Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The use of mini-invasive surgical techniques to treat refractory exit-site and tunnel infections in peritoneal dialysis patients: a clinical approach

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peritoneal dialysis—(PD) related infections continue to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients on PD. Although great advances have been made in the prevention and treatment of infectious complications over the past two decades, catheter-related infections represent a significant cause of technical failure in PD. Recent studies support the role of exit-site/tunnel infections in causing peritonitis. Peritonitis secondary to tunnel infection led to catheter loss in most cases. Thus, removing the catheter when exit-site/tunnel infection is refractory to medical therapy has been recommended. This approach requires interrupting PD and, after the placement of a central venous catheter, and transferring the patient to haemodialysis. In order to continue PD, simultaneous catheter removal and replacement of the PD catheter has been suggested. Although simultaneous catheter removal and replacement avoids temporary haemodialysis, it implies the removal/reinsertion of the catheter and the immediate initiation of PD with the risk of mechanical complications, such as leakage and malfunction. Hence, several mini-invasive surgical techniques, such as curettage, cuff-shaving, removal of the superficial cuff, and partial reimplantation of the catheter, have been proposed as rescue treatments. These procedures may allow the rescue of the catheter with a success rate of 70–100%. Therefore, in case of refractory exit-site/tunnel infection, a mini-invasive surgical revision should be considered before removing the catheter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Kavanagh D, Prescott GJ, Mactier RA, Renal S (2004) Peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis in Scotland (1999–2002). Nephrol Dial Transplant 19:2584–2591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Piraino B, Bernardini J, Sorkin M (1989) Catheter Infections as a factor in the transfer of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients to hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 13:365–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6386(89)80018-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jaar BG, Plantinga LC, Crews DC et al (2009) Timing, causes, predictors and prognosis of switching from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis: a prospective study. BMC Nephrol 10:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. van Diepen ATN, Tomlinson GA, Jassal SV (2012) The association between exit site infection and subsequent peritonitis among peritoneal dialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7:1266–1271

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lloyd A, Tangri N, Shafer LA et al (2013) The risk of peritonitis after an exit site infection: a time-matched, case—control study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 28:1915–1921

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Piraino B (2009) Insights on peritoneal dialysis-related infections. Contrib Nephrol 163:161–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Costerton JW, Cheng KJ, Geesey GG, Ladd TI, Nickel JC, Dasgupta MMTJ (1987) Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. Ann Rev Microbiol 41:435–464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE et al (1995) Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol 49:711–745

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Costerton J, Stewart P, Greenberg E (1999) Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent Infections. Science (1979) 284:1318–1322

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nardelli L, Scalamogna A, Messa P (2021) The impact of the superficial cuff position on the exit site and tunnel infections in CAPD patients. J Nephrol 34:493–501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Perl J, Wald R, Mcfarlane P et al (2011) Hemodialysis vascular access modifies the association between dialysis modality and survival. J Am Soc Nephrol 22:1113–1121

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Astor BC, Eustace JA, Powe NR et al (2005) Type of vascular access and survival among incident hemodialysis patients: the choices for healthy outcomes in caring for ESRD (CHOICE) study. J Am Soc Nephrol 16:1449–1455. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2004090748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ishani A, Collins AJ, Herzog CAFR (2005) Septicemia, access and cardiovascular disease in dialysis patients: the USRDS Wave 2 Study 1. Kidney Int 68:311–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Patel PR, Kallen AJAM (2010) Epidemiology, surveillance, and prevention of bloodstream infections in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 56:566–577. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.02.352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Swartz R, Messana J, Reynolds J, Ranjit U (1991) Simultaneous catheter replacement and removal in refractory peritoneal dialysis infections. Kidney Int 40:1160–1165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cancarini GC, Manili L, Brunori G et al (1994) Simultaneous catheter replacement-removal during infectious complications in peritoneal dialysis. Adv Perit Dial 10:210–213

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Posthuma N, Borgstein PJ, Eijsbouts Q, Wee PM (1998) Simultaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion and removal in catheter-related infections without interruption of peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 13:700–703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Crabtree J, Siddiqi R (2016) Simultaneous catheter replacement for infectious and mechanical complications without interruption of peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 36:182–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lui SL, Yip T, Tse KC et al (2005) Treatment of refractory pseudomonas aeruginosa exit-site infection by simultaneous removal and reinsertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter. Perit Dial Int 25:560–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ziauddin A, Choudhury D, Lee J, Girgis H (1997) The role of curettage in the care of persistent exit-site infection in CAPD patients. Perit Dial Int 17:195–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nichols W, Nolph K (1983) A technique for managing exit site and cuff infections in Tenckhoff catheters. Perit Dial Bull 3:S4–S5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Roman J, Gonzalez A (1984) Tenckhoff catheter repair by the splicing technique. Perit Dial Bull 4:89–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Scalamogna A, De Vecchi A (2000) Nuova tecnica di rimozione della cuffia superficiale nei pazienti con infezione dell’emergenza resistente alla terapia medica. G Ital Nefrol 17:635–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/03913988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Scalamogna A, Nardelli L, Cosa F et al (2021) Mini-invasive surgical techniques for the peritoneal catheter rescue in refractory tunnel infections. G Ital Nefrol 1(3)

  25. Piraino B, Bernardini J, Peitzman A, Sorkin M (1987) Failure of peritoneal catheter cuff shaving to eradicate infection. Perit Dial Bull 7:179–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Scalamogna A, de Vecchi A, Maccario M et al (1995) Cuff-shaving procedure. A rescue treatment for exit-site infection unresponsive to medical therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 10:2325–2327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Crabtree J, Burchette R (2005) Surgical salvage of peritoneal dialysis catheters from chronic exit-site and tunnel infections. Am J Surg 190:4–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Terawaki H, Nakano H, Ogura M et al (2013) Unroofing surgery with en bloc resection of the skin and tissues around the peripheral cuff. Perit Dial Int 33:573–576

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Suh H, Wadhwa N, Cabralda T et al (1997) Persistent exit-site/tunnel infection and subcutaneous cuff removal in PD patients. Adv Perit Dial 13:233–236

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cho K, Do J, Park J, Yoon K (2012) Catheter revision for the treatment of intractable exit site infection/tunnel infection in peritoneal dialysis patients: a single centre experience. Nephrology 17:760–766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Meng C, Beco A, Oliveira A et al (2019) Peritoneal dialysis cuff-shaving—a salvage therapy for refractory exit-site infections. Perit Dial Int 39:276–281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kang SH, Cho KH, Kim AY, Do JY (2022) Catheter salvage using revision for a peritoneal dialysis catheter with intractable exit site and/or tunnel infections. Semin Dial Online ahe: https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.13094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kirmizis D, Bowes E, Ansari B, Cairns H (2019) Exit-site relocation: a novel, straightforward technique for exit-site infections. Perit Dial Int 39:350–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Macchini F, Testa S, Valadè A et al (2009) Conservative surgical management of catheter infections in children on peritoneal dialysis. Pediatr Surg Int 25:703–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yoshino A, Honda M, Ikeda M et al (2004) Merit of the cuff-shaving procedure in children with tunnel infection. Pediatr Nephrol 19:1267–1272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cheung AHS, Wheeler MS, Limm WML et al (1995) A salvage technique for continuous Ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheters with exit-site infections. Am J Surg 170:60–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Oki R, Hamasaki Y, Komaru Y et al (2020) Catheter diversion procedure with exit-site renewal promotes peritoneal dialysis catheter survival. Kidney Int Rep 6:325–332

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Chao S, Tsai T (1996) Partial replantation of Tenckhoff catheters to treat intractable exit-site/tunnel infection. J Am Soc Nephrol 7:1085–1087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sakurada T, Okamoto T, Oishi D et al (2014) Subcutaneous pathway diversion for peritoneal dialysis catheter salvage. Adv Perit Dial 30:11–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Clouatre Y, Cartier P, Charbonneau R et al (2000) Outpatient CAPD catheter salvage for persistent exit-site/tunnel infection. Nephrol Dial Transplant 15:231–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fukasawa M, Matsushita K, Tanabe N et al (2002) A novel salvage technique that does not require catheter removal for exit-site infection. Perit Dial Int 22:618–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Muraoka K, Ishibashi Y, Yamaguchi J et al (2011) Early partial re-implantation of Tenckhoff catheters to treat intractable exit-site or tunnel infection. Perit Dial Int 31:350–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nardelli L, Scalamogna A, Zeiler M, Messa P (2020) Use of ultrasounds in PD catheter related infections: indications and clinical implications. G Ital Nefrol S75(7)

  44. Vychytil A, Lorenz M, Schneider B et al (1998) New criteria for management peritoneal dialysis patients of catheter infections using ultrasonography. J Am Soc Nephrol 9:290–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kwan T, Tong MK, Siu Y, Leung K (2004) Ultrasonography in the management of exit site infections in peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephrology 9:348–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Plum J, Sudkamp S, Grabensee B (1994) Results of ultrasound-assisted diagnosis of tunnel infections in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 23:99–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Scalamogna A, Nardelli L, Cicero E, Castellano G (2022) Analysis of mechanical complications in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis. J Nephrol 35:1489–1496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Scalamogna A, Nardelli L, Zubidat D, Castellano G (2022) Simultaneous replacement and removal of the peritoneal catheter is effective in patients with refractory tunnel infections sustained by S. aureus. Int Urol Nephrol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-022-03288-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Research idea and study design: AS; LN supervision or mentorship: GC. Each author contributed important intellectual content during manuscript drafting or revision and accepts accountability for the overallwork by ensuring that questions pertaining to the accuracy or integrity of any portion of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Nardelli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have read and understood Journal of Nephrology’s reports policy on disclosing conflicts of interest and declare that we have none.

Ethical approval

No required.

Informed consent to participate

No required.

Informed consent to publish

No doubt that anonymity can be maintained.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scalamogna, A., Nardelli, L. & Castellano, G. The use of mini-invasive surgical techniques to treat refractory exit-site and tunnel infections in peritoneal dialysis patients: a clinical approach. J Nephrol 36, 1743–1749 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-022-01479-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-022-01479-7

Keywords

Navigation