Abstract
Unified power quality conditioner (UPQC) holds the capability of solving power quality problems, especially shows good performance in the voltage sag compensation. In this paper, a compensation strategy based on simultaneous reactive power injection for UPQC (namely UPQCSRI) is proposed to address the issue of voltage sag. The proposed UPQCSRI determines the injection angle of compensation voltage with consideration of optimal configuration of UPQC currentcarrying. Moreover, the compensation strategy also considers the currentcarrying limit of UPQC, and then the zero active power injection region of UPQCSRI (also called UPQCSRI region) is obtained. Under the conditions which exceed the UPQCSRI region, the limit value of shunt current is determined by this proposed strategy. Finally, the proposed strategy and the corresponding algorithm are verified under the PSCAD/EMTDC platform. The result indicates the proposed UPQCSRI strategy in this paper can provide more persistent voltage sag compensation than the previous strategies for the sensitive load.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
As the nonlinear power load increases and the structure of distribution grid is more complex, the problems of power quality become more and more serious [1]. Especially, voltage quality problem could severely affect the normal operation of the sensitive load largely connected to the distribution grid, which leads to giant economic losses and negative effects. The complex and coupled power quality problems are commonly widespread in industries, such as automobile and electronics manufacturing, hospital and entertainment facilities [2, 3]. As the comprehensive compensation equipment of power quality, unified power quality conditioner (UPQC) is especially appropriate for solving the problems above, which can mitigate both voltage and current quality issues such as harmonic, unbalance, voltage swell and sag [4]. As shown in Fig. 1, the two converters of UPQC with the back to back combination are connected to power grid in series and shunt respectively, which makes it more suitable for voltage sag compensation with internal energy exchange [5–7].
Voltage sag compensation strategy of UPQC can be divided into three types, namely presag compensation, inphase compensation, and minimum energy compensation [8–11]. The presag compensation and inphase compensation are similar to the compensation strategy of dynamic voltage restorer (DVR), which focus on minimum voltage magnitude and phase angle jump. Compare to minimum energy compensation of DVR, Ref. [12, 13] proposed a minimum VA method of UPQC (UPQCVA_{min}), which utilizes nonlinear optimum algorithm to calculate the injection angle of the voltage compensation so as to minimize the capacity of sag compensation. In addition, Ref. [14] proposed a voltage sag/swell compensation strategy with simultaneous active and reactive power injection by both converters of UPQC (UPQCS), which can maximize the capacity utilization of series converter and compensate the load reactive power.
Both UPQCVA_{min} and UPQCS are based on the same principle, which determines a specific injection angle of injection voltage, for the sake of optimizing the output power of UPQC. Although these strategies can reduce the installed capacity of UPQC, they need to inject a large amount of active power, which will present difficulty in achieving sustainable compensation for voltage sag [15, 16]. However, for low voltage distribution system, on the premise of maintaining the voltage of the DC bus, UPQC usually has sufficient capability of voltage injection for voltage sag compensation. Therefore, instead of the capacity utilization, the currentcarrying utilization becomes the key point of the optimized compensation strategy.
This paper proposed a simultaneous reactive power injection (UPQCSRI) strategy for voltage sag compensation, which is based on the optimization of currentcarrying utilization. This strategy uses both the series and shunt converters to inject reactive power for compensating voltage sag, and calculates the voltage injecting angle based on the minimization of currentcarrying. What’s more, the zero active power injection region of UPQCSRI (also called UPQCSRI region) and the current limit value for the case of exceeding the UPQCSRI region are obtained. Meanwhile, the load harmonic mitigation is also considered, and the comparison between proposed strategy and UPQCS is also performed.
2 Principle of UPQCSRI voltage sag compensation
The compensation phase diagram of UPQCSRI when voltage sag occurs is shown in Fig. 2. With inductive load, for example, the series converter injects the voltage whose phase is ahead of the system. In the meantime, shunt converter injects reactive power to the system, which makes the voltage injection of series converter perpendicular to the system current. Therefore, UPQC can minimize the compensation energy and simultaneously inject reactive power by two converters. The voltage injection angle is represented as α. According to the law of cosine, the relationship of voltage vectors in Fig. 2 can be given by
where V _{Se}, V _{S} and V _{L} are the magnitude of compensation voltage, system voltage and load voltage, respectively. The compensation voltage can be derived as
where D is the coefficient of voltage sag, and D = V _{s} /V _{L}. Meanwhile, the shunt converter injects reactive power for compensating voltage sag, and the magnitude of compensation current I _{Sh} can be given by
where I _{L} represents the magnitude of load current, and φ is the power angle of load. The magnitude of system current I _{S} is given by
Then, the currentcarrying of series converter I _{Se} is
where n is voltage ratio of series transformer of the UPQC.
As can be seen from (2)–(5), V _{Se}, I _{S}, and I _{Sh} are the functions of voltage injection angle α, of which V _{Se} increases with the increase of α, and I _{S} decreases when α increases. According to (3), I _{Sh} can be divided into two parts. The first half will increase with the increase of α, while the second part can be seen as constant. When
i.e. D < cosφ, I _{Sh} increases with the increase of α. When α = 90°, the current flowing through the series and shunt converters reaches to minimum value at the same time. Then, V _{Se} can be represented as
The current of shunt converter I _{Sh} is given by
The current which flows through series converter is
On the contrary, when D > cosφ, the current magnitude of the shunt converter can be zero by adjusting voltage injection angle α of the series converter. In this case,
This conclusion is consistent with the minimum energy compensation in [9].
The above conclusions are also suitable for the case of capacitive load. Under the consideration of different circumstances of voltage sag, α can be determined as 90° using the compensation strategy of USQCSRI. The phase diagram is shown in Fig. 3. This method can realize zero active power injection of voltage sag compensation with minimized converter currentcarrying, and can compensate the load reactive power. However, the aforementioned conclusions are deduced under an ideal condition without considering current limitation. So UPQCSRI strategy with the constraint of currentcarrying limit will be discussed in the following sections.
3 Analysis of zero active power injection region using UPQCSRI
3.1 Analysis of currentcarrying requirements
Several researches mainly focus on capacity optimization of the UPQC [13–16]. However, the proposed strategy focuses on the limitation of currentcarrying capability due to the following reasons.

1)
Generally, UPQCs are directly installed at the nonlinear and sensitive load at low voltage level. Taking 380 V threephase system as an example, UPQC consists of three groups of singlephase fullbridge back to back converters using IGBTs as switches, as shown in Fig. 1. The DC bus voltage could exceed 600 V.

2)
Using the proposed strategy, UPQC could maintain the voltage of dc bus without the output of active power (assuming the loss of UPQC could be ignored). Therefore, the series converter can operate in any circumstances of voltage sag without the limitation of the compensation voltage by properly designing the ratio of the series transformer.

3)
The system current is the vectorial sum of the load current and the shunt converter compensation current. When severe voltage sag occurs, the magnitude of the system current will be larger than the load current, which could lead to the overcurrent of converters using UPQCSRI. Based on (8) and (9), the currentcarrying capability of UPQC has close relationship with the condition of the voltage sag and the voltage ratio of the series transformer.
As a result, currentcarrying capabilities of both converters become the main factors of the voltage compensation. Specially, in section 3.1 to 3.3, the load harmonic mitigation is ignored, which will be elaborated in section 3.4. The currentcarrying curves can be plotted as Figs. 4 and 5 based on (8) and (9).
Assume I _{L} equals to 1 p.u. and the ratio of the series transformer is 1:1. As shown in Figs. 4 and 5, when D = cosφ, I _{Sh} achieves zero, and I _{S} equals to I _{L}. When D > cosφ, I _{S} will be smaller than I _{L} because reactive current is injected from shunt converter with the opposite phase to the reactive component of load current during the voltage compensation using UPQCSRI. When D < cosφ, although UPQCSRI could compensate the voltage sag by reactive power injection, the shunt converter will inject reactive current with the same phase as the reactive component of load current. Then, the magnitude of system current will become larger than the load current. As the result, I _{S} is likely greater than I _{L} using UPQCSRI, which would cause the overcurrent of UPQC.
With consideration of the cost of UPQC, the two converters have the same insulation level, currentcarrying ability and capacity. In consequence, it is necessary to properly design the transformer voltage ratio to enlarge the UPQCSRI region.
3.2 UPQCSRI region and current limit
The voltage ratio of the UPQC series transformer has close relationship with UPQCSRI region. If there is no limitation of the voltage injection magnitude, then the constraint of the series coupled transformer voltage ratio is
where m _{c} is the modulation ratio and V _{DC} is the DC bus voltage of UPQC. Assume V _{DC} = 600 V with the consideration of cost and insulation, D = 0, m _{c} = 0.85, and n < 0.61 under the circumstance of severe voltage sag. The voltage ratio of the transformer can be set to 3:5, and the following discussion will be based on these settings of the parameters.
Let m _{i} denote the currentcarrying ratio of series and shunt converter,
Assume that the currentcarrying capacity of UPQC equals to the rated load current magnitude, and then UPQCSRI region can be obtained as Fig. 6 based on (8), (9) and (12).
The cases when I _{Se} = I _{L} = 1 p.u. and I* =I _{Sh} = I _{L} = 1 p.u. are illustrated in Fig. 6 in black and red lines, where I* is the current capacity of UPQC. The contour curves of m _{i} at n = 0.6 are displayed. As can be known from Fig. 6, the area without shadow is UPQCSRI region, which could compensate the voltage sag with simultaneous reactive power injection of both converters. When the voltage sag occurs in the shadow area, it will cause overcurrent using UPQCSRI. According to the current magnitude of two converters and the overcurrent conditions, the shadow area could be divided into four regions(Region I, II, III and IV).

1)
Region I: When the voltage sag happens in this area, the currentcarrying of the series converter will be larger than the shunt converter, and the overcurrent will occur at the series converter. In order to avoid the overcurrent of the series converter, I _{Sh} needs to be limited, which can be represented by I _{Sh_limit}
$$I_{{{{{\rm Sh}\_{\rm limit}}}}} = \left {\sqrt {\left( {\frac{{I^{\ast} }}{n}} \right)^{2}  \,(I_{\text{L}} \cos \varphi )^{2} }  I_{\text{L}} \sin \varphi } \right$$(13) 
2)
Region II: When the voltage sag occurs in this area, both the series and shunt converters would exceed their current limits using UPQCSRI, and then the current of shunt converter needs to be clamped. The amplitude of current limit is I _{Sh_limit}.

3)
Region III: In this area, the currentcarrying of series converter will be smaller than the shunt converter. Only the current of shunt converter will exceed its limit. Then the current limitation of shunt converter should be I*.

4)
Region IV: In this area, the currentcarrying of series converter will be smaller than the shunt converter. Both converters will exceed their current limit, and I* should also be the limit of shunt converter.
As the result, compared with the conclusion (namely D > cosφ) of [9], UPQCSRI can obtain a larger region of zero active power injection with proper design of n.
3.3 Comparative analysis of active power injection
The clamping current of shunt converter is required using UPQCSRI strategy. When the shunt current reaches its limit, the phase diagram of voltage compensation is shown in Fig. 7. Due to the current limit, the system current will be no longer perpendicular to the injected voltage of series converter, and the angle is γ. It implies that series converter injects active power P _{inj} to the load, where
According to (14), the more severe voltage sag occurs, the more active power is required from UPQC.
Compared with [14], the demand of active power injection using UPQCS strategy P _{inj}` can be given by
where δ _{max} is the maximum difference value of phase angle between the precompensated and compensated load voltage. Assuming the voltage limit of V _{Se} for UPQCS and UPQCSRI is the same, then cosδ _{max} = 0.5 can be obtained. When the voltage sag occurs in region III or region IV, the active power injection ratio of UPQCSRI to UPQCS is defined as m _{p}, which can be given by
According to (16), the ratio of output active power is shown in Fig. 8 with contour curve of m _{p}. When the sag happens in the shadow area, zero active power will be injected for the voltage sag compensation using UPQCSRI. When the severe sag occurs, the demand for active power injection using UPQCSRI is also smaller than that one using UPQCS. Therefore, UPQCSRI can provide more sustaining compensation for the voltage sag.
3.4 Consideration of harmonic mitigation
As the comprehensive compensation equipment, UPQC is able to mitigate both current and voltage power quality issues. However, there may be a conflict when mitigating voltage sag and load harmonic current at same time using UPQCSRI, which will narrow down the UPQCSRI region or cause the overcurrent of shunt converter. Therefore, it becomes much more complicated to deal with these two power quality issues at same time. Generally, the comprehensive mitigation of voltage sag and load harmonic current could be divided into three conditions.

1)
Condition I: When the voltage sag occurs in UPQCSRI region, the mitigation of voltage sag and load harmonic current can be performed at the same time. The overcurrent will only happen in shunt converter if the harmonic component of load current is very large. Therefore, the current limit of shunt converter can be represented as I*.

2)
Condition II: When the voltage sag occurs in region I or II, the currentcarrying of series converter will become larger than that of shunt converter. Thus, the shunt converter may have extra current capacity for the mitigation of load harmonic current using UPQCSRI. Under this condition, the current injection of shunt converter should be limited. Different from Condition I, the fundamental component of shunt current should also be clamped at a proper value, which can avoid the overcurrent of both series and shunt converters. It can be given by
$$\left\{ \begin{aligned} I_{{{\text{Sh}}\_\text{limit} \_{\text{f}}}}& = \left {\sqrt {\left( {\frac{{I^{\ast} }}{n}} \right)^{2}  (I_{\text{L}} \cos \varphi )^{2} }  I_{\text{L}} \sin \varphi } \right \hfill \\ \!I_{{{\rm Sh}\_\text{limit} }} &= I^{\ast} \hfill \\ \end{aligned} \right.$$(17)where I _{Sh_limit_f} is the clamped value of fundamental component of shunt current.

3)
Condition III: When the voltage sag condition occurs in region III or IV, the currentcarrying of series converter will be smaller than that of shunt converter, and the current limit of the shunt converter is represented as I*. Thus, the shunt converter may not have extra current capacity for mitigation of load harmonic current. Therefore, under this condition, the mitigation of load harmonic current should turn off during the voltage sag period.
4 UPQCSRI algorithm and its validation
4.1 Compensation algorithm
The block diagram of the closedloop control algorithm is shown in Fig. 9.
For the closedloop control of series converter, the vector of system voltage is constructed in αβ coordinate using delay operation [17]. Then the system voltage can be transformed into dq coordinate. After that, the system voltage will be transformed to DC component on d axis. Then, D can be calculated in realtime property [18]. Since the compensation voltage is perpendicular to the system voltage, the transformed compensation voltage only exists in q axis. Based on above calculation, the modulation voltage is obtained, which needs to be transformed to the abc coordinate. The difference between referenced compensation voltage and output compensation voltage caused by series transformer needs to be adjusted using proportion resonance (PR) controller. The resonant frequency of PR controller is set at 50 Hz in this paper [19].
For the shunt converter, the same transformation is used to calculate the shunt current. The elements of I _{L}cosφ and I _{L}sinφ in (8) are transformed to the DC components in d and q axis, respectively. As a result, load power factor could be measured in realtime property. Therefore, the detection delay of load switching can be determined by the design of digital filter. Furthermore, the pulse width modulation can be generated by classical dual closedloop control. In order to achieve the stationary chargedischarge of DC capacitance, a ramp function is used in DC bus voltage control. Specially, a saturate block in the q axis is demanded due to the currentcarrying limit. DC voltage control should be stopped during voltage sag period. And then the UPQC will not absorb active power, which may cause more severe voltage sag.
4.2 Simulation results
In order to verify the validity of UPQCSRI, a PSCAD/EMTDC simulation model is constructed. The parameters of simulation are shown in Table 1.
In this simulation, voltage sag occurs at 1.5 s with D = 0.6, and the duration is 150 ms. The current limit of the UPQC is set at 18 A (peak). The proposed strategy is tested under two load conditions, which are in and out of the UPQCSRI region, respectively.
4.2.1 Condition 1
The root mean square (RMS) value of load phase current is 14 A, and the power factor is 0.74. The theoretic output current of the shunt converter is 4.4 A, which is smaller than the limitation 9.07 A according to (8) and (12). Therefore, this voltage sag occurs in the UPQCSRI region, and the waveform is shown in Fig. 10.
As shown in Fig. 10, before the voltage sag happens, injection voltage of series converter equals to zero and the shunt converter provides reactive power compensation for the system. The voltage recovers to the normal rating within half cycle after voltage sag occurs. The angle of voltage injection of the series converter is 90 degrees ahead of system voltage due to the inductive load. Meanwhile, the shunt converter injects inductive reactive power so as to make the system current perpendicular to injection voltage. Then, the system voltage is in phase with system current. Because there is no active power exchange, the DC bus voltage of UPQC drops a little. After sag period, the DC voltage returns to the rating under the control of DC voltage.
4.2.2 Condition 2
In this condition, load phase current is 16 A (RMS) and power factor is 0.96. According to (8), the theoretic minimum value of zero active power injection current of the shunt converter is about 16 A (RMS), which will lead to the overload of the series converter.
This condition of voltage sag exceeds the UPQCSRI region, and the waveform is shown in Fig. 11. According to Fig. 6, the voltage sag condition occurs in region I, in which the series converter overload may happen. According to (13), the limit current of shunt converter is 10.15 A (peak). Due to the active power injection, the DC bus voltage no longer sustains. After the voltage sag period, the dc bus voltage returns to normal rating gradually.
4.2.3 Transient response and algorithm comparison
In order to ensure the realtime property of corresponding control algorithm, the PR controller is utilized to track the sinusoidal reference voltage. Meanwhile, the realtime sampling of power factor is performed. The simulation result is represented in Fig. 12.
The simulation starts from condition 1, and the transient of the load switching occurs at 1.6 s. Then, the load condition switches to condition 2. The result indicates that the PR controller can accurately and quickly track the reference voltage, and the transient response of shunt current t _{ d } is shorter than 10 ms.
As can be seen from Fig. 13, the voltage of DC bus drops more deeply using UPQCS, which means the more active power injection than UPQCSRI during voltage sag. Therefore, the analysis in section 3.3 can be verified by the simulation results. Compared with UPQCS, the proposed strategy can provide more sustainable voltage sag compensation.
5 Conclusion
Firstly, the principle of voltage sag compensation is derived in this paper. And then UPQCSRI voltage compensation strategy with optimal configuration of currentcarrying is proposed. This strategy can achieve the control of unity power factor and provide sustainable voltage sag compensation by simultaneous reactive power injection from both shunt and series converters of the UPQC.
With consideration of currentcarrying limit, the UPQCSRI region is presented, and then the limit value of the shunt current is obtained. Furthermore, the conditions for compensating both the voltage sag and the load harmonic current are analyzed under three sag conditions.
Finally, the UPQCSRI strategy and the corresponding algorithm are verified by PSCAD/EMTDC platform. Both the analysis and the simulation results indicate that when the severe voltage sag occurs, UPQCSRI can compensate the voltage sag with less active power injection than using the traditional strategies.
References
Xiao XN (2004) Analysis and control of power quality. China Electric Power Press, Beijing, pp 124–132 (in Chinese)
Guo XQ, Wang HB, Lu ZG et al (2014) New inverter topology for ground current suppression in transformerless photovoltaic system application. J Mod Power Syst Clean Energ 2(2):191–194
Zhong Q, Gao XH, Yu NH et al (2014) Accommodating capacity and mode of distributed generation under harmonic constraint in active distribution networks. Autom Electr Power Syst 38(24):108–113
Fujita H, Akagi H (1998) The unified power quality conditioner: the integration of series and shuntactive filters. IEEE Trans Power Electron 13(2):315–322
Ganguly S (2014) Impact of unified powerquality conditioner allocation on line loading, losses, and voltage stability of radial distribution systems. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 29(4):1859–1867
Jothibasu S, Mishra MK (2014) A control scheme for storageless DVR based on characterization of voltage sags. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 29(5):2261–2269
Zhang ZH, Xu BY, Chen Q (2012) Control strategies for UPFCbased optimal power flow of distribution network with normally closedloop operation. Power Syst Technol 36(6):122–126 (in Chinese)
Long YB, Xu YF, Xiao XN et al (2015) Precharging control for unified power quality conditioner based on modular multilevel converter. Autom Electr Power Syst 39(7):182–187
Liu YY, Xiao XN, Xu YH (2010) Characteristics analysis on energy steady compensation for dynamic voltage restorer. Proc CSEE 30(13):69–74 (in Chinese)
Wang SW, Huang K, Xu XT (2014) Control strategy for dynamic voltage restorers without inner current loops. Autom Electr Power Syst 38(18):93–98
Khadkikar V, Chandr A, Barry AO et al (2011) Power quality enhancement utilizing singlephase unified power quality conditioner: digital signal processorbased experimental validation. IET Power Electron 4(3):323–331
Rauf AM, Khadkikar V (2015) An enhanced voltage sag compensation scheme for dynamic voltage restorer. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62(5):2683–2692
Kumar GS, Vardhana PH, Kumar BK et al (2009) Minimization of VA loading of unified power quality conditioner (UPQC). In: Proceedings of the international conference on power engineering, energy and electrical drives (POWERENG ’09), Lisbon, Portugal, 18–20 March 2009, pp 552–557
Khadkikar V, Chandra A (2011) UPQCS: a novel concept of simultaneous voltage sag/swell and load reactive power compensations utilizing series inverter of UPQC. IEEE Trans Power Electron 26(9):2414–2425
Bhavani R, Prabha NR, Kanmani C (2015) Fuzzy controlled UPQC for power quality enhancement in a DFIG based grid connected wind power system. In: Proceedings of the 2015 international conference on circuit, power and computing technologies (ICCPCT ’15), Nagercoil, India, 19–20 March 2015, 7 pp
Ganguly S (2014) Impact of unified powerquality conditioner allocation on line loading, losses, and voltage stability of radial distribution systems. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 29(4):1859–1867
Xiao XN, Xu YH, Liu H (2002) Research on the detection method of voltage sag characteristics. Electr Power Autom Equip 22(1):19–22 (in Chinese)
Xiao XN, Xu YH, Liu LG (2002) Research on mitigation methods of voltage sag with phaseangle jump. Proc CSEE 22(1):64–69 (in Chinese)
Xu SH, Li JL, Hui D (2015) Stability analysis of energy storage inverter based on quasi PR controller under offgrid mode. Autom Electr Power Syst 39(19):107–112
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the twelfth fiveyear National Megaprojects of Science and Technology (2011BAA01B03).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
CrossCheck date: 28 December l 2015
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
XU, Y., XIAO, X., SUN, Y. et al. Voltage sag compensation strategy for unified power quality conditioner with simultaneous reactive power injection. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy 4, 113–122 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s405650160183x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s405650160183x