Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling and simulation of the post-impact trajectories of particles in oblique precision shot-peening

  • Published:
Computational Particle Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of targeted particulate jets for surface modification in advanced manufacturing processes such as shot-peening are now becoming widespread. The degree of precision now demanded, in tightly confined workspaces, dictates that these processes undergo deeper scrutiny, refinement and optimization, in particular to avoid unintended excessive normal and tangential impact forces and re-impact from the rebounding jet on secondary surfaces. This work focuses on the building block of a particulate jet, namely the inelastic impact of a particle with a surface. The governing equations for a general three-dimensional inelastic impact with unilateral stick-slip conditions are derived, with the objective being to extract the particle and target characteristics which control the forces induced on impact and the resulting post-impact trajectories. Quantitative and qualitative analyses are performed for different types of surfaces and allows analysts to make informed decisions on the choices of parameters in jets, in order to reduce trial and error procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We ignore gravity throughout the analysis. Furthermore, we will ignore any aerodynamic effects, such as drag and the Magnus effect, whereby a spinning particle with angular velocity \({\varvec{\omega }}\) and velocity \({\varvec{v}}_c\) creates unequal drag forces on the surface, since the points on the surface are traveling at unequal absolute speeds (\({\varvec{v}}_p={\varvec{v}}_{c}+{\varvec{\omega }}\times {\varvec{r}}_{c\rightarrow p}\)). We concentrate only on the instants directly before and after the impact event itself.

  2. If one assumed that the surface’s velocity was zero, we would obtain \(v_{p,n}(t+\delta t)=-v_{p,n}(t)\mathcal{E}.\)

References

  1. Afazov SM, Becker AA, Hyde TH (2012) Mathematical modeling and implementation of residual stress mapping from microscale to macroscale finite element models. J Manuf Sci Eng 134(2):021001–021001-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Avci B, Wriggers P (2012) A DEM–FEM coupling approach for the direct numerical simulation of 3D particulate flows. J Appl Mech 79:010901-(1-7)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bagherifard S, Giglio M, Giudici L, Guagliano M (2010). Experimental and numerical analysis of fatigue properties improvement in a titanium alloy by shot peening. In: Proceedings of ASME 49163; ASME 2010 10th Biennial conference on engineering systems design and analysis, vol 2, pp 317–322

  4. Bolintineanu DS, Grest GS, Lechman JB, Pierce F, Plimpton SJ, Schunk PR (2014) Particle dynamics modeling methods for colloid suspensions. Comput Part Mech 1(3):321–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cante J, Davalos C, Hernandez JA, Oliver J, Jonsen P, Gustafsson G, Haggblad HA (2014) PFEM-based modeling of industrial granular flows. Comput Part Mech 1(1):47–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carbonell JM, Onate E, Suarez B (2010) Modeling of ground excavation with the particle finite element method. J Eng Mech ASCE 136:455–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen Z, Yang F, Meguid SA (2014) Realistic finite element simulations of arc-height development in shot-peened almen strips. J Eng Mater Technol 136(4):041002–041002-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dirksen F, Anselmann M, Zohdi TI, Lammering R (2013) Incorporation of flexural hinge fatigue-life cycle criteria into the topological design of compliant small-scale devices. Precis Eng 37:531–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duran J (1997) Sands, powders and grains. An introduction to the physics of granular matter. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elbella A, Fadul F, Uddanda SH, Kasarla NR (2012) Influence of shot peening parameters on process effectiveness. In: Proceedings ASME, 45196; vol 3: design, materials and manufacturing, parts A, B and C, pp 2015–2021

  11. Fathi S, Dickens P, Khodabakhshi K, Gilbert M (2013) Microcrystal particles behaviour in inkjet printing of reactive nylon materials. J Manuf Sci Eng 135:011009. doi:10.1115/1.4023272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Labra C, Onate E (2009) High-density sphere packing for discrete element method simulations. Commun Numer Methods Eng 25(7):837–849

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Leonardi A, Wittel FK, Mendoza M, Herrmann HJ (2014) Coupled DEM–LBM method for the free-surface simulation of heterogeneous suspensions. Comput Part Mech 1(1):3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lum GZ, Teo TJ, Yang G, Yeo SH, Sitti M (2014) Integrating mechanism synthesis and topological optimization technique for stiffness-oriented design of a three degrees-of-freedom flexure-based parallel mechanism. Precis Eng 39:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Onate E, Idelsohn SR, Celigueta MA, Rossi R (2008) Advances in the particle finite element method for the analysis of fluid-multibody interaction and bed erosion in free surface flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(19–20):1777–1800

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Onate E, Celigueta MA, Idelsohn SR, Salazar F, Surez B (2011) Possibilities of the particle finite element method for fluid-soil-structure interaction problems. Comput Mech 48:307–318

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Onate E, Celigueta MA, Latorre S, Casas G, Rossi R, Rojek J (2014) Lagrangian analysis of multiscale particulate flows with the particle finite element method. Comput Part Mech 1(1):85–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pöschel T, Schwager T (2004) Computational granular dynamics. Springer, Berlin

  19. Rojek J, Labra C, Su O, Onate E (2012) Comparative study of different discrete element models and evaluation of equivalent micromechanical parameters. Int J Solids Struct 49:1497–1517. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.02.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rojek J (2014) Discrete element thermomechanical modelling of rock cutting with valuation of tool wear. Comput Part Mech 1(1):71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wriggers P (2002) Computational contact mechanics. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Zohdi TI (2012) Dynamics of charged particulate systems. Modeling, theory and computation. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Zohdi TI (2013) Numerical simulation of charged particulate cluster-droplet impact on electrified surfaces. J Comput Phys 233:509–526

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Zohdi T (2014) Embedded electromagnetically sensitive particle motion in functionalized fluids. Comput Part Mech 1(1):27–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zohdi TI (2014) Rapid computation of statistically-stable particle/feature ratios for consistent substrate stresses in printed flexible electronics. J Manuf Sci Eng ASME (MANU-14-1476). doi:10.1115/1.4029327

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. I. Zohdi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zohdi, T.I. Modeling and simulation of the post-impact trajectories of particles in oblique precision shot-peening. Comp. Part. Mech. 3, 533–540 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-015-0048-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-015-0048-5

Keywords

Navigation