, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 289–306 | Cite as

Advances in the application of biomimetic surface engineering in the oil and gas industry

  • Yanbao GuoEmail author
  • Zheng Zhang
  • Siwei ZhangEmail author
Open Access
Review Article


Friction is widespread in almost every field in the oil and gas industry, and it is accompanied by huge energy losses and potential safety hazards. To deal with a series of questions in this regard, biomimetic surfaces have been developed over the past decades to significantly reduce economic losses. Presently, biomimetic surface engineering on different scales has been successfully introduced into related fields of the oil and gas industry, such as drill bits and the inner surfaces of pipes. In this review, we focused on the most recent and promising efforts reported toward the application of a biomimetic surface in oil and gas fields, indicating the necessity and importance of establishing this disciplinary study. Regarding the oil and gas industry, we mainly analyzed and summarized some important research results into the following three aspects: (i) applications in reducing the wear of exploration production equipment and its components, (ii) separation and drag release technologies in oil/gas storage and transportation, and (iii) functional coatings used in oil and gas development in oceans and polar regions. Finally, based on an in-depth analysis of the development of biomimetic surface engineering in the fields of oil and gas, some conclusions and perspectives are also discussed. It is expected that biomimetic surface engineering can be used in oil and gas fields more widely and systematically, providing important contributions to green development in the near future.


friction and wear biomimetic surface engineering oil and gas industry 



This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51675534), and the Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing (No. 2462017BJB06).


  1. [1]
    Zhang S W. Prospects for the development of biomimetic tribology. Lubric Eng 43(1): 1–2 (2018)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Gao K, Li M, Dong B, Sun Y H, Sun Y, Liu J. Bionic coupling polycrystalline diamond composite bit. Pet Exp Dev 41(4): 533–537 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Xu L, Sun Y H, Gao K. Efficient rock fragmentation mechanism analysis of impregnated diamond bionics bit. J Jilin Univ (Earth Sci Ed) 38(6): 1015–1019 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Gao K, Sun Y H, Ren L Q, Cao P L, Li W T, Fan H K. Design and analysis of ternary coupling bionic bits. J Bionic Eng S5: 53–59 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Gao K, Sun Y H, Gao R F, Xu L, Wang C L, Li Y M. Application and prospect of bionic non-smooth theory in drilling engineering. Petr Exp Dev 36(4): 519–522, 541 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Shi B R, Pei X H, Wei S B, Li T, Li Y L, Shao T M. Application of bionic non-smooth theory in solid expandable tubular technology. Appl Mech Mater 461: 476–481 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Xuan Y, Jiang G C, Li Y Y, Geng H N, Wang J S. A biomimetic drilling fluid for wellbore strengthening. Pet Exp Dev 40(4): 531–536 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Zheng L H, Wan X H, Zhang H J, Chi L J, Peng K W. A novel multifunctional bionic fuzzy-ball drilling fluid. Adv Mater Res 236-238: 608–615 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Shu X B, Meng Y F, Li G. Bionic technique-based treatment fluid for wellbore stability in drilling through shale formations. Pet Dril Tech 45(3): 15–20 (2017)Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Yan Z, Cong Q, Sun W W. The research of internal combustion engine piston skirts design methods. J Agric Mech Res 33(2): 188–192 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Han Z W, Lu Y, Ma R F, Niu S C, Ren L Q. Dynamic performance of gear surface with bionic micro-morphology. J Beijing Univ Technol 37(6): 806–810 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Cheng X J, Gao T Y, Ru S F, Cong Q. Wear performance of bionic dimpled-shape pistons of mud pump. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2017: 8256429 (2017).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Mezghani S, Demirci I, Zahouani H, El Mansori M. The effect of groove texture patterns on piston-ring pack friction. Precis Eng 36(2): 210–217 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Pettersson U, Jacobson S. Textured surfaces for improved lubrication at high pressure and low sliding speed of roller/ piston in hydraulic motors. Tribol Int 40(2): 355–359 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Zhao Y, Ren L Q, Tong X, Zhou H, Chen L. Frictional wear and thermal fatigue behaviours of biomimetic coupling materials for brake drums. J Bionic Eng S5: 20–27 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Zhou H, Zhang P, Sun N, Wang C T, Lin P Y, Ren L Q. Wear properties of compact graphite cast iron with bionic units processed by deep laser cladding WC. Appl Surf Sci 256(21): 6413–6419 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Li H, Yu S R, Liu E Y, Zhao Y. Fabrication and characterization of bionic amphiphobic functional surface on X70 pipeline steel. Microsyst Technol 21(9): 2003–2010 (2015)Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Luo Y H, Zhang D Y, Liu Y F, Li Y Y, Ng E Y K. Chemical, mechanical and hydrodynamic properties research on composite drag reduction surface based on biological sharkskin morphology and mucus nanolong chain. J Mech Med Biol 15(5): 1550084 (2015)Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Bixler G D, Bhushan B. Fluid drag reduction with shark-skin riblet inspired microstructured surfaces. Adv Funct Mater 23(36): 4507–4528 (2013)Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Zhang W B, Shi Z, Zhang F, Liu X, Jin J, Jiang L. Superhydrophobic and superoleophilic PVDF membranes for effective separation of water-in-oil emulsions with high flux. Adv Mater 25(14): 2071–2076 (2013)Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Wang B, Liang W X, Guo Z G, Liu W M. Biomimetic super-lyophobic and super-lyophilic materials applied for oil/water separation: A new strategy beyond nature. Chem Soc Rev 44(1): 336–361 (2015)Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Zang D M, Wu C X, Zhu R W, Zhang W, Yu X Q, Zhang Y F. Porous copper surfaces with improved superhydrophobicity under oil and their application in oil separation and capture from water. Chem Commun 49(75): 8410–8412 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Wang N, Xiong D S, Deng Y L, Shi Y, Wang K. Mechanically robust superhydrophobic steel surface with anti-icing, UV-durability, and corrosion resistance properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(11): 6260–6272 (2015)Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Zhang Z Z, Ge B, Men X H, Li Y. Mechanically durable, superhydrophobic coatings prepared by dual-layer method for anti-corrosion and self-cleaning. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 490: 182–188 (2016)Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Wang H M, Akid R. Encapsulated cerium nitrate inhibitors to provide high-performance anti-corrosion sol-gel coatings on mild steel. Corros Sci 50(4): 1142–1148 (2008)Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Brassard J D, Sarkar D K, Perron J, Audibert-Hayet A, Melot D. Nano-micro structured superhydrophobic zinc coating on steel for prevention of corrosion and ice adhesion. J Colloid Interface Sci 447: 240–247 (2015)Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Subramanyam S B, Rykaczewski K, Varanasi K K. Ice adhesion on lubricant-impregnated textured surfaces. Langmuir 29(44): 13414–13418 (2013)Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Zuo Z P, Liao R J, Guo C, Yuan Y, Zhao X T, Zhuang A Y, Zhang Y Y. Fabrication and anti-icing property of coral-like superhydrophobic aluminum surface. Appl Surf Sci 331: 132–139 (2015)Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Gu Y Q, Zhao G, Zheng J X, Li Z Y, Liu W B, Muhammad F K. Experimental and numerical investigation on drag reduction of non-smooth bionic jet surface. Ocean Eng 81: 50–57 (2014)Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Bai X Q, Zhang X, Yuan C Q. Numerical analysis of drag reduction performance of different shaped riblet surfaces. Mar Technol Soc J 50(1): 62–72 (2016)Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Fu Y F, Yuan C Q, Bai X Q, Li T. Study on drag reduction performance of antifouling ribbed surfaces. J Ship Prod Des 34(1): 32–41 (2018)Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Zhang B B, Li J R, Zhao X, Hu X H, Yang L H, Wang N, Li Y T, Hou B R. Biomimetic one step fabrication of manganese stearate superhydrophobic surface as an efficient barrier against marine corrosion and Chlorella vulgaris-induced biofouling. Chem Eng J 306: 441–451 (2016)Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Wang G, Zeng Z X, Wang H, Zhang L, Sun X D, He Y, Li L Y, Wu X D, Ren T H, Xue Q J. Low drag porous ship with superhydrophobic and superoleophilic surface for oil spills cleanup. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(47): 26184–26194 (2015)Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Jiang J X, Zhang Q H, Zhan X L, Chen F Q. Renewable, biomass-derived, honeycomblike aerogel as a robust Oil Absorbent with two-way reusability. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 5(11): 10307–10316 (2017)Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Zhang S W. Green tribology: Fundamentals and future development. Friction 1(2): 186–194 (2013)Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Liu H, Yang Q H, Pei X H, Zheng L C, Fu T, Shi B R, Wei S B, Chen L. Current status and development prospect of petroleum engineering bionics. Acta Petrol Sin 37(2): 273–279 (2016)Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Wang Z Z, Zhang Z H, Sun Y H, Gao K, Liang Y H, Li X J, Ren L Q. Wear behavior of bionic impregnated diamond bits. Tribol Int 94: 217–222 (2016)Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    Wang Z Z, Gao K, Sun Y H, Zhang Z H, Zhang S Y, Liang Y H, Li X J, Ren L Q. Effects of bionic units in different scales on the wear behavior of bionic impregnated diamond bits. J Bionic Eng 13(4): 659–668 (2016)Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    Sun Y H, He L K, Zhang C, Meng Q N, Liu B C, Gao K, Wen M, Zheng W T. Enhanced tensile strength and thermal conductivity in copper diamond composites with B4C coating. Sci Rep 7(1): 10727 (2017)Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    Zhang P P, Li F H, Zhang X F, Zhang Z H, Tan C L, Ren L Q, Wang Y L, Ma W Y, Liu M. Effect of bionic unit shapes on solid particle erosion resistance of ZrO2-7wt%Y2O3 thermal barrier coatings processed by laser. J Bionic Eng 15(3): 545–557 (2018)Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    Chen Z W, Zhang H, Shen B, Yin G Q, Wang X F. A study on safe and dangerous drilling azimuths of horizontal well. Acta Petrol Sin 34(1): 164–168 (2013)Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    Jiang G C, Xuan Y, Wang J S, Zhang H, Zhang Z H, Peng C Y. Study and application of bionic borehole wall strengthening agent. Drill Fluid Complet Fluid 31(3): 1–5 (2014)Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    Tung S C, McMillan M L. Automotive tribology overview of current advances and challenges for the future. Tribol Int 37(7): 517–536 (2004)Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    Zhang J H, He Z P, Zhang G C, Ma Z Y, Gao H G, Ma L. Coupled thermal and mechanical load analysis in diesel engine piston. Transactions of CSICE 29(1): 78–83 (2011)Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    Wu B, Xi P. Optimal design apply to orthogonal test in piston with bionic groove. In Proceedings of 2014 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Tianjin, China, 2014: 805–809.Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    Sun Y W, Ru S F, Cong Q. Wear-life experiment of drilling mud pump piston with dimple-shaped bionic surface. Acta Petrol Sin 38(2): 234–240 (2017)Google Scholar
  47. [47]
    Song Q F, Liu Y B, Zhou H, Sun N, Ren L Q. Friction and wear behavior of bionic coupling brake drum processed by laser. J Jilin Univ (Eng Technol Ed) 37(5): 1069–1073 (2007)Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    Wang S T, Liu K S, Yao X, Jiang L. Bioinspired surfaces with superwettability: New insight on theory, design, and applications. Chem Rev 115(16): 8230–8293 (2015)Google Scholar
  49. [49]
    Wu Y X, Xu J Y. Oil and water separation technology. Adv Mech 45(1): 201506 (2015)Google Scholar
  50. [50]
    Tao M M, Xue L X, Liu F, Jiang L. An intelligent superwetting PVDF membrane showing switchable transport performance for oil/water separation. Adv Mater 26(18): 2943–2948 (2014)Google Scholar
  51. [51]
    Xiong Z, Lin H B, Zhong Y, Qin Y, Li T T and Liu F. Robust superhydrophilic polylactide (PLA) membranes with a TiO2 nano-particle inlaid surface for oil/water separation. J Mater Chem A 5(14): 6538–6545 (2017)Google Scholar
  52. [52]
    Xue Z X, Wang S T, Lin L, Chen L, Liu M J, Feng L, Jiang L. A novel superhydrophilic and underwater superoleophobic hydrogel-coated mesh for oil/water separation. Adv Mater 23(37): 4270–4273 (2011)Google Scholar
  53. [53]
    Zhang G F, Jiang J X, Zhang Q H, Gao F, Zhan X L, Chen F Q. Ultralow oil-fouling heterogeneous poly(ether sulfone) ultrafiltration membrane via blending with novel amphiphilic fluorinated gradient copolymers. Langmuir 32(5): 1380–1388 (2016)Google Scholar
  54. [54]
    Zhang G F, Jiang J X, Zhang Q H, Zhan X L, Chen F Q. Amphiphilic poly(ether sulfone) membranes for oil/water separation: Effect of sequence structure of the modifier. AIChE J 63(2): 739–750 (2017)Google Scholar
  55. [55]
    Jiang J X, Zhang Q H, Zhan X L, Chen F Q. A multifunctional gelatin-based aerogel with superior pollutants adsorption, oil/water separation and photocatalytic properties. Chem Eng J 358: 1539–1551 (2019)Google Scholar
  56. [56]
    Fu Y C, Jin B Y, Zhang Q H, Zhan X L, Chen F Q. pHinduced switchable superwettability of efficient antibacterial fabrics for durable selective oil/water separation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(35): 30161–30170 (2017)Google Scholar
  57. [57]
    Kwon G, Kota A K, Li Y X, Sohani A, Mabry J M, Tuteja A. On-demand separation of oil-water mixtures. Adv Mater 24(27): 3666–3671 (2012)Google Scholar
  58. [58]
    Kota A K, Kwon G, Choi W, Mabry J M, Tuteja A. Hygroresponsive membranes for effective oil-water separation. Nat Commun 3: 1025 (2012)Google Scholar
  59. [59]
    Xue Z X, Cao Y Z, Liu N, Feng L, Jiang L. Special wettable materials for oil/water separation. J Mater Chem A 2(8): 2445–2460 (2014)Google Scholar
  60. [60]
    Lee C H, Johnson N, Drelich J, Yap Y K. The performance of superhydrophobic and superoleophilic carbon nanotube meshes in water-oil filtration. Carbon 49(2): 669–676 (2011)Google Scholar
  61. [61]
    Tian D L, Zhang X F, Wang X, Zhai J, Jiang L. Micro/nanoscale hierarchical structured ZnO mesh film for separation of water and oil. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13(32): 14606–14610 (2011)Google Scholar
  62. [62]
    Kobayashi M, Terayama Y, Yamaguchi H, Terada M, Murakami D, Ishihara K, Takahara A. Wettability and antifouling behavior on the surfaces of superhydrophilic polymer brushes. Langmuir 28(18): 7212–7222 (2012)Google Scholar
  63. [63]
    Zhang W B, Zhu Y Z, Liu X, Wang D, Li J Y, Jiang L, Jin J. Salt-induced fabrication of superhydrophilic and underwater superoleophobic PAA-g-PVDF membranes for effective separation of oil-in-water emulsions. Angew Chem Int Ed 53(3): 856–860 (2014)Google Scholar
  64. [64]
    Guo Y B, Yang L, Wang D G. Preparation and hydrophobic behaviours of polystyrene composite coating. Surf Eng 32(2): 95–101 (2016)Google Scholar
  65. [65]
    Cao C Y, Ge M Z, Huang J Y, Li S H, Deng S, Zhang S N, Chen Z, Zhang K Q, Al-Deyab S S, Lai Y. Robust fluorinefree superhydrophobic PDMS-ormosil@fabrics for highly effective self-cleaning and efficient oil-water separation. J Mater Chem A 4(31): 12179–12187 (2016)Google Scholar
  66. [66]
    Xu X, Zhou H, Liu J, Ji Y. Study and application of bionic self-cleaning drag reducing technology in fluid pipeline. Process Equip Pip 50(3): 74–77 (2013)Google Scholar
  67. [67]
    Watanabe K, Udagawa H. Drag reduction of non-newtonian fluids in a circular pipe with a highly water-repellent wall. AIChE J 47(2): 256–262 (2001)Google Scholar
  68. [68]
    Choi C H, Ulmanella U, Kim J, Ho C M, Kim C J. Effective slip and friction reduction in nanograted superhydrophobic microchannels. Phys Fluids 18(8): 087105 (2006)Google Scholar
  69. [69]
    Luo Y H, Song W, Wang X D. Water repellent/wetting characteristics of various bio-inspired morphologies and fluid drag reduction testing research. Micron 82: 9–16 (2016)Google Scholar
  70. [70]
    Luo Y H, Yuan L, Li J H, Wang J S. Boundary layer drag reduction research hypotheses derived from bio-inspired surface and recent advanced applications. Micron 79: 59–73 (2015)Google Scholar
  71. [71]
    Lü T, Chen X L. Numerical simulation of drag reduction of circular pipe with superhydrophobic wall in turbulent flow. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ 43(8): 1280–1283 (2009)Google Scholar
  72. [72]
    Sun H Z. Research on anti-erosion performance and mechanism of a pipe bend with the bio-inspired internal surface. Master’s thesis. Changchun (China): Jilin University, 2017.Google Scholar
  73. [73]
    Peng C W, Chang K C, Weng C J, Lai M C, Hsu C H, Hsu S C, Hsu Y Y, Hung W I, Wei Y, Yeh J M. Nano-casting technique to prepare polyaniline surface with biomimetic superhydrophobic structures for anticorrosion application. Electrochim Acta 95: 192–199 (2013)Google Scholar
  74. [74]
    Liu Y, Xue J Z, Luo D, Wang H Y, Gong X, Han Z W, Ren L Q. One-step fabrication of biomimetic superhydrophobic surface by electrodeposition on magnesium alloy and its corrosion inhibition. J Colloid Interface Sci 491: 313–320 (2017)Google Scholar
  75. [75]
    She Z X, Li Q, Wang Z W, Li L Q, Chen F N, Zhou J C. Researching the fabrication of anticorrosion superhydrophobic surface on magnesium alloy and its mechanical stability and durability. Chem Eng J 228: 415–424 (2013)Google Scholar
  76. [76]
    Zhu Y J, Sun F L, Qian H J, Wang H Y, Mu L W, Zhu J H. A biomimetic spherical cactus superhydrophobic coating with durable and multiple anti-corrosion effects. Chem Eng J 338: 670–679 (2018)Google Scholar
  77. [77]
    Mohamed A M A, Abdullah A M, Younan N A. Corrosion behavior of superhydrophobic surfaces: A review. Arab J Chem 8(6): 749–765 (2015)Google Scholar
  78. [78]
    Wang G R, Liao C J, Hu G, Zhong L, Zhang M. Numerical simulation analysis and the drag reduction performance investigation on circular cylinder with dimples at subcritical Reynolds number. J Mech Strength 39(5): 1119–1125 (2017)Google Scholar
  79. [79]
    Mo M T, Zhao W J, Chen Z F, Zeng Z X, Wu X D, Xue Q J. Research status of marine drag reduction technologies. Tribology 35(4): 505–515 (2015)Google Scholar
  80. [80]
    Sun Y W, Yan X P, Yuan C Q, Bai X Q. Insight into tribological problems of green ship and corresponding research progresses. Friction 6(4): 472–483 (2018)Google Scholar
  81. [81]
    Fu Y F, Yuan C Q and Bai X Q. Marine drag reduction of shark skin inspired riblet surfaces. Biosurf Biotribol 3(1): 11–24 (2017)Google Scholar
  82. [82]
    Wang J J. Reviews and prospects in turbulent drag reduction over riblets surface. J Beijing Univ Aeron Astron 24(1): 31–33 (1998)Google Scholar
  83. [83]
    Wang J J, Chen G. Experimental studies on the near wall turbulent coherent structures over riblets surfaces. Acta Aeron Astron Sin 22(5): 400–405 (2001)Google Scholar
  84. [84]
    Cheng P P, Jiang C G, Wu C W. Numerical simulation of drag reduction characteristics in bionic secondary micro-grooved surface. China Sci 9(8): 940–943 (2014)Google Scholar
  85. [85]
    Dai W, Alkahtani M, Hemmer P R, Liang H. Drag-reduction of 3D printed shark-skin-like surfaces. Friction, in press, DOI 10.1007/s40544-018-0246-2.Google Scholar
  86. [86]
    Wang J D, Wang B, Chen D R. Underwater drag reduction by gas. Friction 2(4): 295–309 (2014)Google Scholar
  87. [87]
    Yu Y S, Wei Q D. Experimental Study on Physical mechanism of drag reduction of hydrophobic materials in laminar flow. Chin Phys Lett 23(6): 1634–1637 (2006)Google Scholar
  88. [88]
    Huang Q G, Pan G, Song B W, Liu Z Y, Hu H B. Numerical simulation of superhydrophobic surface’s flow field characteristic and drag reduction rule. J Ship Mech 18(1-2): 1–11 (2014)Google Scholar
  89. [89]
    Wang Y Y, Zhao Y, Zheng W, Duan M L, Chen H R, Du Y. Beyond self-cleaning: Next generation smart nanoscale manipulators and prospects for subsea production system. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 17(12): 8623–8639 (2017)Google Scholar
  90. [90]
    Bai X Q, Yuan C Q, Yan X P, Liu X M. Research on green bionic ship antifouling techniques based on surface morphology of shell. J Wuhan Univ Technol 33(1): 75–78, 112 (2011)Google Scholar
  91. [91]
    Schumacher J F, Carman M L, Estes T G, Feinberg A W, Wilson L H, Callow M E, Callow J A, Finlay J A, Brennan A B. Engineered antifouling microtopographies-Effect of feature size, geometry, and roughness on settlement of zoospores of the green alga Ulva. Biofouling 23(1): 55–62 (2007)Google Scholar
  92. [92]
    Chen Z F, Zhao W J, Mo M T, Zhou C X, Liu G, Zeng Z X, Wu X D, Xue Q J. Architecture of modified silica resin coatings with various micro/nano patterns for fouling resistance: Microstructure and antifouling performance. RSC Adv 5(118): 97862–97873 (2015)Google Scholar
  93. [93]
    Zhang S Y, Zheng J Y, Fu Y B. Principle and research progress of surface flocking as marine antifouling technology. Paint Coat Ind 42(12): 72–76 (2012)Google Scholar
  94. [94]
    Xiao L L, Li J S, Mieszkin S, et al. Slippery liquid-infused porous surfaces showing marine antibiofouling properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(20): 10074–10080 (2013)Google Scholar
  95. [95]
    Wang P, Lu Z, Zhang D. Slippery liquid-infused porous surfaces fabricated on aluminum as a barrier to corrosion induced by sulfate reducing bacteria. Corros Sci 93: 159–166 (2015)Google Scholar
  96. [96]
    Wang P, Zhang D, Lu Z, Sun S M. Fabrication of slippery lubricant-infused porous surface for inhibition of microbially influenced corrosion. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(2): 1120–1127 (2016)Google Scholar
  97. [97]
    Epstein A K, Wong T S, Belisle R A, Boggsa E M, Aizenberg J. Liquid-infused structured surfaces with exceptional antibiofouling performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(33): 13182–13187 (2012) ai][98]_Wei C Q, Zhang G F, Zhang Q H, Zhan X L, Chen F Q. Silicone oil-infused slippery surfaces based on sol-gel process-induced nanocomposite coatings: A facile approach to highly stable bioinspired surface for biofouling resistance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(50): 34810–34819 (2016)Google Scholar
  98. [99]
    Yong J L, Chen F, Yang Q, Fang Y, Huo J L, Zhang J Z and Hou X. Nepenthes inspired design of self-repairing omniphobic slippery liquid infused porous surface (SLIPS) by femtosecond laser direct writing. Adv Mater Interfaces 4(20): 1700552 (2017)Google Scholar
  99. [100]
    Mishchenko L, Hatton B, Bahadur V, Taylor J A, Krupenkin T, Aizenberg J. Design of ice-free nanostructured surfaces based on repulsion of impacting water droplets. ACS Nano 4(12): 7699–7707 (2010)Google Scholar
  100. [101]
    Cao L L, Jones A K, Sikka V K, Wu J Z, Gao D. Anti-icing superhydrophobic coatings. Langmuir 25(21): 12444–12448 (2009)Google Scholar
  101. [102]
    Guo P, Zheng Y M, Wen M X, Song C, Lin Y C, Jiang L. Icephobic/anti-icing properties of micro/nanostructured surfaces. Adv Mater 24(19): 2642–2648 (2012)Google Scholar
  102. [103]
    Wang Y Y, Xue J, Wang Q J, Chen Q M, Ding J F. Verification of icephobic/anti-icing properties of a superhydrophobic surface. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(8): 3370–3381 (2013)Google Scholar
  103. [104]
    Wang L, Gong Q H, Zhan S H, Jiang L, Zheng Y M. Robust anti-icing performance of a flexible superhydrophobic surface. Adv Mater 28(35): 7729–7735 (2016)Google Scholar
  104. [105]
    Ruan M, Li W, Wang B S, Deng B W, Ma F M, Yu Z L. Preparation and anti-icing behavior of superhydrophobic surfaces on aluminum alloy substrates. Langmuir 29(27): 8482–8491 (2013)Google Scholar
  105. [106]
    Wilson P W, Lu W Z, Xu H J, Kim P, Kreder M J, Alvarenga J, Aizenberg J. Inhibition of ice nucleation by slippery liquid-infused porous surfaces (SLIPS). Phys Chem Chem Phys 15(2): 581–585 (2013)Google Scholar
  106. [107]
    Shen Y Z, Tao J, Tao H J, Chen S L, Pan L, Wang T. Anti-icing potential of superhydrophobic Ti6Al4V surfaces: Ice nucleation and growth. Langmuir 31(39): 10799–10806 (2015)Google Scholar
  107. [108]
    Kim P, Wong T S, Alvarenga J, Kreder M J, Adorno- Martinez W E, Aizenberg J. Liquid-infused nanostructured surfaces with extreme anti-ice and anti-frost performance. ACS Nano 6(8): 6569–6577 (2012)Google Scholar
  108. [109]
    Lv J Y, Song Y L, Jiang L, Wang J J. Bio-inspired strategies for anti-icing. ACS Nano 8(4): 3152–3169 (2014)Google Scholar
  109. [110]
    Chen L Q, Geissler A, Bonaccurso E, Zhang K. Transparent slippery surfaces made with sustainable porous cellulose lauroyl ester films. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(9): 6969–6976 (2014)Google Scholar
  110. [111]
    Chen J, Dou R M, Cui D P, Zhang Q L, Zhang Y F, Xu F J, Zhou X, Wang J J, Song Y L, Jiang L. Robust prototypical anti-icing coatings with a self-lubricating liquid water layer between ice and substrate. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(10): 4026–4030 (2013)Google Scholar
  111. [112]
    Zhang J L, Gu C D, Tu J P. Robust slippery coating with superior corrosion resistance and anti-icing performance for AZ31B Mg alloy protection. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(12): 11247–11257 (2017)Google Scholar
  112. [113]
    He M, Li H L, Wang J J, Song Y L. Superhydrophobic surface at low surface temperature. Appl Phys Lett 98(9): 093118 (2011)Google Scholar
  113. [114]
    Tang Y Q, Zhang Q H, Zhan X L, Chen F Q. Superhydrophobic and anti-icing properties at overcooled temperature of a fluorinated hybrid surface prepared via a sol-gel process. Soft Matter 11(22): 4540–4550 (2015)Google Scholar
  114. [115]
    Yin X Y, Zhang Y, Wang D A, Liu Z L, Liu Y P, Pei X W, Yu B, Zhou F. Integration of self-lubrication and near-infrared photothermogenesis for excellent anti-icing/deicing performance. Adv Funct Mater 25(27): 4237–4245 (2015)Google Scholar
  115. [116]
    Esser-Kahn A P, Trang V, Francis M B. Incorporation of antifreeze proteins into polymer coatings using site-selective bioconjugation. J Am Chem Soc 132(38): 13264–13269 (2010)Google Scholar
  116. [117]
    Davies P L. Ice-binding proteins: A remarkable diversity of structures for stopping and starting ice growth. Trends Biochem Sci 39(11): 548–555 (2014)Google Scholar
  117. [118]
    Sun T L, Qing G Y. Biomimetic smart interface materials for biological applications. Adv Mater 23(12): H57–H77 (2011)Google Scholar
  118. [119]
    Cheng T T, He R, Zhang Q H, Zhan X L, Chen F Q. Magnetic particle-based super-hydrophobic coatings with excellent anti-icing and thermoresponsive deicing performance. J Mater Chem A 3(43): 21637–21646 (2015)Google Scholar
  119. [120]
    Kreder M J, Alvarenga J, Kim P, Aizenberg J. Design of anti-icing surfaces: Smooth, textured or slippery? Nat Rev Mater 1(1): 15003 (2016)Google Scholar
  120. [121]
    Wang H D, Ma G Z, Xu B S, Yong Q S, He P F. Design and application of friction pair surface modification coating for remanufacturing. Friction 5(3): 351–360 (2017)Google Scholar
  121. [122]
    Han Z W, Mu Z Z, Yin W, Li W, Niu S C, Zhang J Q, Ren L Q. Biomimetic multifunctional surfaces inspired from animals. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 234: 27–50 (2016)Google Scholar
  122. [123]
    Stachowiak G W. How tribology has been helping us to advance and to survive. Friction 5(3): 233–247 (2017)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  123. [124]
    Holmberg K, Erdemir A. Influence of tribology on global energy consumption, costs and emissions. Friction 5(3): 263–284 (2017)Google Scholar
  124. [125]
    Zhang S W. Recent developments of green tribology. Surf Topogr Metrol Prop 4(2): 023004 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The author(s) 2018

Open Access: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Li-cense, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Mechanical and Transportation EngineeringChina University of PetroleumBeijingChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and ProspectingBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations