJ, Nankivell BJ (2005) Chronic renal allograft dysfunction. J Am Soc Nephrol 16(10):3015–3026
Tilney NL (1989) Renal transplantation. Curr Probl Surg 26(9):601–669
Hegyi P, Eross B, Izbeki F, Parniczky A, Szentesi A (2021) Accelerating the translational medicine cycle: the Academia Europaea pilot. Nat Med 27(8):1317–1319
Funding
Open access funding provided by Semmelweis University. Funding was provided by Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. Sponsors had no role in the design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, and manuscript preparation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TF: conceptualization, project administration, data curation, investigation, writing—original draft; BT: conceptualization, methodology, project administration, writing—original draft; ASz: conceptualization, investigation, writing—review & editing; AF: conceptualization, investigation, writing—review & editing; JÁ: conceptualization, investigation, writing—review & editing; AV: conceptualization, formal analysis, data curation, writing—review & editing; PH: conceptualization, funding acquisition, writing—review & editing; TSz: conceptualization, writing – review & editing; NÁ: conceptualization, writing—review & editing; PNy: conceptualization, writing—review & editing; PÁD: conceptualization; supervision; writing—original draft. All authors certify that they have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for the content, including participation in the concept, design, analysis, writing, or revision of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Ethics approval
Ethical approval is not applicable for this study. All included studies are in accordance with ethical standards and have taken informed consent in their own setting.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Filipov, T., Teutsch, B., Szabó, A. et al. Investigating the role of ultrasound-based shear wave elastography in kidney transplanted patients: correlation between non-invasive fibrosis detection, kidney dysfunction and biopsy results—a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nephrol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-023-01856-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-023-01856-w