Skip to main content
Log in

Breakage behavior of gravel rock particles under impact force

  • Published:
Computational Particle Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate the rock particle breakage behavior subject to impact load, a series of split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) tests were conducted on selected Nishan rock and Shoushan rock particles within gravel size range at different strain rates. Both rock particles exhibit a typical strain softening macrobehavior and their dynamic peak strengths increase with strain rate. A dynamic increasing factor (DIF) is used to describe this strain rate effect. Based on the SHPB test, a constitutive model is proposed for the two types of rock particles to describe their dynamic stress–strain behavior considering strain rate effect and damaging effect. Grain size distribution of fractured rock particles was analyzed, which reflected the fragmentation characteristics quantitatively. A fractal theory was used to describe the fragmentation characteristics and dynamic strength of both types of rock particles. Dynamic strength was found to vary differently with fractal dimension for Nishan rock and Shoushan rock.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sun F, Zhang Z-H (2012) The three-dimension model for the rock-breaking mechanism of disc cutter and analysis of rock-breaking forces. Acta Mech Sin 28(3):675–682

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Aler J, Mouza JD, Arnould M (1996) Measurement of the fragmentation efficiency of rock mass blasting and its mining applications. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomecha Abstr 33(2):125–139

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xie LX, Lu WB, Zhang QB, Jiang QH, Wang GH, Zhao J (2016) Damage evolution mechanisms of rock in deep tunnels induced by cut blasting. Tunnel Underground Space Technol 58:257–270

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hagan TN (1979) Rock breakage by explosives. Acta Astronaut 6(3–4):329–340

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gong F, Luo Y, Li X, Si X, Tao M (2018) Experimental simulation investigation on rockburst induced by spalling failure in deep circular tunnels. Tunnel Underground Space Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.07.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mao W, Yang Y, Lin W, Aoyama A (2018) High frequency acoustic emissions observed during model pile penetration in sand and implications for particle breakage behavior. Int J Geomech 18(11):04018143

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hogan JD, Spray JG, Rogers RJ et al (2014) Impact failure of planetary materials. Exp Mech 54(4):665–675

    Google Scholar 

  8. Forrestal MJ (2005) Penetration into dry porous rock. Int J Impact Eng 31:1309–1317

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Li J, Wang M, Cheng Y, Qiu Y (2018) Analytical model of hypervelocity penetration into rock. Int J Impact Eng 122:384–394

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kolsky H (1949) An investigation of the mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of loading. Proc Phys Soc London 62b:676–700

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gray GT (2000) Classic split-Hopkinson pressure bar testing. In: Kuhn H, Medlin D, (eds) ASM handbook. Mechanical testing and evaluation, vol 8, pp 462–76

  12. Zhou YX, Xia KW, Li XB, Li HB, Ma GW, Zhao J, Zhou ZL, Dai F (2011) Suggested methods for determining the dynamic strength parameters and mode-I fracture toughness of rock materials. Int J Rock Mech Min 49:105–112

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang QB, Zhao J (2014) A review of dynamic experimental techniques and mechanical behaviour of rock materials. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47(4):1411–1478

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li XF, Li HB, Zhang QB, Zhao J (2018) Dynamic fragmentation of rock material: characteristic size, fragment distribution and pulverization law. Eng Fract Mech 199:739–759

    Google Scholar 

  15. Olsson WA (1991) The compressive strength of tuff as a function of strain rate from 10–6 to 103/s. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 28(1):115–118

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li QM, Meng H (2003) About the dynamic strength enhancement of concrete-like materials in a split Hopkinson pressure bar test. Int J Solids Struct 40(2):343–360

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kimberley J, Ramesh KT, Daphalapurkar NP (2013) A scaling law for the dynamic strength of brittle solids. Acta Mater 61(9):3509–3521

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fondriest M, Doan ML, Aben FM, Fusseis F, Mitchell TM, Gi Toro G (2017) Static versus dynamic fracturing in shallow carbonate fault zones. Earth Planet Sci Lett 461:8–19

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xing HZ, Zhang QB, Zhao J (2018) Stress thresholds of crack development and poisson’s ratio of rock material at high strain rate. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51(3):945–951

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li J, Konietzky H, Frühwirt T (2017) Voronoi-based DEM simulation approach for sandstone considering grain structure and pore size. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50:2749–2761

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hogan JD, Rogers RJ, Spray JG, Boonsue S (2012) Dynamic fragmentation of granite for impact energies of 6–28. J Eng Fract Mech 79:103–125

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hogan JD, Spray JG, Rogers RJ, Gregory V, Markus S (2013) Dynamic fragmentation of planetary materials: ejecta length quantification and semi-analytical modelling. Int J Impact Eng 62:219–228

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chen R, Xia K, Dai F, Lu F, Luo SN (2009) Determination of dynamic fracture parameters using a semi-circular bend technique in split Hopkinson pressure bar testing. Eng Fract Mech 76(9):1268–1276

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wang QZ, Feng F, Ni M, Gou XP (2011) Measurement of mode I and mode II rock dynamic fracture toughness with cracked straight through flattened Brazilian disc impacted by split Hopkinson pressure bar. Eng Fract Mech 8(12):2455–2469

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang QB, Zhao J (2013) Effect of loading rate on fracture toughness and failure micromechanisms in marble. Eng Fract Mech 102:288–309

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dai F, Xia KW (2013) Laboratory measurements of the rate dependence of the fracture toughness anisotropy of Barre granite. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 60:57–65

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lindholm US, Yeakley LM, Nagy A (1974) The dynamic strength and fracture properties of dresser basalt. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 11(5):171–191

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tang Z (1981) Dynamic mechanical properties of epoxy resin under high strain rate. M. S. Thesis, Hefei:University of Science and Technology of China.

  29. Zhao G-M, Xie L-X, Meng X-R (2013) A constitutive model for soft rock under impact load. Explosions and Shock Waves 33(2):126–132

    Google Scholar 

  30. Krajcinovic D, Silva MAG (1982) Statistical aspects of the continuous damage theory. Int J Solids Struct 18:551–562

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Potyondy DO, Cundall PA (2004) A bonded-particle model for rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:1329–1364

    Google Scholar 

  32. Grady DE (1982) Local inertial effects in dynamic fragmentation. J Appl Phys 53(1):322–325

    Google Scholar 

  33. Turcotte DL (1986) Fractals and fragmentation. J Geophys Res 91(B2):1921–1926

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cheong YS, Reynolds GK, Salman AD, Hounslow MJ (2004) Modelling fragment size distribution using two-parameter Weibull equation. Int J Min Proc 74:227–237

    Google Scholar 

  35. Grady D (2007) Fragmentation of rings and shells: the legacy of NF Mott. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zbib BM, Parab DN, Chen WW, Bahr FD (2015) New pulverization parameter derived from indentation and dynamic compression of brittle microspheres. Powder Technol 283:57–65

    Google Scholar 

  37. Aman S, Tomas J, Kalman H (2010) Breakage probability of irregular shaped particles. Chem Eng Sci 65:1503–1512

    Google Scholar 

  38. Salman SA, Jürgen T (2014) Breakage probability of stressed granules using a degradation model. Chem Eng Technol Spec High Press Process 37(11):1949–1958

    Google Scholar 

  39. Shi F, Kojovic T (2006) Validation of a model for impact breakage incorporating particle size effect. Int J Min Process 82(3):156–163

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yu Q, Liu J, Patil DU, Puppala JA (2018) New approach for predicting particle breakage of granular material using the grey system theory. J Mater Civil Eng 30(9):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  41. Li YJ (2005) Mineral composition and characteristics of Shoushan rock. Geol Fujian 24(2):79–89

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bastianini L, Caline B, Hoareau G, Bonnel C, Martinez M, Lézin C, Baudin F, Brasier A, Guy L (2017) Sedimentary characterization of the carbonate source rock of upper kimmeridgian parnac formation of the Aquitaine Basin(Quercy area). BSGF Earth Sci Bull 188:32

    Google Scholar 

  43. Du J, Chen C, Liang Q, Zhou C (2010) The characteristics of rock-density distributions on the surface and in the crust of the Moon. Chin J Geophys 53(9):2059–2067

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hou T-X, Xu Q, Zhou J-W (2015) Size distribution, morphology and fractal characteristics of brittle rock fragmentations by the impact loading effect. Acta Mech 226:3623–3637

    Google Scholar 

  45. Davarpanah MS, Ván P, Vásárhelyi B (2020) Investigation of the relationship between dynamic and static deformation moduli of rocks. Geomech Geophys Geoenerg Georesour 2020:6–29

    Google Scholar 

  46. Dong Y, Xie H, Li S (1996) Continuum damage mechanics constitutive model of concrete under compression. Eng Mech 1:44–53

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tyler WS, Wheatcraft SW (1989) Application of fractal mathematics to soil water retention estimation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 3:987–996

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tuitza C, Exner U, Frehner M, Grasemann B (2012) The impact of ellipsoidal particle shape on pebble breakage in gravel. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 54:70–79

    Google Scholar 

  49. Shang G, Sun L, Li S, Liu X, Chen W (2020) Experimental study of the shear strength of carbonate gravel. Bull Eng Geol Environ 2020:5

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.11672066) and Haitian Scholar fund of Dalian University of Technology. The authors are greatly appreciated of this financial support, which made this study possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Honghua Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, H., Liu, C., Zhang, J. et al. Breakage behavior of gravel rock particles under impact force. Comp. Part. Mech. 8, 1075–1087 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-021-00393-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-021-00393-2

Keywords

Navigation