Skip to main content
Log in

A Survey of Staff Training and Performance Management Practices: An Update

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Behavior Analysis in Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The field of behavior analysis has experienced marked growth in the number of credentialed professionals over the last decade. This growth may have implications for the quality of staff training, performance management, and supervision practices provided in human service settings. The purpose of this survey was to extend DiGennaro Reed and Henley (2015) by surveying credentialed and aspiring behavior analytic professionals on the staff training, performance management, and supervision practices available at their current place of employment. Three main differences were observed in relation to the findings of DiGennaro Reed and Henley. The current findings indicate notable changes in the demographic characteristics of survey respondents. In addition, we observed modest increases in the use of best practices for initial and ongoing training and performance management. Results also indicate several areas of concern regarding the provision of supervisory skills training.

• Results revealed improvements in the percentage of respondents who received initial or preservice training compared to DiGennaro Reed and Henley (2015). However, employers primarily rely on instructions and modeling to train their employees.

• Findings revealed greater reliance on asynchronous and synchronous online training modalities compared to DiGennaro Reed and Henley (2015).

• Results revealed a slight shift in the percentage of respondents who reported receiving ongoing training compared to DiGennaro Reed and Henley (2015). In the present study, BCaBAs and RBTs generally received ongoing training; however, fewer BCBAs reported receiving ongoing training.

• The reported use of performance management practices improved compared to DiGennaro Reed and Henley (2015). That is, a higher percentage of respondents reported being observed at work while carrying out their job responsibilities.

• Of the respondents who supervise staff, less than half of them reported receiving supervisory skills training. And only half of those respondents reported that their training prepared them to supervise others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The full dataset is freely available on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/f4zds/) for readers who are interested.

Notes

  1. In this article, BCBA refers to credentialed professionals at both the master’s and doctoral (i.e., BCBA-D) levels.

  2. The Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts now requires supervisors to evaluate the effects of their supervision and training (BACB, 2020).

  3. Because this survey focuses on credentialed professionals, we use this terminology. However, we advocate that training and performance management should be in place for all employees regardless of credential status.

  4. Where appropriate, we analyzed the data across certification type to capture potential differences in staff training and performance management practices based on credential.

  5. For those who are interested in reading the specific requirement changes, please visit the Behavior Analyst Certification Board website (www.bacb.com).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florence D. DiGennaro Reed.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

We have no known conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the University IRB.

Informed Consent

All participants provided informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blackman, A.L., DiGennaro Reed, F.D., Erath, T.G. et al. A Survey of Staff Training and Performance Management Practices: An Update. Behav Analysis Practice 16, 731–744 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-022-00762-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-022-00762-0

Keywords

Navigation