Skip to main content
Log in

Neighborhood social capital and incidence and mortality of prostate cancer: a Swedish cohort study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is a growing interest in the contextual effect of neighborhood linking social capital on different health outcomes, including cancer.

Aims

To examine associations between neighborhood linking social capital and incidence and mortality of prostate cancer.

Method

This cohort study was based on national registers. Between 2002 and 2015, we included 1,196,563 men aged 50 years and above in the analyses. Multilevel logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between exposure and outcome, adjusting for potential confounding factors.

Results

The total incidence of prostate cancer and mortality in patients with prostate cancer were 8.22 (per 100) and 1.80 (per 100), respectively, during the follow-up period. Individuals living in neighborhoods with low (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.88–0.93) and intermediate (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.92–0.96) linking social capital were less likely to be diagnosed with prostate cancer than those living in neighborhoods with high linking social capital. Opposite effects were observed for mortality; prostate cancer patients living in neighborhoods with low (OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.08–1.23) and intermediate (OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.03–1.14) linking social capital were more likely to die from prostate cancer than those in neighborhoods with high linking social capital.

Conclusions

Lower neighborhood linking social capital was associated with lower incidence but higher mortality in patients with prostate cancer. These findings suggest that men living in neighborhoods with low linking social capital may need additional surveillance for prostate cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used in the present study cannot be shared as it is based on data obtained from Swedish population-based registers with national coverage.

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68:394–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rawla P (2019) Epidemiology of prostate cancer. World J Oncol 10:63–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cao Y, Ma J (2011) Body mass index, prostate cancer-specific mortality, and biochemical recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 4:486–501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Aune D, Navarro Rosenblatt DA, Chan DS, Vieira AR, Vieira R, Greenwood DC, Vatten LJ, Norat T (2015) Dairy products, calcium, and prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr 101:87–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Friedenreich CM, Neilson HK, Lynch BM (2010) State of the epidemiological evidence on physical activity and cancer prevention. Eur J Cancer 46:2593–2604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. DeRouen MC, Schupp CW, Yang J, Koo J, Hertz A, Shariff-Marco S, Cockburn M, Nelson DO, Ingles SA, Cheng I, John EM, Gomez SL (2018) Impact of individual and neighborhood factors on socioeconomic disparities in localized and advanced prostate cancer risk. Cancer Causes Control 29:951–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. DeRouen MC, Schupp CW, Koo J, Yang J, Hertz A, Shariff-Marco S, Cockburn M, Nelson DO, Ingles SA, John EM, Gomez SL (2018) Impact of individual and neighborhood factors on disparities in prostate cancer survival. Cancer Epidemiol 53:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawachi I, Berkman LF (2014) Social capital, social cohesion, and health. In: Berkman LF, Kawachi I, Glymour MM (eds) Social epidemiology, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 290–319

    Google Scholar 

  9. Putnam R (1993) Making democracy work. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  10. Szreter S, Woolcock M (2004) Health by association? social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. Int J Epidemiol 33:650–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamano T, Li X, Sundquist J, Sundquist K (2019) Neighborhood linking social capital as a predictor of lung cancer: a Swedish national cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol 61:23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sundquist K, Hamano T, Li X, Kawakami N, Shiwaku K, Sundquist J (2014) Linking social capital and mortality in the elderly: a Swedish national cohort study. Exp Gerontol 55:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Murayama H, Fujiwara Y, Kawachi I (2012) Social capital and health: a review of prospective multilevel studies. J Epidemiol 22:179–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Carrillo-Álvarez E, Kawachi I, Riera-Romaní J (2019) Neighbourhood social capital and obesity: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev 20:119–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kawachi I (2006) Commentary: social capital and health: making the connections one step at a time. Int J Epidemiol 35:989–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ehsana A, Klaas HS, Bastianen A, Spini D (2019) Social capital and health: a systematic review of systematic reviews. SSM Popul Health 8:100425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sundquist J, Johansson SE, Yang M, Sundquist K (2006) Low linking social capital as a predictor of coronary heart disease in Sweden: a cohort study of 2.8 million people. Soc Sci Med 62:954–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sundquist J, Hamano T, Li X, Kawakami N, Shiwaku K, Sundquist K (2014) Neighborhood linking social capital as a predictor of psychiatric medication prescription in the elderly: a Swedish national cohort study. J Psychiatr Res 55:44–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sundquist K, Yang M (2007) Linking social capital and self-rated health: a multilevel analysis of 11,175 men and women in Sweden. Health Place 13:324–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Callas PW, Pastides H, Hosmer DW (1998) Empirical comparisons of proportional hazards, poisson, and logistic regression modeling of occupational cohort data. Am J Ind Med 33:33–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Snijders T, Bosker R (1999) Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. SAGE Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shelton RC, Gage-Bouchard EA, Jandorf L, Sriphanlop P, Thelemaque LD, Erwin DO (2016) Examining Social capital and its relation to breast and cervical cancer screening among underserved Latinas in the U.S. J Health Care Poor Underserved 27:1794–1811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bender AM, Kawachi I, Jørgensen T, Pisinger C (2015) Neighborhood social capital is associated with participation in health checks of a general population: a multilevel analysis of a population-based lifestyle intervention- the Inter99 study. BMC Public Health 15:694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F (1997) Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 64:918–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mihor A, Tomsic S, Zagar T, Lokar K, Zadnik V (2020) Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer incidence in Europe: a comprehensive review of population-based epidemiological studies. Radiol Oncol 54:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Openshaw S (1983) The modifiable areal unit problem. Geo Books, Norwick

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by KAKENHI (Grant Number: 18K11143 to Tsuyoshi Hamano). This work was also supported by the Swedish Research Council to Kristina Sundquist. The funders had no role in the analysis, interpretation of data, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TH, XL, JS, KS worked on the conception of the study; XL performed the statistical analyses; TH, XL, JS, KS contributed to data interpretation; TH drafted the paper. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsuyoshi Hamano.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no confict of interest to disclose.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Lund.

Statement of human and animal rights

The study have been approved by the appropriate institutional research ethics committee and have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Participant consent was not obtained as the study was based on registry information.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamano, T., Li, X., Sundquist, J. et al. Neighborhood social capital and incidence and mortality of prostate cancer: a Swedish cohort study. Aging Clin Exp Res 33, 3333–3342 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-021-01852-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-021-01852-9

Keywords

Navigation