Study design and population
In the spring of 1999, 1200 free living respondents aged 75–80 years (born in 1914–1924) were randomly selected from the Census Bureau according to the Personal Identification Number (PESEL) by quota 600 participants from the Warsaw region and 600 from the Olsztyn region, Poland (Fig. 1). In each region, the proportion of selected men and women was 1:1 and the proportion of people living in cities, small towns, and rural areas was 1:1:1. The participation rate in the study was 54.4% (306 men and 347 women). Among these participants, 403 people (190 men and 213 women) have agreed to a blood test and those people were included in the analysis. The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Commission located at the National Food and Nutrition Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Assessment of diet and other exposure
In the spring of 1999, after a pilot study carried out among 60 participants from the Warsaw region and 60 participants from the Olsztyn region, the main study was conducted. Data on food consumption were collected using 3-day records in Warsaw and 24-h recalls in the Olsztyn region. Information on physical activity, education, smoking status, avoiding alcohol, dietary supplement use, and medicine use was obtained at baseline using a self-administered questionnaire. The body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing the weight (kg) by the square of height (m).
Hematological parameters and total serum cholesterol level
Blood parameters were determined in the medical laboratory of the National Food and Nutrition Institute in Warsaw and in the medical laboratory of the Municipal Polyclinic Hospital in Olsztyn. RBC, Hb, HCT, MCV, MCH, and MCHC in blood were determined using the Biocode Hycel Celly Hematology Analyzer (Biocode Hycel, Rennes, France) in Warsaw and the Minos analyzer (ABX, France) in Olsztyn. Total cholesterol was measured in serum using the Vitros 250 analyzer (Johnson & Johnson Clinical Diagnostic, New Zealand) in Warsaw and the Cobas Mira E analyzer (La Roche, Switzerland) in Olsztyn.
Case ascertainment
The data on deaths from all causes were collected from June 1, 1999 until October 31, 2006. The data on deaths were obtained from the Register Offices individually for each participant.
Statistical analysis
Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of all-cause mortality. We categorized participants into tertiles of RBC, Hb, HCT, MCV, MCH, and MCHC, separately for men and women. Among women in the result description, the second and third quartiles of hematological parameters were combined because of a relatively small number of deaths and unstable HRs.
The multivariable models included the following variables: age (continuous variable), region (Warsaw or Olsztyn), physical activity (very low and low, or moderate and high), education (lower then higher, or higher and university), smoking status (yes or no), avoiding alcohol (yes or no), supplement use (yes or no), medicine use (yes or no), body mass index (≤25 or >25 kg/m2), serum cholesterol level (tertiles), and intake of energy and iron (tertiles). The multivariable models were calculated separately for each tested hematological parameter.
To compare survival curves, the Kaplan–Meier method and the log-rank test were used. The proportional hazards’ assumption was evaluated by regressing scaled Schoenfeld residuals against survival time. There was no evidence of departure from the assumption. To calculate p values for trend, the median values of tertiles for RBC, Hb, HCT, RBC, MCV, MCH, and MCHC were used as a continuous variable. Using the likelihood ratio test, we tested statistical interactions between tested hematological parameters in predicting all-cause mortality according to sex, physical activity, BMI, smoking status, and avoiding alcohol.
The statistical analyses were performed using Statistica version 10.0 PL and IBM SPSS Statistics version 21. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to check the data distribution. Average values of the tested parameters were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test, while categorical data were analyzed using the Chi2 Pearson test. All reported p values were two-sided, and p values ≤0.05 were considered as statistically significant.