Advertisement

Behavior Analysis in Practice

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 313–317 | Cite as

An Evaluation of Instructive Feedback to Teach Play Behavior to a Child with Autism Spectrum Disorder

  • Laura L. Grow
  • Tiffany Kodak
  • Andrea Clements
Brief Practice

Abstract

Instructive feedback is used to expose learners to secondary targets during skill acquisition programs (Reichow & Wolery, in Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 327–340, 2011; Werts, Wolery, Gast, & Holcombe, in Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 55–75, 1995). Although unrelated feedback may have clinical utility in practice, very little research has evaluated unrelated instructive feedback, particularly for promoting play behavior (Colozzi, Ward, & Crotty, in Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43, 226–248, 2008). The purpose of the study was to determine if play emerged after embedding instructive feedback during the consequence portion of discrete trial training to teach tacts. An adapted alternating treatments design was used to compare tact training with and without instructive feedback for play behaviors. Instructive feedback resulted in the emergence of play behaviors during tabletop instruction and a play area of a classroom. We discuss the results in terms of clinical practice and future research.

Keywords

Autism Instructive feedback Play behaviors Tact training 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Colozzi, G. A., Ward, L. W., & Crotty, K. E. (2008). Comparison of simultaneous prompting procedure in 1:1 and small group instruction to teach play behaviors to preschool students with pervasive developmental disorder and developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43, 226–248.Google Scholar
  3. Dupere, S., Macdonald, R. P. F., & Ahearn, W. H. (2013). Using video modeling with substitutable loops to teach varied play to children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 662–668. doi: 10.1002/jaba.68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Haq, S., Zemantic, P., Kodak, T., LeBlanc, B., & Ruppert, T. (2016). Examination of variables impacting the efficacy of instructive feedback. Behavioral Interventions, in press.Google Scholar
  5. Loughrey, T. O., Betz, A. M., Majdalany, L. M., & Nicholson, K. (2014). Using instructive feedback to teach category names to children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 425–430. doi: 10.1002/jaba.123.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nottingham, C. L., Vladescu, J. C., & Kodak, T. M. (2015). Incorporating additional targets into learning trials for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 227–232. doi: 10.1002/jaba.179.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Reichow, B., & Wolery, M. (2011). Comparison of progressive prompt delay with and without instructive feedback. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 327–340. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-327.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Sindelar, P. T., Rosenberg, M. S., & Wilson, R. J. (1985). An adapted alternating treatments design for instructional research. Education and Treatment of Children, 8, 67–76.Google Scholar
  9. Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-349.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Vladescu, J. C., & Kodak, T. M. (2013). Increasing instructional efficiency by presenting additional stimuli in learning trials for children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 805–816. doi: 10.1002/jaba.70
  11. Werts, M. G., Wolery, M., Gast, D. L., & Holcombe, A. (1995). Instructive feedback: a review of the parameters and effects. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 55–75. doi: 10.1007/BF02110214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wolery, M., Doyle, P. M., Ault, M. L., Gast, D. L., Meyer, S., & Stinson, D. (1991). Effects of presenting incidental information in consequent events on future learning. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 79–104. doi: 10.1007/BF00956755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura L. Grow
    • 1
  • Tiffany Kodak
    • 2
  • Andrea Clements
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCalifornia State UniversityFresnoUSA
  2. 2.University of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA
  3. 3.University of Nebraska Medical CenterMunroe-Meyer InstituteOmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations