Abstract
Objective
Evidence suggests that racial discrimination causes stress among non-Hispanic Black women, and some Black women may cope with exposure to vicarious racial discrimination by engaging in maladaptive eating behaviors.
Methods
We examined eating behaviors among Black women (N = 254) before and after Freddie Gray’s death while in police custody. Maladaptive eating behaviors were assessed using the three-factor eating questionnaire. Our independent variables included the following: (1) time period and (2) geographic proximity to the event. Three two-way analysis of covariance tests were conducted to assess potential effects of geographic proximity (close, distant), time period in relation to unrest (before, after unrest), and their interaction on emotional eating, uncontrolled eating, and cognitive restraint controlling for participant age.
Results
There was a statistically significant main effect of proximity to the unrest on emotional eating, F (1, 252) = 5.64, p = .018, and partial η2 = .022 such that women living in close geographic proximity to the unrest reported higher mean levels of emotional eating as compared to those living more distant to the unrest. There was also a borderline statistically significant interaction between geographic proximity and time period on cognitive restraint, F (1, 252) = 3.89, p = .050, and partial η2 = .015.
Conclusion
Our study found a relationship between vicarious racial discrimination and maladaptive eating behaviors among Black women. Future work should examine stress related to vicarious racial discrimination and maladaptive eating behaviors longitudinally.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
A growing body of literature suggests that racial discrimination is linked to psychological and physiological stress [1,2,3]. Non-Hispanic Black women engage in a variety of coping strategies to endure exposure to racial discrimination to include but not limited to avoidance, social support, religious/spiritual-based activities, and other covert strategies [4]. For some, coping behaviors may also include maladaptive eating behaviors such as emotional and uncontrolled eating [5, 6]. Given the prevalence of maladaptive eating behaviors among Black women and its association with other risk factors [7, 8], it is critical to examine the potential contribution of racial discrimination to this disparity.
According to the environmental affordances (EA) model [9], an individual’s environment can induce stress, but there are also affordances or stress-reducers which can be used as coping strategies. The EA model also asserts that all things (human and otherwise) typically move to engage in self-regulatory coping strategies that will immediately reduce psychological/physiological stress and that factors such as race/gender could influence behaviors [9]. In theory, some Black women may cope with racial discrimination by engaging in maladaptive eating behaviors [10] For example, Black women who participated in an ecological momentary assessment study reported an increase in disordered eating behaviors following experiences with racial discrimination [5]. Of note, the majority of these experiences were vicarious [5]—meaning these experiences were related to negative incidents that participants witnessed happening to others because of their race (not direct experiences themselves). Additionally, a recent systematic review found racial discrimination negatively impacts eating behaviors, including loss of control eating, binge eating, over snacking, and restraint [11]. These studies included both Black and White individuals; however, the majority (63%) were Black/African American samples only. One study found a relation between racial discrimination and binge eating among Black women only such that Black women endorsed greater binge eating. In addition, a recent study conducted by Hoggard and colleagues found a positive association between racism and emotional eating among a sample of Black adults [12].
For Black women, vicarious racial discrimination may occur when they observe racial discrimination or violence towards other members of the Black community [13]—this includes family, friends, colleagues, neighbors, and/or individuals that are not personally known to the individual. Importantly, vicarious racial discrimination is typically reported more frequently compared to personal racial discrimination—particularly among women [14, 15]. Over the years, police violence has been commonplace, with multiple Black individuals dying at the hands of police officers [16]. Witnessing police violence is one way in which individuals could be exposed to racial discrimination vicariously. Neighbors and bystanders are often subjected to emotional and psychological trauma from witnessing racial discrimination via acts of police brutality. In recent years, such events have garnered significant media attention [16, 17] with periods of protest, riots, and civil unrest following many events. A study conducted by Hines and colleagues [18, 19] found a relation between proximity to civil unrest and depressive symptoms among Black individuals living in two low-income neighborhoods. Similarly, participants in another study reported greater maternal depressive symptoms following civil unrest in their community as compared to before the event [20].
With the increase in video footage and various media outlets [16, 17] (e.g., Twitter, TV, and TikTok), the reach and potential physical and mental health impact of vicarious racial discrimination has continued to rise [18, 19]—which means those who are not present at the scene of the event could still be exposed to racial discrimination and subsequent harm vicariously. For example, a study conducted by Garrick and colleagues found a significant relation between police violence and vicarious trauma from viewing police brutality videos [21]. Black women in this same study were impacted more than Black men [21]. However, few studies have examined whether such acute events of vicarious racial discrimination influence maladaptive eating habits. Notably, social media is not the only way to be exposed to racial discrimination vicariously. For example, witnessing a discriminatory event in your neighborhood or while dining at a restaurant or traveling could also lead to vicarious exposures. Further, listening to the lived experiences of someone else could have a similar impact.
Regardless of how racial discrimination is experienced, exposure could lead to race-based traumatic stress (RBTS) [22]. RBTS is the psychological and emotional response to racism/racial discrimination [22]. RBTS is quite complex and linked to both poor mental and physical health outcomes [23]. Importantly, every discriminatory event might not trigger a traumatic response [22]; however, exposure to racial discrimination particularly cumulatively increases one’s risk [22, 23]. Additionally, factors such as racial identity and worldview could moderate the perception of racial discrimination, which could also influence response [22].
To that end, we conducted a secondary data analysis, drawing upon data collected from a community-based sample in our parent study, Communities CARING. We examined the influence of vicarious racial discrimination by comparing differences before and after a high-profile event involving police officers in Baltimore, MD. We hypothesized that reports of maladaptive eating would be higher post-unrest compared to pre-unrest. We further hypothesized that participants residing in the neighborhood where the event occurred would endorse greater maladaptive eating behaviors compared to individuals residing in a similar neighborhood that was more distant to the event.
Methods
Description of the Event
Trigger warning: Please be advised the that following paragraph includes content that is disturbing and may be traumatizing for some readers.
On April 12, 2015, Freddie Gray, a 25-year-old Black man residing in West Baltimore, was arrested by White police officers for carrying a knife. Shortly after his arrest, his neck was broken, and spinal cord almost completely severed while being transported in a police van. Mr. Gray died from his injuries a week later. Release of video footage of the arrest and bystander testimonies detailing the unnecessary use of extreme force against a young Black man garnered national media attention and spurred subsequent protests, civil unrest, and riots. The height of the unrest and media attention occurred after Mr. Gray’s funeral on April 27, 2015—many police officers were injured, and nearly 150 cars and multiple buildings were burned. Subsequently, the entire city of Baltimore was given a 10 pm curfew, and the National Guard was activated to assist with maintaining the peace after riots broke out.
Parent Study, Participants, and Procedures
Prior to and immediately following the unrest, researchers were collecting cross-sectional survey data for the Communities CARING study. This study collected information on health behaviors among residents in two public housing developments—one in West Baltimore (Gilmor Homes) and the other in East Baltimore (Latrobe Homes). Mr. Gray’s arrest occurred in Gilmor Homes. Households were randomly selected to participate, and up to four adults in each household could enroll (total N = 358). All addresses were randomly selected at the beginning of the study, and no new addresses were added. Data was collected from August 2014 to August 2015, spanning the death of Mr. Gray and the subsequent media attention and unrest. All addresses were randomly selected at the beginning of the study, and no new addresses were added. All participants received the same incentives regardless of being in the pre-post group. The study protocol, including all procedures and recruitment materials were approved by the Johns Hopkins University Institutional Review Board.
Study Design
We conducted a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data collected as part of the Communities CARING study both before and after this high-profile event. Given our research question, we limited the analytic sample to Black women (N = 257) for these secondary analyses.
Measures
Maladaptive Eating (Dependent Variables)
Maladaptive eating behaviors were assessed using three subscales—cognitive restraint, uncontrolled eating, and emotional eating—from the previously validated three-factor eating questionnaire [24]. While uncontrolled and emotional eating are typically associated with stress response/coping, we also included cognitive restraint due to the exploratory nature of this study. Cognitive restraint examined purposeful food restriction for weight loss and an example item is “I consciously hold back at meals in order not to weight gain.” Uncontrolled eating examined experiencing a loss of control over food intake, thus leading to greater than usual consumption and an example item is “Sometimes when I start eating, I just can’t seem to stop.” And emotional eating examined the inability to abstain from emotional cues and an example item is “When I feel blue, I often overeat.” For each participant, we calculated a score for each subscale as recommended per the instrument (higher scores indicate greater degree of the specific eating behavior). Given the short time course, we did not examine differences in body mass index (BMI)—changes and conditions that typically require greater duration of time to occur.
Time Period and Geographic Proximity (Independent Variables)
Our independent variables included the following: (1) time period and (2) geographic proximity to the event. We used an approach previously used in a similar study [25]. For time period, we defined “before event” as survey participants who completed interviews before April 27th and surveys after this date as “after event.” For geographic proximity, we defined participants in Gilmor Homes as “close” and Latrobe Homes as “distant,” given that Mr. Gray’s arrest took place in Gilmor Homes.
Covariates
We considered age as a covariate considering existing research suggesting that eating behaviors vary by age [26, 27]. Furthermore, the response to vicarious racial discrimination and trauma may be different based on age/life stage.
Statistical Analyses
Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the sample including demographics, health status, and perceived neighborhood factors among our sample. Bivariate analyses, including independent samples t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square analyses for categorical variables, were conducted to compare sample characteristics by geographic proximity to the unrest alone and by time period within the context of geographic proximity to the unrest. Using the univariate general linear model procedure in SPSS 28 (IBM Corp, 2021), three two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) tests were conducted to assess the potential effects of geographic proximity (close, distant), time period in relation to unrest (before April 27, after April 27), and the interaction between these factors on the three eating behaviors (emotional eating, uncontrolled eating, cognitive restraint) controlling for participant age at the time of the study. Post hoc simple main effects tests were conducted to explore significant interactions. Before conducting each ANCOVA, the data were examined for the assumptions of the analysis, including linearity, homogeneity of regression slopes, homogeneity of variance, and normality. All assumptions of two-way ANCOVA were met for the cognitive restraint scale, and all but one was met for the emotional eating and uncontrolled eating scales. Specifically, the assumption of normality was violated for the emotional eating and uncontrolled eating scales due to a pile up of scores at or near 0. Despite this violation, we felt comfortable moving forward with the analysis because ANCOVA is relatively robust to departures from normality.
Results
Characteristics for the total sample are reported in Table 1. On average, the sample was 42.6 years old (SD = 13.2), and 95.3% were single. A majority of the sample had achieved a high school diploma or greater (65.3%) and were employed (63.8%). On average, the sample had lived in their neighborhoods for 7.0 years (SD = 7.3) and a majority reported concerns about neighborhood crime during the day and night. Mean BMI for the sample met criteria for obesity (M = 32.8, SD = 10.2). History of cardiovascular diseases (myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure) were uncommon. A majority of the sample were currently smokers.
Table 1 also displays comparisons of sample characteristics by geographic proximity to the unrest. Overall, the two neighborhoods were similar on most of the characteristics examined. However, there were statistically significant differences on measures of daytime and nighttime crime, BMI, and emotional eating. Specifically, a larger proportion of individuals residing in the neighborhood that was in closer geographic proximity to the unrest reported feeling unsafe during the day and at night as compared to those residing in the neighborhood that was more distant from the unrest. Those residing in the neighborhood in closer proximity to the unrest also reported higher mean levels of emotional eating and a larger proportion of individuals in this neighborhood reported smoking as compared to those residing in the neighborhood that was more distant from the unrest.
Table 2 shows comparisons on key sample characteristics by time period in relation to the unrest within the context of geographic proximity to the unrest. Overall, study participants in the two neighborhoods were similar on all variables regardless of whether they participated in the study before or after the unrest with one exception. Specifically, individuals residing in the neighborhood in close proximity to the unrest who completed study measures after the unrest reported significantly higher levels of cognitive restraint as compared to those within the same neighborhood who completed study measures before the unrest.
Table 3 displays results of the three ANCOVA models controlling for age. There was a statistically significant main effect of proximity to the unrest on emotional eating, F (1, 252) = 5.64, p = 0.018, and partial η2 = 0.022 such that women living in close geographic proximity to the unrest reported higher mean levels of emotional eating as compared to those living in the neighborhood more distant to the unrest. There were no significant differences by time period in relation to the unrest on emotional eating. There were also no significant differences by geographic proximity or time period in relation to unrest on uncontrolled eating. There was a borderline statistically significant interaction between geographic proximity and time period in relation to the unrest on cognitive restraint, F (1, 252) = 3.89, p = 0.050, and partial η2 = 0.015. Probing of the simple main effects within the interaction revealed significant differences in mean levels of cognitive restraint before versus after the unrest within the neighborhood in close geographic proximity to the unrest, F (1, 252) = 5.80, p = 0.017, and partial η2 = 0.023; among women living in close proximity to the unrest, those who participated in the study after the unrest reported higher levels of cognitive restraint than those who participated in the study prior to the unrest.
Discussion
Vicarious racial discrimination is a major stressor for Black individuals. One way in which individuals can be exposed to vicarious racial discrimination is by witnessing police violence and subsequent civil unrest. Our study examined the relation between civil unrest due to police violence, proximity to the unrest, and eating behaviors (uncontrolled, emotional, cognitive restraint) among Black women. In the paragraphs to follow, we discuss our findings from this study and the impact of vicarious racial discrimination more broadly.
In our study, emotional eating differed between the two neighborhoods, such that women residing in West Baltimore reported greater emotional eating. Parallel to this, West Baltimore women also perceived greater daytime crime and reported a higher percentage of smoking compared to those in East Baltimore. These findings underscore the idea that women residing in West Baltimore have higher stress and are engaging in multiple coping behaviors—one of which could be emotional eating to cope with stress related to feeling chronically unsafe [28]. The relationship between eating behaviors and stress has been well researched [29,30,31]. These findings also align with the environmental affordances model [9], which links environmental stressors to self-regulatory behaviors, such as emotional eating—which could help mental health in the short-term, but ultimately could lead to poor physical and mental health outcomes long term [32]. It is also important to emphasize the potential intergenerational effects of emotional eating, specifically among mothers and daughters [33] and those with poor emotional regulation [32]. While it is unclear if intergenerational effects are primarily due to modeling behavior or reinforcement of behaviors [33], the cyclic outcomes are very much the same—a child being introduced to consuming food as a coping mechanism, who eventually grows up to be an adult who might also engage in emotional eating as a self-regulatory practice. Of note, we saw no differences in uncontrolled eating between neighborhoods or time periods. This finding is opposite of much of the stress-based literature in that evidence suggests that greater stress is associated with both emotional and uncontrolled eating [34,35,36]. Perhaps the timing of when we were able to measure impacted our findings or uncontrolled eating was not as prevalent among our sample in general.
Cognitive restraint also differed between the two neighborhoods such that those residing in closer proximity to the event reported greater cognitive restraint. Cognitive restraint was also higher among individuals that were surveyed after the unrest occurred. Our findings are consistent with general stress-based literature in that evidence suggests some individuals report greater cognitive restraint when they are under increased stress [37]. In theory, women in our study could have been practicing cognitive restraint to prevent eating as a way to cope with stress [37]—more specifically RBTS [22]. Other research has suggested that there is a positive relation between high cognitive restraint and greater urinary cortisol secretion—a known indicator for stress [38, 39]. Further, while evidence is limited, our findings are also consistent with previous literature in that experiences of discrimination could contribute to cognitive restraint [40]—this is particularly true for those who sit at the intersection of more than one identity (e.g., being Black and a woman). Similarly, another study found a link between eating behaviors and ethnic discrimination, such that those reporting greater discrimination also reported higher maladaptive eating behaviors [41]. Admittedly while our findings align with some previous research, results are somewhat surprising considering that emotional and uncontrolled eating is typically known to have a greater association with stress relative to cognitive restraint. These findings highlight the importance of continuing to explore cognitive restraint and stress related to racial discrimination. Future studies should consider using mixed methods to further explore mechanisms that could contribute to cognitive restraint, which might help further explain these findings.
Importantly, vicarious racial discrimination is not limited to police violence. Vicarious racial discrimination could show up in other context such as among colleagues in the workplace or within school settings. For example, Black individuals attending predominately white institutions often report witnessing and/or experiencing racial discrimination [18, 42, 43]. Further, like personal exposure to racial discrimination, experiencing vicarious racial discrimination carries harmful health effects both mentally and physically [44,45,46].
Findings from our study should be interpreted considering several limitations. First, causality cannot be determined as our study is cross-sectional. Future work should examine the effects of vicarious racial discrimination and eating behaviors among Black women using ecologically valid and longitudinal approaches. Second, the original purpose of this data was to examine health behaviors of public housing residents; therefore, it was not specifically designed for our research question. However, our findings still contribute to the literature by providing a basis to continue exploring the impact of vicarious racial discrimination via unpredictable high-profile events. Third, we did not include depression, or BMI as covariates in our analysis, given the exploratory nature of our study and our sample size. Future work should consider mechanisms that might contribute to racial discrimination and subsequent eating behaviors. Fourth, we cannot fully account for the duration of time pre and post changes due to the unrest during which changes in eating behaviors occurred, which means we are unable to fully disentangle other possible contributing factors. Fifth, we did not examine general stress related to living in each neighborhood which means we were unable to tease out overall stress and stress from the vicarious racial discrimination event specifically. Finally, we did not capture other environmental factors such as structural racism, which contributes to neighborhood food access [47, 48]—this is particularly relevant considering both neighborhoods are classified as food insecure/food desserts [47].
Our study has several strengths including focusing specifically on Black women—a high-risk understudied population. In addition, this study captured data before and after a high-profile discriminatory event. Given the unpredictable nature of acute, high-profile discriminatory events, community data that was collected before and after such an event is highly unique. Finally, this is one of the first studies to examine the relation between eating behaviors and vicarious racial discrimination via police violence within a sample of Black women.
In conclusion, our study found a relation between vicarious racial discrimination and maladaptive eating behaviors among Black women. Specifically, Black women residing in closer proximity to the unrest and who took the survey after the unrest reported higher cognitive restraint. Individuals living in the neighborhood closer to the event also reported higher emotional eating and a greater perception of neighborhood crime compared to the more distal neighborhood. Future work should examine stress related to vicarious racial discrimination and eating behaviors longitudinally—particularly exploring the relation between perceiving your environment as chronically unsafe, RBTS, and maladaptive eating behaviors.
References
Allen AM, Wang Y, Chae DH, Price MM, Powell W, Steed TC, et al. Racial discrimination, the superwoman schema, and allostatic load: exploring an integrative stress-coping model among African American women. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019;1457(1):104–27.
Moody MD, Tobin CST, Erving CL. Vicarious experiences of major discrimination and psychological distress among Black men and women. Soc Ment Health. 2022;12(3):175–94.
Paradies Y. A systematic review of empirical research on self-reported racism and health. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35(4):888–901.
Jacob G, Faber SC, Faber N, Bartlett A, Ouimet AJ, Williams MT. A systematic review of Black people coping with racism: approaches, analysis, and empowerment. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023;18(2):392–415.
Brown KL, Graham AK, Perera RA, LaRose JG. Eating to cope: advancing our understanding of the effects of exposure to racial discrimination on maladaptive eating behaviors. Int J Eat Disord. 2022;55(12):1744–52.
Kazmierski KFM, Gillespie ML, Kuo S, Zurita T, Felix D, Rao U. Stress-induced eating among racial/ethnic groups in the United States: a systematic review. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2021;8(4):912–26.
Goode RW, Cowell MM, Mazzeo SE, Cooper-Lewter C, Forte A, Olayia OI, Bulik CM. Binge eating and binge-eating disorder in Black women: a systematic review. Int J Eat Disord. 2020;53(4):491–507.
Goode RW, Kalarchian MA, Craighead L, Conroy MB, Wallace J Jr, Eack SM, Burke LE. The feasibility of a binge eating intervention in Black women with obesity. Eat Behav. 2018;29:83–90.
Mezuk B, Abdou CM, Hudson D, Kershaw KN, Rafferty JA, Lee H, Jackson JS. “White box” epidemiology and the social neuroscience of health behaviors: the environmental affordances model. Soc Ment Health. 2013;3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2156869313480892.
Brown KL, Hines AL, Hagiwara N, Utsey S, Perera RA, LaRose JG. The weight of racial discrimination: examining the association between racial discrimination and change in adiposity among emerging adult women enrolled in a behavioral weight loss program. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022;9(3):909–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-021-01030-7.
Rodrigues YE, Fanton M, Novossat RS, Canuto R. Perceived racial discrimination and eating habits: a systematic review and conceptual models. Nutr Rev. 2022;80(7):1769–86.
Hoggard LS, Volpe VV, Hatton VL, Jones SJ, Tikhonov AA, Davis SE. “Now I just need something sweet”: racism, emotional eating, and health among African Americans. Soc Sci Med. 2023;316:114947.
Heard-Garris NJ, Cale M, Camaj L, Hamati MC, Dominguez TP. Transmitting trauma: a systematic review of vicarious racism and child health. Soc Sci Med. 2018;199:230–40.
Brody GH, Chen Y-F, Kogan SM, Murry VM, Logan P, Luo Z. Linking perceived discrimination to longitudinal changes in African American mothers’ parenting practices. J Marriage Fam. 2008;70(2):319–31.
Tynes BM, Giang MT, Williams DR, Thompson GN. Online racial discrimination and psychological adjustment among adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2008;43(6):565–9.
Desmond M, Papachristos AV, Kirk DS. Police violence and citizen crime reporting in the Black community. Am Sociol Rev. 2016;81(5):857–76.
Williams DR, Medlock MM. Health effects of dramatic societal events — ramifications of the recent presidential election. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(23):2295–9.
Tynes BM, Rose CA, Markoe SL. Extending campus life to the Internet: social media, discrimination, and perceptions of racial climate. J Divers High Educ. 2013;6(2):102–14.
Tynes BM, Willis HA, Stewart AM, Hamilton MW. Race-related traumatic events online and mental health among adolescents of color. J Adolesc Health. 2019;65(3):371–7.
Yimgang DP, Yan W, Paik G, Hager ER, Black MM. Civil unrest in the context of chronic community violence: impact on maternal depressive symptoms. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(9):1455–62.
Beauliere GI. Assessing vicarious trauma in Black people who never experienced police violence. The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. 2022. (Order no. 28966162).
Carter RT. Racism and psychological and emotional injury: recognizing and assessing race-based traumatic stress. Couns Psychol. 2007;35(1):13–105.
Cénat JM. Complex racial trauma: evidence, theory, assessment, and treatment. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023;18(3):675–87.
de Lauzon B, Romon M, Deschamps V, Lafay L, Borys J-M, Karlsson J, et al. The Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire-R18 is able to distinguish among different eating patterns in a general population. J Nutr. 2004;134(9):2372–80.
Hines AL, Yeh H-C, Gudzune KA. Stress-related outcomes after a period of unrest in two low-income African American communities. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2020;31(1):287–300.
Boyatzis CJ, McConnell KM. Quest orientation in young women: age trends during emerging adulthood and relations to body image and disordered eating. Int J Psychol Relig. 2006;16(3):197–207.
Rodgers RF, Berry RA, Laveway K. Body image concerns and disordered eating among older women: identifying variables of interest for integrated models. Int J Eat Disord. 2022;55(7):886–91.
Scott SB, Munoz E, Mogle JA, Gamaldo AA, Smyth JM, Almeida DM, Sliwinski MJ. Perceived neighborhood characteristics predict severity and emotional response to daily stressors. Soc Sci Med. 2018;200:262–70.
Hudson DL, Neighbors HW, Geronimus AT, Jackson JS. Racial discrimination, John Henryism, and depression among African Americans. J Black Psychol. 2016;42(3):221–43.
Light KC, Brownley KA, Turner JR, Hinderliter AL, Girdler SS, Sherwood A, Anderson NB. Job status and high-effort coping influence work blood pressure in women and Blacks. Hypertension. 1995;25(4):554–9.
Mensorio MS, Cebolla A, Lisón JF, Rodilla E, Palomar G, Miragall M, Baños RM. Emotional eating as a mediator between anxiety and cholesterol in population with overweight and hypertension. Psychol Health Med. 2017;22(8):911–8.
Leppanen J, Brown D, McLinden H, Williams S, Tchanturia K. The role of emotion regulation in eating disorders: a network meta-analysis approach. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:793094.
Talmon A, Tsur N. Intergenerational transmission of childhood maltreatment and eating disorder behaviors: shedding light on the mother-daughter dyad and grandmother-mother-daughter triad. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2021;129:106209.
Diggins A, Woods-Giscombe C, Waters S. The association of perceived stress, contextualized stress, and emotional eating with body mass index in college-aged Black women. Eat Behav. 2015;19:188–92.
Järvelä-Reijonen E, Karhunen L, Sairanen E, Rantala S, Laitinen J, Puttonen S, et al. High perceived stress is associated with unfavorable eating behavior in overweight and obese Finns of working age. Appetite. 2016;103:249–58.
Richardson AS, Arsenault JE, Cates SC, Muth MK. Perceived stress, unhealthy eating behaviors, and severe obesity in low-income women. Nutr J. 2015;14:1–10.
Richards AL, Specker B. Evaluating hours of sleep and perceived stress on dietary cognitive restraint in a survey of college students. J Am Coll Health. 2020;68(8):824–31.
Rideout CA, Linden W, Barr SI. High cognitive dietary restraint is associated with increased cortisol excretion in postmenopausal women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(6):628–33.
McLean JA, Barr SI, Prior JC. Cognitive dietary restraint is associated with higher urinary cortisol excretion in healthy premenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73(1):7–12.
Nelson JD, Martin LN, Izquierdo A, Kornienko O, Cuellar AE, Cheskin LJ, Fischer S. The role of discrimination and adverse childhood experiences in disordered eating. J Eat Disord. 2023;11(1):1–12.
Hagiwara N, Green TL, Moreno O, Smith D, Corona R. Ethnic discrimination and weight outcomes among Latinx emerging adults: examinations of an individual-level mediator and cultural moderators. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2021;27(2):189–200.
Jochman JC, Cheadle JE, Goosby BJ, Tomaso C, Kozikowski C, Nelson T. Mental health outcomes of discrimination among college students on a predominately white campus: a prospective study. Socius. 2019;5:2378023119842728.
Hurd NM, Trawalter S, Jakubow A, Johnson HE, Billingsley JT. Online racial discrimination and the role of White bystanders. Am Psychol. 2022;77(1):39–55.
Holloway K, Varner F. Forms and frequency of vicarious racial discrimination and African American parents’ health. Soc Sci Med. 2023;316:114266.
Daniels KP, Valdez Z, Chae DH, Allen AM. Direct and vicarious racial discrimination at three life stages and preterm labor: results from the African American Women’s Heart & Health Study. Matern Child Health J. 2020;24(11):1387–95.
Tao X, Fisher CB. Exposure to social media racial discrimination and mental health among adolescents of color. J Youth Adolesc. 2022;51(1):30–44.
Hines AL, Brody R, Zhou Z, Collins SV, Omenyi C, Miller ER 3rd, et al. Contributions of structural racism to the food environment: a photovoice study of black residents with hypertension in Baltimore, MD. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022;15(11):e009301.
Herbozo S, Brown KL, Burke NL, LaRose JG. A call to reconceptualize obesity treatment in service of health equity: review of evidence and future directions. Curr Obes Rep. 2023;12(1):24–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-023-00493-5.
Funding
Support for this study was provided by the American Heart Association (AHA) for KLB postdoctoral effort. Additional support was provided by the NIH NIMHD Loan Repayment Program. KLB is also supported by the NIH FIRST award number U54CA267735, with funding support from Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study conceptualization, visualization, and writing of the original draft were performed by Kristal Lyn Brown. Lisa Cooper assisted with study conceptualization and visualization. Investigation, conceptualization, and supervision were conducted by Kimberly Gudzune. Methodology and formal analysis were completed by Amie F. Bettencourt. Anika L. Hines also helped with the initial methodology. All authors commented and provided edits on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
Approval was granted by The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine institutional review board.
Consent to Participate
Written informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.
Competing Interests
KAG serves as the medical director for the American Board of Obesity Medicine, receives royalties from Johns Hopkins ACG System, has a research grant from Novo Nordisk, and is a paid consultant to Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk. All other authors do not have any conflicts to declare related to this work.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, K.L., Bettencourt, A.F., Hines, A.L. et al. Association Between Maladaptive Eating Behaviors Among Black Women and Vicarious Racial Discrimination Following a High-Profile Event. J. Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-01994-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-01994-2