Introduction

Cost- and energy-effective silicon feedstock is necessary for further progress of the photovoltaic (PV) industry. Metallurgical refining technologies may be used to produce solar-grade silicon suitable for PV applications.[13] Elkem Solar Silicon (ESS) is a maturing, metallurgically produced material with a current total production energy consumption of less than 40 kWh/kg of Si[4] compared to 120 to 180 kWh/kg of Si for electronic grade produced from the conventional Siemens process.[58] The Elkem Solar refining process has been described in earlier publications[4] and is still under development with process steps removed and/or simplified, promising an even cheaper and more energy-efficient process in the years to come.

Another cost dilemma for the current state-of-the-art wafer production value chain—in addition to the high energy consumption—is the amount of scrap generated during ingot crystallization, cutting, sizing and wafering processes, losing more than half of the in-going silicon. Making full use of off-grade materials (top cut, off-side, crucible bed charge, etc.) is one way to improve resources use in the PV industry and control the cost of solar cells.

Research on the effects and feasibility of using metallurgically produced silicon feedstock in both multi- and mono-crystalline solar cells[9,10] has previously been reported. The use of recycled materials in Cz processes has, however, received little attention. The present work aims at investigating the performance of the Cz ingots made from ESS and recycled materials, as discussed in Part I, in solar cells processed in an industrial screen printing solar cell manufacture line, optimized for the current materials.

Experimental Details

Sample Preparation

As described in Part I, two experimental Cz ingots (Cz1 and Cz2) and a third, standard polysilicon reference ingot (RS) were grown under identical pulling conditions. No process problem or apparent structure loss was observed in the main body of all ingots. As illustrated in paper Part I, efficient yields were cut to 156 mm × 156 mm quasi-square in radial direction, and then sawed to 200-µm-thick wafers. The properties along the ingots growth direction were characterized via analysis of twelve positions with fixed interval distance (~125 mm) along the ingot. Four point probe (FPP) resistivity measurements were performed on wafers after rapid thermal processing to eliminate the detrimental effect of oxygen thermal donors. The ASTM F723-99[11] standard method was used to calculate the net doping levels from the measured resistivity values. Glow discharge mass spectrometry (GDMS)[12] results were used to measure the metallic impurity concentrations, the total doping concentrations (Al, B, and P), and thus to calculate the net doping level.

Solar Cell Processing

The solar cells were manufactured using screen printing standard procedures as shown in Figure 1, including the following main steps: phosphorus emitter diffusion in horizontal furnace with POCl3 atmosphere following surface treatment by potassium hydroxide (KOH) at ~355.15 K, SiN x :H deposited by Plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition (PECVD) as the antireflection coating layer, gridded front contracts, and Al back surface field on the rear side.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The flow chart for manufacturing solar cells based on experimental wafers

In order to maximize the solar cell performance, the phosphorous diffusion process was optimized based on temperature and diffusion time. The optimized parameters of the phosphorous diffusion steps are shown in the Table I. The optimized process led to 60 Ω/sq sheet resistance given by FPP.

Table I Optimized Phosphorous Diffusion Procedures

Minority carrier lifetime was characterized by quasi-steady-state photo conductance to analyse the effects of solar cell processing on the recombination centres identified in Part I of this work, in particular the phosphorous diffusion and antireflection coating processes. Electrical properties and light-induced degradation (LID) were measured on the solar cells to assess the solar cells performance as well as the reliability and stability through general testing instruments, including I-V tester, photoluminescence (PL), and electroluminescence (EL). At last, external quantum efficiency (EQE) measurement shows the optical property dependence on the main spectrum.

Results and Discussion

Doping Level and Resistivity

The concentration of the doping elements (boron and phosphorus) and main metallic impurities (aluminum, iron, and copper) as measured by GDMS, and light elements (oxygen and carbon) as measured by FTIR on top and tail slabs, are shown in Table II. The main differences between the experimental and reference ingots have been discussed in Part I, i.e., both experimental ingots show slightly higher light elements concentration (Oi > 18 ppma, Cs > 2 ppma) while same level of metallic impurities Fe and Al as the reference ingot were measured throughout the body of the experimental ingot. Copper levels were elevated in both the experimental ingot as compared to the reference ingot. The ESS material introduced a higher P level into the Cz1 ingot compared with the Cz2 ingot pulled from 100 pct top-cut silicon material. In this work, we focus on the net doping level, which affects the final solar cell parameters.

Table II Light Elements, Metallic Impurities and Net Doping Level for the Ingots and Samples Investigated

The results of the resistivity measurements after 1073.15 K rapid heat treatment (thermal donor killing) at different ingot heights (i.e., fraction solid) are shown in Figure 2. The resistivity throughout Cz1 performs consistently around 1.4 Ohms cm. Uniform resistivity demonstrates that there is no majority carrier-type transition until the end of body part, i.e., transition to n-type. The relatively low and sinking resistivity of the 100 pct recycled material Cz2 from the seed-end to the tail is likely due to the larger amount of boron contained in the p-type top cuts. The effective dopant concentrations analysed by GDMS and resistivity are also listed in Table II as p 0 and p net, respectively. The p 0 value was evaluated according to [B] + [Al] − [P], and the net doping level p net was calculated from the resistivity.[13] It is apparent that p net deviates from p 0 in both Cz1 and Cz2. The measured effective dopant concentration ([B] + [Al] − [P]) is small compared with the calculated net dopant level in Cz1, which indicates that parts of the phosphorous was combined in defects or complexes rather than totally activated in substitutional positions. Inversely, p 0 > p net throughout the Cz2 ingot revealed the presence of a large amount of interstitial boron and B-O complexes. In this work, we will use the P net as the true doping level and consider the inactivated dopants as impurities. How these impurities influence the performances of solar cells produced from the two ingots is discussed based on light elements distribution and recombination properties.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Resistivity along the ingot height for all ingots

Phosphorous Diffusion

The materials’ effective minority carrier lifetime (τ eff at an injection level of 5 × 1014 cm−3) along the ingot height is given in Figure 3 after SiN x :H passivation by a standard PECVD in a PV industrial line. The significant difference between the samples was the front junction, which was diffused in a vertical quartz tube furnace according to the different parameters shown in Table I. Similar to the results discussed in Part I, the wafers of both experimental ingots Cz1 and Cz2 show gradually increasing lifetime along the ingot growth, which was due to the decrease of light elements (Oi and Cs). Moreover, it can be seen from Figure 3 that the minority carrier lifetimes of both ingots are generally increased more than 20 pct throughout the length of the ingots. The gettering effect of the phosphorous silicon glass still works on the experimental materials, and it also excludes the formation of detrimental oxygen-related precipitates during phosphorous diffusion as indicated by the increased lifetime. The phosphorous gettering effect was likely influenced by the compensation in Cz1, as evidenced by an increasing difference in lifetime between Cz1 and Cz2 at high solid fraction. The complex mechanisms related to the increase in minority carrier lifetime during diffusion processes need more detailed investigation in future work.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Minority carrier lifetime on samples after SiNx:H passivation

Solar Cell Properties

Solar cells from wafers at twelve different positions for each investigated ingot were processed in a standard conventional line. Figure 4 reports the main characteristic parameters of these solar cells, i.e., efficiency (EFF), fill factor (FF), short-circuit current density (J sc), and open-circuit voltage (V oc) along the ingots height. Note that all the data are from the statistical average of ten solar cells obtained from the same processing batch at 298.15 K (25.15 °C) and one sun. The FF values of solar cells from the three ingots show relatively high values (>79.4 pct). Under the condition of finite sheet resistance (R s) and shunt resistance (R sh), FF can be expressed with the following Eq. [1][14]:

$$ {\text{FF}} = {\text{FF}}_{0 } \left( {1 - r_{\text{s}} } \right)[1 - \frac{{\left( {v_{\text{oc}} + o.7} \right)}}{{v_{\text{oc}} }}\frac{{{\text{FF}}_{0} \left( {1 - r_{\text{s}} } \right)}}{{r_{\text{sh}} }}], $$
(1)

where \( {\text{FF}}_{0} = (v_{\text{oc}} - \ln \, \left( {v_{\text{oc}} + 0.72} \right)/\left( {v_{\text{oc}} + 1} \right) \), \( v_{oc} = V_{oc} /(\frac{nkT}{q}) \), r s = R s/(V oc/J sc), r sh = R sh/(V oc/J sc), and n is the ideality factor. It demonstrates that the FF values are not only dependent on the v oc, but also R s and R sh. Given the I-V measurements of solar cells produced from Cz1, Cz2, and RS, the values of R s and R sh arranged in a same level, i.e., R s = 2 mΩ and R sh = 700 to 800 Ω. Therefore, the possible cause for slight differences between the samples is the concurrent effect of V oc rather than normal resistance effects. The short-circuit current densities of Cz1 and Cz2 solar cells are significantly lower than that of the reference ingot, which should be attributed to Shockley-Read-Hall recombination as demonstrated in Part I and shown in Figure 3. Higher density of as-grown defects as efficient recombination centres reduced the J sc significantly, compared with the reference samples. The diffusion length (\( L = \sqrt {D_{\text{e}} \tau_{\text{eff}} } \)) in our experimental ingots accounts for the different J sc between Cz1 and Cz2. Compensation could introduce two concurrent effects, i.e., reducing the net doping level (positive effect) and increasing the scattering centers (negative effect). Higher J sc in Cz1 than in Cz2 demonstrates a positive effect rather than a negative effect of the compensation in our experimental ingots.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Average values for solar cells performances along the height of ingots

Unlike the J sc, the V oc in both experimental ingots shows comparable level or even higher level than the reference cells along the whole ingot. Macdonald[15] demonstrated that the voltage for p-type base with n + pp + structure silicon may be calculated by Eq. [2]:

$$ V_{\text{oc}} = \frac{KT}{q}\ln \left[ {\frac{{\left( {n_{\text{net}} + \Delta n_{\text{front}} } \right)\left( {p_{\text{net}} + \Delta n_{\text{back}} } \right)}}{{n_{\text{i}}^{2} }}} \right] + V_{\text{base}} , $$
(2)

where n net and p net are the net doping levels as shown in Table II, Δn front and Δn back are the excess carrier densities at the edges of the space charge regions of the front n + p junction and the rear pp + high-low junction, respectively, n i is the intrinsic carrier concentration, and V base is the electrostatic drop across the base region due to the ohmic losses and to the difference between electron and hole mobilities. Under illumination, the mean excess carrier density is directly related to the effective carrier lifetime via Δn mean =  eff, where G is the mean carrier generation rate. Therefore, three competing parameters, namely τ eff, P net, and V base, determine the V oc, for all solar cells produced in the same processes. It is clear that P net plays a dominant role for the difference between experimental ingots and the reference ingot. Comparing the Cz1 and Cz2 solar cells, V oc of Cz1 is generally larger than the one of Cz2 with higher net doping level throughout the ingot body. A reasonable explanation is that the improved minority carrier lifetime incurred by the compensation determined the V oc, even while the compensation also acted to reduce P net. Increased doping level and lower density of ring pattern defects in Cz2 gradually improved the V oc along with the growth of the ingot.

As such, the addition of compensated ESS feedstock to the recycled material served to improve the resulting solar cell performance. Solar cell efficiencies up to 18.72 pct (Cz1) and 18.85 pct (Cz2) made from the middle part of the ingot body are comparable to the 18.93 pct obtained for the reference ingot RS. However, it seems that the effect of bulk recombination at the body top is the main cause for lower efficiencies.

Figure 5 shows the EQEs of the solar cells from Cz1 and Cz2 wafers as well as the reference wafers. Note that since all the solar cells were processed in the same production line, there was no distinct difference in the reflectivity. Compared to the reference solar cell, the EQEs of solar cells based on Cz1 and Cz2 wafers show a clear reduction in EQE for the whole wavelength region, especially in the long wavelength range from 900 to 1100 nm. It is known that the long-wavelength light is mainly absorbed by the solar cells substrate due to its low absorption coefficient in crystalline silicon (>950 nm).[16] Thus, the lower EQEs of solar cells in the long wavelength in the Cz1 and Cz2 solar cells mainly originated from the experimental p-type silicon substrates. A slight improvement at short wavelength 400 to 650 nm on the Cz2 solar cells compared with the Cz1 solar cells can be observed. Regarding the Auger recombination mechanism, the lower quantum response at this region in Cz1 solar cells was probably attributed to higher emitter doping level and phosphorous-related complexes which are usually the cause for the “dead-layer“ on the solar cell front surface.[17]

Fig. 5
figure 5

External quantum efficiencies (EQEs) of the solar cells based on the Cz1, Cz2 and reference solar cells

Leakage Current

Figure 6 displays the PL images and EL images of wafers from the top of the ingots. Ring pattern areas with serious recombination, which were detected on all passivated wafers from ingots Cz1 and Cz2 as shown in Figures 6(c) and (f), discussed in Part I, disappeared after the solar cell processing illustrated in Figures 6(a) and (d).

Fig. 6
figure 6

PL and EL images of solar cells and passivated wafers. Where (a), (b) and (c) are taken from Cz1 seed-end; (d), (e) and (f) are taken from Cz2 seed-end. (a) and (d) PL image of solar cell, (b) and (e) EL image of solar cell, (c) and (f) PL image of passivated wafers

The leakage current for the three ingots is shown in Figure 7 and is larger in Cz1 and Cz2 than in the reference wafers. With reference to EL images of experimental seed-end wafers displayed in b and e of Figure 6, white points on the images displayed leakage current points under 12 V inverse voltage. This is probably associated with the bulk properties, i.e., related to parts with as-grown microdefects of critical size. However, these leakage locations are not consistent with the ring defect distribution and it seems that some of these points originated from processing contaminations (such as wire mesh belt contaminations in screen printing and firing processes) rather than ring defects. Therefore, it is proposed that ring defects did not agglomerate to a destructive structure which otherwise would give rise to a large reduction in solar cell performance.[18] The shallow rings shown in Figure 6 illustrate that the solar cell process applied in our work had a positive effect on the solar cell performance. Phosphorus gettering and hydrogenated silicon nitride passivation (SiN x :H) greatly improved the bulk properties by reducing the level of metallic impurities and by passivating the dangling bonds, respectively. Given the main difference between Cz1, Cz2, and RS, discussed in paper I, the comparable performances of the solar cells from these ingots were mainly attributed to the elimination of ring pattern defects introduced by light elements (carbon and oxygen) during the refining Cz process.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Typical values of leakage current in the Cz1 and Cz2 wafers as well as reference wafers (RS)

Stability and Reliability

LID was measured on selected solar cells under 1 hour exposure to one-tenth of a sun at 298.15 K (25.15 °C), as displayed in Figure 8(a). It can be seen that the degradation in our experimental ingots was greater than that referenced along the whole ingots. Cz1 shows the most serious degradation in all samples (Cz1, Cz2, and RS) throughout the whole ingot, being almost double than that of the reference solar cells at the body top of the ingot. Especially comparing the LID ratio between Cz1 and Cz2, the higher degradation rate is likely related to total boron concentration and its related complexes such as B-Fe,[19] given to almost same net doping level and [Oi] shown in Table II. Meanwhile along with the growth of the ingots, gradually reduced [Oi] mainly accounted for the lower LID ratio in both experimental ingots, while higher boron concentration in Cz1 does not worsen the degradation of the solar cells compared with Cz2. Besides, smaller different LID ratios between Cz1 and Cz2 at the main body part displayed in Figure 8 as well were likely thanks to relatively lower net doping level in Cz1 compared with Cz2. Therefore, slightly deviating from Macdonald’s theories (namely light degradation is only determined by the net doping level),[20] it is suggested that the LID effect is determined by the concurrent effect of boron concentration, oxygen concentration levels, and net doping levels rather than only one of these factors in our experimental ingots. Figure 8(b) shows the influence of LID on the EQE. As predicted, the degradation of the EQE was approximately 3 pct due to the increased bulk recombination at the long wavelength range (850 to 100 nm). However, the results of Cz1 at short wavelength (400 to 650 nm) displayed an inverse variation, increasing at least 4 pct and the phenomenon was observed on all Cz1 solar cells. Further experiments should be carried out to characterize the mechanism behind this phenomenon.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Light soaking test after 1 hour of illumination under halogen lamp with an intensity equivalent to approximately one-tenth of a sun at 298.15 K (25.15 °C): (a) relative efficiency degradation ratio; (b) external quantum efficiency before and after light induced degradation

Conclusions

The solar cell performance of two p-type Cz ingots made from mixtures of ESS and recycled materials has been investigated and compared to cells made from a polysilicon reference ingot. The results may be summarised as follows:

  • Solar cells made from experimental ingots pulled from recycled and ESS materials showed efficiency values up to 18.9 pct and fill factor values up to 79 pct, compared to the reference cells.

  • The compensation introduced into the recycled materials by the ESS material was shown to have a positive effect on the bulk properties and solar cell performance.

  • Tailored phosphorous diffusion and SiN x :H passivation processes could improve the bulk properties with respect to oxygen-related defects significantly, as illustrated by an increased minority carrier lifetime and annihilated ring pattern regions on PL images.

  • The concurrent effect of total boron and oxygen concentration levels and net doping levels on the LID was demonstrated by light soaking measurements on Cz1, Cz2, and referenced samples. It was also observed that the higher doping levels of the experimental materials brought a higher rate of LID compared to the reference ingot material.

  • Comparable conversion efficiencies of p-type mono crystalline solar cells from recycled and compensated materials with reference solar cells demonstrates the commercial potential of these materials in Cz processes with strict oxygen management.