Abstract
An evaluation method for the seismic stability of embankment slope was presented based on catastrophe theory. Seven control factors, including internal frictional angle, cohesion force, slope height, slope angle, surface gradients, peak acceleration, and distance to fault were selected for analysis of multi-level objective decomposition. According to the normalization formula and the fuzzy subject function produced by combination of catastrophe theory and fuzzy math, a recursive calculation was carried out to obtain a catastrophic affiliated functional value, which can be used to evaluate the seismic stability of embankment slope. Fifteen samples were used to verify the effectiveness of this method. The results show that compared with the traditional quantitative method, the catastrophe progression owns higher accuracy and good application potential in predicting the seismic stability of embankment slope.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
At 14:28, May 12, 2008, a great earthquake measured Ms = 8.0 hit Wenchuan, Sichuan Province of China. According to field investigation, 53,295 km-long highways were badly destroyed in the earthquake [1]. In order to provide references for reconstruction and further research [2, 3], we have made a lot of field investigation to many highways in the earthquake area. The results of field investigation show that the dominant failure modes of embankments are lateral spreading, surface subsidence, collapse, and dislocation, as shown in Fig. 1.
Failure modes, mechanism, and sliding surface of earthquake-induced landslides are studied by means of field investigation and shaking table model tests. The earthquake-induced failure surfaces usually consist of tension cracks and shear which is different from gravity-induced failure surface made by shear zone only. Depth of dynamic sliding surface will be deeper along with the increase of peak ground acceleration, as shown in Fig. 2.
Because the stability of a slope is affected by geological and engineering factors, and many of the factors can not be obtained directly, we have to use uncertain method to deal with this kind of issues, such as fuzzy math [4], artificial neural network method [5], grey theory [6], support vector machine model [7], and extension method [8]. In these methods, the weight of each factor index directly determines the accuracy to a certain extent.
Catastrophe theory, which originated from the study of the French mathematician René Thom in the 1960s, becomes very popular due to the efforts of Christopher Zeeman [3] in the 1970s. It considers the special case where the long-run stable equilibrium can be identified with the minimum of a smooth, well-defined potential function (Lyapunov function) [9, 10].
In mathematics, catastrophe theory is a branch of bifurcation theory for study of dynamical systems and a particular special case of more general singularity theory in geometry as well. Bifurcation theory studies and classifies phenomena characterized by sudden shifts in behavior arising from small changes in circumstances, analyzing how the qualitative nature of equation solutions depends on the parameters that appear in the equation. This may lead to sudden and dramatic changes, such as the unpredictable timing and magnitude of a landslide [11].
Small changes in certain parameters of a nonlinear system can cause equilibria to appear or disappear, or to change from attracting to repelling and vice versa, leading to large and sudden changes of the behavior of the system. However, examined in a larger parameter space, catastrophe theory reveals that such bifurcation points tend to occur as part of well-defined qualitative geometrical structures. The main feature of the catastrophe progression method is that the weight of indices is not considered, which can avoid the effect of human subjective factor in practice [12].
In this article, the catastrophe progression method is used to evaluate the seismic stability of the embankment slope, and a reasonable result was achieved, indicating that the catastrophe progression method is feasible in predicting the seismic stability of embankment slope.
2 Key evaluation technique and steps of catastrophe progression method
In the catastrophe progression method, we first divide the evaluation system into sub-indexes, then normalize the control variables, and finally calculate the catastrophe affiliated functional value according to the complementary principle and non-complementary principle [13, 14]. The main evaluation steps are as follows.
2.1 Establishment of the hierarchy analysis model
First of all, an overall evaluation system is divided into sub-indices and all indices are grouped in accordance with the purpose of evaluation. In each hierarchy, the indices form a different catastrophe system. The weights of indices are not concerned, but the relative importance of each index is considered. Because the number of control variables could not exceed 4, the number of index in each hierarchy will not exceed 4 either.
2.2 Determination of catastrophe system classification for each hierarchy
There are seven types of catastrophe systems, wherein the most four common types are folded catastrophe, cusp catastrophe, swallowtail catastrophe, and butterfly catastrophe. The potential functions are shown as follows [15, 16]:
Folded catastrophe:
Cusp catastrophe:
Swallowtail catastrophe:
Butterfly catastrophe:
In above equations, \( f_{i} (x) \) is the potential function of the state variable x, and a, b, c, and d are control variables of x.
2.3 Normalizing the control variables of the catastrophe model
Lack of proportionality in the indices can be eliminated using a standard transformation method so that the evaluation indices are dimensionless.
For the-larger-the-better indices can be calculated by the following functions:
and for the-smaller-the-better indices can be calculated by the following functions:
where \( x_{\hbox{max} } \) and \( x_{\hbox{min} } \) are the maximum and minimum value of the measured x, respectively.
If the values of x are within the range [0, 1], the measured values does not need to be normalized and can be directly used in the catastrophe progression computation.
2.4 Normalization formula
Let \( f(x) \) be the potential function of the catastrophe system, and the critical points of the potential function form an equilibrium surface according to the catastrophe theory. We can obtain the equation by calculating the first derivative of \( f(x) \), and obtain its singularity set by setting \( f''(x) = 0 \). The normalization formula is derived from the decomposition forms of the equation of the bifurcation point set. Different states of the control variables in the catastrophe system are then transformed into state variables using normalization formula. Based on catastrophe theory, the decomposition forms of the equation and normalization formulas of three conmen catastrophe systems are obtained as follows [17, 18].
For the cusp catastrophe system, the bifurcation point set equation is
and its normalization formulas are
For the swallowtail catastrophe system, the decomposition forms of the bifurcation point set equation are
and the normalization formulas are
For the butterfly catastrophe system, the decomposition forms of the bifurcation point set equation are
and the normalization formulas are
In Eqs. (1)–(12), x a , x b , x c , and x d are values of x corresponding to a, b, c, and d.
2.5 Comprehensive evaluation through normalization formulas
Following the complementary principle and non-complementary principle, the catastrophe progression of each control variable can be computed from the initial fuzzy subordinate function. We find that each control variable of a system tends to reach the average value, so
However, the non-complementary principle implies that the control variables cannot offset each other. Therefore, the smallest values of the state variables corresponding to the control variables are chosen to be state variable of the whole system. Based on hierarchical calculation, the value of the overall catastrophe subordinate function can be found in the same way [19, 20].
3 Application of catastrophe progression method to evaluate the seismic stability of embankment slope
3.1 Evaluation system of seismic stability of embankment slope
The control variables influencing the seismic stability of embankment slope are divided into three hierarchies, namely, the strength index, geometry characters of slope, and the earthquake effect. The indices of strength are internal frictional angle and cohesion force; the indices of geometry characters of slope include slope height, slope angle, and surface gradients; and peak acceleration and distance to fault are selected to be the influencing factors of earthquake. The overall evaluation system of seismic stability of the embankment slope is shown in Fig. 3.
3.2 Determination of evaluation factors of embankment seismic stability
At present, the seismic fortification principle in the world is that the frame structure can achieve the seismic protective objective of no damage in small earthquake, repairable damage in moderate earthquake, and no collapse in severe earthquake. According to the above principle, the evaluation standard of the seismic damage to embankment slope is presented in Table 1. In addition, based on lots of tentative calculation, the critical values of catastrophe progression are also obtained [21, 22].
The embankments investigated include normal embankment and high fill embankment. In the high fill embankment, the surface gradient varies and crushed stones are the main filling material. The actual seismic damage to embankment can be described as in Table 2.
3.3 Determination of utility function values of bottom factors
In order to illustrate the concrete application of the catastrophe method, we take sample 1 as an example. According to formulas (5) and (6), it is easy to get C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6, and C7 as follows:
The slope safety factor can be calculated by rigid limiting equilibrium method, and the catastrophe progression value is calculated by formulas (7)–(13).
Since the units of indexes are not the same, the data in Table 2 should be normalized. The utility function values of bottom factors and the catastrophe progression of the samples are calculated and shown in Table 3.
3.4 Result analysis
A comparison between the catastrophe progression and safety factor of embankment slope is shown in Fig. 4. We can see that the catastrophe progression and safety factor have an approximately similar change law: the safety factor increases (decreases) with the catastrophe progression value in a similar way. In addition, most of the safety factor values is over 1.2 and the catastrophe progression value over 0.8, which means that most part of the embankment is stable in Wenchuan earthquake except for the part collapsed. The result is in accord with field investigation.
The value of catastrophe progression reflects the combination relationship of the influencing factors, which can be used to analyze the synthetic effect of the influencing factors with different combinations on the seismic stability of embankment slope, and thus find the unfavorable combinations. Moreover, based on the field investigation and statistics, the catastrophe progression being employed as a quantitative criterion could avoid the complicated calculation and uncertainty assumption of safety factor.
The catastrophe progression method does not need to assign a weight for each index as required by the fuzzy mathematical method, and hence can avoid the human subjectivity in determining the weights. Even so, subjectivity and fuzziness can not be eliminated completely from damage evaluation and description, thus resulting in some difference between the evaluation results and the actuality. From comparative analysis of the obtained results, however, the estimation model can meet for the demand of engineering practices on the whole.
4 Conclusion
In this article, we introduce the catastrophe progression method to evaluate the seismic stability of embankment, by selecting internal frictional angle, cohesion force, slope height, slope angle, surface gradient, peak acceleration, and distance to fault as evaluation indices. Each objective index is quantified and normalized without need to consider its weight. Compared with the traditional fuzzy mathematical method, the catastrophe progression method is simpler and can avoid the human subjectivity in determining the weights of indices. Comparative analysis of the on-site investigation results show that the method can evaluate the seismic stability of embankment with a high accuracy and therefore has an application potential in predicting the seismic stability of embankment.
References
Xie HP (2008) Wenchuan large earthquake and post-earthquake reconstruction-related geotechnical problems. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 27(9):1780–1791 (in Chinese)
Zhu HW, Yao LK, Liu ZS (2012) Research on seismic deformation characteristics of flexible wall. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 31(Suppl 1):2829–2838 in Chinese
Zhu HW, Yao LK, ZhangX H (2012) Comparison of dynamic characteristics between netted and packaged reinforced soil retaining walls and recommendations for seismic design. Chin J Geotech Eng 34(11):2072–2080 (in Chinese)
Zhang YB, Shi H (2000) Fuzzy mathematics method for analysis for slope stability. J Eng Geol 8(1):31–34 (in Chinese)
Li HZ, Deng GT (2006) Application of BP network to estimating stability of rock slope. J Geol Hazards Environ Preserv 17(3):106–109 (in Chinese)
Wu ZY, Bao JS, Liu HS et al (2004) A method for evaluating dynamic safety factor rock slope seismic stability analysis. J Disaster Prev Mitig Eng 24(3):237–241 (in Chinese)
Li KG, Xu J, Li SC et al (2007) Research on evaluation of the slope stability based on the extension theory. J Chongqing Jianzhu Univ 29(4):75–78 (in Chinese)
Xi BX, Chen YJ, Shi XZ (2007) IRMR method for evaluation of surrounding rock quality in deep rock mass engineering. J Cent South Univ Sci Technol 38(5):987–992 (in Chinese)
Jones DD, Carl JW (1976) Catastrophe theory and fisheries regulation. J Fish Res Board Can 33(12):2829–2833
Kolata GB (1977) Catastrophe theory: the emperor has no clothes. Science 196(4286):287, 350–351
Rand D (1978) Exotic phenomena in games and duopoly models. J Math Econ 5(2):173–184
Puu T (1979) Regional modeling and structural stability. Environ Plan A 11:1431–1438
Tian YL, Zhou LH (2005) The study on the methods for predicting coal or gas outburst based on BP neural network. Syst Eng Theory Pract 12(12):104–106
Thom R (1975) Structural stability and morphogenesis. Benjamin, Reading
Yu DH, Peng JB (2005) Visual evaluation of neural network on classification of surrounding rocks for underground engineering. Chin J Geol Hazard Control 16(4):116–119 (in Chinese)
Gong FQ, Li XB, Gao K (2008) Catastrophe progression method for stability classification of underground engineering surrounding rock. J Disaster Prev Mitig Eng 39(5):1081–1087 (in Chinese)
Jiang JC (1999) Catastrophe theory and application in the safety engineering. J Nanjing Univ Chem Technol 21(1):2428 (in Chinese)
Sussman HJ, Raphael Z (1978) Catastrophe theory as applied to the social and biological sciences. Synthèse 37(2):117–216
Rosser JB Jr (2000) Aspects of dialectics and nonlinear dynamics. Camb J Econ 24(3):311–324
Li Y, Chen XH, Zhang PF (2007) Application of catastrophe progression method to evaluation of regional ecosystem health. Chin Popul Resour Environ 17(3):50–54 (in Chinese)
Li SP, Sun LY (2002) The assessment model of slope stability based on non-linear theory. Eng Geol Hydrol Geol 10(2):11–14 (in Chinese)
Huang YL (2001) Application of catastrophe progression method to evaluation of sustainable usage of water resource. Arid Environ Monit 15(3):167–170 (in Chinese)
Acknowledgments
The research was financially supported by the open research fund of Key Laboratory of Highway Engineering of Sichuan Province, Southwest Jiaotong University (No. LHTE009201109).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, H., Yao, L. & Luo, Y. Seismic stability evaluation of embankment slope based on catastrophe theory. J. Mod. Transport. 21, 111–116 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-013-0016-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-013-0016-9