Abstract
Matrix training consists of arranging targets for instruction to promote fine-grained stimulus control resulting in the establishment of skills without direct training. Recent reviews of the matrix training literature (Curiel et al., 2020a, b.; Kemmerer et al., 2021) highlighted the efficacy and efficiency of the approach with learners with and without disabilities. These reviews noted substantial variations in procedures across studies, suggesting the approach may be flexibly deployed across content areas and teaching procedures. This outcome is positive for practitioners as they may customize matrix training to meet the unique needs of their clients. However, it also necessitates decision making to sort through the variations in the literature. This tutorial was developed to help practitioners weigh various considerations when using matrix training. Tools and resources are provided to illustrate and accelerate adoption into practice settings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Axe, J. B., & Sainato, D. M. (2010). Matrix training of preliteracy skills with preschoolers with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43(4), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-635
Bergmann, S., Van Den Elzen, G., Kodak, T., Niland, H., & Dawson, D. (2022). Comparing matrix training procedures for children with autism spectrum disorder. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 38(1), 24-53.
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Allen & Unwin.
Carnine, D. (1997). Bridging the research-to-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63(4), 513–521.
Cook, B. G., & Odom, S. L. (2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional Children, 79(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291307900201
Curiel, E. S., & Curiel, H. (2021). Teaching receptive money identification skills using matrix training: A preliminary investigation. Behavioral Interventions, 36(3), 572–582. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1794
Curiel, E. S., Sainato, D. M., & Goldstein, H. (2016). Matrix training of receptive language skills with a toddler with autism spectrum disorder: A case study. Education and Treatment of Children, 39(1), 95–109.
Curiel, E. S., Sainato, D. M., & Goldstein, H. (2018). Matrix training for toddlers with autism spectrum disorder and other language delays. Journal of Early Intervention, 40(3), 268–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815118788060
Curiel, E. S., Axe, J. B., Sainato, D. M., & Goldstein, H. (2020a). Systematic review of matrix training for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities, 35(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357619881216
Curiel, E. S., Curiel, H., & Li, A. (2020b). Generative time telling in adults with disabilities: A matrix training approach. Behavioral Interventions, 35(2), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1714
Engelmann, S., & Osborn, J. (2008). Language for learning. Science Research Associates.
Frampton, S. E., Wymer, S. C., Hansen, B., & Shillingsburg, M. A. (2016). The use of matrix training to promote generative language with children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49(4), 869–883. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.340
Frampton, S. E., Thompson, T. M., Bartlett, B. L., Hansen, B., & Shillingsburg, M. A. (2019). The use of matrix training to teach color-shape tacts to children with autism. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12(2), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-018-00288-4
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1993.12085636
Fuller, J. L., & Fienup, D. M. (2018). A preliminary analysis of mastery criterion level: Effects on response maintenance. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 11(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-017-0201-0
Goldstein, H. (1983). Recombinative generalization: Relationships between environmental conditions and the linguistic repertoires of language learners. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 3(4), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-4684(83)90002-2
Goldstein, H., & Mousetis, L. (1989). Generalized language learning by children with severe mental retardation: Effects of peers’ expressive modeling. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22(3), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1989.22-245
Goldstein, H., Angelo, D., & Mousetis, L. (1987). Acquisition and extension of syntactic repertoires by severely mentally retarded youth. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 8(4), 549–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(87)90054-0
Grow, L. L., Carr, J. E., Kodak, T. M., Jostad, C. M., & Kisamore, A. N. (2011). A comparison of methods for teaching receptive labeling to children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(3), 475–498. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-475
Grow, L. L., Kodak, T., & Carr, J. E. (2014). A comparison of methods for teaching receptive labeling to children with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic replication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47(3), 600–605. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.141
Hatzenbuhler, E. G., Molteni, J. D., & Axe, J. B. (2019). Increasing play skills in children with autism spectrum disorder via peer-mediated matrix training. Education and Treatment of Children, 42(3), 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2019.0014
Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65(1), 185–241. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1996.65-185
Jimenez-Gomez, C., Rajagopal, S., Nastri, R., & Chong, I. M. (2019). Matrix training for expanding the communication of toddlers and preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12(2), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-019-00346-5
Kemmerer, A. R., Vladescu, J. C., Carrow, J. N., Sidener, T. M., & Deshais, M. A. (2021). A systematic review of the matrix training literature. Behavioral Interventions, 36(2), 473–495. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1780
Kinney, E. M., Vedora, J., & Stromer, R. (2003). Computer-presented video models to teach generative spelling to a child with an autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 5(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007030050010301
Kohler, K. T., & Malott, R. W. (2014). Matrix training and verbal generativity in children with autism. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 30(2), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-014-0016-9
LaFrance, D. L., & Tarbox, J. (2020). The importance of multiple exemplar instruction in the establishment of novel verbal behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53(1), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.611
LeBlanc, L. A., Miguel, C. F., Cummings, A. R., Goldsmith, T. R., & Carr, J. E. (2003). The effects of three stimulus-equivalence testing conditions on emergent US geography relations of children diagnosed with autism. Behavioral Interventions: Theory & Practice in Residential & Community-Based Clinical Programs, 18(4), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.144
Marya, V., Frampton, S., & Shillingsburg, A. (2021). Matrix training to teach tacts using speech generating devices: Replication and extension. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 54(3), 1235–1250. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.819
Mayfield, K. H., & Chase, P. N. (2002). The effects of cumulative practice on mathematics problem solving. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 35(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2002.35-105
Miguel, C. F. (2016). Common and intraverbal bidirectional naming. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0066-2
Mueller, M. M., Olmi, D. J., & Saunders, K. J. (2000). Recombinative generalization of within-syllable units in prereading children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33(4), 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2000.33-515
Naoi, N., Yokoyama, K., & Yamamoto, J. (2006). Matrix training for expressive and receptive two-word utterances in children with autism. Japanese Journal of Special Education, 43, 505–518.
Odom, S. L., Collet-Klingenberg, L., Rogers, S. J., & Hatton, D. D. (2010). Evidence-based practices in interventions for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 54(4), 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10459881003785506
Palmer, D. C. (2012). The role of atomic repertoires in complex behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 35(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392266
Pauwels, A. A., Ahearn, W. H., & Cohen, S. J. (2015). Recombinative generalization of tacts through matrix training with individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 31(2), 200–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-015-0038-y
Saaybi, S., AlArab, N., Hannoun, S., Saade, M., Tutunji, R., Zeeni, C., Shbarou, R., Hourani, R., & Boustany, R. M. (2019). Pre-and post-therapy assessment of clinical outcomes and white matter integrity in autism spectrum disorder: pilot study. Frontiers in Neurology, 10, 877.
Saunders, K. J., & Spradlin, J. E. (1993). Conditional discrimination in mentally retarded subjects: Programming acquisition and learning set. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60(3), 571–585. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1993.60-571
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century Crofts.
Solano, A. S., Reeve, S. A., Reeve, K. F., DeBar, R. M., Dickson, C. A., & Milata, E. M. (2021). Comparing matrix sizes when teaching direction following to preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder. Behavioral Interventions, 36(4), 778–795. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1824
Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10(2), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1977.10-349
Sundberg, M. L. (2008). VB-MAPP: Verbal Behavior Milestones Assessment and Placement Program. AVB Press.
Wilson, E. R., Wine, B., & Fitterer, K. (2017). An investigation of the matrix training approach to teach social play skills. Behavioral Interventions, 32(3), 278–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1473
Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., Cybriwsky, C., Doyle, P. M., Schuster, J. W., Ault, M. J., & Gast, D. L. (1992). Constant time delay with discrete responses: A review of effectiveness and demographic, procedural, and methodological parameters. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 13(3), 239–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(92)90028-5
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Bill Heward and Dr. Gretchen Dittrich for encouraging us to write this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
We have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Sarah E. Frampton is now at the University of Nebraska Omaha.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(DOCX 300 kb)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Frampton, S.E., Axe, J.B. A Tutorial for Implementing Matrix Training in Practice. Behav Analysis Practice 16, 334–345 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-022-00733-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-022-00733-5