Racial Disparities in Cleanliness Attitudes Mediate Purchasing Attitudes Toward Cleaning Products: a Serial Mediation Model
- 18 Downloads
The present study has three objectives (1) to examine whether there are differences in cleanliness concerns between African Americans and European Americans toward kitchen items that are known to be vectors of disease, (2) to examine whether disparities in cleanliness attitudes have an impact on purchasing attitudes toward kitchen cleaning products, and (3) to explore the mechanisms that may account for these differences utilizing a serial mediation model. Five hundred participants, 50% African American and 50% European American were shown a picture of a sponge cleaning product and filled out multiple survey instruments relating to cleanliness attitudes. We found greater concern with cleanliness of kitchen items (d = .46) and a greater willingness to purchase cleaning products among African Americans compared to European Americans (17 vs 10%). A serial mediation analysis revealed that general cleanliness concerns account for the increased willingness to spend money on cleaning products among African Americans. These results suggest that African Americans are more sensitive to issues of cleanliness compared to European Americans and, in particular, are more sensitive to cleanliness of kitchen items such as sponges, which can be vectors of food-borne pathogens. Potential reasons for the observed racial disparities in cleanliness attitudes and the implications of these results for public health are discussed.
KeywordsRacial disparities Cleanliness attitudes Contamination attitudes Public health African Americans
The authors would like to thank Matthew W. Flannery and Tod Maitland, owners of SpongeBath, LLC for their contributions and for providing the stimuli for this study.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Leib Litman, Monnica T. Williams, Zohn Rosen, Sarah Weinberger-Litman, and Jonathan Robinson declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Studies Involving Human Participants
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Ann, P. (2014). Evaluation of the domestic environment as a reservoir for foodborne pathogens: identification of consumer practices associated with microbial contamination in the home, (May).Google Scholar
- 6.Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). Table 2100. Race of reference person: annual means, standard errors and coefficients of variation. Consumer Expenditure Survey, 2015.Google Scholar
- 7.Chandler, J., & Shapiro, D. (2016). Conducting clinical research using crowdsourced convenience samples. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12.Google Scholar
- 9.Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression based approach. Guilford Press; 2013.Google Scholar
- 11.John OP, Robins RW, Pervin LA. Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York; 2008.Google Scholar
- 12.Josephson KL, Rubino JR, Pepper IL. Characterization and quantification of bacterial pathogens and indicator organisms in household kitchens with and without the use of a disinfectant cleaner. J Appl Microbiol. 1997;83(6):737–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.1997.00308.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Kusumaningrum, H. D., van Putten, M. M., Rombouts, F. M., & Beumer, R. R. (2002). Effects of antibacterial dishwashing liquid on foodborne pathogens ..., 1, 5–237.Google Scholar
- 14.Litman L, Robinson J, Rosenzweig C. The relationship between motivation, monetary compensation, and data quality among US-and India-based workers on Mechanical Turk. Behav Res Methods. 2015;47(2):519–28.Google Scholar
- 18.Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk.Google Scholar
- 19.Pervin, L. A., & John, O. P. (Eds.). (1999). Handbook of personality: theory and research. Elsevier.Google Scholar
- 21.Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivar Behav Res. 2007;42(1):185–227.Google Scholar
- 22.Quinlan JJ. Foodborne illness incidence rates and food safety risks for populations of low socioeconomic status and minority race/ethnicity: a review of the literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(8):3634–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10083634.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 23.Rusin, P., & Gerba, C. (1998). Reduction of faecal coliform , coliform and heterotrophic plate count bacteria in the household kitchen and bathroom by disinfection with hypochlorite cleaners, (1985), 819–828.Google Scholar
- 26.Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Widdowson MA, Roy SL, Jones LJ, Griffin PM. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(1)Google Scholar
- 35.Williams MT, Wetterneck C, Sawyer B. Assessment of obsessive-compulsive disorder in African Americans. In: Benuto LT, Leany BD, editors. Guide to psychological assessment with African Americans. New York: Springer; 2015.Google Scholar
- 37.Litman, L., Robinson, J., Weinberger-Litman, S. L., & Finkelstein, R. (2017). Both Intrinsic and Extrinsic Religious Orientation are Positively Associated with Attitudes Toward Cleanliness: Exploring Multiple Routes from Godliness to Cleanliness. Journal of Religion and Health, 1-12.Google Scholar