Abstract
A free tool for measuring dissemination impact (as opposed to scholarly citation impact) is reviewed. The tool is easy to use and provides much information of interest to the scientist-practitioner who is interested in publishing articles that promote the dissemination of applied behavior analysis. It may also help applied behavior analysts meet the ethics code requirement to strive for accurate representation of their work in public forums like social media.
Notes
The cultural power of the printed word (McCuskey, 2014) is what makes these written records seem a good place to start in measuring dissemination-relevant attention. But full disclosure: There is debate in the bibliometrics literature about whether it is justified to call this kind of attention "impact." Critics point out that altmetric mentions can be superficial, i.e., not indicate a profound influence over someone's daily functioning (e.g., Sugimoto, 2015). We think this argument is misguided, however, because it implies that other forms of mention, such as those in scholarly citations, are by contrast always substantive. In reality, citations often demonstrate "an apparent lack of engagement with the cited literature" (Horbach et al., 2021, p. 1). Therefore, although some altmetric mentions indeed are superficial (as acknowledged later in this article), this doesn't make the attention score any less valid than other means of estimating "impact."
Most journal websites list an article's DOI along with title, authors, abstract, and other core information.
All data presented here were obtained via the Bookmarklet on February 7–11, 2022.
Book content is incorporated into the Altmetric.com database under certain circumstances. For more information, including about a tool that can search book content, see https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions.
For specifics of how different types of mentions are weighted in calculating the attention score, see https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000233311-how-is-the-altmetric-attention-score-calculated-
Within reason. Articles older than the electronic sources of altmetric data have reduced odds of receiving mentions, although there are some exceptions to this rule (e.g., see the Upper article in Table 1).
As tabulated by Altmetric.con. No two tools tabulate citations in exactly the same way, so the counts shown here are likely to disagree with those in the more familiar Google Scholar and Web of Science.
Most contemporary observers see the study is as forcibly imposing cisgender norms. The procedures described in the study have been condemned by the journal that originally published it (Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior & LeBlanc, 2020) and by the Association for Behavior Analysis International (2022).
References
Adie, E., & Roe, W. (2013). Altmetric: enriching scholarly content with article-level discussion and metrics. Learned Publishing, 26, 11–17.
Association for Behavior Analysis International. (2022). Statement on conversion therapy and practices. https://www.abainternational.org/about-us/policies-and-positions/policy-statement-on-conversion-therapy-and-practices,-2021.aspx
Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2020). Ethics code for behavior analysts. https://www.bacb.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Ethics-Code-for-Behavior-Analysts-220316-2.pdf
Blampied, N. M., & France, K. G. (1993). A behavioral model of infant sleep disturbance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 477–492.
Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9), article e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. (2015). Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 66, 2003–2019.
Critchfield, T. S., & Shue, E. Z. (2018). The dead man test: A preliminary experimental analysis. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 11, 381–384.
DeRosa, N. M., Novak, M. D., Morley, A. J., & Roane, H. S. (2019). Comparing response blocking and response interruption/redirection on levels of motor stereotypy: Effects of data analysis procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 52, 1021–1033.
Dixon, D. R., Linstead, E., Granpeesheh, D., Novack, M. N., French, R., Stevens, E., Stevens, L., & Powell, A. (2016). An evaluation of the impact of supervision intensity, supervisor qualifications, and caseload on outcomes in the treatment of autism spectrum disorder. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9, 339–348.
Gelino, B. W., Critchfield, T. S., & Reed, D. R. (in press). Measuring the dissemination impact of culturo-behavior science. Behavior & Social Issues.
Hayes, S. C., Barlow, D. H., & Nelson-Gray, R. O. (1999). The scientist practitioner: Research and accountability in the age of managed care. Allyn & Bacon.
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Aagard, K., & Schneider, J. W. (2021). Meta-research: How problematic citing practices distort science. MetaArXiv. https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/aqyhg/download
McCuskey, B. (2014). Last words in Deadwood: Literacy and mortality on the frontier. Journal of Popular Culture, 47, 284–306.
Ortega, J. L. (2018). The life cycle of altmetric impact: A longitudinal study of six metrics from PlumX. Journal of Informetrics, 12, 579–589.
Patel, V. M., Hounschild, R., & Bornmann, L. (2020). Altmetrics as social-spatial sensors. In S. Konkiel (Ed.), The state of Altmetrics: A tenth anniversary celebration. Altmetric https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13010000
Rekers, G. A., & Lovaas, O. I. (1974). Behavioral treatment of deviant sex-role behaviors in a male child. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 173–190.
Ross, S. W., Horner, R. H., & Higbee, T. (2009). Bully prevention in positive behavior support. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 747–759.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, & LeBlanc, L. A. (2020). Editor's note: Societal changes and expression of concern about Rekers and Lovaas' (1974) “Behavioral treatment of deviant sex-role behaviors in a male child.”. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53, 1830–1836.
Sugimoto, C. (2015, June 24). "Attention is not impact" and other challenges for altmetrics. Wiley Network. https://www.wiley.com/network/researchers/promoting-your-article/attention-is-not-impact-and-other-challenges-for-altmetrics
Trueger, N. S., Thoma, B., Hsu, C. H., Sullivan, D., Peters, L., & Lin, M. (2015). The Altmetric score: A new measure for article-level dissemination and impact. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 66, 549–553.
Twohig, M. P., & Woods, D. W. (2001). Evaluating the duration of the competing response in habit reversal: A parametric analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 517–520.
Walsh, M. B. (2011). The top 10 reasons children with autism deserve ABA. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 4, 72–79.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing financial or nonfinancial interests related to this article or the product described therein.
Ethical Approval
Because this article presents only information available in public databases (no primary research data), oversight by an Institutional Review Board or Animal Care and Use Committee is irrelevant.
Informed Consent
Because no data were collected from human participants, Informed Consent is irrelevant.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The two authors (Thomas S. Critchfield and Dennis R. Dixon) be listed jointly as corresponding authors.
Cheryl Ecott provided helpful feedback on a draft of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Critchfield, T.S., Dixon, D.R. A Scientist-Practitioner’s Guide to Tracking Personal Dissemination Impact: Using the Altmetric Attention Score and Bookmarklet. Behav Analysis Practice 15, 1006–1014 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-022-00725-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-022-00725-5