Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluating DualSPHysics performance implemented in the study of heat transfer in multiphase systems with applications in nuclear reactors

  • Published:
Computational Particle Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For this work, we condense current endeavors and improvements in the expansion of applications of the DualSPHysics code to nuclear reactor safety analysis, that includes the analysis of very complex multiphysical phenomena, involving, in some cases, a highly nonlinear deformation. Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) codes have been developed to analyze some phenomena in nuclear reactors with very good performance; however, this kind of method, based on a well-defined mesh, presents some restrictions when physical phenomena like thermal expansion change the dimensions of the system. The smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) formulation could represent an option to analyze with more precision some physical phenomena in nuclear reactors where a rigid mesh cannot fully represent the system. The DualSPHysics code has shown to be a real and robust alternative, since it involves a free mesh approach, and the numerical method is very well parallelized in both computational and graphical processing units (CPU and GPU). Five cases have been chosen and studied to validate the developments in the code. The results show an exceptionally good approximation with other simulation approaches and with experimental observations. Based on the analyzed cases, the potential applications for nuclear reactors are discussed. As a result, a development path for the DualSPHysics code has been identified as a starting point to further apply the code in nuclear safety analysis as an innovative technique in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Park SH, Jo YB, Ahn Y, Choi HY, Choi TS, Park SS, Kim ES (2020) Development of multi-GPU-based smoothed particle hydrodynamics code for nuclear thermal hydraulics and safety: potential and challenges. Front Energy Res 8:86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jo YB, Park SH, Choi HY, Jung HW, Kim YJ, Kim ES (2019) SOPHIA: development of Lagrangian-based CFD code for nuclear thermal-hydraulics and safety applications. Ann Nucl Energy 124:132–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chae H, Park SH, Kim ES (2020) Simulation of jet breakup in lower plenum with internal structure using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Simulation

  4. Park SH, Choi TS, Choi HY, Jo YB, Kim ES (2018) Simulation of a laboratory-scale experiment for wave propagation and interaction with a structure of undersea topography near a nuclear power plant using a divergence-free SPH. Ann Nucl Energy 122:340–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jo YB, Park SH, Park J, Kim ES (2021) Numerical simulation on LMR molten-core centralized sloshing benchmark experiment using multi-phase smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Nucl Eng Technol 53(3):752–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gómez TAM, Puente EF, Del Valle GE, Francois LJL, Martin del Campo MC, Espinosa PG (2014) AZTLAN platform: Mexican platform for analysis and design of nuclear reactors

  7. Crespo AJ, Domínguez JM, Rogers BD, Gómez-Gesteira M, Longshaw S, Canelas RJFB, García-Feal O (2015) DualSPHysics: Open-source parallel CFD solver based on Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH). Comput Phys Commun 187:204–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pahuamba-Valdez F, Mayoral-Villa E, Alvarado-Rodríguez CE, Klapp J, Gómez-Torres AM, Del Valle-Gallegos E (2019) Lagrangian approach for the study of heat transfer in a nuclear reactor core using the SPH methodology. In: International conference on supercomputing in Mexico. Springer, Cham, pp 108–124

  9. Pahuamba V (2020) Desarrollo de códigos SPH para el studio de transferencia de calo ren el núcleo de reactors nucleares (Master Thesis at Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México)

  10. Gingold RA, Monaghan JJ (1977) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to non-spherical stars. Mon Not R Astron Soc 181(3):375–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sigalotti LDG, Klapp J, Sira E, Meleán Y, Hasmy A (2003) SPH simulations of time-dependent Poiseuille flow at low Reynolds numbers. J Comput Phys 191(2):622–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu Y, Fox PJ (2001) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics model for diffusion through porous media. Transp Porous Media 43(3):441–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu MB, Liu GR, Lam KY (2003) A one-dimensional meshfree particle formulation for simulating shock waves. Shock Waves 13(3):201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Colagrossi A, Landrini M (2003) Numerical simulation of interfacial flows by smoothed particle hydrodynamics. J Comput Phys 191(2):448–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rodriguez-Paz M, Bonet J (2005) A corrected smooth particle hydrodynamics formulation of the shallow-water equations. Comput Struct 83(17–18):1396–1410

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Sigalotti LDG, López H, Donoso A, Sira E, Klapp J (2006) A shock-capturing SPH scheme based on adaptive kernel estimation. J Comput Phys 212(1):124–149

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Verlet L (1967) Computer" experiments" on classical fluids. I. Thermodynamical properties of Lennard-Jones molecules. Phys Rev 159(1):98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Crespo AJ, Gómez-Gesteira M, Dalrymple RA (2007) Boundary conditions generated by dynamic particles in SPH methods. Comput Mater Contins 5(3):173–184

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu R, Stansby PK, Laurence D (2009) Accuracy and stability in incompressible SPH (ISPH) based on the projection method and a new approach. J Comput Phys 228:6703–6725

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Mokos A, Rogers BD, Stansby PK (2014) A multi-phase particle shifting algorithm for SPH Simulations for Violent Hydrodynamics on a GPU. In: Proceedings of 9th international SPHERIC workshop, Paris, France, 03-05

  21. Vacondio R, Rogers BD, Stansby PK, Mignosa P, Feldman J (2013) Variable resolution for SPH: A dynamic particle coalescing and splitting Scheme. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 256:132–148

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Rook R, Yildiz M, Dost S (2007) Modeling transient heat transfer using SPH and implicit time integration. Numer Heat Transf B Fundam 51(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. de Bruyn JR, Bodenschatz E, Morris SW, Trainoff SP, Hu Y, Cannell DS, Ahlers G (1996) Apparatus for the study of Rayleigh-Bénard convection in gases under pressure. Rev Sci Instrum 67(6):2043–2067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang X, Kong SC (2019) Numerical study of natural convection in a horizontal concentric annulus using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Eng Anal Bound Elem 102:11–20

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuehn TH, Goldstein RJ (1976) An experimental and theoretical study of natural convection in the annulus between horizontal concentric cylinders. J Fluid Mech 74(4):695–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Imke U, Sanchez V, Gomez R (2010) SUBCHANFLOW. A new empirical knowledge based subchannel code. In: Annual meeting on nuclear technology 2010. Documentation

  27. Gomez R (2010) Validation of the two-phase flow models of the 3D subchannel code SUBCHANFLOW using the NUPEC BFBT data. Technical report, FZK-INR

  28. Berkhan AKC (2011) Qualifizierung des Thermohydraulik-Unterkanalcodes SUBCHANFLOW für die Anwendung auf Leichtwasserreaktoren. Master's thesis, KIT-INR

  29. Torres G, Miguel A (2011) Further developments of multiphysics and multiscale methodologies for coupled nuclear reactor simulations. Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universität München

  30. Rubin A, Schoedel A, Avramova M, Utsuno H, Bajorek S, Velazquez-Lozada A (2012) Oecd/nrc benchmark based on nupec pwr sub-channel and bundle test (psbt). volume i: Experimental database and final problem specifications (No. NEA-NSC-DOC-2012-1). Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development

  31. Peréz Mañes J (2013) Development of CFD thermal hydraulics and neutron kinetics coupling methodologies for the prediction of local safety parameters for light water reactors

  32. Monaghan J (1985) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Annu Rev Astron Astrophys 30:543–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lo E, Shao S (2002) Simulation of near-shore solitary wave mechanics by an incompressible SPH method. Appl Ocean Res 24:275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the National Strategic Project No. 212602 (AZTLAN platform project) as part of the Sectorial Fund for Energy Sustainability CONACYT-SENER, and the funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Program under the ENERXICO Project, Grant Agreement No. 828947 and under CONACYT-SENER-Hidrocarburos (Mexico), Grant Agreement No. B-S-69926. The calculations reported here were mostly performed using the supercomputing facilities of ABACUS Laboratorio de Matemática Aplicada y Cómputo de Alto Rendimiento of CINVESTAV-IPN, and the Barcelona Supercomputer Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. E. Alvarado-Rodríguez.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mayoral-Villa, E., Alvarado-Rodríguez, C.E., Pahuamba-Valdez, F. et al. Evaluating DualSPHysics performance implemented in the study of heat transfer in multiphase systems with applications in nuclear reactors. Comp. Part. Mech. 9, 1085–1103 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-022-00476-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-022-00476-8

Keywords

Navigation