Skip to main content
Log in

Discussion and Conceptual Analysis of Four Group Contingencies for Behavioral Process Improvement in an ABA Service Delivery Quality Framework

  • Discussion and Review Paper
  • Published:
Behavior Analysis in Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Applied behavior analysis (ABA) organizations that provide services to children with autism can apply contingencies to improve employee performance or behavioral processes. Such contingencies may be especially important for maximizing ABA service delivery quality (ASDQ). For some behavioral processes, group contingencies applied to the behavior of individuals within the process may be more appropriate than individualized contingencies. In the history of the profession, behavior analysts have used group contingencies at the operant level of selection, such as independent, interdependent, and dependent group contingencies. However, recent experimental work in culturo-behavioral science suggests the metacontingency, an analogue of the operant contingency at the cultural level of selection, can also control the behavior of individuals in a group. This article discusses how such group-oriented contingencies could be used by managers in organizations in behavioral process improvement efforts to target key performance indicators of quality in an ASDQ framework. The paper ends with a discussion of limitations and future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

None to report.

Notes

  1. Although it is possible to implement MC with restrictions on IBC, too.

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Sarah Liberty, Aecio Borba, Robbie Fattal, Traci Cihon, Sigrid Glenn, and Scott Page for their helpful comments on previous versions of this manuscript.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryant C. Silbaugh.

Ethics declarations

Informed Consent

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

None to report. No businesses have provided monetary support, and the authors are not affiliated with the organizations identified in this paper.

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

The author consents to publication of the current manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silbaugh, B.C. Discussion and Conceptual Analysis of Four Group Contingencies for Behavioral Process Improvement in an ABA Service Delivery Quality Framework. Behav Analysis Practice 16, 421–436 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-022-00750-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-022-00750-4

Keywords

Navigation