Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Status Report on Electrification Policy: Where to Next?

  • Topical Collection on Electrification (J Logan, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

As the carbon intensity of electricity generation declines, electrification of vehicles, buildings, and industrial processes becomes an increasingly critical decarbonization strategy. This review summarizes policy approaches to advancing electrification in each sector, and highlights promising developments at the national, state, and local level in the USA.

Recent Findings

Recent developments include targets and incentives for heavy-duty vehicles, growing programs to promote heat pumps for buildings and electric vehicles in disadvantaged communities, shifts to energy efficiency goals and utility performance incentives to include electrification, and emerging efforts to address the future of the natural gas distribution system.

Summary

Policy activity to encourage electrification is accelerating in the transportation and buildings sectors at the state, city, and utility level, with more barriers for policy action in the industrial sector. Current policies to promote electrification include incentives, mandates, changes to valuation and rate design, and procurement policies. Emerging policy areas, particularly around equity and federal policy strategies, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. L2 and DCFC chargers are different forms of EV chargers. L2 chargers have a minimum voltage of 240 volts and DCFC chargers have a minimum voltage of 480 volts.

  2. California, Colorado, Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. New Mexico and Minnesota are considering adoption of California’s LD EV standards [30].

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

    Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

    1. Larsen K, Pitt H, Larsen J, Herndon W, Houser T, Kolus H, Mohan S, Wimberger E. Taking stock 2020 The COVID-19 Edition. 2020. https://www.rhg.com/research/taking-stock-2020/

      Google Scholar 

    2. (EIA) Energy Information Administration. U.S. energy-related carbon dioxide emissions, 2019. 2020. https://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/carbon/

      Google Scholar 

    3. Nadel S. Electrification in the transportation, buildings, and industrial sectors: a review of opportunities, barriers, and policies. Curr Sustain. Energy Reports. 2019;6:158–68.

      Google Scholar 

    4. Ungar L, Barrett J, Nadel S, Elliott RN, Rightor E, Amann J, et al. Growing a greener economy: job and climate impacts from energy efficiency investments. Washington, DC: ACEEE; 2020. https://www.aceee.org/white-paper/2020/09/growing-greener-economy-job-and-climate-impacts-energy-efficiency-investments.

      Google Scholar 

    5. Griffith S, Calisch S. Mobilizing for a zero carbon America: jobs, jobs, jobs, and more jobs. 2020. A jobs and employment study report. Rewiring America. https://www.rewiringamerica.org/jobs-report.

    6. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyInventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-2009, EPA 430-R-11-005. 2011. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/usinventoryreport.html

      Google Scholar 

    7. (EPRI) Electric Power Research Institute and (NRDC) Natural Resources Defense Council. Electrifying transportation reduces greenhouse gases and improves air quality. 2015.

      Google Scholar 

    8. Mai TT, Jadun P, Logan JS, McMillan CA, Muratori M, Steinberg DC, et al. Electrification futures study: scenarios of electric technology adoption and power consumption for the United States. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2018. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy18osti/71500.pdf.

      Book  Google Scholar 

    9. Giordano G. Electric vehicles: setting a course for 2030. 2020. Deloitte Insights. https://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/insights/focus/future-of-mobility/electric-vehicle-trends-2030.html.

      Google Scholar 

    10. Singer M. The barriers to acceptance of plug-in electric vehicles: 2017 update. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2017. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy18osti/70371.pdf.

      Book  Google Scholar 

    11. McMahon J. The 4 lingering obstacles to electric vehicle adoption (and what might overcome them). Forbes. 2019; https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcmahon/2019/01/27/the-4-lingering-obstacles-to-electric-vehicle-adoption-and-what-might-overcome-them/?sh=8124235c548d.

    12. Buholtz T, Burger A, Gander S, Nelson B, Prochazka B, Swalnick N. Electrifying freight: pathways to accelerating the transition. 2020. Electrification Coalition. https://www.electrificationcoalition.org/electrifying-freight-pathways-to-accelerating-the-transition/

      Google Scholar 

    13. ACT News. Calculating TCO for EVs: where to find the greatest long-term cost savings for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles. In: Adv. Clean Tech News; 2020. https://www.act-news.com/news/calculating-tco-for-medium-and-heavy-duty-evs/. Accessed 20 Oct 2020.

      Google Scholar 

    14. Alliance for Transportation Electrification and Plug In America. The missing piece on meeting transportation electrification goals: utility education and outreach programs. 2020. https://pluginamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/EO-White-Paper.pdf.

      Google Scholar 

    15. Knight P, Camp E, Bhandari D, Hall J, Whited M, Havumaki B, et al. Making electric vehicles work for utility customers. Cambridge, MA: Synapse Energy Economics; 2019. https://www.synapse-energy.com/sites/default/files/Making-Electric-Vehicles-Work-for-Utility-Customers.pdf.

      Google Scholar 

    16. Congressional Research Service. Vehicle electrification: federal and state issues affecting deployment. 2019.

      Google Scholar 

    17. Federal EV tax credit phase out tracker by automaker. In: EV Adoption; 2020. https://evadoption.com/ev-sales/federal-ev-tax-credit-phase-out-tracker-by-automaker/. Accessed 20 Dec 2020.

    18. Jenn A, Springel K, Gopal AR. Effectiveness of electric vehicle incentives in the United States. Energy Policy. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.065.

    19. Zhou Y, Levin T, Plotkin SE. Plug-in electric vehicle policy effectiveness: literature review: Argonne National Laboratory; 2016. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2017/01/f34/Plug-In%20Electric%20Vehicle%20Policy%20Effectiveness%20Literature%20Review.pdf

    20. Narassimhan E, Johnson C. The role of demand-side incentives and charging infrastructure on plug-in electric vehicle adoption: analysis of US states. Environ Res Lett. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aad0f8.

    21. Maine Legislature. Title 35-A: public utilities, part 8: energy efficiency, Chapter 97: efficiency Maine Trust Act, §10126. 2019. Electric Vehicle Fund.

      Google Scholar 

    22. PA Department of Environmental Protection Alternative Fuel Vehicle Rebate Program Guidance 0220-FM-EPO0001. https://www.dep.pa.gov/Citizens/GrantsLoansRebates/Alternative-Fuels-Incentive-Grant/pages/alternative-fuel-vehicles.aspx.

    23. US Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy State Laws and Incentives, Alternative Fuels Data Center. https://afdc.energy.gov/laws/state. Accessed 3 Dec 2020.

    24. David R, Stefen S, Kate T, Hannah B, Emma C, Drehobl A, et al. The 2020 city clean energy scorecard. Washington, DC: ACEEE; 2020. https://www.aceee.org/local-policy/city-scorecard.

      Google Scholar 

    25. Smith C. Investment in public EV charging in the United States. Washington, DC; Seattle, WA: Atlas Public Policy and Alliance for Transportation Electrification; 2020. https://www.atlasevhub.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Investment-in-Public-EV-Charging-in-the-United-States.pdf.

      Google Scholar 

    26. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Volksagen Clean Air Act Civil Settlement. 2020. epa.gov/enforcement/volkswagen-clean-air-act-civil-settlement. Accessed 11 Dec 2020

      Google Scholar 

    27. Jenks C, Van Horn G, Slawsky L, Hill S, Bradley MJ. Toolkit for advanced transportation policies. Concord, MA: MJ Bradley & Associates; 2018. https://www.mjbradley.com/sites/default/files/mjba_transportation_toolkit.pdf

      Google Scholar 

    28. Gold R, Goldenberg C. Driving integration. Boulder, CO: Rocky Mountain Institut; 2016. https://rmi.org/insight/driving-integration/

      Google Scholar 

    29. Redd JM. Pedal to the metal: 15 states and D.C. seek to achieve 100% zero emission vehicle sales for new medium-and heavy-duty vehicles by 2050. Natl. Law Rev. 2020. https://www.natlawreview.com/article/pedal-to-metal-15-states-and-dc-seek-to-achieve-100-zero-emission-vehicle-sales-new.

    30. Shepardson D. Minnesota, New Mexico to adopt California vehicle emissions rules: Reuters; 2019. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-autos-emissions-california-minnesota/minnesota-new-mexico-to-adopt-california-vehicle-emissions-rules-idUSKBN1WA2SJ

    31. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation ZERO EMISSION VEHICLES. https://dec.vermont.gov/air-quality/mobile-sources/zev. Accessed 22 Dec 2020.

    32. California Air Resource Board. Advanced clean trucks fact sheet. 2020. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/fact-sheets/advanced-clean-trucks-fact-sheet. Accessed 22 Dec 2020.

      Google Scholar 

    33. Signatory States. Multi-state medium- and heavy-duty zero emission vehicle memorandum of understanding. 2020. https://www.nescaum.org/documents/medium-and-heavy-duty-zero-emission-vehicles-action-plan-development-process/medium-and-heavy-duty-zero-emission-vehicles-action-plan-development-process#announcements

      Google Scholar 

    34. Medha S, Brenda C, Mac K, Trevor G. 2018 Utility demand response market snapshot. Washington, DC: Smart Electric Power Alliance; 2018. https://sepapower.org/resource/2018-demand-response-market-snapshot/thank-you/.

      Google Scholar 

    35. Office of Governor New York State Governor Cuomo announces nation-leading initiatives to expand electric vehicle use to combat climate change. https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/governor-cuomo-announces-nation-leading-initiatives-expand-electric-vehicle-use-combat-climate. Accessed 14 Dec 2020.

    36. (CARB) California Air Resource Board. Children’s school bus exposure and mitigation studies. 2003. ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/childrens-school-bus-exposure-and-mitigation-studies. Accessed 11 Dec 2020

      Google Scholar 

    37. Rowangould GM. A census of the US near-roadway population: public health and environmental justice considerations. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.08.003.

    38. Lyft leading the transition to zero emissions: our commitment to 100% electric vehicles by 2030. https://www.lyft.com/blog/posts/leading-the-transition-to-zero-emissions. Accessed 14 Dec 2020.

    39. California State Legislature. California health and safety code 44274.4, and California Public Utilities Code 5431 and 5450. 2018.

      Google Scholar 

    40. DC Council. District of Columbia Code 50-721 and 50-741. 2018.

      Google Scholar 

    41. US Drive. Grid integration tech team and summary report on EVs at scale and the U.S. electric power system. 2019. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2019/12/f69/GITT/ISATT EVs/at/Scale/Grid/Summary/Report/FINAL/Nov2019.pdf.

      Google Scholar 

    42. Engel H, Hensley R, Knupfer S, Sadhev S. The potential impact of electric vehicles on global energy systems. Stamford: McKinsey & Company; 2018.

    43. Wilson D, Stith P, Smith J, Myers E, Bolduc A, Novotny G, et al. Preparing for an electric vehicle future: how utilities can succeed. Washington, DC: Smart Electric Power Alliance; 2019. https://sepapower.org/resource/preparing-for-an-electric-vehicle-future-how-utilities-can-succeed/.

      Google Scholar 

    44. Black & Veatch. Electric fleets 8 steps to medium and heavy-duty fleet electrification. 2019. https://www.bv.com/sites/default/files/2019-11/Electric_Fleets_Ebook_2019.pdf.

      Google Scholar 

    45. Guidehouse for California Electric Transportation Coalition. Medium- and heavy-duty electric vehicle forecasting. 2020. https://caletc.com/assets/files/20200526-CalETCMHDEVForecasting-FinalDeliverable.pdf.

      Google Scholar 

    46. (EIA) Energy Information Administration. 2015 RECS survey data. Washington, DC: EIA; 2018. https://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/data/2015/.

      Google Scholar 

    47. (EIA) Energy Information Administration. 2012 CBECS survey data. Washington, DC: EIA; 2016. https://www.eia.gov/consumption/commercial/data/2012/.

      Google Scholar 

    48. Nadel S. Energy savings, consumer economics, and greenhouse gas emissions reductions from replacing oil and propane furnaces, boilers, and water heaters with air-source heat pumps. Washington, DC: ACEEE; 2018. https://www.aceee.org/research-report/a1803.

      Google Scholar 

    49. Nadel S. Comparative energy use of residential gas furnaces and electric heat pumps. Washington, DC: ACEEE; 2016. https://www.aceee.org/research-report/a1602.

      Google Scholar 

    50. Nadel S, Perry C. Electrifying space heating in existing commercial buildings: opportunities and challenges. Washington, DC: ACEEE; 2020. https://www.aceee.org/research-report/b2004. First study examining U.S. commerical building electrification opportunities based on detailed EIA CBECS data

      Google Scholar 

    51. Billimoria S, Guccione L, Henchen M, Louis-Prescott L. The economics of electrifying buildings. Boulder, Co: Rocky Mountain Institute; 2018. https://rmi.org/insight/the-economics-of-electrifying-buildings/.

      Google Scholar 

    52. (NEEP) Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships ccASHP specification and product list. https://neep.org/high-performance-air-source-heat-pumps/ccashp-specification-product-list. Accessed 2 Dec 2020.

    53. Schoenbauer B, Kessler N, Bohac D, Kushler M. Field assessment of cold climate air source heat pumps. In: Proceeding of 2018 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in. Buildings; 2016.

      Google Scholar 

    54. Coalition BD. The efficient electrification market hurdle: building industry and homebuyer perceptions. Proceeding of 2020 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. 2020.

      Google Scholar 

    55. Billimoria S, Henchen M. Regulatory solutions for building decarbonization: institute. 2020. https://rmi.org/insight/regulatory-solutions-for-building-decarbonization/. Examination of the broad range of issues facing economic utility regulators around building decarbonization.

      Google Scholar 

    56. Berg W, Vaidyanathan S, Jennings B, Cooper E, Perry C, DiMascio M, et al. The state energy efficiency scorecard. Washington, DC: ACEEE; 2020. https://www.aceee.org/state-policy/scorecard.

      Google Scholar 

    57. Nadel S. Programs to electrify space heating in homes and buildings. Washington, DC: ACEEE; 2020. https://www.aceee.org/topic-brief/2020/06/programs-electrify-space-heating-homes-and-buildings.

      Google Scholar 

    58. Gold R, Gilleo A, Berg W. Next generation energy efficiency resource standards. Washington, DC: ACEEE; 2019. https://www.aceee.org/research-report/u1905.

      Google Scholar 

    59. Wang F, Menonna F. This California utility is now measuring building electrification in “avoided carbon.” Greentechmedia. 2020. https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/this-california-utility-is-now-measuring-building-electrification-in-avoided-carbon

      Google Scholar 

    60. Allison J, Biermayer P, Lerhaupt S. Aligning regulatory policy with changing environmental goals: a fuel substitution case study. Proceeding of 2020 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. 2020.

      Google Scholar 

    61. ACEEE. State policies and rules to enable beneficial electrification in buildings through fuel switching. Washington DC: ACEEE; 2020. https://www.aceee.org/policy-brief/2020/04/state-policies-and-rules-enable-beneficial-electrification-buildings-through.

      Google Scholar 

    62. National Efficiency Screening Project. National standard practice manual for benefit-cost analysis of distributed energy resources. 2020. https://www.nationalenergyscreeningproject.org/national-standard-practice-manual/. Guidelines and principles for benefit-cost analysis for electrification measures, alongside other distributed energy resources.

      Google Scholar 

    63. van’t Hof W. Energy transition in the Netherlands – phasing out of gas. Presentation. The Netherlands: Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy; 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/01.b.02_mf31_presentation_nl-fuel_switch-vanthof.pdf.

      Google Scholar 

    64. Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities. Investigation by the Department of Public Utilities on its own motion into the role of gas local distribution companies as the Commonwealth achieves its target 2050 climate goals, D.P.U; 2020. p. 20–80.

      Google Scholar 

    65. California Public Utilities Commission. Order instituting rulemaking to establish policies, processes, and rules to ensure safe and reliable gas systems in California and perform long-term gas system planning. 2020. Docket No: R2001007.

      Google Scholar 

    66. New York State Public Service Commission. Proceeding on motion of the commission in regard to gas planning procedures. 2020. Docket No 20-G-0131.

      Google Scholar 

    67. Gerdes J. Massachusetts moves to follow California, New York in planning for natural gas phaseout. Greentechmedia. 2020. https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/massachusetts-to-follow-california-and-new-york-in-planning-for-natural-gas-phase-down.

    68. Bilich A, Colvin M, O’Conner T. Managing the transition proactive soluions for stranded gas asset risk in California. San Francisco, CA: Environmental Defense Fund; 2019. https://www.edf.org/sites/default/files/documents/Managing_the_Transition_new.pdf.

      Google Scholar 

    69. Gridworks. California’s gas system in transition equitable, affordable, decarbonized and smaller. 2019. https://gridworks.org/initiatives/cagas-system-transition/

      Google Scholar 

    70. Tigue K. San Francisco becomes the latest city to ban natural gas in new buildings, citing climate effects. 2020. Inside Climate News. https://insideclimatenews.org/news/13112020/san-francisco-natural-gas-ban/

      Google Scholar 

    71. DiChristopher T. “Banning” natural gas is out; electrifying buildings is in: S&P Global Market Intelligence; 2020. https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/banning-natural-gas-is-out-electrifying-buildings-is-in-59285807

    72. California Energy Commission. Lead commissioner workshop for flexible demand appliance rulemaking agenda. 2020. https://efiling.energy.ca.gov/GetDocument.aspx?tn=235921&DocumentContentId=68912. Accessed 4 Jan 2020

      Google Scholar 

    73. Oregon Department of Energy. Permanent administrative order Establishes new energy efficiency standards and testing procedures; updates existing standards and product listing requirements. 2020.

      Google Scholar 

    74. Washington State Legislature WAC 194-24-180 Electric storage water heaters.

    75. US Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. 2016-09-23 Energy Conservation Program: energy conservation standards for residential furnaces; supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNOPR) and announcement of public meeting. 2016.

      Google Scholar 

    76. Nadel S, Hinge A. Mandatory building performance standards: a key policy for achieving climate goals. Washington, DC: ACEEE; 2020. https://www.aceee.org/white-paper/2020/06/mandatory-building-performance-standards-key-policy-achieving-climate-goals.

      Google Scholar 

    77. (IMT) Institute for Market Transformation. Using building performance standards to advance electrification. Washington, DC: IMT; 2020. https://www.imt.org/resources/using-building-performance-standards-to-advance-electrification/.

      Google Scholar 

    78. City of Seattle. Seattle Municipal Code. 2019. Ordinance 125934.

      Google Scholar 

    79. Takahashi K, Frost J, Goldberg D, Hopkins A, Energy S. Survey of U.S. state and local building decarbonization policies and programs research methodology. In: Proceeding of 2020 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings; 2020.

      Google Scholar 

    80. Brown A. End of an era: New York City bids farewell to dirtiest heating oil. In: EDF blog; 2016. http://blogs.edf.org/energyexchange/2016/02/17/end-of-an-era-new-york-city-bids-farewell-to-dirtiest-heating-oil/.

      Google Scholar 

    81. Gowrishankar V, Levin A. America’s clean energy frontier: the pathway to a safer climate future. Washington, DC: Natural Resource Defense Council; 2017. https://www.nrdc.org/resources/americas-clean-energy-frontier-pathway-safer-climate-future.

      Google Scholar 

    82. Rissman J, Bataille C, Masanet E, et al. Technologies and policies to decarbonize global industry: Review and assessment of mitigation drivers through 2070. Appl Energy. 2020;266:114848.

      Article  Google Scholar 

    83. (EIA) Energy Information Administration. 2014 Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey (MECS). 2017. https://www.eia.gov/consumption/manufacturing/

      Google Scholar 

    84. Rightor E, Whitlock A, Elliott RN. Beneficial electrification in industry. Washington, DC: ACEEE; 2020. https://www.aceee.org/research-report/ie2002.

      Google Scholar 

    85. Sandalow D, Friedmann J, Mccormick C, Mccoy S. ICEF 2019 Roadmap: industrial heat decarbonization. 2019. https://www.icef-forum.org/roadmap/

      Google Scholar 

    86. (C2ES) Center for Climate and Energy Solutions U.S. state carbon pricing policies. https://www.c2es.org/document/us-state-carbon-pricing-policies/. Accessed 14 Dec 2020.

    87. The World Bank Carbon Pricing Dashboard. https://carbonpricingdashboard.worldbank.org. Accessed 14 Dec 2020.

    88. Fowlie M, Cullenward D. Report on emissions leakage and resource shuffling. California Environmental Protection Agency, Independent Emissions Market Advisory Committee. 2018. https://calepa.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2018/09/6e.-IEMAC_Meeting_Materials_9-21-18__Fowlie_and_Cullenward_Report_on_Emissions_Leakage.pdf

      Google Scholar 

    89. (IEA) International Energy Agency. Clean energy innovation. Paris, France: IEA; 2020. https://www.iea.org/reports/clean-energy-innovation.

      Google Scholar 

    90. DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). Advanced manufacturing office multi-year program plan for fiscal years 2017 through 2021, Draft. Washington, DC; 2016. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2017/01/f34/Draft/Advanced/Manufacturing/Office/MYPP_1.pdf

    91. Let’s Fund. Clean energy innovation policy. 2019. https://lets-fund.org/clean-energy/

      Google Scholar 

    92. BlueGreen Alliance. Buy Clean California Act clamps down on imported carbon emissions: State Infrastructure Projects to be Subject to New, Low-Carbon Product Standards; 2017. https://www.bluegreenalliance.org/the-latest/buy-clean-california-act-clamps-down-on-imported-carbon-emissions/.

    Download references

    Author information

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, 529 14th St NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC, 20045, USA

      Rachel Gold

    Authors
    1. Rachel Gold
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Rachel Gold.

    Ethics declarations

    Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

    This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

    Conflict of Interest

    Rachel Gold declares that ACEEE receives modest support from several electric and gas utilities. They join our corporate Ally program, sponsor conferences, and sponsor research projects. Taken together, they are less than 5% of our total budget. And, since they are electric, gas, and combined utilities, they differ in opinions—some want more electrification, some less.

    Additional information

    Publisher’s Note

    Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

    This article is part of the Topical Collection on Electrification

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Gold, R. Status Report on Electrification Policy: Where to Next?. Curr Sustainable Renewable Energy Rep 8, 114–122 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-021-00180-w

    Download citation

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-021-00180-w

    Keywords

    Search

    Navigation