Abstract
Introduction
Guided by an intersectional approach, we assessed the association between social categories (individual and combined) on time to linkage to HIV care in Tennessee.
Methods
Tennessee residents diagnosed with HIV from 2012-2016 were included in the analysis (n=3750). Linkage was defined by the first CD4 or HIV RNA test date after HIV diagnosis. We used Cox proportional hazards models to assess the association of time to linkage with individual-level variables. We modeled interactions between race, age, gender, and HIV acquisition risk factor (RF), to understand how these variables jointly influence linkage to care.
Results
Age, race, and gender/RF weAima A. Ahonkhaire strong individual (p < 0.001 for each) and joint predictors of time to linkage to HIV care (p < 0.001 for interaction). Older individuals were more likely to link to care (aHR comparing 40 vs. 30 years, 1.20, 95%CI 1.11-1.29). Blacks were less likely to link to care than Whites (aHR= 0.73, 95% CI: 0.67-0.79). Men who have sex with men (MSM) (aHR = 1.18, 95%CI: 1.03-1.34) and heterosexually active females (females) (aHR = 1.32, 95%CI: 1.14-1.53) were more likely to link to care than heterosexually active males. The three-way interaction between age, race, and gender/RF showed that Black males overall and young, heterosexually active Black males in particular were least likely to establish care.
Conclusions
Racial disparities persist in establishing HIV care in Tennessee, but data highlighting the combined influence of age, race, gender, and sexual orientation suggest that heterosexually active Black males should be an important focus of targeted interventions for linkage to HIV care.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
HIV does not affect all people or places in the United States (US) equally, and populations with the highest rates of HIV diagnoses often have the lowest rates of linkage to care [1]. While there is a tendency to consider demographic and place-based factors separately, an intersectional approach may provide a more nuanced way to highlight the conversion between structures and processes — as represented by race, place, age, gender, sexuality, and other factors — and the implications of such on resources and opportunities that affect health and health care [2,3,4]. Intersectionality highlights the connected nature of social categories and informs how intersecting categories may place socially marginalized groups at even greater risk for disease [5, 6].
First described by legal scholar Kimberle Crenshaw, intersectionality posits that an individual’s social identities (for example a young, Black, man who has sex with men, from the Southern US) are not simply the additive sum of these individual identities [7]. Rather, these identities represent larger societal structures that both co-exist and are interdependent [7]. Such perspectives have gained attention as a way to identify and contextualize those at greatest risk of acquiring HIV or having poor outcomes from HIV infection [8,9,10,11]. Intersectionality-informed approaches have highlighted how structural racism impacts HIV-related health behaviors, and how inequalities attributed to one demographic factor alone (race) do not capture fully other markers of who may be disadvantaged (such as high levels of stigma, incarceration, unemployment, and other similar sociocultural factors) which may be important for intervention development and resource allocation [8,9,10,11]. One study among Ugandan men highlighted how the intersection of masculinity and HIV-associated stigma influenced healthcare seeing behavior through their views on sickness, vulnerability, and financial responsibility; and illustrated that support group participation could be improved by focusing on income-generating activities [12]. Another study among gay Latino men in the Southern US highlighted the importance of integrating health and immigration interventions to address multilayered experiences with stigma that directly impact engagement in care and adherence to ART [13].
Race, place, age, and sexuality represent important factors that are routinely considered in describing cohorts of people living with HIV (PLWH) and identifying groups at greater risk for poor HIV outcomes. In 2017, non-Hispanic Black (Black) individuals accounted for 13% of the US population, but 43% of new HIV diagnoses nationwide [14, 15]. Black PLWH in the US also have worse HIV care and viral load outcomes relative to other races/ethnicities [14, 15]. Place has been recognized as a useful proxy for identifying populations at risk for HIV, and those who may need better access to HIV care. Southern states account for 51% of all new HIV cases despite only representing only 38% of the US population; the rates in this region may be exacerbated by structural factors like high rates of poverty, unemployment, and HIV-related stigma [16]. Furthermore, age has been shown to be an important predictor of HIV outcomes [6, 17,18,19]. Robust literature highlights poor HIV care outcomes for adolescents and young adults due, in part, to dynamics of this unique developmental period including impulsivity, risk-taking behavior, poor abstract thinking, nascent autonomy, and variable levels of social support [6, 17,18,19].
Sexual orientation is also intricately linked with HIV risk acquisition by defined behaviors and sexual networks [17, 18]. In 2017, 70% of incident HIV infections in the US were among men who have sex with men (MSM) [20]. Sexual and gender minorities, particularly those who are also racial and ethnic minorities, may contend with intersectional stigma (i.e., stigmatization based on overlapping structures defined by race, sexuality, and gender identity), isolation, and discrimination that pose substantial barriers to HIV care and treatment [15, 17, 18].
Tennessee, like the US, has witnessed persistent racial disparities in new HIV diagnoses in the state [21]. In 2017, black individuals were diagnosed with HIV at a rate of 35.9 per 100,000 persons, compared to 10.1 among Hispanic individuals and 5.2 among non-Hispanic White (White) individuals [22]. Further exacerbating this disparity, Tennessee trails the nation in linkage to HIV care and Black PLWH remain the least likely of any race/ethnicity to establish care after HIV diagnosis despite efforts by the Tennessee Department of Health (TDH) to address racial disparities in HIV outcomes [15, 22]. The objective of this analysis was to illustrate whether an intersectional approachconsidering age, race, gender, and sexual orientation from TDH surveillance data could help to better understand who has the lowest linkage to HIV care in Tennessee. Answering this question will help TDH and HIV service providers create a more tailored plan to close gaps in HIV prevention and care-related disparities, and further efforts to end the epidemic.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of Tennessee residents who were newly diagnosed with HIV between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2016. Data were available in the same calendar year of diagnosis. We assessed individual factors associated with time from diagnosis to linkage to HIV care, defined as receipt of the first CD4 or HIV-1 RNA test result within the same calendar year as diagnosis captured via Tennessee’s enhanced HIV/AIDS reporting system (eHARS).
The individual-level variables obtained from eHARS included year of diagnosis, age at diagnosis, gender, race/ethnicity (White/non-Hispanic, Black/non-Hispanic, Hispanic/all races, other/unknown), HIV acquisition risk factor (heterosexual contact, MSM, injection drug use (IDU), MSM/IDU, other, unknown), and site of diagnosis (inpatient facility/ER, outpatient facility, health department or STD/family planning clinic, blood bank, correctional facility, other/unknown, missing). We combined gender and HIV acquisition risk factor into one indicator with the following categories: male/heterosexual, male/MSM, male/IDU, male/other-unknown, female/heterosexual, female/IDU, and female/other-unknown. Data on transgender and gender non-confirming individuals was not routinely collected by TDH for this analysis period and was thus not available for this analysis.
We used descriptive statistics (median, interquartile range [IQR] or percent, as appropriate) to summarize demographic characteristics of the cohort. We then fit Cox proportional hazards models to assess the association of time to linkage to care within the first year post diagnosis with a priori selected individual-level covariates. Year and age were included as continuous variables with age expanded using restricted cubic splines with 4 knots to relax linearity assumptions. Subjects were followed until linkage to care within the same calendar year as diagnosis, death, or end of the calendar year.
Finally, in addition to modeling main effects for all covariates, we also modeled the joint effects of age, gender/transmission risk category, and race on linkage to HIV care using a three-way interaction. Results from these models were summarized using the estimated probability of linkage to care at 30 days according to race/ethnicity, transmission risk factor, and age; other variables (year and facility of diagnosis) were held constant (2013 and inpatient facility/ ER). Consistent with CDC and HIV/AIDS Bureau recommendations, linkage to care was defined at 30 days after HIV diagnosis [23]. These recommendations reflect the importance of immediate ART initiation both for individual health benefit and to decrease the risk of HIV transmission in the community, and are essential for the country’s “Ending the Epidemic” initiatives [24]. The three-way interaction analysis was restricted to Black and White individuals since they comprised over 90% of the cohort.
IRB Approval
We obtained a waiver of consent and IRB approval from Vanderbilt University Medical Center (Protocol no. 17119, Nashville, TN, USA) and TDH (protocol no. 1097644-4).
Results
Description of Cohort of Tennessee Residents Newly Diagnosed with HIV
There were 3750 newly diagnosed individuals included in this analysis. The number of new HIV diagnoses gradually decreased between 2012 and 2016 (2012: 842 individuals, 2013: 756 individuals, 2014: 729 individuals, 2015: 716 individuals, 2016: 707 individuals). By the end of the study period, 207 persons (6%) died. Individuals were more likely to be men (80% vs. 20% women) and Black (59% vs. 33% White), with a median age at diagnosis of 31 years [IQR 24, 43]. Over half (55%) reported an acquisition risk factor of MSM, while 24% reported heterosexual sex and 16% risk factors that were other or unknown. Approximately one-third (34%) were diagnosed at an outpatient health facility followed by 28% at a health department or STD/family planning clinic and 20% at an inpatient facility or emergency room (Table 1). Median time to linkage to care overall was 26 days [IQR = 9, 59]. A total of 207 deaths were recorded during the analysis period. By calendar year there were 8 deaths among 100 individuals not linked to care, 4 deaths among 93, 5 deaths among 82, 12 deaths among 102, and 2 deaths among 98 individuals not linked to care (2012 to 2016 respectively).
Individual-Level Predictors of Time to Linkage to Care
Age was a significant individual predictor of linkage to HIV care (p < 0.001). Younger (20 years old, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08, 1.26) and older individuals (40 and 45 years old, aHR = 1.20, and 1.29, respectively) were more likely to establish care within a shorter time compared to 30-year-olds. Blacks had significantly longer times to linkage than Whites in both unadjusted (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.65-0.75) and adjusted (aHR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.67–0.79) analyses. Time to linkage to care did not differ significantly between White and Hispanic individuals (aHR = 0.94, 95%CI: 0.80–1.11) or those with “other/unknown ethnicity” (aHR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.78–1.17). We found that MSM (aHR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.03–1.34) and heterosexually active females (aHR = 1.32, 95%CI: 1.14–1.53) were more likely to have a shorter time to link to care than heterosexually active males. Compared to an inpatient facility or emergency room, diagnosis at any other location was associated with a longer time to establish care (aHR = 0.71 outpatient facility, 0.52 health department or family planning clinic, 0.30 blood bank, 0.43 correctional facilities, 0.30 other locations) (Table 2).
Three-Way Interaction Between Age, Gender/Exposure, and Race
We modeled linkage to HIV care’s association with three-way interactions between age, gender/acquisition risk category, and race for Black and White individuals. Predicted probabilities of linkage to HIV care within 30 days of HIV diagnosis by age are illustrated in Fig. 1. In general, the three-way interactions were found to be significant (p < 0.001) as were the two-way individual interactions of race by gender (p = 0.001), race by gender/acquisition risk category (p = 0.001) and age by gender/acquisition risk category (p < 0.001). The lowest probability of linkage to HIV care at 30 days, approximately 50%, was among young, heterosexually active men. This probability was lower for Black as compared to White men. Among heterosexually active men, this racial disparity trend continued to diverge at older ages. Among MSM, racial disparities were evident among younger (< 40 years) but not older PLWH. For men, the probability of linkage increased with age. Black women had an overall consistent probability of linkage to care (62–70%) even at older ages; however, more prominent racial disparities among Black women were observed at younger (< 25 years) and older (> 50 years) ages.
Discussion
In our cohort, while race was a strong, independent predictor of linkage to HIV care, our intersectional approach allowed us to appreciate how age, gender, and sexual orientation provided important contextualizing factors for understanding racial disparities in HIV care linkage in Tennessee. This approach underscores how looking at disparities from the perspective of race alone may obscure important, complex relationships between an individual’s social identities. Heterosexually active women were 30% more likely to link to care than heterosexually active men, and racial disparities were most notable among the youngest and oldest women in the cohort. The picture was different for men. Among heterosexually active men, the most substantial racial disparities were among those over 40 years of age. In contrast, the greatest racial disparities between Black and White MSM were observed among young men aged < 35 years. Heterosexually active Black men, however, fared worse in linking to care than any other group, at any age, and thus remain an important focus for interventions aimed at ending the epidemic.
Lower linkage to care among heterosexually active Black men, compared to Black MSM, underscores how the social identity described by sexual orientation creates a starkly different experience for Black men, and the framing of sexual orientation is an important factor in public health interventions. HIV outreach efforts and messages are often geared towards gay, bisexual, and other MSM which may alienate Black men who do not identify as gay [25]. In addition, gender and gender expression may also be an influential factor for utilization of HIV care services. Traditional masculine beliefs have been associated with poor health-seeking behaviors in both sexual minority and heterosexual Black men and research suggests that race-related threats or daily experiences of racism may further exacerbate the effect of masculinity on an individual’s attitude toward his health [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. These experiences can also lead to mistrust of the healthcare system, an important contributor to negative HIV-related outcomes for Black men living with HIV [35, 36]. Utilization of non-clinical venues can potentially be leveraged as a differentiated model of care to address the concerns of these men who are often unseen by the healthcare system.
Our analysis has notable limitations. With access to historical data, we cannot comment on changes that may have occurred in linkage to care in TN between the study’s end in 2016 and the present. Additionally, our measures of linkage to care were reliant on the completeness of the mandatory reporting system, which varies by site and could have introduced some bias despite improvements in HIV surveillance and data quality since 2012. Further, we were unable to distinguish transgender individuals or those with joint MSM/IDU acquisition risk who are known to experience health disparities, and could not incorporate other important factors related to linkage to HIV, such as individual experiences with stigma, racism, and proxy measures for socio-economic status. These omissions could have introduced bias into our results.
Conclusions
Our analysis highlights that race remains an important, independent predictor of linkage to HIV care in Tennessee and supports continued efforts to address structural racism as a driver of poor health outcomes. Furthermore, our analysis additionally highlights the importance of intersectionality in identifying populations at high risk for not establishing HIV care after diagnosis. Despite the high risk for poor linkage to care among Black PLWH in TN as a whole, we see a drastically different picture for Black women compared to Black men, and an even more contextualized picture when we consider sexuality. Our findings underscore that all Black men cannot be considered through the same lens. Without specific interventions that consider race, gender, and sexual orientation, heterosexually active Black men diagnosed with HIV in Tennessee may remain in the shadows leading to persistent disparities in HIV outcomes and undermining efforts focused on ending the epidemic in Tennessee.
Data Availability
Due to the nature of this research, participants of this study did not agree for their data to be shared publicly, so supporting data is not available.
References
CDC. (2018). HIV surveillance report. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance/vol-31/index.html. Accessed 14 Oct 2020
Griffith DM. Biopsychosocial approaches to men’s health disparities research and policy. Behav Med. 2016;42(3):211–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2016.1194158.
Griffith DM. “Centering the margins”: Moving equity to the center of men’s health research. Am J Mens Health. 2018;12(5):1317–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988318773973.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Health and Medicine Division, Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice, & Committee on Community-Based Solutions to Promote Health Equity in the United States. (2017). Communities in action: Pathways to health equity (A. Baciu, Y. Negussie, A. Geller, & J. N. Weinstein, Eds.). National Academies Press (US). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK425848/. Accessed 14 Oct 2020
Singer MC, Erickson PI, Badiane L, Diaz R, Ortiz D, Abraham T, et al. Syndemics, sex and the city: Understanding sexually transmitted diseases in social and cultural context. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(8):2010–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.05.012.
Bowleg L, Teti M, Malebranche DJ, Tschann JM. “It’s an uphill battle everyday”: Intersectionality, low-income black heterosexual men, and implications for HIV prevention research and interventions. Psychol Men Masculinity. 2013;14(1):25–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028392.
Crenshaw K. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 2015; 1989(1). https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/81989/iss1/8. Accessed 14 Oct 2020
Algarin AB, Zhou Z, Cook CL, Cook RL, Ibañez GE. Age, sex, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation: Intersectionality of marginalized-group identities and enacted HIV-related stigma among people living with HIV in Florida. AIDS Behav. 2019;23(11):2992–3001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02629-y.
Agénor M, Pérez AE, Koma JW, Abrams JA, McGregor AJ, Ojikutu BO. Sexual orientation identity, race/ethnicity, and lifetime HIV testing in a national probability sample of U.S. women and men: An intersectional approach. LGBT Health. 2019;6(6):306–18. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2019.0001.
Sun S, Crooks N, Kemnitz R, Westergaard RP. Re-entry experiences of Black men living with HIV/AIDS after release from prison: Intersectionality and implications for care. Soc Sci Med (1982). 2018;211:78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.003.
Freeman R, Gwadz MV, Silverman E, Kutnick A, Leonard NR, Ritchie AS, et al. Critical race theory as a tool for understanding poor engagement along the HIV care continuum among African American/Black and Hispanic persons living with HIV in the United States: A qualitative exploration. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16(1):54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0549-3.
Mburu G, Ram M, Siu G, Bitira D, Skovdal M, Holland P. Intersectionality of HIV stigma and masculinity in eastern Uganda: Implications for involving men in HIV programmes. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1061. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1061.
Barrington C, Davis DA, Villa-Torres L, Carcano J, Hightow-Weidman L. Intersectionalities and the HIV continuum of care among gay Latino men living with HIV in North Carolina. Ethn Health. 2019:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2019.1620177.
CDC. (2021). HIV and African American people. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/racialethnic/africanamericans/index.html . Accessed 14 Oct 2020
CDC. (2018). Monitoring selected national HIV prevention and care objectives by using HIV surveillance data—United States and 6 dependent areas, 2017. 24(3), 74. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveillance-supplemental-report-vol-24-3.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2020
CDC. (2019). HIV in the southern United States. 4. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/policies/cdc-hiv-in-the-south-issue-brief.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2020
Lall P, Lim SH, Khairuddin N, Kamarulzaman A. Review: An urgent need for research on factors impacting adherence to and retention in care among HIV-positive youth and adolescents from key populations. J Int AIDS Soc, 2015; 18(2Suppl 1). https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.18.2.19393
Gross IM, Hosek S, Richards MH, Fernandez MI. Predictors and profiles of antiretroviral therapy adherence among African American adolescents and young adult males living with HIV. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2016;30(7):324–38. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2015.0351.
Bowleg L, Teti M, Massie JS, Patel A, Malebranche DJ, Tschann JM. “What does it take to be a man? What is a real man?”: ideologies of masculinity and HIV sexual risk among black heterosexual men. Cult Health Sex. 2011;13(5):545–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2011.556201.
CDC. HIV and gay and bisexual men. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020 https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/index.html. Accessed 14 Oct 2020
TDH. TN HIV/AIDS strategy: An integrated HIV care and prevention plan. 2016. https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/health/documents/TN_HIVAIDS_Strategy_September_2016_with_appendices.pdf Accessed 14 Oct 2020
TDH. Tennessee HIV epidemiological profile 2018. 2020. https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/health/program-areas/hiv/Tennessee-HIV-Epidemiological-Profile-2018.pdf2018.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2020
HRSA. HIV/AIDS Bureau performance measures. 2019. https://hab.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/hab/clinical-quality-management/systemlevelmeasures.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2020
CDC. 2015 STD treatment guidelines; HIV infection: Detection, counseling, and referral. 2015. https://www.cdc.gov/std/tg2015/hiv.htm2015/hiv.htm. Accessed 14 Oct 2020
Bowleg L, Raj A. Shared communities, structural contexts, and hiv risk: Prioritizing the hiv risk and prevention needs of black heterosexual men. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(Suppl 2):S173–7. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300342.
Hammond WP. Psychosocial correlates of medical mistrust among African American men. Am J Community Psychol. 2010;45(1–2):87–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-009-9280-6.
Hammond WP, Matthews D, Mohottige D, Agyemang A, Corbie-Smith G. Masculinity, medical mistrust, and preventive health services delays among community-dwelling African-American men. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(12):1300–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1481-z.
Parent MC, Torrey C, Michaels MS. “HIV testing is so gay”: The role of masculine gender role conformity in HIV testing among men who have sex with men. J Couns Psychol. 2012;59(3):465–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028067.
Hamilton CJ, Mahalik JR. Minority stress, masculinity, and social norms predicting gay men’s health risk behaviors. J Couns Psychol. 2009;56(1):132–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014440.
Kerrigan D, Andrinopoulos K, Johnson R, Parham P, Thomas T, Ellen JM. Staying strong: Gender ideologies among African-American adolescents and the implications for HIV/STI prevention. J Sex Res. 2007;44(2):172–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490701263785.
Pleck JH, O’Donnell LN. Gender attitudes and health risk behaviors in urban African American and Latino early adolescents. Matern Child Health J. 2001;5(4):265–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013084923217.
Pleck JH, Sonenstein FL, Ku LC. Masculinity ideology: Its impact on adolescent males’ heterosexual relationships. J Soc Issues. 1993;49(3):11–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb01166.x.
Wolfe WA. Overlooked role of African-American males’ hypermasculinity in the epidemic of unintended pregnancies and HIV/AIDS cases with young African-American women. J Natl Med Assoc. 2003;95(9):846–52.
Santana MC, Raj A, Decker MR, La Marche A, Silverman JG. Masculine gender roles associated with increased sexual risk and intimate partner violence perpetration among young adult men. J Urban Health. 2006;83(4):575–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9061-6.
Dale SK, Bogart LM, Wagner GJ, Galvan FH, Klein DJ. Medical mistrust is related to lower longitudinal medication adherence among African-American males with HIV. J Health Psychol. 2016;21(7):1311–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105314551950.
Bogart LM, Wagner GJ, Green HD, Mutchler MG, Klein DJ, McDavitt B, et al. Medical mistrust among social network members may contribute to antiretroviral treatment nonadherence in African Americans living with HIV. Soc Sci Med (1982). 2016;164:133–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.028.
Funding
The data in this manuscript have been supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P30-AI110527) and the National Institute of Mental Health (R25-MH080665).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Leslie J. Pierce, Peter Rebeiro, Cathy A. Jenkins, Bryan Shepherd, and Aima A. Ahonkhai. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Leslie J. Pierce and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pierce, L.J., Rebeiro, P., Brantley, M. et al. Who Is Not Linking to HIV Care in Tennessee — the Benefits of an Intersectional Approach. J. Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities 9, 849–855 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-021-01023-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-021-01023-6