Abstract
Curriculum-based measurement (CBM) is an approach to measuring student academic growth and evaluating the effectiveness of instruction (Deno, Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232, 1985) that was developed, in part, based on characteristics of applied behavior analysis. Learning to administer and use CBM data is commonly part of teacher preparation programs, but less common in behavior analysis graduate programs (Schreck et al. Behavioral Interventions, 31, 355-376, 2016; Schreck & Mazur, Behavioral Interventions, 23, 201-212, 2008). This article describes a sequence of steps that educational teams can follow to use CBM within the multi-tiered system of support (MTSS) framework. These steps include (1) selecting a CBM publisher and gathering materials; (2) practicing administering and scoring CBM; (3) administering, scoring, and comparing student scores to grade-level benchmarks; (4) using CBM data to write ambitious and realistic IEP goals; and (5) using data-based individualization. Each step is described and includes a description of a case study that is based on our experiences working with pre-service teacher candidates, and special education and behavior analysis graduate students in K–12 and after-school instructional programs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
References
Bailey, T. R., & Weingarten, Z. (2019). Strategies for setting high-quality academic individualized education program goals. Washington, DC: National Center on Intensive Intervention, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (n.d.). BACB certificant data. Retrieved from https://www.bacb.com/BACB-certificant-data/
Deno, S. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging Alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298505200303
Deno, S. (2003). Curriculum-based measurements: Development and perspective. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28(3–4), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/073724770302800302
Deno, S. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 184–192. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ785942.pdf
Deno, S., & Mirkin, P. K. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Council for Exceptional Children.
Goos, M., Watt, S., Park, Y., & Hosp, J. (2012). A guide to choosing web-based curriculum-based measurement for the classroom. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(2), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991204500204
Heward, W. L. (2005). Twelve reasons why ABA is good for education and why those reasons have been insufficient. In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, N. A. Neef, S. M. Peterson, D. M. Sainato, G. Cartledge, R. Gardner, L. D. Peterson, S. B. Hersch, & J. C. Dardig (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education: Achievements, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 239–251). Pearson.
Hosp, M., Hosp, J., & Howell, K. (2016). The ABCs of CBM: A Practical Guide to curriculum-based measurement (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
Horner, R. H., & Sugai, G. (2015). School-wide PBIS: An example of applied behavior analysis implemented at a scale of social importance. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8(1), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-015-0045-4
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).
Kipfmiller, K. J., Brodhead, M. T., Wolfe, K., LaLonde, K., Sipila, E. S., Bak, M. Y., & Fisher, M. H. (2019). Training front-line employees to conduct visual analysis using a clinical decision-making model. Journal of Behavioral Education, 28, 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-09318-1
Layden, S. J. (2022). Creating a professional network: A statewide model to support school-based behavior analysts. Behavioral Analysis in Practice, 16, 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-022-00700-0
McLeskey, J., Barringer, M-D., Billingsley, B., Brownell, M., Jackson, D., Kennedy, M., Lewis, T., Maheady, L., Rodriguez, J., Scheeler, M. C., Winn, J., & Ziegler, D. (2017, January). High-leverage practices in special education. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children & CEEDAR Center. © 2017 CEC & CEEDAR.
National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2013). Data-based individualization: A framework for intensive intervention. Office of Special Education, U.S. Department of Education.
Putnam, R., & F. & Kincaid, D. (2015). School-wide PBIS: Extending the impact of applied behavior analysis. Why is this important to behavior analysts? Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8(1), 88–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-015-0055-2
Schreck, K. A., & Mazur, K. (2008). Behavior analyst use of and beliefs in treatments for people with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 23, 201–212.
Schreck, K. A., Karunaratne, Y., Zane, T., & Wilford, H. (2016). Behavior analysts’ use of and beliefs in treatment for people with autism: A 5-year follow-up. Behavioral Interventions, 31(4), 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1461
Shepley, C., & Grisham-Brown, J. (2019). Applied behavior analysis in early childhood education: An overview of policies, research, blended practices, and the curriculum framework. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12(1), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-018-0236-x
Stecker, P. M., Fuch, L., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42(8), 795–819. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20113
The IRIS Center. (2015). Intensive intervention (part 2): Collecting and analyzing data for data-based individualization. Retrieved from https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/dbi2/
Vladescu, J. C., Breenman, S. L., Cox, D. J., & Drevon, D. D. (2022). What’s the big IDEA? A preliminary analysis of behavior analyst’s self-reported training in and knowledge of federal special education law. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 15, 867–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-021-00673-6
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or nonfinancial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We have no known conflict of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
LaLonde, K., VanDerwall, R. & Walsh, M. The Basics of CBM: What BCBAs Need to Know. Behav Analysis Practice 16, 1231–1240 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-023-00841-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-023-00841-w