Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of density ratio on the dispersion of particles in a submerged liquid jet

  • Published:
Computational Particle Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A submerged jet is utilized to disperse buoyant particle in a cylindrical receiver. A discrete particle model (DPM) is used for an axisymmetric domain. An unsteady DPM model is used on a steady-state fluid fully developed condition. The primary fluid (a vertical submerged liquid water jet on a cylindrical water bath) jet flow is fully developed and calculated by complete solution of Navier–Stokes equation. The primary flow is validated and verified (published earlier), and then an unsteady DPM is used to investigate the dispersion of particles. For validation, experiments were performed using Doppler velocimetry (LDV) and these data were generated at the Centre for Multiphase Processes, the University of Newcastle. Few turbulence models (\(k-\in \) realizable, SST models) generated results were compared. Using the models, dispersion of particle was predicted as a function of particle-to-liquid density ratio. For the same particle-to-liquid density ratio, it was found that the dispersion behavior is similar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armenante PM, Huang YT, Li T (1992) Determination of the minimum agitation speed to attain the just dispersed state in solid-liquid and liquid–liquid reactors provided with multiple impellers. Chem Eng Sci 47:2865–2870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bakker A, Frijlink JJ (1989) The drawdown and dispersion of floating solids in aerated and unaerated stirred vessels. Chem Eng Res Des 67:208–10

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baxter LL, Smith PJ (1993) Turbulent dispersion of particles: the STP model. Energy Fuels 7:852–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dupont V, Pourkashanian M, Williams A, Woolley R (1993) The reduction of nitrogen oxide (NOx) formation in natural gas burner flames. Fuel 72:497–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferzieger JL, Peric M (1996) Computational methods for fluid dynamics. Springer, Heidelberg

  6. Haider A, Levenspiel O (1989) Drag coefficient and terminal velocity of spherical and nonspherical particles. Powder Technol 58:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(89)80008-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hasan N, Rahman AO, Alam MS (2018) Validation and verification of CFD prediction of fluid flow of a submerged vertical round jet. J Int J Eng Mater 3(2):113–121

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hemrajani RR, Smith DL, Koros RM, Tarmy BL (1988) Suspending floating solids in stirred tanks—mixer design, scale-up and optimization. In: 6th Proceedings of the European conference on mixing, pp 259–265

  9. Henkes RAWM, Hoogendoorn CJ (1994) Scaling of the turbulent natural convection flow in a heated square cavity. J Heat Transf Trans ASME 116:400–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huck PD, Bateson C, Volk R, Cartellier A, Bourgoin M, Aliseda A (2018) The role of collective effects on settling velocity enhancement for inertial particles in turbulence. J Fluid Mech 846:1059–1075. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.272

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Jain S (1995) Three-dimensional simulation of turbulent particle dispersion. PhD thesis, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, University of Utah, Utah, USA

  12. Joosten GEH, Schilder JGM, Janssen JJ (1977) The influence of suspended solid material on the gas-liquid mass transfer in stirred gas–liquid contactors. Chem Eng Sci 32:563–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khan MNH, Fletcher C, Evans G, He Q (2001) CFD modeling of free surface and entrainment of buoyant particles from free surface for submerged jet systems. In: 2001 ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, New York, NY, pp 115–120

  14. Khan MNH, Fletcher C, Evans G, He Q (2003) CFD analysis of the mixing zone for a submerged jet system. In: Proceedings of the ASME fluids engineering division summer meeting, pp 29–34

  15. Litchford RJ, Jeng SM (1991) Efficient statistical transport model for turbulent particle dispersion in sprays. AIAA J 29:1443–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lu QQ, Fontaine JR, Aubertin G (1993) A Lagrangian model for solid particles in turbulent flows. Int J Multiph Flow 19:347–367

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Mehrabian S, Acosta E, Bussmann M (2018) Oil-particle separation in a falling sphere configuration: Effect of viscosity ratio & interfacial tension. Int J Multiph Flow 98:120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2017.09.004

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Menter FR (1994) Two-equation Eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 32:1598–1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Naser J, Alam F, Khan M (2007) Evaluation of a proposed dust ventilation/collection system in an underground mine crushing plant. In 16th Australasian fluid mechanics conference, 16AFMC, Gold Coast, QLD, pp 1411–1414

  20. Oosterhuis JP, Timmer MAG, Bühler S, Meer THVD, Wilcox D (2016) On the performance and flow characteristics of jet pumps with multiple orifices. J Acoust Soc Am 139:2732–2740. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4948930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pierson JL, Magnaudet J (2017) Inertial settling of a sphere through an interface. Part 1. From sphere flotation to wake fragmentation. J Fluid Mech 835:762–807. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.747

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Rashid H, Hasan N, Nor MIM (2014) Accurate modeling of evaporation and enthalpy of Vapor phase in CO2 absorption by amine based solution. Sep Sci Technol 49:1326–1334

  23. Rashid H, Hasan N, Nor M, Iskandar M (2014) Temperature peak analysis and its effect on absorption column for CO2 capture process at different operating conditions. Chem Prod Process Model 9(2):105–115

    Google Scholar 

  24. Roache PJ (1998) Verification and validation in computational science and engineering

  25. Morsi SA, Alexander JA (1972) An investigation of particle trajectories in two-phase flow systems. J Fluid Mech 55:193–208

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Saeid NH, Hasan N, Ali MHBHM (2018) Effect of the metallic foam heat sink shape on the mixed convection jet impingement cooling of a horizontal surface. J Por Media 21:295–309. https://doi.org/10.1615/JPorMedia.v21.i4.10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sern WK, Takriff MS, Kartom S, Kamarudin MZMT, Hasan N (2012) Numerical simulation of fluid flow behaviour on scale up of oscillatory baffled column. J Eng Sci Technol 7:119–130

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shih TH, Liou WW, Shabbir A, Yang Z, Zhu J (1995) A new k-Epsilon eddy viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows. Comput Fluids 24:227–238

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Thring RW, Edwards MF (1990) An experimental investigation into the complete suspension of floating solids in an agitated tank. Ind Eng Chem Res 29:676–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Witt P, Khan MNH, Brooks G (2007) CFD modelling of heat transfer in supersonic nozzles for magnesium production. In 136th TMS Annual Meeting, 2007, Orlando, FL, pp 123–132

  31. Zhalehrajabi E, Rahmanian N, Hasan N (2014) Effects of mesh grid and turbulence models on heat transfer coefficient in a convergent-divergent nozzle. Asia-Pac J Chem Eng 9:265–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christ Trang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trang, C., Ahmed, R. & Kaosar, M.G. Effect of density ratio on the dispersion of particles in a submerged liquid jet. Comp. Part. Mech. 6, 581–589 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-019-00234-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-019-00234-3

Keywords

Navigation