Skip to main content
Log in

Honoring Uncontrolled Events: Commentary on Slocum et al.

  • SI: Commentary on Slocum et al, Threats to Internal Validity
  • Published:
Perspectives on Behavior Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this special section of Perspectives on Behavior Science, Slocum et al. (2022) provide a summary of the logic and protocol for the construction, implementation, and analysis of single-case multiple-baseline designs. A major contribution of this article is a reassessment of the nonconcurrent multiple baseline design as a credible approach to documenting experimental control. In this commentary we provide considerations for readers as they approach the Slocum et al. article and suggest that although the resurrection of nonconcurrent multiple-baseline designs to a higher status is warranted, researchers will find more control for threats to internal validity in concurrent multiple-baseline designs, and the concurrent format should remain the preferred option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Levin, J. R., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2021). Randomized single-case intervention designs and analyses for health sciences researchers: A versatile clinical trials companion. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 55(4), 755–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slocum, T. A., Pinkelman, S. E., Joslyn, P. R., & Nichols, B. (2022). Threats to internal validity in multiple-baseline design variations. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-022-00326-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge and extend appreciation to Dr. Thomas R. Kratochwill for his comments on early drafts of this commentary.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert H. Horner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

We have no known conflict of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Horner, R.H., Machalicek, W. Honoring Uncontrolled Events: Commentary on Slocum et al.. Perspect Behav Sci 45, 639–645 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-022-00345-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-022-00345-y

Keywords

Navigation