Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
The case
A 67-year-old male presented with a 3-year history of proteinuria and hematuria. Baseline serum creatinine (SCr) was 112 μmol/L. Twenty days before admission, he had fever up to 38.6 °C and acute dysuria, after swimming. After taking ibuprofen, azithromycin, and Chinese herbs for 7 days and receiving levofloxacin intravenously for 3 days in a local clinic, his temperature returned to normal. However, he developed dysuria and acute kidney injury (AKI) while SCr rose to 925 μmol/L. Abdominal CT scan revealed urine retention and prostate enlargement. After urethral catheterization, he was transferred to our hospital.
On admission, the patient’s SCr had decreased to 651 μmol/L. He presented with moderate proteinuria (2.01 g/24 h), mild leukocyturia (white blood cells 5–9/HPF), and hypophosphatemia, hypokalemia, and renal glycosuria. Urine protein electrophoresis showed a high proportion of low molecular weight proteinuria (50.1%). A monoclonal free κ spike was detected in urine by immunofixation electrophoresis. He had abnormal serum free light chain (sFLC) levels: serum free κ light chain of 325 mg/L, free λ light chain of 32.3 mg/L, with a κ/λ ratio of 10.1, and a difference between involved and uninvolved sFLC (dFLC) of 292.7 mg/L. Bone marrow aspiration revealed 2% plasma cells with 0.2% abnormal plasma cells and κ light chain restriction.
A kidney biopsy was performed, with suspicion of monoclonal κ light chain-induced tubulointerstitial injury. Light microscopy examination revealed mild changes in most glomeruli (Fig. 1A). Massive interstitial cell infiltration and desquamation of tubular epithelial cells were observed (Fig. 1B). Crystal inclusions were observed in the cytoplasm of some tubular epithelial cells as well as in the cytoplasm of CD68-positive histiocytes massively infiltrating the interstitium. (Fig. 1C, D). There were massive infiltrates of CD138-positive plasma cells in the renal interstitium with κ light chain restriction (Fig. 1E). Congo red staining for amyloid was negative. Electron microscopy examination revealed no obvious lesions or electron-dense deposits in the glomeruli (Fig. 1F). However, there were massive, variously shaped intracytoplasmic crystalline inclusions in the cytoplasm of the proximal tubular epithelial cells (Fig. 1G), in the cytoplasm of renal interstitial histiocytes (Fig. 1G, I), and in bone marrow histiocytes (Fig. 1J). Immuno-electron microscopy revealed κ light chain in the crystals (Fig. 1K) (Fig. 1L). The patient was diagnosed with monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS), which manifested as light chain proximal tubulopathy (LCPT) combined with crystal-storing histiocytosis (CSH).
Findings on kidney biopsy. A Glomeruli of mild change (PASM + Masson staining, × 200). B The figure shows prominent tubulointerstitial lesions: massive interstitial cell infiltration, desquamation of tubular epithelial cells, and some cell debris in the tubular lumen (PAS staining, × 100). C Massive crystal inclusions in the cytoplasm of some tubular epithelial cells (Masson staining, × 200). D These inclusion-containing cells were CD68 positive (Immunohistochemistry, × 100). E There was massive CD138 positive plasma cell infiltration. (Immunohistochemistry, × 100). F Normal glomeruli on electron microscopy without any deposits (EM, × 6000). G Different shapes of crystals in the cytoplasm of the proximal tubular epithelial cells (EM, × 4000). H Rhomboid-shaped intracytoplasmic crystalline inclusion in histiocytes (EM, × 4000). I Rhomboid-shaped intracytoplasmic crystalline inclusion in histiocytes (EM, × 10,000). J Rhomboid-shaped crystalline inclusion in the cytoplasm of bone marrow histiocytes (EM, × 20,000). K Immuno-electron microscopy showed these crystals were κ light chain positive (EM, × 10,000). L Immuno-electron microscopy showed these crystals were λ light chain negative (EM, × 20,000)
The patient initially refused chemotherapy. He was referred to the urology department for prostatectomy due to the enlarged prostate. Six months after the kidney biopsy, SCr decreased to 160.4 μmol/L, but there was no decrease in proteinuria, and sFLC level was still high. He consented to be treated with bortezomib-based chemotherapy. After two cycles of CyBorD (cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone) regimen, the dFLC level decreased to 79 mg/L from 292.7 mg/L, and he achieved partial response (PR). However, dFLC levels slightly increased to 93.7 mg/L after the following two cycles of CyBorD, so we administered daratumumab intravenously once a week for four consecutive weeks combined with BorD (bortezomib and dexamethasone) for the fifth cycle. To complete treatment, we administered a further cycle of BorD. The dFLC level decreased to 28.2 mg/L, but monoclonal free κ light chain was still detected in his urine, suggesting very good partial response (VGPR). To date, the patient has been followed up for 30 months, and SCr is stable at approximately 125–140 μmol/L (Fig. 2). In addition, his Fanconi syndrome improved.
Therapeutic effects over the disease course. BorD bortezomib and dexamethasone, CyBorD cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone, Dara daratumumab, sFLC serum free light chain, dFLC the difference between involved and uninvolved sFLC, sFLC-κ serum free κ light chain, SCr serum creatinine, PR partial response, VGPR very good partial response
Lessons for the clinical nephrologist
Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance refers to a group of renal disorders caused by monoclonal immunoglobulin (MIg) secreted by a nonmalignant or premalignant B cell or plasma cell clone [1]. MGRS-associated renal lesions encompass a wide spectrum of renal pathology, among which, LCPT and CSH, characterized by monoclonal immunoglobulin accumulation and aggregation as crystals within proximal tubular epithelial cells and histiocytes [2], have seldom been reported. Combined LCPT and CSH is even rarer, with only 11 cases reported in the literature (Table S1, Supplementary Appendix). Furthermore, most of the reported cases were associated with multiple myeloma. We discuss this unusual case of a 67-year-old male with MGRS characterized by combined LCPT and CSH responding to daratumumab.
Diagnostic clues to this case
This patient presented with moderate proteinuria, partial Fanconi syndrome, and AKI, which improved with supportive treatment. First, the significant reduction in SCr after urethral catheterization indicated that acute obstructive nephropathy due to prostatic hyperplasia was an additional cause of AKI. Drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis was initially suspected due to the medications administered, eosinophilia, and rash. Further laboratory tests revealed monoclonal κ chains in the urine with abnormal serum free light chains. In a study published recently, Klomjit N et al. found that proteinuria ≥ 1.5 g/day, hematuria, and an elevated free light chain ratio increase the likelihood of finding MGRS [3], and a study from our center confirmed that abnormal free light and proteinuria ≥ 1.5 g/day were predictors of MGRS [4]. Kidney biopsy should be highly recommended in such patients. After multiple myeloma and other malignant lymphoplasmacytic proliferative disorders were ruled out, kidney biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of MGRS characterized by combined monoclonal κ-restricted CSH and crystalline LCPT.
The pathogenic mechanism of LCPT and/or CSH
CSH is a rare complication of multiple myeloma and B cell lymphoproliferative disorders, characterized by the accumulation of light chain crystals in histiocytes, primarily in the bone marrow but also in the kidney [5, 6]. The mechanisms of crystallization of immunoglobulins and of their accumulation in various cells are not fully understood. Consistent with the present case, most crystalline immunoglobulin deposits are reported to be caused by monoclonal κ light chains [2, 6]. It was suspected that the light chain isotype is a major determinant of crystallization. Researchers suggested that unique mutations in the variable domains of the monoclonal κ light chain could result in the substitution of polar residues by hydrophobic residues, inducing the κ crystals to be resistant to normal lysosome enzyme proteolysis. Then the undigested light chains form highly organized crystals within the endolysosomal compartment under certain conditions. In the present case, the presence of the κ light chain was confirmed by immuno-electron microscopy in both proximal tubular epithelium and interstitial histiocytes. In addition, the crystals in CSH resembled those that presented within proximal tubule cells, suggesting that LCPT and CSH may share a similar pathogenesis.
How do we treat MGRS-associated LCPT or CSH?
The optimal therapy for patients with MGRS-associated LCPT or CSH is not established. The therapeutic decision should be made depending on the severity of the kidney lesion and the risk of progression. In patients who present with significant kidney injury and/or proteinuria, the International Kidney and Monoclonal Gammopathy Research Group suggests chemotherapy to eradicate the plasma cell or B cell clone responsible for the production of the pathologic MIg [7]. Stokes et al. reported a series of 46 patients with LCPT (21 with MGRS) [8] in whom treatment was associated with a higher rate of improvement in renal function compared to no treatment (32% versus 14%). ESRD occurred in 29% of untreated patients but in none of the treated patients. In our case, the patient achieved partial remission with two cycles of CyBorD regimen. However, the serum free light chain fluctuated after the following two cycles of CyBorD, so daratumumab was added, leading to very good partial remission with improved tubular function and stable kidney function. Daratumumab is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody which has been widely used in multiple myeloma and light chain (AL) amyloidosis with good hematologic and organ response [9][S1]. However, the data on daratumumab in non-amyloid MGRS patients are limited. Kastritis et al. summarized their experience using daratumumab-based therapy in 25 MGRS patients (including 22 patients with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease, two patients with C3 nephropathy, and one with proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits) [S2]. The median follow-up of the cohort was 14 months. The best hematologic response in the involved patients was 74%, with complete response in five (22%), very good partial remission in five (22%), and partial remission in seven (30%) patients. Of note, in our case we used four doses of daratumumab, considering the patient’s financial status and susceptibility to infection. We referred to the protocol of Kastritis et al., applying the short course (1 month–four doses) of daratumumab consolidation strategy after eight cycles of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone in 25 patients with AL amyloidosis or light chain deposition disease [S3]. Their experience showed that this short daratumumab consolidation strategy induced complete hematologic response in 32% of patients and was also associated with excellent long-term outcomes. Daratumumab can be considered an effective treatment option for patients with MGRS.
Which lessons can be drawn from this report?
We describe a rare case of a patient with MGRS characterized by combined LCPT and CSH who achieved VGPR to bortezomib-based chemotherapy combined with a short course of daratumumab. MGRS is an under-recognized disease, and appropriate treatment may delay hematologic and kidney disease progression.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
References
Leung N, Bridoux F, Batuman V, Chaidos A, Cockwell P, D’Agati VD, Dispenzieri A, Fervenza FC, Fermand JP, Gibbs S, Gillmore JD, Herrera GA, Jaccard A, Jevremovic D, Kastritis E, Kukreti V, Kyle RA, Lachmann HJ, Larsen CP, Ludwig H, Markowitz GS, Merlini G, Mollee P, Picken MM, Rajkumar VS, Royal V, Sanders PW, Sethi S, Venner CP, Voorhees PM, Wechalekar AD, Weiss BM, Nasr SH (2019) The evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance: a consensus report of the International Kidney and Monoclonal Gammopathy Research Group. Nat Rev Nephrol 15(1):45–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-018-0077-4
Sethi S, Rajkumar SV, D’Agati VD (2018) The complexity and heterogeneity of monoclonal immunoglobulin-associated renal diseases. J Am Soc Nephrol 29(7):1810–1823. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2017121319
Klomjit N, Leung N, Fervenza F, Sethi S, Zand L (2020) Rate and predictors of finding Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance (MGRS) lesions on kidney biopsy in patients with monoclonal gammopathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 31(10):2400–2411. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2020010054
Yong ZH, Yu XJ, Liu JX, Zhou FD, Wang SX, Zhao MH (2022) Kidney histopathologic spectrum and clinical indicators associated with MGRS. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 17(4):527–534. https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.12890921
Fang H, Chiu A, Reichard KK (2018) Crystal-storing histiocytosis in bone marrow: a clinicopathologic study of eight cases and review of the literature. Am J Clin Pathol 149(2):148–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqx150
Sethi S, Cuiffo BP, Pinkus GS, Rennke HG (2002) Crystal-storing histiocytosis involving the kidney in a low-grade B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder. Am J Kidney Dis 39(1):183–188. https://doi.org/10.1053/ajkd.2002.29914
Fermand JP, Bridoux F, Kyle RA, Kastritis E, Weiss BM, Cook MA, Drayson MT, Dispenzieri A, Leung N (2013) How I treat monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS). Blood 122(22):3583–3590. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-05-495929
Stokes MB, Valeri AM, Herlitz L, Khan AM, Siegel DS, Markowitz GS, D’Agati VD (2016) Light chain proximal tubulopathy: clinical and pathologic characteristics in the modern treatment era. J Am Soc Nephrol 27(5):1555–1565. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2015020185
Palumbo A, Chanan-Khan A, Weisel K, Nooka AK, Masszi T, Beksac M, Spicka I, Hungria V, Munder M, Mateos MV, Mark TM, Qi M, Schecter J, Amin H, Qin X, Deraedt W, Ahmadi T, Spencer A, Sonneveld P (2016) Daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 375(8):754–766. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1606038
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 82070747) and CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (Grant Number: 2019-I2M-5-046). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation of the data, the decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study's conception and design. ABQ collected the patient’s clinical data and wrote the first draft. SXW and XJY performed the histological examination of the kidney biopsy. XZZ followed up with the patient and collected the clinical data. FDZ, XJY, and MHZ revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Peking University First Hospital.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of the case report and any accompanying images.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Qin, Ab., Yu, Xj., Zheng, Xz. et al. Lessons for the clinical nephrologist: a rare case with MGRS characterized by combined crystalline light chain proximal tubulopathy and crystal-storing histiocytosis responding to daratumumab. J Nephrol 36, 1203–1207 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-023-01584-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-023-01584-1