Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Confined binary particle mixing with a modified discrete element method

  • Published:
Computational Particle Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A modified version of a nonlinear viscoelastic damping model is presented to better represent overall spherical particle response using the discrete element method (DEM) to simulate gravity-driven mixing of binary particles into a confined box. Nonlinear springs are used in the normal and tangential directions to simulate the contact forces, and an additional nonlinear annular spring is employed at the contact points to account for rolling friction. A viscous damping term related to the relative motion between contacting particles is applied to represent energy dissipation, and an alternative condition for checking the end of a collision is applied. The new model is shown to successfully recover the tangential force behavior in stick and sliding regions without having to introduce more complicated behavior. Results are in excellent agreement with existing benchmark tests, and the model is applied to evaluating several different mixing schemes using fixed geometric particle flow disruptors with sometimes surprising results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cundall P, Strack O (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Géotechnique 29:47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Luding S (2008) Cohesive, frictional powders: contact models for tension. Granul Matter 10:235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsuji Y, Kawaguchi T, Tanaka T (1993) Discrete particle simulation of two dimensional fluidized bed. Powder Technol 77(1993):79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Heyliger PR, McMeeking RM (2001) Cold plastic compaction of powders by a network model. J Mech Phys Solids 49:2031–2054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu YC, Thompson EG, Heyliger PR (2003) The compaction of aggregates of non-spherical linear viscous particles. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192:4929–4946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cleary P (2000) DEM simulation of industrial particle flows: case studies of dragline excavators, mixing in tumblers and centrifugal mills. Powder Technol 109:83–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hertz H (1882) Ueber die Berührung fester elastischer Koerper. J Die Rein Angew Math 92:156–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maugis D, Pollock HM (1984) Surface forces, deformation and adherence at metal microcontacts. Acta Metall 32:1323–1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Walton O, Braun R (1986) Viscosity, granular-temperature and stress calculations for shearing assemblies of inelastic, frictional disks. J Rheol 30:949–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thomas J (2007) Adhesion of ultrafine particles—energy absorption at contact. Chem Eng Sci 62:5925–5939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brilliantov NV, Pimenova AV, Goldobin DS (2015) A dissipative force between colliding viscoelastic bodies: rigorous approach. Europhys Lett 109:14005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Olsson E, Jelagin D (2019) A contact model for the normal force between viscoelastic particles in discrete element simulations. Powder Technol 342:985–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jian B, Hu GM, Fang ZQ, Zhou HJ, Xia R (2019) A normal contact force approach for viscoelastic spheres of the same material. Power Technol 350:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zabulionis D, Kacianauskas R, Markauskas D, Rojek J (2012) An investigation of nonlinear tangential contact behaviour of a spherical particle under varying loading. Bull Pol Acad Sci, Tech Sci 60:265–278

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mindlin R, Deresiewicz H (1953) Elastic spheres in contact under varying oblique forces. ASME J Appl Mech 20:327–344

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Di Renzo A, Di Maio FP (2004) Comparison of contact-force models for the simulation of collisions in DEM-based granular flow codes. Chem Eng Sci 59:525–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsuji Y, Tanaka T, Ishida T (1992) Lagrangian numerical simulation of plug flow of cohesionless particles in a horizontal pipe. Powder Technol 71:239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vu-Quoc L, Zhang X (1999) An accurate and efficient tangential force-displacement model for elastic frictional contact in particle-flow simulations. Mech Mater 31:235–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vu-Quoc L, Zhang X, Walton O (2000) A 3-D discrete element method for dry granular flows of ellipsoidal particles. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 187:483–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Di Renzo A, Di Maio FP (2005) An improved integral non-linear model for the contact of particles in distinct element simulations. Chem Eng Sci 60:1303–1312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Franken P, Francois S, Tijskens E, Degrande G A tangential force-displacement model for elastic frictional contact between particles in triaxial test simulations. In: International conference on particle-based methods (PARTICLES)—ii international conference on particle-based methods: fundamentals and applications (PARTICLES 2011), Barcelona, 26–28 October 2011

  22. Balevic̆ius R, Mróz Z (2013) A finite sliding model of two identical spheres under displacement and force control-part I: static analysis. Acta Mech 224:1659–1684

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Balevic̆ius R, Mróz Z (2014) A finite sliding model of two identical spheres under displacement and force control-part II: dynamic analysis. Acta Mech 225:1735–1759

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Elghannay HA, Tafti DK (2020) Alternate tangential impact treatments for the soft-sphere collision model. Part Sci Technol 38:354–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Iwashita K, Oda M (1998) Rolling resistance at contacts in simulation of shear band development by DEM. ASCE J Eng Mech 124:285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jiang M, Yu HS, Harris D (2005) A novel discrete model for granular material incorporating rolling resistance. Comput Geotech 32:340–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ai J, Chen J-F, Rotter JM, Ooi JY (2011) Assessment of rolling resistance models in discrete element simulations. Powder Technol 206:269–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hosn RA, Sibille L, Benahmed N, Chareyre B (2017) Discrete numerical modeling of loose soil with spherical particles and interparticle rolling friction. Granul Matter 19:4. 10.1007

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cundall P (1987) Distinct element models of rock and soil structure. In: Brown E (ed), Analytical and computational methods in engineering rock mechanics. Allen and Unwin

  30. O’Sullivan C (2011) Particulate discrete element modelling: a geomechanics perspective. Spon Press (an imprint of Taylor & Francis), London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Itasca (2008) PFC3D 4.0 particle flow code in three dimensions, theory and implementation volume, Minneapolis, Minnesota

  32. Stevens A, Hrenya C (2005) Comparison of soft-sphere models to measurements of collision properties during normal impacts. Powder Technol 154:99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kac̆ianauskas R, Kruggel-Emden H, Markauskas D, Zdancevic̆ius E (2015) Critical assessment of visco-elastic damping models used in DEM simulations. Procedia Eng 102:1415–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zdancevic̆ius E, Kac̆ianauskas R, Zabulionis D (2017) Improvement of viscoelastic damping for the Hertz contact of particles due to impact velocity. Procedia Eng 172:1286–1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chung YC, Ooi JY (2011) Benchmark tests for verifying discrete element modelling codes at particle impact level. Granul Matter 13:643–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wilson WG (2001) Co-disposal of tailings and waste rock. Geotech News 19:44–49

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fines P, Wilson GW, Landreault D, Langetine L, Hulett L (2003) Co-mixing of tailings, waste rock and slag to produce barrier cover systems. In: Application of sustainablility of technologies: proceedings of the 6th international conference on acid rock drainage (ICARD), Cairns, QLD, Australia, 14–17 July 2003. The AusIMM, Carlton South, pp 1019–1022

  38. Williams DJ, Wilson GW, Panidis C (2003) Waste rock and tailings mixtures as a possible seal for potentially acid forming waste rock. In: Application of sustainability of technologies: proceedings of the 6th international conference on acid rock drainage (ICARD), Cairns, QLD, Australia, 14–17 July 2003. The AusIMM, Carlton South, pp 427–436

  39. Wilson GW, Newman LL, Ferguson KD (2000) The co-disposal of waste rock and tailings. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on acid rock drainage (ICARD 2000), Denver, CO, 21–24 May 2000, vol 2. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration Inc., Littleton, pp 789–796

  40. Wilson GW, Plewes HD, Williams D, Roberston J (2003) Concepts for comixing of tailings and waste rock. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on acid rock drainage, Cairns, QLD, pp 437–443

  41. Wickland B, Wilson GW, Johnson G (2003) A meso-scale column test for co-mixed tailings and waste rock. In: Application of sustainability of technologies: proceedings of the 6th international conference on acid rock drainage (ICARD), Cairns, QLD, Australia, 14–17 July 2003. Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Carlton South, pp 1171–1173

  42. Wickland BE, Ward Wilson G, Wijewickreme D, Klein B (2006) Design and evaluation of mixtures of mine waste rock and tailings. Can Geotech J 43:928–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wickland BE, Wilson GW (2005) Self-weight consolidation of mixtures of mine waste rock and tailings. Can Geotech J 42(2):327–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wickland BE, Wilson GW, Wijewickreme D (2010) Hydraulic conductivity and consolidation response of mixtures of mine waste rock and tailings. Can Geotech J 47(4):472–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Vallejo LE, Mawby R (2000) Porosity influence on the shear strength of granular material-clay mixtures. Eng Geol 58(2):125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Vallego LE (2001) Interpretation of the limits in shear strength in binary granular mixtures. Can Geotech J 38(5):1097–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Dias RP, Teixeira JA, Mota MG, Yelshin AI (2004) Particulate binary mixtures: dependence of packing porosity on particle size ratio. Ind Eng Chem Res 43:7912–7919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Khalili A, Wijewickreme D, Wilson W (2010) Mechanical response of highly gapgraded mixtures of waste rock and tailings. Part I: monotonic shear response. Can Geotech J 47(5):552–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Leduc M, Backens M, Smith ME (2004) Tailings co-disposal at the Esquel gold mine Patagonia, Argentina. In: Proceedings of the SME annual meeting, Denver, CO

  50. Jehring MM, Bareither CA (2016) Tailings composition effects on shear strength behavior of co-mixed mine waste rock and tailings. Acta Geotech 11:1147–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Feng Hu, Pettinari M, Hofko B, Stang H (2015) Study of the internal mechanical response of an asphalt mixture by 3-D discrete element modeling. Constr Build Mater 77:187–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Rahman M, Shinohara K, Zhu HP, Yu AB, Zulli P (2011) Size segregation mechanism of binary particle mixture in forming a conical pile. Chem Eng Sci 66:6089–6098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Xu D, Tang Z, Zhang L (2019) Interpretation of coarse effect in simple shear behavior of binary sand-gravel mixture by DEM with authentic particle shape. Constr Build Mater 195:292–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Dabeet A, Wijewickreme D, Byrne P (2014) Application of DEM for simulation of the cyclic direct simple shear response of granular materials. In: Proceedings of the 10th national conference in earthquake engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Anchorage, AK, Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering

  55. Mindlin R (1949) Compliance of elastic bodies in contact. ASME J Appl Mech 16:259–269

  56. Maw N, Barber JR, Fawcett JN (1976) The oblique impact of elastic spheres. Wear 38:101–114

  57. Munjiza A (2004) The combined finite-discrete element methods. Wiley, Chichester

  58. DEM Solutions (2014) EDEM 2.6 theory reference guide, Edinburgh, UK

  59. Brilliantov NV, Spahn F, Hertzsch J-M, Pöschel T (1996) Model for collisions in granular gases. Phys Rev E 53(5):5382–5392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Delaney G, Inagaki S, Aste T (2007) Fine tuning DEM simulations to perform virtual experiments with three dimensional granular packings. In: Aste Y, Di Matteo T, Tordesillas A (eds) Granular and complex materials. World Scientific, pp 169–185

  61. Luding S (1998) Collisions & contacts between two particles. In: Herrmann HJ, Hovi JP, Luding S (eds) Physics of dry granular media-NATO ASI series E350. Kluwer, Dordrecht, p 285

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  62. Wensrich CM, Katterfeld A (2012) Rolling friction as a technique for modelling particle shape in DEM. Powder Technol 217:409–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Timoshenko SP, Goodier JN (1970) Theory of elasticity, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  64. Di Maio FP, Di Renzo A (2004) Analytical solution for the problem of frictional-elastic collisions of spherical particles using the linear model. Chem Eng Sci 59(16):3461–3475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Brendel L, Dippel S (1998) Lasting contacts in molecular dynamics simulations. In: Hermann HJ, Hovi J-P, Luding S (eds) Physics of dry granular media. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 313–318

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  66. Kruggel-Emden H, Wirtz S, Scherer V (2008) A study on tangential force laws applicable to the discrete element method (DEM) for materials with viscoelastic or plastic behavior. Chem Eng Sci 63:1523–1541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Bardet JP, Proubet J (1991) Adaptive dynamic relaxation for statics of granular materials. Comput Struct 39:221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Bagi K (1999) Microstructural stress tensor of granular assemblies with volume forces. ASME J Appl Mech 66:934–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Gowan M, Lee M, Williams DJ. Co-disposal techniques that may mitigate risks associated with storage and management of potentially acid generating wastes. In: Jewell R, Fourie AB (eds) Mine Waste 2010: proceedings of the 1st international seminar on the reduction of risk in the management of tailings and mine waste, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp 389–404

  70. Wu CY, Thornton C, Li LY (2003) Coefficients of restitution for elastoplastic oblique impacts. Adv Powder Technol 14:435–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the Mountain-Plains Consortium and the National Science Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA

    Chao Jiang, Christopher A. Bareither & Paul R. Heyliger

Authors
  1. Chao Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher A. Bareither
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul R. Heyliger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul R. Heyliger.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, C., Bareither, C.A. & Heyliger, P.R. Confined binary particle mixing with a modified discrete element method. Comp. Part. Mech. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-024-00767-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-024-00767-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation