Psychometric properties of the Drive for Muscularity Scale in Mexican males

  • Consuelo Escoto
  • Georgina Alvarez-Rayón
  • Juan Manuel Mancilla-Díaz
  • Esteban Jaime Camacho Ruiz
  • Karina Franco Paredes
  • Carlos Saúl Juárez Lugo
Original Article

Abstract

This study refers to the evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Drive for Muscularity Scale among Mexican population. The exploratory factor analysis was carried out with 369 university males (mean age = 20.93 years). A three-factor structure that explains 45.64 % of the variance was found for the scale: 31.10 % by attitudes (α = 0.87), 10.70 % by substance intake (α = 0.72) and 3.84 % by training adherence (α = 0.68). Only the two first sub-scales and total score (α = 0.86) offered acceptable levels of internal consistence. The confirmatory factor analysis, carried out with 200 males (mean age = 20.79 years), verified both the suitability of this factor structure and the two-factor structure proposed by McCreary et al. (Psychol Men Masc 5:49–58, 1). Drive for muscularity is important in comprehending male body image and Drive for Muscularity Scale has demonstrated to be psychometrically suitable to assess this construct in Mexican males.

Keywords

Drive for muscularity Body image Males Psychometrics Confirmatory factor analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    McCreary DR, Sasse DK, Saucier DM et al (2004) Measuring the drive for muscularity: factorial validity of the Drive for Muscularity Scale in men and women. Psychol Men Masc 5:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alvarez G, Escoto MC, Vázquez R et al (2009) Trastornos del comportamiento alimentario en varones: De la anorexia nerviosa a la dismorfia muscular. In: López JA, Franco K (eds) Comportamiento alimentario: Una perspectiva multidisciplinar. Universidad de Guadalajara, México, pp 138–157Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McCreary DR (2007) The Drive for Muscularity Scale: description, psychometrics, and research findings. In: Thompson JK, Cafri G (eds) The muscular ideal: Psychological, social, and medical perspectives. American Psychological Association, Washington, pp 87–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cafri G, Thompson K (2007) Measurement of the muscular ideal. In: Thompson JK, Cafri G (eds) The muscular ideal: psychological, social, and medical perspectives. American Psychological Association, Washington, pp 107–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bratland-Sanda S, Sundgot-Borgen J (2011) Symptoms of eating disorders, drive for muscularity and physical activity among Norwegian adolescents. Eur Eat Disord Rev. doi:10.1002/erv.1156
  6. 6.
    Daniel S, Bridges SK (2010) The drive for muscularity in men: media influences and objectification theory. Body Image 7:32–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grossbard J, Lee C, Neighbors C et al (2009) Body image concerns and contingent self-esteem in male and female college students. Sex Roles 60:198–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Helfert S, Warschburger P (2011) A prospective study on the impact of peer and parental pressure on body dissatisfaction in adolescent girls and boys. Body Image 8:101–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Litt D, Dodge T (2008) A longitudinal investigation of the Drive for Muscularity Scale: predicting use of performance enhancing substances and weightlifting among males. Body Image 5:346–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mussap A (2008) Masculine gender role stress and the pursuit of muscularity. Int J Men’s Health 7:72–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vocks S, Stahn C, Loenser K et al (2009) Eating and body image disturbances in male-to-female and female-to-male transsexuals. Arch Sex Behav 38:364–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McCreary DR, Sasse DK (2000) An exploration of the drive for muscularity in adolescent boys and girls. J Am Coll Health 48:297–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morrison TG, Morrison MA, McCann L (2006) Striving for bodily perfection? An overview of the drive for muscularity. In: Kindes MV (ed) Body image: new research. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 2–34Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Osborne JW, Costello AB (2005) Best practice in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval 10. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=7
  15. 15.
    Visauta B, Martori JC (2003) Análisis estadístico con SPSS para WINDOWS. McGraw-Hill, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stevens JP (2002) Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences, 4th edn. Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ferketich S (1991) Focus on psychometrics: aspects of item analysis. Res Nurs Health 14:165–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bentler PM, Bonett DG (1980) Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull 88:588–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6:1–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McPherson KE, McCarthy P, McCreary DR et al (2010) Psychometric evaluation of the Drive for Muscularity Scale in a community-based sample of Scottish men participating in an organized sporting event. Body Image 7:368–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6:284–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wojtowicz AE, von Ranson KM (2006) Psychometric evaluation of two scales examining muscularity concerns in men and women. Psychol Men Masc 7:56–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Goldfield GS (2009) Body image disordered eating and anabolic steroid use in female bodybuilders. Eat Disord 17:200–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goldfield GS, Blouin AG, Woodside DB (2006) Body image, binge eating, and bulimia nervosa in male bodybuilders. Can J Psychiatry 51:160–168PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Consuelo Escoto
    • 1
  • Georgina Alvarez-Rayón
    • 2
  • Juan Manuel Mancilla-Díaz
    • 2
  • Esteban Jaime Camacho Ruiz
    • 3
  • Karina Franco Paredes
    • 4
  • Carlos Saúl Juárez Lugo
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro Universitario UAEM EcatepecUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de MéxicoEcatepecMexico
  2. 2.Laboratorio de Trastornos Alimentarios-FES IztacalaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoTlalnepantlaMexico
  3. 3.Unidad Académica Profesional NezahualcóyotlUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de MéxicoNezahualcóyotlMexico
  4. 4.Centro de Investigación en Comportamiento Alimentario y Nutrición, Centro Universitario del SurUniversidad de GuadalajaraCiudad GuzmánMexico

Personalised recommendations