Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Association of aldehyde exposure with bone mineral density in the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES 2013–2014)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The association between aldehyde exposure and bone health in humans remains unclear. This study was to evaluate the association of serum aldehydes with bone mineral density (BMD) and osteopenia/osteoporosis.

Methods

We analyzed the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cross-sectional data from 2013 to 2014. Weighted multivariate-adjusted linear regression and logistic regression models were used to assess the association between specific aldehydes and osteopenia/osteoporosis. Associations between aldehyde combinations and BMD were also evaluated using the restricted cubic spline (RCS) method.

Results

Compared with men in the first tertile, those in the third tertile of propanaldehyde concentration were negatively associated with proximal femur and lumbar spine BMD. Significant inverse associations were observed between benzaldehyde exposure and trochanter BMD in women. Benzaldehyde increased the risk of osteopenia/osteoporosis 2.75-fold [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06, 7.11] in the highest tertile in women compared to the lowest tertile concentration. In males, the prevalence of total femur, femur neck, and trochanter osteopenia/osteoporosis was significantly higher in the highest versus the lowest tertile of propanaldehyde exposure, with odds ratios (ORs) of 6.84 (95% CI = 2.33, 20.04), 2.72 (95% CI = 1.18, 6.27), and 3.26 (95% CI = 1.25, 8.56), respectively. RCS regression also showed decreased BMD continuously with increasing serum mixed aldehyde levels.

Conclusions

Serum aldehyde concentrations were associated with low BMD and high osteopenia/osteoporosis risk in adults, with propanaldehyde and benzaldehyde being the most critical. Co-exposure to aldehyde combinations was negatively correlated with BMD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Camacho PM, Petak SM, Binkley N, Diab DL, Eldeiry LS, Farooki A et al (2020) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology Clinical Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis-2020 Update. Endocr Pract 26:1–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hendrickx G, Boudin E, Van Hul W (2015) A look behind the scenes: the risk and pathogenesis of primary osteoporosis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 11:462–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wright NC, Saag KG, Dawson-Hughes B, Khosla S, Siris ES (2017) The impact of the new National Bone Health Alliance (NBHA) diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of osteoporosis in the USA. Osteoporos Int 28:1225–1232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenblatt MB, Tsai JN, Wein MN (2017) Bone turnover markers in the diagnosis and monitoring of metabolic bone disease. Clin Chem 63:464–474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu J, Curtis EM, Cooper C, Harvey NC (2019) State of the art in osteoporosis risk assessment and treatment. J Endocrinol Invest 42:1149–1164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Elonheimo H, Lange R, Tolonen H, Kolossa-Gehring M (2021) Environmental substances associated with osteoporosis-a scoping review. Int J Environ Res Pub Health 18(2):738

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cai S, Zhu J, Sun L, Fan C, Zhong Y, Shen Q et al (2019) Association between urinary triclosan with bone mass density and osteoporosis in US adult women, 20052010. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 104:4531–4538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ma Y, Ran D, Shi X, Zhao H, Liu Z (2021) Cadmium toxicity: a role in bone cell function and teeth development. Sci Total Environ 769:144646

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sinharoy P, McAllister SL, Vasu M, Gross ER (2019) Environmental aldehyde sources and the health implications of exposure. Adv Exp Med Biol 1193:35–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Silva LK, Espenship MF, Newman CA, Zhang L, Zhu W, Blount BC et al (2021) Assessment of serum concentrations of 12 Aldehydes in the U.S. population from the 2013–2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Environ Sci Technol 55:5076–5083

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Weng X, Chen J, Fei Q, Guo X, Liu S, Wen L et al (2021) The association of aldehydes exposure with diabetes mellitus in US population: NHANES 2013–2014. Chemosphere 291:133019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liao S, Zhang J, Shi S, Gong D, Lu X, Cheang I et al (2020) Association of aldehyde exposure with cardiovascular disease. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 206:111385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wojciechowska C, Jachec W, Romuk E, Ciszek A, Bodnar P, Chwalba T et al (2021) Serum sulfhydryl groups malondialdehyde, uric acid, and bilirubin as predictors of adverse outcome in heart failure patients due to ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2021:6693405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Srivastava S, Chandrasekar B, Bhatnagar A, Prabhu SD (2002) Lipid peroxidation-derived aldehydes and oxidative stress in the failing heart: role of aldose reductase. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 283:H2612-2619

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsai HY, Hsu YJ, Lu CY, Tsai MC, Hung WC, Chen PC et al (2021) Pharmacological activation of aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 protects against heatstroke-induced acute lung injury by modulating oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction. Front Immunol 12:740562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Romagnoli C, Marcucci G, Favilli F, Zonefrati R, Mavilia C, Galli G et al (2013) Role of GSH/GSSG redox couple in osteogenic activity and osteoclastogenic markers of human osteoblast-like SaOS-2 cells. FEBS J 280:867–879

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bonewald LF (2011) The amazing osteocyte. J Bone Miner Res 26:229–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Maggio D, Barabani M, Pierandrei M, Polidori MC, Catani M, Mecocci P et al (2003) Marked decrease in plasma antioxidants in aged osteoporotic women: results of a cross-sectional study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1523–1527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cervellati C, Bonaccorsi G, Cremonini E, Bergamini CM, Patella A, Castaldini C et al (2013) Bone mass density selectively correlates with serum markers of oxidative damage in post-menopausal women. Clin Chem Lab Med 51:333–338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey., Available from: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/ContinuousNhanes/Default.aspx?BeginYear=2013. (accessed 9 May 2022). (2013–2014).

  21. Silva LK, Hile GA, Capella KM, Espenship MF, Smith MM, De Jesus VR et al (2018) Quantification of 19 Aldehydes in Human Serum by Headspace SPME/GC/High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry. Environ Sci Technol 52:10571–10579

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: 2013–2014 data documentation, codebook, and frequencies: dual energy X-ray absorptiometry-femur (DXXFEM_H). Available from: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/Nchs/Nhanes/2013-2014/DXXFEM_H.htm. (accessed 9 May 2022).

  23. Looker AC, Orwoll ES, Johnston CC Jr, R.L. (1997) Lindsay, H.W. Wahner, W.L. Dunn, et al., Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. adults from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 12:1761–1768

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Looker AC, Borrud LG, Hughes JP, Fan B, Shepherd JA, Melton LJ 3rd (2012) Lumbar spine and proximal femur bone mineral density, bone mineral content, and bone area: United States, 2005–2008, Vital Health. Stat 11:1–132

    Google Scholar 

  25. Phipps AI, Ichikawa L, Bowles EJ, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K, Miglioretti DL et al (2010) Defining menopausal status in epidemiologic studies: a comparison of multiple approaches and their effects on breast cancer rates. Maturitas 67:60–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Qu CJ, Teng LQ, Liu XN, Zhang YB, Fang J, Shen CY (2021) Dose-response relationship between physical activity and the incidence of peripheral artery disease in general population: insights from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2004. Front Cardiovasc Med 8:730508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Guo J, Huang Y, Bian S, Zhao C, Jin Y, Yu D et al (2018) Associations of urinary polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with bone mass density and osteoporosis in U.S. adults, NHANES 2005–2010. Environ Pollut 240:209–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hu Y, Chiu YH, Hauser R, Chavarro J, Sun Q (2016) Overall and class-specific scores of pesticide residues from fruits and vegetables as a tool to rank intake of pesticide residues in United States: a validation study. Environ Int 92–93:294–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. LoPachin RM, Gavin T (2014) Molecular mechanisms of aldehyde toxicity: a chemical perspective. Chem Res Toxicol 27:1081–1091

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu C, Liang J, Xu S, Liu Q, Xu J, Gu A (2020) Increased serum levels of aldehydes are associated with cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors in adults. J Hazard Mater 400:123134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Huang CX, Lv B, Wang Y (2015) Protein phosphatase 2A mediates oxidative stress induced apoptosis in Osteoblasts. Mediat Inflamm 2015:804260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Almeida M, Martin-Millan M, Ambrogini E, Bradsher R 3rd, Han L, Chen XD et al (2010) Estrogens attenuate oxidative stress and the differentiation and apoptosis of osteoblasts by DNA-binding-independent actions of the ERalpha. J Bone Miner Res 25:769–781

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Agidigbi TS, Kim C (2019) Reactive oxygen species in osteoclast differentiation and possible pharmaceutical targets of ros-mediated osteoclast diseases. Int J Mol Sci 20:3576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen L, Wang G, Wang Q, Liu Q, Sun Q, Chen L (2019) N-acetylcysteine prevents orchiectomy-induced osteoporosis by inhibiting oxidative stress and osteocyte senescence. Am J Transl Res 11:4337–4347

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ahmed Laskar A, Younus H (2019) Aldehyde toxicity and metabolism: the role of aldehyde dehydrogenases in detoxification, drug resistance and carcinogenesis. Drug Metab Rev 51:42–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hoshi H, Hao W, Fujita Y, Funayama A, Miyauchi Y, Hashimoto K et al (2012) Aldehyde-stress resulting from Aldh2 mutation promotes osteoporosis due to impaired osteoblastogenesis. J Bone Miner Res 27:2015–2023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Liao S, Wu N, Gong D, Tang X, Yin T, Zhang H et al (2020) Association of aldehydes exposure with obesity in adults. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 201:110785

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Barrera G, Pizzimenti S, Daga M, Dianzani C, Arcaro A, Cetrangolo GP et al (2018) Lipid peroxidation-derived aldehydes, 4-hydroxynonenal and malondialdehyde in aging-related disorders. Antioxidants (Basel) 7:102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chrostek L, Jelski W, Szmitkowski M, Puchalski Z (2003) Gender-related differences in hepatic activity of alcohol dehydrogenase isoenzymes and aldehyde dehydrogenase in humans. J Clin Lab Anal 17:93–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the National Center for Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the participants who enrolled in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PZ, XFX, and CPC designed the study and collected the data. PZ, XFX, and JMR analyzed the data. PZ, CPC and JMR wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Ran.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethic approval

The National Center for Health Statistics institutional review board approved the study, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Research involving human participants

NHANES was performed by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and was approved by the institutional review board of the NCHS.

Informed consent

All participants provided written informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Fig. 1. Flowchart showing the selection of eligible participants

40618_2022_1840_MOESM2_ESM.tif

Supplementary Fig. 2. Correlation between exposure to different aldehydes. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were determined between serum concentrations of six aldehydes in US adults from NHANES 2013-2014. Darker color represents higher levels of correlation coefficients. BNA, benzaldehyde; BTA, butyraldehyde; HPA, heptanaldehyde; HXA, hexanaldehyde; IOA, isopentanaldehyde; POA, propanaldehyde; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.

Supplementary file3 (DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, P., Xiong, X., Chen, C. et al. Association of aldehyde exposure with bone mineral density in the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES 2013–2014). J Endocrinol Invest 45, 2085–2096 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-022-01840-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-022-01840-4

Keywords

Navigation