Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stimulus Avoidance Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review

  • Review
  • Published:
Perspectives on Behavior Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Board certified behavior analysts are ethically required to first address destructive behavior using reinforcement-based and other less intrusive procedures before considering the use of restrictive or punishment-based procedures (ethics standard 2.15; Behavior Analyst Certification Board, 2020). However, the inclusion of punishment in reinforcement-based treatments may be warranted in some cases of severe forms of destructive behavior that poses risk of harm to the client or others. In these cases, behavior analysts are required to base the selection of treatment components on empirical assessment results (ethics standard 2.14; Behavior Analyst Certification Board, 2020). One such preintervention assessment is the stimulus avoidance assessment (SAA), which allows clinicians to identify a procedure that is likely to function as a punisher. Since the inception of this assessment approach, no studies have conducted a systematic literature review of published SAA cases. These data may be pertinent to examine the efficacy, generality, and best practices for the SAA. The current review sought to address this gap by synthesizing findings from peer-reviewed published literature including (1) the phenomenology and epidemiology of the population partaking in the SAA; (2) procedural variations of the SAA across studies (e.g., number of series, session length); (3) important quality indicators of the SAA (i.e., procedural integrity, social validity); and (4) how the SAA informed final treatment efficacy. We discuss findings in the context of the clinical use of the SAA and suggest several avenues for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no original datasets were generated during the current study.

Notes

  1. Fisher et al. (1994a) conducted 10-min sessions for water mist.

References

* Asterisk indicates studies analyzed in the current review

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alyssa M. Hurd.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no relevant financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose.

Additional information

The authors thank Juliana Aguilar for her comments on an earlier version of the article.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Table 6 Operational Definitions of Stimulus Avoidance Procedures

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hurd, A.M., Brown, K.R. & Randall, K.R. Stimulus Avoidance Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review. Perspect Behav Sci 47, 139–166 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-024-00398-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-024-00398-1

Keywords

Navigation