Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Virtual Reality Simulation for Suicide Risk Assessment Training: Prevalence of Adverse Effects

  • In Brief Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Virtual reality (VR) simulation is changing the landscape of simulation-based medical education. Immersive VR allows users to interact with a computer-generated environment and digital avatars using a VR headset and controllers. However, current literature regarding the use of immersive VR simulation in psychiatric medical education is sparse. This study describes its use and considerations regarding tolerability.

Methods

At a mental health hospital in Canada, two immersive VR suicide risk assessment (SRA) case simulations were developed. These simulations have participants interview VR patients to characterize their suicide risk, offering a novel and safe way to engage healthcare providers in SRA training. Regarding user tolerability of these VR simulations, the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) was administered to participants after the simulation to characterize any motion sickness symptoms experienced.

Results

Of the 22 participants in this study, the overall SSQ scores demonstrated good tolerability of the VR SRA, with the majority of participants reporting no or minimal simulator sickness symptoms. Moreover, the majority of participants reported being satisfied with this training and that the VR SRA simulation enhanced their learning experience.

Conclusion

These study findings are novel, given the current dearth of data regarding the use of immersive VR in simulation-based psychiatric medical education. Further studies exploring the educational effectiveness of VR SRA in simulation-based psychiatric medical education are indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Abdool PS, Nirula L, Bonato S, Rajji TK, Silver IL. Simulation in undergraduate psychiatry: exploring the depth of learner engagement. Acad Psychiatry. 2017;41(2):251–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Piot MA, Dechartres A, Attoe C, Jollant F, Lemogne C, Layat Burn C, et al. Simulation in psychiatry for medical doctors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ. 2020;54(8):696–708.

  3. van Gaalen AEJ, Brouwer J, Schönrock-Adema J, Bouwkamp-Timmer T, Jaarsma ADC, Georgiadis JR. Gamification of health professions education: a systematic review. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2021;26(2):683–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Harrington CM, Kavanagh DO, Quinlan JF, Ryan D, Dicker P, O'Keeffe D, et al. Development and evaluation of a trauma decision-making simulator in Oculus virtual reality. Am J Surg. 2018;215(1):42–7.

  5. Frederiksen JG, Sørensen SMD, Konge L, Svendsen MBS, Nobel-Jørgensen M, Bjerrum F, et al. Cognitive load and performance in immersive virtual reality versus conventional virtual reality simulation training of laparoscopic surgery: a randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(3):1244–52.

  6. Huber T, Paschold M, Hansen C, Wunderling T, Lang H, Kneist W. New dimensions in surgical training: immersive virtual reality laparoscopic simulation exhilarates surgical staff. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(11):4472–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barré J, Michelet D, Truchot J, Jolivet E, Recanzone T, Stiti S, et al. Virtual reality single-port sleeve gastrectomy training decreases physical and mental workload in novice surgeons: an exploratory study. Obes Surg. 2019;29(4):1309–16.

  8. Harrington CM, Kavanagh DO, Wright Ballester G, Wright Ballester A, Dicker P, Traynor O, et al. 360° Operative videos: a randomised cross-over study evaluating attentiveness and information retention. J Surg Educ. 2018;75(4):993–1000.

  9. Huber T, Paschold M, Hansen C, Lang H, Kneist W. Artificial versus video-based immersive virtual surroundings: analysis of performance and user’s preference. Surg Innov. 2018;25(3):280–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hooper J, Tsiridis E, Feng JE, Schwarzkopf R, Waren D, Long WJ, et al. Virtual reality simulation facilitates resident training in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(10):2278–83.

  11. Birrenbach T, Zbinden J, Papagiannakis G, Exadaktylos AK, Müller M, Hautz WE, et al. Effectiveness and utility of virtual reality simulation as an educational tool for safe performance of COVID-19 diagnostics: prospective, randomized pilot trial. JMIR Serious Games. 2021;9(4):e29586.

  12. Parsons TD, Kenny P, Ntuen CA, Pataki CS, Pato MT, Rizzo AA, et al. Objective structured clinical interview training using a virtual human patient. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;132:357–62.

  13. Hsin LJ, Chao YP, Chuang HH, Kuo TBJ, Yang CCH, Huang CG, et al. Mild simulator sickness can alter heart rate variability, mental workload, and learning outcomes in a 360° virtual reality application for medical education: a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Virtual Real. 2022;1–17.

  14. Mospan HR, Blackwelder R, Grover S, Dula C. A two-year review of suicide ideation assessments among medical, nursing, and pharmacy students. J Interprof Care. 2017;31(4):537–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Verkuyl M, Taplay K, Atack L, Boulet M, Dubois N, Goldsworthy S, et al. Virtual simulation: an educatorʼs toolkit. Centennial College. 2022.

  16. Kennedy RS, Lane NE, Berbaum KS, Lilienthal MG. Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int J Aviation Psych. 1993;3(3):203–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bouchard S, St-Jacques J, Renaud P, Wiederhold BK. Side effects of immersions in virtual reality for people suffering from anxiety disorders. J Cybertherapy Rehabil. 2009;2(2):127–37.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bouchard S, Robillard G, Renaud P. Revising the factor structure of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire. Acte de colloque du Annual Review of CyberTherapy and Telemedicine. 2007;5:117–22.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bracq MS, Michinov E, Arnaldi B, Caillaud B, Gibaud B, Gouranton V, et al. Learning procedural skills with a virtual reality simulator: an acceptability study. Nurse Educ Today. 2019;79:153–60.

  20. Moro C, Štromberga Z, Raikos A, Stirling A. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(6):549–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This project was financially supported by the eCampusOntario initiative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander G. Bahadur.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bahadur, A.G., Hargreaves, F., Antinucci, R. et al. Virtual Reality Simulation for Suicide Risk Assessment Training: Prevalence of Adverse Effects. Acad Psychiatry 48, 57–60 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-023-01799-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-023-01799-1

Keywords

Navigation