, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 437–446 | Cite as

Friction and wear behavior of Cu–4 wt.%Ni–TiC composites under dry sliding conditions

Open Access
Research Article


The present study synthesized Cu–4 wt% Ni matrix composites reinforced with different percentages of TiC (0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 wt%) through high-energy ball milling, followed by compaction and sintering. The friction and wear behavior was examined at four different normal loads of 5, 10, 15, and 20 N. A constant sliding speed of 1.25 m/s was maintained while sliding against a hardened counterface made of EN31 steel (HRC 60) under ambient conditions using a pin-on-disk test rig. The composite hardness increased until the addition of 4 wt% of TiC, beyond which it was observed to decrease. Such a trend may be attributed to the TiC agglomeration in the composites containing relatively larger amounts of TiC (i.e., 6 and 8 wt%). The wear rate linearly increased with the load. However, the composites exhibited a lower rate of wear than the matrix alloy, which may have resulted from the relatively higher hardness of composites. The observed friction and wear behavior has been explained on the basis of hardness and presence of the transfer layer on the worn surface and its nature, i.e., loose or well compacted. Addition of 4 wt% TiC showed the optimum performance in terms of friction and wear caused by its higher hardness and ability to hold a transfer layer of a relatively larger thickness compared to the other materials. The wear mechanism for the Cu4Ni matrix alloy was a mix of adhesive and oxidative wear and primarily abrasive for the composites containing hard TiC particles.


sliding wear composites TiC particles friction 


  1. [1]
    Miracle D B. Metal matrix composites-From science to technological significance. Comp Sci Tech 65: 2526–2540 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Vettivel S C, Selvakumar N, Leema N, Lenin A H. Electrical resistivity, wear map and modeling of extruded tungsten reinforced copper composite. Mater Des 56: 791–806 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Jha P, Gupta P, Kumar D, Parkash O. Synthesis and characterization of Fe-ZrO2 metal matrix composites. J Comp Mater 48(17): 2107–2115 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Kaftelen H, Ünlü N, Göller G, Öveçog ̮lu M L, Henein H. Comparative processing-structure–property studies of Al–Cu matrix composites reinforced with TiC particulates. Compos: Part A 42: 812–824 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Zhuang J, Liu Y B, Cao Z Y, Li Y Y. Microstructure and wear resistance of Cu-TiC composites fabricated by mechanical alloying and spark plasma sintering. Adv Mater Res 213: 524–528 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Ma W, Lu J. Effect of sliding speed on surface modification and tribological behavior of copper–graphite composite. Tribo Lett 41: 363–370 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Rosso M. Ceramic and metal matrix composites: Routes and properties. J Mater Proce Techn 175: 364–375(2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Torralba J M, da Costa C E, Velasco F. P/M aluminum matrix composites: an overview. J Mater Proces Techn 133: 203–206 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Suryanarayana C. Mechanical alloying and milling. Prog Mater Sci 46: 1–184 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Fathy A, Shehata F, Abdelhameed M, Elmahdy M. Compressive and wear resistance of nanometric alumina reinforced copper matrix composites. Mater Des 36: 100–107 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Dhokey N B, Paretkar R K. Study of wear mechanisms in copper-based SiCp (20% by volume) reinforced composite. Wear 265: 117–133 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Hong E, Kaplin B, You T, Suh M, Kim Y S, Choe H. Tribological properties of copper alloy-based composites reinforced with tungsten carbide particles. Wear 270: 591–597 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Tu J P, Rong W, Guo S Y, Yang Y Z. Dry sliding wear behavior of in situ Cu–TiB2 nanocomposites against medium carbon steel. Wear 255: 832–835 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Li L, Wong Y S, Fuh J Y H, Lu L. Effect of TiC in copper–tungsten electrodes on EDM performance. J Mater Proces Techn 113: 563–567 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Akhtar F, Askari S J, Shah K A, Du X, Guo S. Microstructure, mechanical properties, electrical conductivity and wear behavior of high volume TiC reinforced Cu-matrix composites. Mater Charac 60: 327–336 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Buytoz S, Dagdelen F, Islak S, Kok M, Kir D, E Ercan. Effect of the TiC content on microstructure and thermal properties of Cu–TiC composites prepared by powder metallurgy. J Ther Ana Calor 117: 1277–1283 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Rathod S, Sharma M, Modi O P, Khare A K, Prasad B K. Effect of aluminium addition on densification behaviour and microstructural features of P/M processed Cu–TiC composites. Inter J Mater Res 104: 666–674 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Sabbaghian M, Shamanian M, Akramifard H R, Esmailzadeh M. Effect of friction stir processing on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Cu–TiC composite. Ceram Inter 40: 12969–12976 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Rajkumar K, Aravindan S. Tribological performance of microwave sintered copper–TiC–graphite hybrid composites. Tribo Inter 44: 347–358 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Chrysanthou A, Erbaccio G. Enhancing the dispersion of TiC in copper. J Mater Sci Lett 15: 774–775 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Lee D W, Ha G H, Kim B K. Synthesis of Cu–Al2O3 nano composite powder. Sci Mater 44: 2137–2140 (2001)Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Nemati N, Khosroshahi R, Emamy M, Zolriasatein A. Investigation of microstructure, hardness and wear properties of Al–4.5 wt.% Cu–TiC nanocomposites produced by mechanical milling. Mater Des 32: 3718–3729 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Arsenault R J, Shi N. Dislocation generation due to differences between the coefficients of thermal expansion. Mater Sci Eng 81: 175–187 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Ma Z Y, Li Y L, Liang Y, Zheng F, Bi J, Tjong S C. Nanometric Si3N4 particulate- reinforced aluminum composite. Mater Sci Eng A 31: 219–229 (1996)Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Kumar A, Jha P K, Mahapatra M M. Abrasive wear behavior of in situ TiC reinforced with Al-4.5%Cu matrix. J Mater Eng Perf 23: 743–752 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Archard J F. Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J App Phy 24: 981–988 (1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Celikyurek I, Körpe N O, Olc¸er T, Gurler R. Microstructure, properties and wear behaviors of (Ni3Al) reinforced Cu matrix composites. J Mater Sci Tech 27: 937–943 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Saka N, Teixeira J J P, Suh N P. Wear of two phase metals. Wear 44: 77–86 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The author(s) 2017

Open Access: The articles published in this journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pushkar Jha
    • 1
  • Rakesh Kumar Gautam
    • 1
  • Rajnesh Tyagi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University)VaranasiIndia

Personalised recommendations